The integrity of retinal ganglion cells is tightly associated with diabetic macular degeneration that leads to damage and death of retinal ganglion cells,affecting vision.The major clinical treatments for diabetic mac...The integrity of retinal ganglion cells is tightly associated with diabetic macular degeneration that leads to damage and death of retinal ganglion cells,affecting vision.The major clinical treatments for diabetic macular edema are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and laser photocoagulation.However,although the macular thickness can be normalized with each of these two therapies used alone,the vision does not improve in many patients.This might result from the incomplete recovery of retinal ganglion cell injury.Therefore,a prospective,non-randomized,controlled clinical trial was designed to investigate the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs combined with laser photocoagulation on the integrity of retinal ganglion cells in patients with diabetic macular edema and its relationship with vision recovery.In this trial,150 patients with diabetic macular edema will be equally divided into three groups according to therapeutic methods,followed by treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs,laser photocoagulation therapy,and their combination.All patients will be followed up for 12 months.The primary outcome measure is retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness at 12 months after treatment.The secondary outcome measures include retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness before and 1,3,6,and 9 months after treatment,retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,best-corrected visual acuity,macular area thickness,and choroidal thickness before and 1,3,6,9,and 12 months after treatment.Safety measure is the incidence of adverse events at 1,3,6,9,and 12 months after treatment.The study protocol hopes to validate the better efficacy and safety of the combined treatment in patients with diabetic macula compared with the other two monotherapies alone during the 12-month follow-up period.The trial is designed to focus on clarifying the time-effect relationship between imaging measures related to the integrity of retinal ganglion cells and best-corrected visual acuity.The trial protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University with approval No.(2023)(26)on April 25,2023,and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(registration number:ChiCTR2300072478,June 14,2023,protocol version:2.0).展开更多
AIM:To analyze the relationship between optical coherence tomography(OCT)and OCT angiography(OCTA)imaging in patients with diabetic macular edema(DME)who are treated with a combination of aflibercept and triamcinolone...AIM:To analyze the relationship between optical coherence tomography(OCT)and OCT angiography(OCTA)imaging in patients with diabetic macular edema(DME)who are treated with a combination of aflibercept and triamcinolone acetonide(TA).METHODS:A total of 76 eyes newly diagnosed DME were included in this study.They were randomly assigned to receive either aflibercept or a combination of aflibercept and TA.Injections once a month for a total of three injections.Central macular thickness(CMT),number of hyperreflective foci(HRF),height of subretinal fluid(SRF),and area of foveal avascular zone(FAZ)were evaluated using OCT and OCTA at baseline and after each monthly treatment.RESULTS:Both groups showed improvement in best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and reduction in macular edema after treatment,and the difference in BCVA between the two groups was statistically significant after each treatment(P<0.05).The difference in CMT between the two groups was statistically significant after the first two injections(P<0.01),but not after the third injection(P=0.875).The number of HRF(1mo:7.41±8.25 vs 10.86±7.22,P=0.027;2mo:5.33±6.13 vs 9.12±8.61,P=0.034;3mo:3.58±3.00 vs 6.37±5.97,P=0.007)and height of SRF(1mo:82.39±39.12 vs 105.77±42.26μm,P=0.011;2mo:36.84±10.02 vs 83.59±37.78μm,P<0.01;3mo:11.57±3.29 vs 45.43±12.60μm,P<0.01)in combined group were statistically significant less than aflibercept group after each injection,while the area of FAZ showed no significant change before and after treatment in both groups.CONCLUSION:The combination therapy of aflibercept and TA shows more significant effects on DME eyes with decreased HRF and SRF.However,both aflibercept and combination therapy show no significant change in the area of FAZ.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the efficacy of aflibercept combined with sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating diabetic macular edema(DME)and to examine changes in growth factors and inflammatory mediator ...AIM:To investigate the efficacy of aflibercept combined with sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating diabetic macular edema(DME)and to examine changes in growth factors and inflammatory mediator levels in aqueous humor after injection.METHODS:Totally 67 DME patients(67 eyes)and 30 cataract patients(32 eyes)were enrolled as the DME group and the control group,respectively.The DME group was divided into the aflibercept group(34 cases)and the aflibercept combined with TA group(combined group,33 cases).The aqueous humor of both groups was collected during the study period.The aqueous levels of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF),monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1),interleukin-6(IL-6),interleukin-8(IL-8),and interleukin-1β(IL-1β)were detected using a microsphere suspension array technology(Luminex 200TM).Aqueous cytokines,best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT),and complications before and after treatment were compared between the aflibercept group and combined group.RESULTS:The concentrations of VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor were significantly higher in the DME group than those of the control group(all P<0.01).After 1mo of surgery,the concentrations of VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor were significantly lower in the combined group than those of the aflibercept group(all P<0.01).The BCVA and CMT values of the two groups were statistically different after 1 and 2mo of treatment(P<0.01).However,the difference was not statistically significant after 3mo of treatment(P>0.05).CONCLUSION:The cytokines VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor of DME patients are significantly increased.Aflibercept and aflibercept combined with TA have good efficacy in DME patients,can effectively reduce CMT,improve the patient’s vision,and have high safety.Aflibercept combined with TA can quickly downregulate the aqueous humor cytokines and help to relieve macular edema rapidly.However,the long-term efficacy is comparable to that of aflibercept alone.展开更多
AIM:To observe the therapeutic effect of conbercept on diabetic macular edema(DME)complicated with diabetic nephropathy(DN).METHODS:In this retrospective study,54 patients(54 eyes)that diagnosed as DME from January 20...AIM:To observe the therapeutic effect of conbercept on diabetic macular edema(DME)complicated with diabetic nephropathy(DN).METHODS:In this retrospective study,54 patients(54 eyes)that diagnosed as DME from January 2017 to October 2021 were collected.The patients were divided into two groups:DME patients with DN(25 eyes),and DME patients without DN(29 eyes).General conditions were collected before treatment,laboratory tests include fasting blood glucose,HbA1c,microalbumin/creatinine,serum creatinine.Optical coherence tomography(OCT)was used to check the ellipsoidal zone(EZ)and external limiting membrane(ELM)integrity.Central macular thickness(CMT),best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),and retinal hyperreflective foci(HF)as well as numbers of injections were recorded.RESULTS:There were significant differences between fasting blood glucose,HbA1c,serum creatinine,urinary microalbumin/creatinine,and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)between the two groups(all P<0.05).EZ and ELM continuity in the DME+DN group was worse than that in the DME group(P<0.05).BCVA(logMAR)in the DME group was significantly better than that in the DME+DN group at the same time points during treatment(all P<0.05).CMT and HF values were significantly higher in the DME+DN group than that in the DME group at the all time points(all P<0.05)and significantly decreased in both groups with time during treatment.At 6mo after treatment,the mean number of injections in the DME+DN and DME group was 4.84±0.94 and 3.79±0.86,respectively.CONCLUSION:Conbercept has a significant effect in short-term treatment of DME patients with or without DN,and can significantly ameliorate BCVA,CMT and the number of HF,treatment efficacy of DME patients without DN is better than that of DME patients with DN.展开更多
