BACKGROUND Intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones are among the most important risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma(CCC).Approximately 10%of patients with IHD stones develop CCC;however,there are limited studies regarding the ef...BACKGROUND Intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones are among the most important risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma(CCC).Approximately 10%of patients with IHD stones develop CCC;however,there are limited studies regarding the effect of IHD stone removal on CCC development.AIM To investigate the association between IHD stone removal and CCC development.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 397 patients with IHD stones at a tertiary referral center between January 2011 and December 2020.RESULTS CCC occurred in 36 of the 397 enrolled patients.In univariate analysis,chronic hepatitis B infection(11.1%vs 3.0%,P=0.03),carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9,176.00 vs 11.96 II/mL,P=0.010),stone located in left or both lobes(86.1%vs 70.1%,P=0.042),focal atrophy(52.8%vs 26.9%,P=0.001),duct stricture(47.2%vs 24.9%,P=0.004),and removal status of IHD stone(33.3%vs 63.2%,P<0.001)were significantly different between IHD stone patients with and without CCC.In the multivariate analysis,CA19-9>upper normal limit,carcinoembryonic antigen>upper normal limit,stones located in the left or both lobes,focal atrophy,and complete removal of IHD stones without recurrence were independent factors influencing CCC development.However,the type of removal method was not associated with CCC risk.CONCLUSION Complete removal of IHD stones without recurrence could reduce CCC risk.展开更多
BACKGROUND For intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones,laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)is currently a reliable treatment.However,the current LLR difficulty scoring system(DSS)is only available for patients with hepatocellular c...BACKGROUND For intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones,laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)is currently a reliable treatment.However,the current LLR difficulty scoring system(DSS)is only available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.AIM To explore the development of a DSS for IHD stone patients with LLR and the validation of its reliability.METHODS We used clinical data from 80 patients who received LLR for IHD stones.Forty-six of these patients were used in multiple linear regression to construct a scoring system.Another 34 patients from different centers were used as external validation.The completeness of our DSS was then evaluated in patients with varying degrees of surgical difficulty based on documented surgical outcomes in the study group of patients.RESULTS The following five predictors were ultimately included and scored by calculating the weighted contribution of each factor to the prediction of operative time in the training cohort:Location of stones,number of stones≥3,stones located in the bile ducts of several grades,previous biliary surgery less than twice,distal bile duct atrophy.Subsequently,the data set was validated using a DSS developed from the variables.The following variables were identified as statistically significant in external validation:Operative time,blood loss,intraoperative transfusion,postoperative alanine aminotransferase,and Clavien-Dindo grading≥3.These variables demonstrated statistically significant differences in patients with three or more grades.CONCLUSION Patients with IHD stones have varying degrees of surgical difficulty,and the newly developed DSS can be validated with external data to effectively predict risks and complications after LLR surgery.展开更多
Although endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) is still considered as a gold standard treatment for common bile duct(CBD) stones in western guideline, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation(EPBD) is commonly used by the endos...Although endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) is still considered as a gold standard treatment for common bile duct(CBD) stones in western guideline, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation(EPBD) is commonly used by the endoscopists in Asia as the first-line treatment for CBD stones. Besides the advantages of a technical easy procedure, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD) can facilitate the removal of large CBD stones.The indication of EPBD is now extended from removal of the small stones by using traditional balloon, to removal of large stones and avoidance of lithotripsy by using large balloon alone or after EST. According to the reports of antegrade papillary balloon dilatation, balloon dilation itself is not the cause of pancreatitis. On the contrary, adequate dilation of papillary orifice can reduce the trauma to the papilla and pancreas by the basket or lithotripter during the procedure of stone extraction. EPLBD alone is as effective as EPLBD with limited EST. Longer ballooning time may be beneficial in EPLBD alone to achieve adequate loosening of papillary orifice. The longer ballooning time does not increase the risk of pancreatitis but may reduce the bleeding episodes in patients with coagulopathy. Slowly inflation of the balloon, but not exceed the diameter of bile duct and tolerance of the patients are important to prevent the complication of perforation. EPBLD alone or with EST are not the sphincter preserved procedures, regular follow up is necessary for early detection and management of CBD stones recurrence.展开更多
Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatm...Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatment for asymptomatic CBDS,the risk of ERCP-related complications and outcome of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS should be compared.The incidence rate of ERCP-related complications,particularly of post-ERCP pancreatitis for asymptomatic CBDS,was reportedly higher than that of symptomatic CBDS,increasing the risk of ERCP-related complications for asymptomatic CBDS compared with that previously reported for biliopancreatic diseases.Although studies have reported short-to middle-term outcomes of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS,its long-term natural history is not well known.Till date,there are no prospective studies that determined whether ERCP has a better outcome than no treatment in patients with asymptomatic CBDS or not.No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the risk of early and late ERCP-related complications vs the risk of biliary complications in the wait-and-see approach,suggesting that a change is needed in our perspective on endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS.Further studies examining long-term complication risks of ERCP and wait-and-see groups for asymptomatic CBDS are warranted to discuss whether routine endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS is justified or not.展开更多
BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend not performing papillary large balloon dilation in patients with nondilated distal bile ducts.AIM To assess the feasibility of balloon dilation to remove difficult stones in pat...BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend not performing papillary large balloon dilation in patients with nondilated distal bile ducts.AIM To assess the feasibility of balloon dilation to remove difficult stones in patients with nondilated distal bile ducts.METHODS Data from 1289 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)procedures were obtained from two prospective studies.While 258 cases had difficult stones(>1 cm,multiple>8,impacted,or having a thin distal duct),191 underwent biliary dilation up to 15 mm after endoscopic sphincterotomy.Cholangiographies of these cases were retrospectively reviewed in order to classify the distal bile duct and both the stone size and number.Primary outcomes were clearance rate at first ERCP and complications.RESULTS Of the 191 patients(122 women and 69 men;mean age:60 years)who underwent biliary dilation for difficult stones,113(59%)had a nondilated or tapered distal duct.Patients with a dilated distal duct were older than those with nondilated distal ducts(mean 68 and 52 years of age,respectively;P<0.05),had more stones(median 4 and 2 stones per patient,respectively;P<0.05),and had less need for additional mechanical lithotripsy(6.4%vs 25%,respectively;P<0.05).Clearance rate at first ERCP was comparable between patients with a dilated(73/78;94%)and nondilated distal ducts(103/113;91%).Procedures were faster in patients with a dilated distal duct(mean 17 vs 24 min,respectively;P<0.005).Complications were similar in both groups(6.4%vs 7.1%,respectively).CONCLUSION Large balloon dilation for difficult stones is feasible in patients with a nondilated or even tapered distal duct.展开更多
目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78...目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。展开更多
目的探讨加速术后康复(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念应用于微创肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石肝萎缩病人围手术期的临床价值。方法回顾性队列研究分析青岛市市立医院肝胆外科2016年12月至2023年3月通过腹腔镜下肝切除术治疗...目的探讨加速术后康复(enhanced recovery after surgery,ERAS)理念应用于微创肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石肝萎缩病人围手术期的临床价值。方法回顾性队列研究分析青岛市市立医院肝胆外科2016年12月至2023年3月通过腹腔镜下肝切除术治疗的63例肝内胆管结石肝萎缩病人的临床资料,根据围手术期处理方法不同将其分为ERAS组(32例)和对照组(常规组,31例)。比较分析ERAS理念对病人术中情况(手术时间及术中出血量)、住院费用、术后肝功能、康复时间及并发症等指标的影响。呈偏态分布的计量资料以M(Q1,Q3)表示,采用秩和检验。结果ERAS组与对照组比较,病人术后康复时间明显缩短[6.0(5.0,7.0)d比8.0(5.0,9.0)d,P<0.01],住院费用更少[46531(38676,51311)元比55553(47638,65529)元,P<0.01],并发症发生率更低[31.3%(10/32)比93.5%(29/31),P<0.01],术后留置T管率更低[28.1%(9/32)比58.1%(18/31),P<0.01];两组病人在手术时间、出血量以及术后1 d、3 d的血谷丙转氨酶、谷草转氨酶、C反应蛋白及预后营养指数方面差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论ERAS理念应用于肝切除治疗肝胆管结石肝萎缩的围手术期管理是安全有效的,有助于病人的快速安全康复,值得在肝内胆管结石肝切除术中推广。展开更多
基金Supported by a grant from the National R&D Program for Cancer Control,Ministry of Health and Welfare,Republic of Korea,No.HA20C0009.
文摘BACKGROUND Intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones are among the most important risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma(CCC).Approximately 10%of patients with IHD stones develop CCC;however,there are limited studies regarding the effect of IHD stone removal on CCC development.AIM To investigate the association between IHD stone removal and CCC development.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 397 patients with IHD stones at a tertiary referral center between January 2011 and December 2020.RESULTS CCC occurred in 36 of the 397 enrolled patients.In univariate analysis,chronic hepatitis B infection(11.1%vs 3.0%,P=0.03),carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA19-9,176.00 vs 11.96 II/mL,P=0.010),stone located in left or both lobes(86.1%vs 70.1%,P=0.042),focal atrophy(52.8%vs 26.9%,P=0.001),duct stricture(47.2%vs 24.9%,P=0.004),and removal status of IHD stone(33.3%vs 63.2%,P<0.001)were significantly different between IHD stone patients with and without CCC.In the multivariate analysis,CA19-9>upper normal limit,carcinoembryonic antigen>upper normal limit,stones located in the left or both lobes,focal atrophy,and complete removal of IHD stones without recurrence were independent factors influencing CCC development.However,the type of removal method was not associated with CCC risk.CONCLUSION Complete removal of IHD stones without recurrence could reduce CCC risk.