AIM:To assess diabetic macular edema(DME)progression during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic,when severe societal restrictions raised the concern of possible deterioration of health in patients with systemic ...AIM:To assess diabetic macular edema(DME)progression during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic,when severe societal restrictions raised the concern of possible deterioration of health in patients with systemic conditions,particularly those requiring frequent office visits.METHODS:This is a multicenter retrospective chart review of 370 patients(724 eyes)with an established diagnosis of DME seen on 3 separate visits between January 2019 and July 2021.Period 1 was January 2019 to February 2020(considered pre-COVID-19),period 2 was March 2020 to December 2020(considered the height of the pandemic;highest level of pandemic-related clinical and societal regulations)and period 3 was January 2021 to July 2021(re-adjustment to the new“pandemic norms”).Main outcome measures included visual acuity,body mass index(BMI),blood pressure(BP),hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c),macular thickness,patient adherence to scheduled ophthalmology visits,and DME treatment(s)received at each visit.To facilitate measurement of macular thickness,each macula was divided into 9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS)-defined macular sectors as measured by OCT imaging.RESULTS:There was no change of BMI,systolic BP,and diastolic BP between any of the time periods.HbA1c showed a very small increase from period 1(7.6%)to period 2(7.8%,P=0.015)and decreased back to 7.6%at period 3(P=0.12).Macular thickness decreased for 100%of macular regions.The central macular thickness decreased across all 3 periods from 329.5 to 316.6μm(P=0.0045).After analysis of multiple variables including HbA1c,BMI,adherence to scheduled appointments,different clinic centers,and treatment interventions,there was no easily identifiable subgroup of patients that experienced the increase in DME.CONCLUSION:DME doesn’t worsen during the COVID-19 pandemic,instead sustaining a very small but statistically significant improvement.While identifying a mechanism behind our findings is beyond the scope of this study,potential explanations may include a delay in retinal changes beyond our study period,an unexpected increase in treatment frequency despite pandemic restrictions,and an unanticipated pandemic-related improvement in some lifestyle factors that may have had a positive impact on DME.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab(IVR)for diabetic macular edema(DME)in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.METHODS:The PubMed,EMBASE,Web of Science,Cochrane,EBSCO were c...AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab(IVR)for diabetic macular edema(DME)in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.METHODS:The PubMed,EMBASE,Web of Science,Cochrane,EBSCO were comprehensively searched for studies comparing vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes with DME.Clinical outcomes of best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT),the mean number of intravitreal injection and adverse events were extracted and analyzed.RESULTS:Six studies involving 641 eyes were included.Final visual gain significantly improved and CMT significantly reduced in vitrectomized eyes at 6mo and 12mo visits(P<0.05).Although the mean reduction in CMT among non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly greater than in vitrectomized eyes at the 6mo[mean difference(MD)=53.57,95%confidence interval(CI):28.03 to 78.72,P<0.0001]and 12mo(MD=49.65,95%CI:19.58 to 79.72,P=0.01),no significant difference was detected in improvement in BCVA at either 6mo(MD=0.05,95%CI:-0.02 to 0.13,P=0.14)or 12mo(MD=0.03,95%CI:-0.04 to 0.09,P=0.43).Injection number of ranibizumab in non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly less than that in vitrectomized eyes during 6-month period(MD=0.60,95%CI:0.16 to 1.04,P=0.008),while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during 12mo of follow-up.CONCLUSION:Evidence from current study suggests that IVR was useful for both vitrectomized group and nonvitrectomized group with DME.Although less reduction in macular thickness is found in vitrectomized group,visual improvement between two groups is similar.展开更多
BACKGROUND The prevalence of diabetes mellitus(DM)in China is high,and the base is broad.Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is a critical condition affecting the life and health of a nation and its economic development.DR is a c...BACKGROUND The prevalence of diabetes mellitus(DM)in China is high,and the base is broad.Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is a critical condition affecting the life and health of a nation and its economic development.DR is a common complication of DM.AIM To investigate the efficacy of laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreal injection of conbercept for treating macular edema.METHODS Overall,130 patients with diabetic macular edema(DME)hospitalized in The Third People’s Hospital of Changzhou from January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively included.According to the treatment plan,130 patients with DME were categorized into an observation and a control group,with 65 patients in each group.The control group received laser photocoagulation,and the observation group received laser photocoagulation with intravitreal injection of conbercept.Observe changes in vision,cytokines in the eye and so on.RESULTS The total efficacy rate in the observation group(93.85%)was higher than that in the control group(78.46%)(P<0.05).In both groups,the best corrected visual acuity correction effect improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).Retinal thickness and central macular thickness improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor,interleukin-6,soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1,and basic fibroblast growth factor in both groups improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION In patients with macular edema,combining laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of conbercept for DME is a more effective and safer strategy to improve vision,and lower intraocular cytokine levels.展开更多
AIM:To derive a Malaysia guideline and consensus as part of the Malaysia Retina Group's efforts for diagnosis,treatment,and best practices of diabetic macular edema(DME).The experts'panel suggests that the tre...AIM:To derive a Malaysia guideline and consensus as part of the Malaysia Retina Group's efforts for diagnosis,treatment,and best practices of diabetic macular edema(DME).The experts'panel suggests that the treatment algorithm to be divided into groups according to involvement the central macula.The purpose of DME therapy is to improve edema and achieve the best visual results with the least amount of treatment load.METHODS:On two different occasions,a panel of 14 retinal specialists from Malaysia,together with an external expert,responded to a questionnaire on management of DME.A consensus was sought by voting after compiling,analyzing and discussion on first-phase replies on the round table discussion.A recommendation was deemed to have attained consensus when 12 out of the 14 panellists(85%)agreed with it.RESULTS:The terms target response,adequate response,nonresponse,and inadequate response were developed when the DME patients'treatment responses were first characterized.The panelists reached agreement on a number of DME treatment-related issues,including the need to classify patients prior to treatment,firstline treatment options,the right time to switch between treatment modalities,and side effects associated with steroids.From this agreement,recommendations were derived and a treatment algorithm was created.CONCLUSION:A detail and comprehensive treatment algorithm by Malaysia Retina Group for the Malaysian population provides guidance for treatment allocation of patients with DME.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the changes in macular morphology and function after a single intravitreal injection of aflibercept in diabetic macular edema(DME)using optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)and MP-3 microperim...AIM:To evaluate the changes in macular morphology and function after a single intravitreal injection of aflibercept in diabetic macular edema(DME)using optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)and MP-3 microperimetry.METHODS:Twenty-eight patients(42 eyes)diagnosed with DME were treated with intravitreal injection of aflibercept.The changes in best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central retinal thickness(CRT),foveal avascular zone(FAZ)area,vessel density of superficial retinal capillary plexus(SVD),vessel density of deep retinal capillary plexus(DVD),mean light sensitivity(MLS),2°fixation rate(P1),4°fixation rate(P2),and other indicators 1mo after treatment were compared;of these,BCVA was conver ted into logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR),and the correlation among the factors was analyzed.RESULTS:After treatment,logMAR BCVA was 0.47±0.24,which was significantly better than that before treatment(0.63±0.28,P<0.001).The CRT was 359.21±107.87μm after treatment,which was significantly lower than before treatment(474.10±138.20μm,P<0.001).The FAZ area,SVD,and DVD were not significantly changed after treatment compared with the baseline.MLS was 22.16±4.20 dB after treatment,which was significantly higher than before treatment(19.63±4.23 dB,P<0.001).P2 significantly increased after treatment than before treatment(P=0.007).P1 had no significant change after treatment than before treatment(P=0.086).CONCLUSION:A single intravitreal injection of aflibercept effectively reduces macular edema and improves retinal sensitivity,fixation stability,and visual acuity,possibly without causing significant changes in the retinal vascular condition in a short time.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling for diabetic macular edema(DME). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, SionMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, ...AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling for diabetic macular edema(DME). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, SionMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI databases and Wanfang databases, published until Oct. 2017, were searched to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes following vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling, for treating DME. Pooled results were expressed as odds ratios(ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals(CI) for vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling with regard to best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT), and complication incidents. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 857 eyes were included of which three studies were Chinese and the rests were English literatures. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with vitrectomy alone, vitrectomy with ILM peeling could improve BCVA more obviously(OR=1.66, 95%CI: 1.12-2.46, P=0.01) and had higher rate of CMT reduction(OR=3.89, 95%CI: 1.37-11.11, P=0.01). There were significant statistical differences between the two surgical methods for both BCVA and CMT(P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, the incidence of epiretinal membrane(ERM) was slightly lower in the ILM peeling group than the group without ILM peeling(OR=0.38, 95%CI: 0.07-2.00, P=0.25), although insignificant statistically. Other incidences of overall complications, iatrogenic peripheral retinal break and increased intraocular pressure indicated no significant difference between two groups(OR=1.19, 95%CI: 0.82-1.73, P=0.36; OR=1.21, 95%CI: 0.66-2.21, P=0.53; OR=1.34, 95%CI: 0.75-2.40, P=0.32). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy is effective for DME and the effect can be improved by additional ILM peeling, especially for anatomical efficacy, without increasing the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. However, it is imperative to gain more evaluation in the future due to the paucity of prospective randomized study.展开更多
AIM:To examine possible differences in clinical outcomes between sub-threshold micro-pulse diode laser photocoagulation(SDM) and traditional modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(mETDRS)treatment protoco...AIM:To examine possible differences in clinical outcomes between sub-threshold micro-pulse diode laser photocoagulation(SDM) and traditional modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(mETDRS)treatment protocol in diabetic macuiar edema(DME).METHODS:A comprehensive literature search using the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify RCTs comparing SDM with mETDRS for DME.The participants were type Ⅰ or type Ⅱ diabetes mellitus with clinically significant macuiar edema treated by SDM from previously reported randomized controlled trials(RCTs).The primary outcome measures were the changes in the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and the central macuiar thickness(CMT) as measured by optical coherence tomography(OCT).The secondary outcomes were the contrast sensitivity and the damages of the retina.RESULTS:Seven studies were identified and analyzed for comparing SDM(215 eyes) with mETDRS(210 eyes)for DME.There were no statistical differences in the BCVA after treatment between the SDM and mETDRS based on the follow-up:3mo(MD,-0.02;95% Cl,-0.12 to 0.09;P=0.77),6mo(MD,-0.02;95% Cl,-0.12 to 0.09;P=0.75),12mo(MD,-0.05;95% Cl,-0.17 to 0.07;P=0.40).Likewise,there were no statistical differences in the CMT after treatment between the SDM and mETDRS in 3mo(MD,-9.92;95% Cl,-28.69 to 8.85;P=0.30),6mo(MD,-11.37;95% Cl,-29.65 to 6.91;P=0.22),12mo(MD,8.44;95% Cl,-29.89 to 46.77;P=0.67).Three RCTs suggested that SDM laser results in good preservation of contrast sensitivity as mETDRS,in two different followup evaluations:3mo(MD,0.05;95% Cl,0 to 0.09;P=0.04) and 6mo(MD,0.02;95% Cl,-0.10 to 0.14;P=0.78).Two RCTs showed that the SDM laser treatment did less retinal damage than that mETDRS did(OR,0.05;95% Cl,0.02 to 0.13;P<0.01).CONCLUSION:SDM laser photocoagulation shows an equally good effect on visual acuity,contrast sensitivity,and reduction of DME as compared to conventional mETDRS protocol with less retinal damage.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema(DME) with intravitreal Conbercept(IVC).METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients(36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The pa...AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema(DME) with intravitreal Conbercept(IVC).METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients(36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were treated with IVC for 3 mo. Additional IVC was given at subsequent monthly visits, if needed(3+PRN). The patients were followed up for 24 mo.RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) at 24 mo significantly increased(66.7±15.3 letters) in comparison with the baseline(54.4±15.4 letters, P<0.0001). The mean improvement in BCVA was 11.0±2.9 letters. At 24 mo, 44.1% of the eyes surveyed gained ≥15 letters, 52.9% of the eyes gained ≥10 letters, and 70.6% of the eyes gained ≥5 letters. No vision loss was noted in 96.8% of the eyes, and 5.9% of the eyes lost ≥5 letters, but ≤10 letters. The central retinal thickness(CRT) at 24 mo was significantly reduced(277.1±122.9 μm) in comparison with the baseline(510.9±186.1 μm, P<0.0001). At 24 mo, 43.3% of the patients had a CRT ≤250 μm. The mean number of injections over 24 mo was 10.6±2.0. No severe eye or systemic adverse events related to either the drug or injection were noted.CONCLUSION: IVC is safe and effective for the treatment of DME.展开更多
Diabetic macular edema(DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic retinopathy,affecting 1 in 15 patients with diabetes mellitus(DM).The disruption of the inner blood-retina barrier(BRB) has been largely ...Diabetic macular edema(DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic retinopathy,affecting 1 in 15 patients with diabetes mellitus(DM).The disruption of the inner blood-retina barrier(BRB) has been largely investigated and attributed the primary role in the pathogenesis and progression in DME, but there is increasing evidence regarding the role of outer BRB, separating the RPE from the underlying choriocapillaris,in the occurrence and evolution of DME.The development of novel imaging technologies has led to major improvement in the field of in vivo structural analysis of the macula allowing us to delve deeper into the pathogenesis of DME and expanding our vision regarding this condition.In this review we gathered the results of studies that investigated specific outer BRB optical coherence tomography parameters in patients with DM with the aim to outline the current status of its role in the pathogenesis and progression of DME and identify new research pathways contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the understanding of this condition.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implants in subjects affected by diabetic macular edema(DME) resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) therapy.METHODS: Thirty-two D...AIM: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implants in subjects affected by diabetic macular edema(DME) resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) therapy.METHODS: Thirty-two DME patients were enrolled.A700 microgram slow release Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant(Ozurdex~) was placed in the vitreous cavity.All patients were followed for 18 mo.Best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS) and central macular thickness(CMT) exams were carried out at baseline(T0)and after 1(T1),3(T3),4(T4),6(T6),9(T9),12(T12),15(T15),and 18mo(T18) post injection. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA showed an effect of treatment on ETDRS(P<0.0001).Post hoc analyses revealed that ETDRS values were significantly increased at T1,T3,T4,T9,and T15(P <0.001) as compared to baseline value(T0).At T6,T12,and T18,ETDRS values were still statistically higher than baseline(P<0.001 vs T0).However,at these time points,we observed a trend to return to baseline conditions.ANOVA also showed an effect of treatment(P <0.0001).CMT decreased significantly at T1,T3,T4,T9,and T15(P<0.001).At T6(P<0.01),T12 and T18(P<0.001) CMT was also significantly lower than T0 although a trend to return to the baseline conditions was also observed.CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant is a good option to improveBCVA and CMT in DME patients resistant to anti-VEGF therapy.Our data also show that the use of drugs administered directly into the vitreous allows achieving appropriate and long-lasting concentration at the site of disease without systemic side effects.展开更多