文摘BACKGROUND For intrahepatic duct(IHD)stones,laparoscopic liver resection(LLR)is currently a reliable treatment.However,the current LLR difficulty scoring system(DSS)is only available for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.AIM To explore the development of a DSS for IHD stone patients with LLR and the validation of its reliability.METHODS We used clinical data from 80 patients who received LLR for IHD stones.Forty-six of these patients were used in multiple linear regression to construct a scoring system.Another 34 patients from different centers were used as external validation.The completeness of our DSS was then evaluated in patients with varying degrees of surgical difficulty based on documented surgical outcomes in the study group of patients.RESULTS The following five predictors were ultimately included and scored by calculating the weighted contribution of each factor to the prediction of operative time in the training cohort:Location of stones,number of stones≥3,stones located in the bile ducts of several grades,previous biliary surgery less than twice,distal bile duct atrophy.Subsequently,the data set was validated using a DSS developed from the variables.The following variables were identified as statistically significant in external validation:Operative time,blood loss,intraoperative transfusion,postoperative alanine aminotransferase,and Clavien-Dindo grading≥3.These variables demonstrated statistically significant differences in patients with three or more grades.CONCLUSION Patients with IHD stones have varying degrees of surgical difficulty,and the newly developed DSS can be validated with external data to effectively predict risks and complications after LLR surgery.
文摘Although endoscopic sphincterotomy(EST) is still considered as a gold standard treatment for common bile duct(CBD) stones in western guideline, endoscopic papillary balloon dilation(EPBD) is commonly used by the endoscopists in Asia as the first-line treatment for CBD stones. Besides the advantages of a technical easy procedure, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation(EPLBD) can facilitate the removal of large CBD stones.The indication of EPBD is now extended from removal of the small stones by using traditional balloon, to removal of large stones and avoidance of lithotripsy by using large balloon alone or after EST. According to the reports of antegrade papillary balloon dilatation, balloon dilation itself is not the cause of pancreatitis. On the contrary, adequate dilation of papillary orifice can reduce the trauma to the papilla and pancreas by the basket or lithotripter during the procedure of stone extraction. EPLBD alone is as effective as EPLBD with limited EST. Longer ballooning time may be beneficial in EPLBD alone to achieve adequate loosening of papillary orifice. The longer ballooning time does not increase the risk of pancreatitis but may reduce the bleeding episodes in patients with coagulopathy. Slowly inflation of the balloon, but not exceed the diameter of bile duct and tolerance of the patients are important to prevent the complication of perforation. EPBLD alone or with EST are not the sphincter preserved procedures, regular follow up is necessary for early detection and management of CBD stones recurrence.
文摘Current guidelines for treating asymptomatic common bile duct stones(CBDS)recommend stone removal,with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography(ERCP)being the first treatment choice.When deciding on ERCP treatment for asymptomatic CBDS,the risk of ERCP-related complications and outcome of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS should be compared.The incidence rate of ERCP-related complications,particularly of post-ERCP pancreatitis for asymptomatic CBDS,was reportedly higher than that of symptomatic CBDS,increasing the risk of ERCP-related complications for asymptomatic CBDS compared with that previously reported for biliopancreatic diseases.Although studies have reported short-to middle-term outcomes of natural history of asymptomatic CBDS,its long-term natural history is not well known.Till date,there are no prospective studies that determined whether ERCP has a better outcome than no treatment in patients with asymptomatic CBDS or not.No randomized controlled trial has evaluated the risk of early and late ERCP-related complications vs the risk of biliary complications in the wait-and-see approach,suggesting that a change is needed in our perspective on endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS.Further studies examining long-term complication risks of ERCP and wait-and-see groups for asymptomatic CBDS are warranted to discuss whether routine endoscopic treatment for asymptomatic CBDS is justified or not.
文摘BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend not performing papillary large balloon dilation in patients with nondilated distal bile ducts.AIM To assess the feasibility of balloon dilation to remove difficult stones in patients with nondilated distal bile ducts.METHODS Data from 1289 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)procedures were obtained from two prospective studies.While 258 cases had difficult stones(>1 cm,multiple>8,impacted,or having a thin distal duct),191 underwent biliary dilation up to 15 mm after endoscopic sphincterotomy.Cholangiographies of these cases were retrospectively reviewed in order to classify the distal bile duct and both the stone size and number.Primary outcomes were clearance rate at first ERCP and complications.RESULTS Of the 191 patients(122 women and 69 men;mean age:60 years)who underwent biliary dilation for difficult stones,113(59%)had a nondilated or tapered distal duct.Patients with a dilated distal duct were older than those with nondilated distal ducts(mean 68 and 52 years of age,respectively;P<0.05),had more stones(median 4 and 2 stones per patient,respectively;P<0.05),and had less need for additional mechanical lithotripsy(6.4%vs 25%,respectively;P<0.05).Clearance rate at first ERCP was comparable between patients with a dilated(73/78;94%)and nondilated distal ducts(103/113;91%).Procedures were faster in patients with a dilated distal duct(mean 17 vs 24 min,respectively;P<0.005).Complications were similar in both groups(6.4%vs 7.1%,respectively).CONCLUSION Large balloon dilation for difficult stones is feasible in patients with a nondilated or even tapered distal duct.
文摘目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。