AIM: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) versus macular photocoagulation(MPC) in treatment of diabetic macular edema(DME) by Meta-analysis. METHODS: Pertinent publications were...AIM: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) versus macular photocoagulation(MPC) in treatment of diabetic macular edema(DME) by Meta-analysis. METHODS: Pertinent publications were identified through systemic searches of Pub Med, Medline,EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to 30 November, 2013. Changes in central macular thickness(CMT) in μm and best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) in log MAR equivalents were extracted at 1, 3, 6,12 and 24 mo after initial treatment, and a Meta-analysis was carried out to compare results between groups receiving IVB and MPC.RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trial(RCTs) and one high-quality comparative study were identified and included. Our Meta-analysis revealed that both IVB and MPC resulted in the improvements of CMT and BCVA in eyes with DME at 1mo after initial treatment, with IVB being significantly superior to MPC(P =0.01 and 0.02,respectively). The improvements of both measure outcomes at 3, 6, 12 and 24 mo after treatment did not vary significantly between the IVB groups and MPC groups(CMT at 3mo, P =0.85; at 6mo, P =0.29; at 12 mo,P =0.56; at 24 mo, P =0.71; BCVA at 3mo, P =0.31; at 6mo,P =0.30; at 12 mo, P =0.23; at 24 mo, P =0.52). However,the number of observed adverse events was low in all studies.CONCLUSION: Current evidence shows IVB treatment trends to be more effective in improvements of macular edema and vision in eyes with DME at an earlier follow up(1mo) compared with MPC. At other time, both interventions have comparable efficacy without statistical significances.展开更多
● AIM: To elucidate the relationship between systemic risk factors and different patterns of diabetic macular edema(DME) determined with optical coherence tomography(OCT).● METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, DM...● AIM: To elucidate the relationship between systemic risk factors and different patterns of diabetic macular edema(DME) determined with optical coherence tomography(OCT).● METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, DME was classified by OCT as diffuse retinal thickness(DRT), cystoid macular edema(CME) and serous retinal detachment(SRD) and the relationship between the systemic risk factors and DME patterns was evaluated.● RESULTS: Of the 57 patients with DME, 21(36.8%) had DRT, 24(42.1%) had CME and 12(21.0%) had SRD. Microor macro-albuminuria was significantly higher in the DRT pattern(61.9%) compared with the SRD(50.0%) and CME patterns(25.0%; P=0.040). Hemoglobin A1 c(Hb A1 c) level was significantly higher and patients were younger in the DRT pattern group(P=0.034, P=0.032). Best corrected visual acuity was the worst and central macular thickness was the thickest in the CME pattern group.● CONCLUSION: Micro-or macro-albuminuria may be more frequent and Hb A1 c level may be higher in patients with DRT. These patients are also seen to be younger than patients with non-DRT.展开更多
AIM: To analyze the clinical efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(IVR) on diabetic macular edema(DME) with multifocal electroretinography(mf ERG) and optical coherence tomography(OCT).METHODS: A total of ...AIM: To analyze the clinical efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(IVR) on diabetic macular edema(DME) with multifocal electroretinography(mf ERG) and optical coherence tomography(OCT).METHODS: A total of 41 patients(41 eyes) with DME were treated with IVR. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), mf ERG results, and OCT were analyzed to compare to the baselines at 1 wk, 1, and 3 mo after operation.RESULTS: The BCVA was significantly improved in all eyes at each time point(P<0.001). The macular area leakage and edema were reduced 1 wk and 1 mo after IVR, and the central fovea thickness(CFT) was significantly reduced compared to baseline(P<0.001). The mf ERG, twodimensional and three-dimensional images all showed that the macular fovea(1 ring) response density decreased, and the fovea and macular area spikes significantly decreased or disappeared. The amplitude density of the P1 wave was increased, and the latency of the P1 wave was shortened than preoperation(P<0.001). At 1 wk and 1 mo after the operation, there was a negative correlation between the amplitude density of P1 waves and CFT.CONCLUSION: OCT and mf ERG fully demonstrate the importance of IVR for DME patients from the macular morphology and function, especially the significance of mf ERG in this disease.展开更多
AIM:To quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of 577-nm subthreshold micropulse macular laser(SML)and multi-point mode pan retinal laser photocoagulation(PRP)on severe non-proliferative diabetic retino...AIM:To quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of 577-nm subthreshold micropulse macular laser(SML)and multi-point mode pan retinal laser photocoagulation(PRP)on severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy(NPDR)with central-involved diabetic macular edema(CIDME)using optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA).METHODS:In this observational clinical study,86 eyes of 86 NPDR patients with CIDME who underwent SML and PRP treatment were included.Images were obtained 1 d before laser and post-laser(1 d,1 wk,1,3,and 6 mo)using AngioV ue software 2.0.Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA,LogM AR),foveal avascular zone area(FAZ),choriocapillary flow area(Ch F),parafoveal vessel density(PVD),capillary density inside disc(CDD),peripapillary capillary density(PCD),macular ganglion cell complex thickness(m GCCT),central macular thickness(CMT),and subfoveal choroidal thickness(ChT)were compared between pre-and post-laser treatment.RESULTS:BCVA remained stable during 6 mo postlaser therapy(pre-laser vs 6 mo post-laser:0.53±0.21 vs 0.5±0.15,P>0.05).PVD,ChF,ChT,CMT,and mGCCT significantly increased 1 d post-laser therapy[pre-laser vs 1 d post-laser:superficial PVD(%),40.51±3.42 vs 42.43±4.68;deep PVD(%),42.66±3.67 vs 44.78±4.52;ChF,1.72±0.21 vs 1.9±0.12 mm^2;ChT,302.45±69.74 vs 319.38±70.93μm;CMT,301.65±110.78 vs 320.86±105.62μm;m GCCT,105.71±10.72 vs 115.46±9.64μm;P<0.05].However,PVD,ChF and ChT decreased to less than baseline level at 6 mo postlaser therapy(pre-laser vs 6 mo post-laser:superficial PVD(%),40.51±3.42 vs 36.32±4.19;deep PVD(%),42.66±3.67 vs 38.76±3.74;Ch F,1.72±0.21 vs 1.62±0.09 mm^2;Ch T,302.45±69.74 vs 289.61±67.55μm;P<0.05),whereas CMT and mG CCT decreased to baseline level at 6 mo postlaser therapy(CMT,301.65±110.78 vs 297.77±90.23μm;m GCCT,105.71±10.72 vs 107.05±11.81μm;P>0.05).Moreover,FAZ continuously increased while CDD and PCD continuously decreased in 6 mo after laser therapy.CMT and ChT had a significant positive correlation with ChF and PVD in most post-laser stages.CONCLUSION:During a 6-month follow-up period after combined use of SML and PRP therapy,BCVA remained stable and there was a decreased trend in macular edema.Blood flow increased at 1 d post-laser therapy and reduced at 6 mo post-laser therapy.展开更多
BACKGROUND Diabetes is a serious public health concern in China,with 30%of patients developing retinopathy,and diabetic macular edema(DME)having the biggest impact on vision.High blood glucose level can cause retinal ...BACKGROUND Diabetes is a serious public health concern in China,with 30%of patients developing retinopathy,and diabetic macular edema(DME)having the biggest impact on vision.High blood glucose level can cause retinal cell hypoxia,thus promoting vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)formation and increasing vascular permeability,which induces DME.Moreover,cell hypoxia can accelerate the rate of apoptosis,which leads to the aging of patients.In severe cases,optic cell apoptosis or retinal fibrosis and permanent blindness may occur.AIM To investigate and compare the efficacy,mechanism,and differences between two anti-VEGF drugs(Compaq and ranibizumab)in DME patients.METHODS Ninety-six patients with DME who attended our hospital from April 2018 to February 2020 were included and randomly divided into two groups(Compaq group and ranibizumab group).The groups received vitreal cavity injections of 0.5 mg Compaq and 0.5 mg ranibizumab,respectively,once a month.The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),intraocular pressure(IOP),macular retinal thickness(CMT),macular choroidal thickness(SFCT),foveal no perfusion area(FAZ),superficial capillary density,deep capillary density,treatment effect,and adverse reactions were compared before and after treatment and between the two groups.RESULTS Before treatment and 1-mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated BCVA in both groups(P>0.05).BCVA decreased in the Compaq group 3 mo after treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,and 1 mo and 3 mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated IOP in either group(P>0.05).Before treatment and 1-mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated CMT,SFCT,or FAZ in either group(P>0.05).CMT and SFCT values decreased in the Compaq group 3 mo post-treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,and 1 mo and 3 mo post-treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in vascular density in the shallow or deep capillary plexi of the fovea,parafovea,or overall macular area between the two groups(P>0.05).Marked efficient,effective,and invalid rates were 70.83%and 52.08%,27.08%and 39.58%,and 2.08%and 8.33%in the Compaq and ranibizumab groups,respectively.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Anti-VEGF drugs can effectively improve CMT and SFCT,without affecting microcirculation,thus providing an effective and safe treatment for patients with DME.展开更多
Diabetic macular edema(DME)is a very important and well-known cause of visual loss in diabetics.Blood-retina barrier disruption and consequent intraretinal fluid accumulation may lead to retinal thickening at the post...Diabetic macular edema(DME)is a very important and well-known cause of visual loss in diabetics.Blood-retina barrier disruption and consequent intraretinal fluid accumulation may lead to retinal thickening at the posterior pole namely DME.Even though it is not clearly understood,current evidence suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation characterized with various cytokines has a major role in the occurrence of DME.Clinical trials are continuously shaping our treatment approaches for the eyes with DME.Today,vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)inhibitor and steroid administrations are the main alternatives in DME treatment.Dexamethasone(DEX)implant(Ozurdex®;Allergan,Inc.,Irvine,CA,United States)was approved by the United States Food&Drug Administration in 2014 for DME treatment.The implant is made up of a biodegradable solid copolymer that is broken down by releasing its active ingredient into the vitreous cavity over time.Biphasic release feature of this sustained-release drug delivery system ensures its efficacy for up to 6 mo with an acceptable and manageable safety profile.DEX implant provides a favorable anatomical and functional outcome in DME as shown in several randomized-controlled studies but has a relatively higher ocular side-effect profile such as increased risk of cataract formation and raised intraocular pressure when compared to the gold standard anti-VEGF agents.Thus,DEX implant becomes the second-line treatment option demonstrating inadequate clinical response to anti-VEGF therapy.However,it can be preferred as the first-line treatment in vitrectomized and pseudophakic eyes.Even in some selected conditions DEX implant is favored over anti-VEGF agents where the use of VEGF-inhibitors is either inappropriate or contraindicated such as the patients with a recent history of a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event,pregnancy and noncompliant to frequent visits.This mini-review briefly overviews the efficacy,safety profile and complications of DEX implant and summarizes the outcome of DEX implant administration in major clinical studies on DME treatment.展开更多
基金supported by Science and Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education,No.JJKH20220072KJ(to XL)Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province,No.20200201495JC(to YL)。
文摘The integrity of retinal ganglion cells is tightly associated with diabetic macular degeneration that leads to damage and death of retinal ganglion cells,affecting vision.The major clinical treatments for diabetic macular edema are anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and laser photocoagulation.However,although the macular thickness can be normalized with each of these two therapies used alone,the vision does not improve in many patients.This might result from the incomplete recovery of retinal ganglion cell injury.Therefore,a prospective,non-randomized,controlled clinical trial was designed to investigate the effect of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs combined with laser photocoagulation on the integrity of retinal ganglion cells in patients with diabetic macular edema and its relationship with vision recovery.In this trial,150 patients with diabetic macular edema will be equally divided into three groups according to therapeutic methods,followed by treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs,laser photocoagulation therapy,and their combination.All patients will be followed up for 12 months.The primary outcome measure is retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness at 12 months after treatment.The secondary outcome measures include retinal ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness before and 1,3,6,and 9 months after treatment,retinal nerve fiber layer thickness,best-corrected visual acuity,macular area thickness,and choroidal thickness before and 1,3,6,9,and 12 months after treatment.Safety measure is the incidence of adverse events at 1,3,6,9,and 12 months after treatment.The study protocol hopes to validate the better efficacy and safety of the combined treatment in patients with diabetic macula compared with the other two monotherapies alone during the 12-month follow-up period.The trial is designed to focus on clarifying the time-effect relationship between imaging measures related to the integrity of retinal ganglion cells and best-corrected visual acuity.The trial protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University with approval No.(2023)(26)on April 25,2023,and was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(registration number:ChiCTR2300072478,June 14,2023,protocol version:2.0).
基金Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,China(No.2022A1515010742)Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China(No.2023JJ70039)Scientific Research Program of Xiangjiang Philanthropy Foundation.
文摘AIM:To analyze the relationship between optical coherence tomography(OCT)and OCT angiography(OCTA)imaging in patients with diabetic macular edema(DME)who are treated with a combination of aflibercept and triamcinolone acetonide(TA).METHODS:A total of 76 eyes newly diagnosed DME were included in this study.They were randomly assigned to receive either aflibercept or a combination of aflibercept and TA.Injections once a month for a total of three injections.Central macular thickness(CMT),number of hyperreflective foci(HRF),height of subretinal fluid(SRF),and area of foveal avascular zone(FAZ)were evaluated using OCT and OCTA at baseline and after each monthly treatment.RESULTS:Both groups showed improvement in best corrected visual acuity(BCVA)and reduction in macular edema after treatment,and the difference in BCVA between the two groups was statistically significant after each treatment(P<0.05).The difference in CMT between the two groups was statistically significant after the first two injections(P<0.01),but not after the third injection(P=0.875).The number of HRF(1mo:7.41±8.25 vs 10.86±7.22,P=0.027;2mo:5.33±6.13 vs 9.12±8.61,P=0.034;3mo:3.58±3.00 vs 6.37±5.97,P=0.007)and height of SRF(1mo:82.39±39.12 vs 105.77±42.26μm,P=0.011;2mo:36.84±10.02 vs 83.59±37.78μm,P<0.01;3mo:11.57±3.29 vs 45.43±12.60μm,P<0.01)in combined group were statistically significant less than aflibercept group after each injection,while the area of FAZ showed no significant change before and after treatment in both groups.CONCLUSION:The combination therapy of aflibercept and TA shows more significant effects on DME eyes with decreased HRF and SRF.However,both aflibercept and combination therapy show no significant change in the area of FAZ.
基金Supported by the Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee,China(No.JCYJ20220530164600002)Scientific Research Program of Xiangjiang Philanthropy FoundationScience Research Grant of Aier Eye Hospital Group(No.AF2201D06).
文摘AIM:To investigate the efficacy of aflibercept combined with sub-tenon injection of triamcinolone acetonide(TA)in treating diabetic macular edema(DME)and to examine changes in growth factors and inflammatory mediator levels in aqueous humor after injection.METHODS:Totally 67 DME patients(67 eyes)and 30 cataract patients(32 eyes)were enrolled as the DME group and the control group,respectively.The DME group was divided into the aflibercept group(34 cases)and the aflibercept combined with TA group(combined group,33 cases).The aqueous humor of both groups was collected during the study period.The aqueous levels of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF),monocyte chemoattractant protein-1(MCP-1),interleukin-6(IL-6),interleukin-8(IL-8),and interleukin-1β(IL-1β)were detected using a microsphere suspension array technology(Luminex 200TM).Aqueous cytokines,best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT),and complications before and after treatment were compared between the aflibercept group and combined group.RESULTS:The concentrations of VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor were significantly higher in the DME group than those of the control group(all P<0.01).After 1mo of surgery,the concentrations of VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor were significantly lower in the combined group than those of the aflibercept group(all P<0.01).The BCVA and CMT values of the two groups were statistically different after 1 and 2mo of treatment(P<0.01).However,the difference was not statistically significant after 3mo of treatment(P>0.05).CONCLUSION:The cytokines VEGF,MCP-1,IL-6,and IL-8 in the aqueous humor of DME patients are significantly increased.Aflibercept and aflibercept combined with TA have good efficacy in DME patients,can effectively reduce CMT,improve the patient’s vision,and have high safety.Aflibercept combined with TA can quickly downregulate the aqueous humor cytokines and help to relieve macular edema rapidly.However,the long-term efficacy is comparable to that of aflibercept alone.
文摘AIM:To observe the therapeutic effect of conbercept on diabetic macular edema(DME)complicated with diabetic nephropathy(DN).METHODS:In this retrospective study,54 patients(54 eyes)that diagnosed as DME from January 2017 to October 2021 were collected.The patients were divided into two groups:DME patients with DN(25 eyes),and DME patients without DN(29 eyes).General conditions were collected before treatment,laboratory tests include fasting blood glucose,HbA1c,microalbumin/creatinine,serum creatinine.Optical coherence tomography(OCT)was used to check the ellipsoidal zone(EZ)and external limiting membrane(ELM)integrity.Central macular thickness(CMT),best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),and retinal hyperreflective foci(HF)as well as numbers of injections were recorded.RESULTS:There were significant differences between fasting blood glucose,HbA1c,serum creatinine,urinary microalbumin/creatinine,and estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR)between the two groups(all P<0.05).EZ and ELM continuity in the DME+DN group was worse than that in the DME group(P<0.05).BCVA(logMAR)in the DME group was significantly better than that in the DME+DN group at the same time points during treatment(all P<0.05).CMT and HF values were significantly higher in the DME+DN group than that in the DME group at the all time points(all P<0.05)and significantly decreased in both groups with time during treatment.At 6mo after treatment,the mean number of injections in the DME+DN and DME group was 4.84±0.94 and 3.79±0.86,respectively.CONCLUSION:Conbercept has a significant effect in short-term treatment of DME patients with or without DN,and can significantly ameliorate BCVA,CMT and the number of HF,treatment efficacy of DME patients without DN is better than that of DME patients with DN.
文摘AIM:To assess diabetic macular edema(DME)progression during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic,when severe societal restrictions raised the concern of possible deterioration of health in patients with systemic conditions,particularly those requiring frequent office visits.METHODS:This is a multicenter retrospective chart review of 370 patients(724 eyes)with an established diagnosis of DME seen on 3 separate visits between January 2019 and July 2021.Period 1 was January 2019 to February 2020(considered pre-COVID-19),period 2 was March 2020 to December 2020(considered the height of the pandemic;highest level of pandemic-related clinical and societal regulations)and period 3 was January 2021 to July 2021(re-adjustment to the new“pandemic norms”).Main outcome measures included visual acuity,body mass index(BMI),blood pressure(BP),hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c),macular thickness,patient adherence to scheduled ophthalmology visits,and DME treatment(s)received at each visit.To facilitate measurement of macular thickness,each macula was divided into 9 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS)-defined macular sectors as measured by OCT imaging.RESULTS:There was no change of BMI,systolic BP,and diastolic BP between any of the time periods.HbA1c showed a very small increase from period 1(7.6%)to period 2(7.8%,P=0.015)and decreased back to 7.6%at period 3(P=0.12).Macular thickness decreased for 100%of macular regions.The central macular thickness decreased across all 3 periods from 329.5 to 316.6μm(P=0.0045).After analysis of multiple variables including HbA1c,BMI,adherence to scheduled appointments,different clinic centers,and treatment interventions,there was no easily identifiable subgroup of patients that experienced the increase in DME.CONCLUSION:DME doesn’t worsen during the COVID-19 pandemic,instead sustaining a very small but statistically significant improvement.While identifying a mechanism behind our findings is beyond the scope of this study,potential explanations may include a delay in retinal changes beyond our study period,an unexpected increase in treatment frequency despite pandemic restrictions,and an unanticipated pandemic-related improvement in some lifestyle factors that may have had a positive impact on DME.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab(IVR)for diabetic macular edema(DME)in vitrectomized versus non-vitrectomized eyes.METHODS:The PubMed,EMBASE,Web of Science,Cochrane,EBSCO were comprehensively searched for studies comparing vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes with DME.Clinical outcomes of best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central macular thickness(CMT),the mean number of intravitreal injection and adverse events were extracted and analyzed.RESULTS:Six studies involving 641 eyes were included.Final visual gain significantly improved and CMT significantly reduced in vitrectomized eyes at 6mo and 12mo visits(P<0.05).Although the mean reduction in CMT among non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly greater than in vitrectomized eyes at the 6mo[mean difference(MD)=53.57,95%confidence interval(CI):28.03 to 78.72,P<0.0001]and 12mo(MD=49.65,95%CI:19.58 to 79.72,P=0.01),no significant difference was detected in improvement in BCVA at either 6mo(MD=0.05,95%CI:-0.02 to 0.13,P=0.14)or 12mo(MD=0.03,95%CI:-0.04 to 0.09,P=0.43).Injection number of ranibizumab in non-vitrectomized eyes was significantly less than that in vitrectomized eyes during 6-month period(MD=0.60,95%CI:0.16 to 1.04,P=0.008),while there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups during 12mo of follow-up.CONCLUSION:Evidence from current study suggests that IVR was useful for both vitrectomized group and nonvitrectomized group with DME.Although less reduction in macular thickness is found in vitrectomized group,visual improvement between two groups is similar.
基金the Youth Project of Changzhou Health Commission,No.QN202129.
文摘BACKGROUND The prevalence of diabetes mellitus(DM)in China is high,and the base is broad.Diabetic retinopathy(DR)is a critical condition affecting the life and health of a nation and its economic development.DR is a common complication of DM.AIM To investigate the efficacy of laser photocoagulation combined with intravitreal injection of conbercept for treating macular edema.METHODS Overall,130 patients with diabetic macular edema(DME)hospitalized in The Third People’s Hospital of Changzhou from January 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively included.According to the treatment plan,130 patients with DME were categorized into an observation and a control group,with 65 patients in each group.The control group received laser photocoagulation,and the observation group received laser photocoagulation with intravitreal injection of conbercept.Observe changes in vision,cytokines in the eye and so on.RESULTS The total efficacy rate in the observation group(93.85%)was higher than that in the control group(78.46%)(P<0.05).In both groups,the best corrected visual acuity correction effect improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).Retinal thickness and central macular thickness improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor,interleukin-6,soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1,and basic fibroblast growth factor in both groups improved after treatment,and the observation group was superior to the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION In patients with macular edema,combining laser photocoagulation and intravitreal injections of conbercept for DME is a more effective and safer strategy to improve vision,and lower intraocular cytokine levels.
文摘AIM:To derive a Malaysia guideline and consensus as part of the Malaysia Retina Group's efforts for diagnosis,treatment,and best practices of diabetic macular edema(DME).The experts'panel suggests that the treatment algorithm to be divided into groups according to involvement the central macula.The purpose of DME therapy is to improve edema and achieve the best visual results with the least amount of treatment load.METHODS:On two different occasions,a panel of 14 retinal specialists from Malaysia,together with an external expert,responded to a questionnaire on management of DME.A consensus was sought by voting after compiling,analyzing and discussion on first-phase replies on the round table discussion.A recommendation was deemed to have attained consensus when 12 out of the 14 panellists(85%)agreed with it.RESULTS:The terms target response,adequate response,nonresponse,and inadequate response were developed when the DME patients'treatment responses were first characterized.The panelists reached agreement on a number of DME treatment-related issues,including the need to classify patients prior to treatment,firstline treatment options,the right time to switch between treatment modalities,and side effects associated with steroids.From this agreement,recommendations were derived and a treatment algorithm was created.CONCLUSION:A detail and comprehensive treatment algorithm by Malaysia Retina Group for the Malaysian population provides guidance for treatment allocation of patients with DME.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the changes in macular morphology and function after a single intravitreal injection of aflibercept in diabetic macular edema(DME)using optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA)and MP-3 microperimetry.METHODS:Twenty-eight patients(42 eyes)diagnosed with DME were treated with intravitreal injection of aflibercept.The changes in best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),central retinal thickness(CRT),foveal avascular zone(FAZ)area,vessel density of superficial retinal capillary plexus(SVD),vessel density of deep retinal capillary plexus(DVD),mean light sensitivity(MLS),2°fixation rate(P1),4°fixation rate(P2),and other indicators 1mo after treatment were compared;of these,BCVA was conver ted into logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution(logMAR),and the correlation among the factors was analyzed.RESULTS:After treatment,logMAR BCVA was 0.47±0.24,which was significantly better than that before treatment(0.63±0.28,P<0.001).The CRT was 359.21±107.87μm after treatment,which was significantly lower than before treatment(474.10±138.20μm,P<0.001).The FAZ area,SVD,and DVD were not significantly changed after treatment compared with the baseline.MLS was 22.16±4.20 dB after treatment,which was significantly higher than before treatment(19.63±4.23 dB,P<0.001).P2 significantly increased after treatment than before treatment(P=0.007).P1 had no significant change after treatment than before treatment(P=0.086).CONCLUSION:A single intravitreal injection of aflibercept effectively reduces macular edema and improves retinal sensitivity,fixation stability,and visual acuity,possibly without causing significant changes in the retinal vascular condition in a short time.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane(ILM) peeling for diabetic macular edema(DME). METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, SionMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, CNKI databases and Wanfang databases, published until Oct. 2017, were searched to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes following vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling, for treating DME. Pooled results were expressed as odds ratios(ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals(CI) for vitrectomy with and without ILM peeling with regard to best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central macular thickness(CMT), and complication incidents. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies involving 857 eyes were included of which three studies were Chinese and the rests were English literatures. Meta-analysis indicated that compared with vitrectomy alone, vitrectomy with ILM peeling could improve BCVA more obviously(OR=1.66, 95%CI: 1.12-2.46, P=0.01) and had higher rate of CMT reduction(OR=3.89, 95%CI: 1.37-11.11, P=0.01). There were significant statistical differences between the two surgical methods for both BCVA and CMT(P<0.05). For the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, the incidence of epiretinal membrane(ERM) was slightly lower in the ILM peeling group than the group without ILM peeling(OR=0.38, 95%CI: 0.07-2.00, P=0.25), although insignificant statistically. Other incidences of overall complications, iatrogenic peripheral retinal break and increased intraocular pressure indicated no significant difference between two groups(OR=1.19, 95%CI: 0.82-1.73, P=0.36; OR=1.21, 95%CI: 0.66-2.21, P=0.53; OR=1.34, 95%CI: 0.75-2.40, P=0.32). CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy is effective for DME and the effect can be improved by additional ILM peeling, especially for anatomical efficacy, without increasing the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. However, it is imperative to gain more evaluation in the future due to the paucity of prospective randomized study.
文摘AIM:To examine possible differences in clinical outcomes between sub-threshold micro-pulse diode laser photocoagulation(SDM) and traditional modified Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(mETDRS)treatment protocol in diabetic macuiar edema(DME).METHODS:A comprehensive literature search using the Cochrane Collaboration methodology to identify RCTs comparing SDM with mETDRS for DME.The participants were type Ⅰ or type Ⅱ diabetes mellitus with clinically significant macuiar edema treated by SDM from previously reported randomized controlled trials(RCTs).The primary outcome measures were the changes in the best corrected visual acuity(BCVA) and the central macuiar thickness(CMT) as measured by optical coherence tomography(OCT).The secondary outcomes were the contrast sensitivity and the damages of the retina.RESULTS:Seven studies were identified and analyzed for comparing SDM(215 eyes) with mETDRS(210 eyes)for DME.There were no statistical differences in the BCVA after treatment between the SDM and mETDRS based on the follow-up:3mo(MD,-0.02;95% Cl,-0.12 to 0.09;P=0.77),6mo(MD,-0.02;95% Cl,-0.12 to 0.09;P=0.75),12mo(MD,-0.05;95% Cl,-0.17 to 0.07;P=0.40).Likewise,there were no statistical differences in the CMT after treatment between the SDM and mETDRS in 3mo(MD,-9.92;95% Cl,-28.69 to 8.85;P=0.30),6mo(MD,-11.37;95% Cl,-29.65 to 6.91;P=0.22),12mo(MD,8.44;95% Cl,-29.89 to 46.77;P=0.67).Three RCTs suggested that SDM laser results in good preservation of contrast sensitivity as mETDRS,in two different followup evaluations:3mo(MD,0.05;95% Cl,0 to 0.09;P=0.04) and 6mo(MD,0.02;95% Cl,-0.10 to 0.14;P=0.78).Two RCTs showed that the SDM laser treatment did less retinal damage than that mETDRS did(OR,0.05;95% Cl,0.02 to 0.13;P<0.01).CONCLUSION:SDM laser photocoagulation shows an equally good effect on visual acuity,contrast sensitivity,and reduction of DME as compared to conventional mETDRS protocol with less retinal damage.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the two-year outcomes of patients treated for diabetic macular edema(DME) with intravitreal Conbercept(IVC).METHODS: The clinical data of 30 DME patients(36 eyes) were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were treated with IVC for 3 mo. Additional IVC was given at subsequent monthly visits, if needed(3+PRN). The patients were followed up for 24 mo.RESULTS: The best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) at 24 mo significantly increased(66.7±15.3 letters) in comparison with the baseline(54.4±15.4 letters, P<0.0001). The mean improvement in BCVA was 11.0±2.9 letters. At 24 mo, 44.1% of the eyes surveyed gained ≥15 letters, 52.9% of the eyes gained ≥10 letters, and 70.6% of the eyes gained ≥5 letters. No vision loss was noted in 96.8% of the eyes, and 5.9% of the eyes lost ≥5 letters, but ≤10 letters. The central retinal thickness(CRT) at 24 mo was significantly reduced(277.1±122.9 μm) in comparison with the baseline(510.9±186.1 μm, P<0.0001). At 24 mo, 43.3% of the patients had a CRT ≤250 μm. The mean number of injections over 24 mo was 10.6±2.0. No severe eye or systemic adverse events related to either the drug or injection were noted.CONCLUSION: IVC is safe and effective for the treatment of DME.
文摘Diabetic macular edema(DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic retinopathy,affecting 1 in 15 patients with diabetes mellitus(DM).The disruption of the inner blood-retina barrier(BRB) has been largely investigated and attributed the primary role in the pathogenesis and progression in DME, but there is increasing evidence regarding the role of outer BRB, separating the RPE from the underlying choriocapillaris,in the occurrence and evolution of DME.The development of novel imaging technologies has led to major improvement in the field of in vivo structural analysis of the macula allowing us to delve deeper into the pathogenesis of DME and expanding our vision regarding this condition.In this review we gathered the results of studies that investigated specific outer BRB optical coherence tomography parameters in patients with DM with the aim to outline the current status of its role in the pathogenesis and progression of DME and identify new research pathways contributing to the advancement of knowledge in the understanding of this condition.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implants in subjects affected by diabetic macular edema(DME) resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF) therapy.METHODS: Thirty-two DME patients were enrolled.A700 microgram slow release Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant(Ozurdex~) was placed in the vitreous cavity.All patients were followed for 18 mo.Best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) measured with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study(ETDRS) and central macular thickness(CMT) exams were carried out at baseline(T0)and after 1(T1),3(T3),4(T4),6(T6),9(T9),12(T12),15(T15),and 18mo(T18) post injection. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA showed an effect of treatment on ETDRS(P<0.0001).Post hoc analyses revealed that ETDRS values were significantly increased at T1,T3,T4,T9,and T15(P <0.001) as compared to baseline value(T0).At T6,T12,and T18,ETDRS values were still statistically higher than baseline(P<0.001 vs T0).However,at these time points,we observed a trend to return to baseline conditions.ANOVA also showed an effect of treatment(P <0.0001).CMT decreased significantly at T1,T3,T4,T9,and T15(P<0.001).At T6(P<0.01),T12 and T18(P<0.001) CMT was also significantly lower than T0 although a trend to return to the baseline conditions was also observed.CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant is a good option to improveBCVA and CMT in DME patients resistant to anti-VEGF therapy.Our data also show that the use of drugs administered directly into the vitreous allows achieving appropriate and long-lasting concentration at the site of disease without systemic side effects.
文摘AIM: To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal bevacizumab(IVB) versus macular photocoagulation(MPC) in treatment of diabetic macular edema(DME) by Meta-analysis. METHODS: Pertinent publications were identified through systemic searches of Pub Med, Medline,EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register up to 30 November, 2013. Changes in central macular thickness(CMT) in μm and best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) in log MAR equivalents were extracted at 1, 3, 6,12 and 24 mo after initial treatment, and a Meta-analysis was carried out to compare results between groups receiving IVB and MPC.RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trial(RCTs) and one high-quality comparative study were identified and included. Our Meta-analysis revealed that both IVB and MPC resulted in the improvements of CMT and BCVA in eyes with DME at 1mo after initial treatment, with IVB being significantly superior to MPC(P =0.01 and 0.02,respectively). The improvements of both measure outcomes at 3, 6, 12 and 24 mo after treatment did not vary significantly between the IVB groups and MPC groups(CMT at 3mo, P =0.85; at 6mo, P =0.29; at 12 mo,P =0.56; at 24 mo, P =0.71; BCVA at 3mo, P =0.31; at 6mo,P =0.30; at 12 mo, P =0.23; at 24 mo, P =0.52). However,the number of observed adverse events was low in all studies.CONCLUSION: Current evidence shows IVB treatment trends to be more effective in improvements of macular edema and vision in eyes with DME at an earlier follow up(1mo) compared with MPC. At other time, both interventions have comparable efficacy without statistical significances.
文摘● AIM: To elucidate the relationship between systemic risk factors and different patterns of diabetic macular edema(DME) determined with optical coherence tomography(OCT).● METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, DME was classified by OCT as diffuse retinal thickness(DRT), cystoid macular edema(CME) and serous retinal detachment(SRD) and the relationship between the systemic risk factors and DME patterns was evaluated.● RESULTS: Of the 57 patients with DME, 21(36.8%) had DRT, 24(42.1%) had CME and 12(21.0%) had SRD. Microor macro-albuminuria was significantly higher in the DRT pattern(61.9%) compared with the SRD(50.0%) and CME patterns(25.0%; P=0.040). Hemoglobin A1 c(Hb A1 c) level was significantly higher and patients were younger in the DRT pattern group(P=0.034, P=0.032). Best corrected visual acuity was the worst and central macular thickness was the thickest in the CME pattern group.● CONCLUSION: Micro-or macro-albuminuria may be more frequent and Hb A1 c level may be higher in patients with DRT. These patients are also seen to be younger than patients with non-DRT.
文摘AIM: To analyze the clinical efficacy of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab(IVR) on diabetic macular edema(DME) with multifocal electroretinography(mf ERG) and optical coherence tomography(OCT).METHODS: A total of 41 patients(41 eyes) with DME were treated with IVR. The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), mf ERG results, and OCT were analyzed to compare to the baselines at 1 wk, 1, and 3 mo after operation.RESULTS: The BCVA was significantly improved in all eyes at each time point(P<0.001). The macular area leakage and edema were reduced 1 wk and 1 mo after IVR, and the central fovea thickness(CFT) was significantly reduced compared to baseline(P<0.001). The mf ERG, twodimensional and three-dimensional images all showed that the macular fovea(1 ring) response density decreased, and the fovea and macular area spikes significantly decreased or disappeared. The amplitude density of the P1 wave was increased, and the latency of the P1 wave was shortened than preoperation(P<0.001). At 1 wk and 1 mo after the operation, there was a negative correlation between the amplitude density of P1 waves and CFT.CONCLUSION: OCT and mf ERG fully demonstrate the importance of IVR for DME patients from the macular morphology and function, especially the significance of mf ERG in this disease.
基金Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province(No.2015A030313019)the Sun Yat-sen Clinical Research Cultivation Project(No.SYS-C-201705)。
文摘AIM:To quantitatively evaluate the effect of the combined use of 577-nm subthreshold micropulse macular laser(SML)and multi-point mode pan retinal laser photocoagulation(PRP)on severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy(NPDR)with central-involved diabetic macular edema(CIDME)using optical coherence tomography angiography(OCTA).METHODS:In this observational clinical study,86 eyes of 86 NPDR patients with CIDME who underwent SML and PRP treatment were included.Images were obtained 1 d before laser and post-laser(1 d,1 wk,1,3,and 6 mo)using AngioV ue software 2.0.Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA,LogM AR),foveal avascular zone area(FAZ),choriocapillary flow area(Ch F),parafoveal vessel density(PVD),capillary density inside disc(CDD),peripapillary capillary density(PCD),macular ganglion cell complex thickness(m GCCT),central macular thickness(CMT),and subfoveal choroidal thickness(ChT)were compared between pre-and post-laser treatment.RESULTS:BCVA remained stable during 6 mo postlaser therapy(pre-laser vs 6 mo post-laser:0.53±0.21 vs 0.5±0.15,P>0.05).PVD,ChF,ChT,CMT,and mGCCT significantly increased 1 d post-laser therapy[pre-laser vs 1 d post-laser:superficial PVD(%),40.51±3.42 vs 42.43±4.68;deep PVD(%),42.66±3.67 vs 44.78±4.52;ChF,1.72±0.21 vs 1.9±0.12 mm^2;ChT,302.45±69.74 vs 319.38±70.93μm;CMT,301.65±110.78 vs 320.86±105.62μm;m GCCT,105.71±10.72 vs 115.46±9.64μm;P<0.05].However,PVD,ChF and ChT decreased to less than baseline level at 6 mo postlaser therapy(pre-laser vs 6 mo post-laser:superficial PVD(%),40.51±3.42 vs 36.32±4.19;deep PVD(%),42.66±3.67 vs 38.76±3.74;Ch F,1.72±0.21 vs 1.62±0.09 mm^2;Ch T,302.45±69.74 vs 289.61±67.55μm;P<0.05),whereas CMT and mG CCT decreased to baseline level at 6 mo postlaser therapy(CMT,301.65±110.78 vs 297.77±90.23μm;m GCCT,105.71±10.72 vs 107.05±11.81μm;P>0.05).Moreover,FAZ continuously increased while CDD and PCD continuously decreased in 6 mo after laser therapy.CMT and ChT had a significant positive correlation with ChF and PVD in most post-laser stages.CONCLUSION:During a 6-month follow-up period after combined use of SML and PRP therapy,BCVA remained stable and there was a decreased trend in macular edema.Blood flow increased at 1 d post-laser therapy and reduced at 6 mo post-laser therapy.
文摘BACKGROUND Diabetes is a serious public health concern in China,with 30%of patients developing retinopathy,and diabetic macular edema(DME)having the biggest impact on vision.High blood glucose level can cause retinal cell hypoxia,thus promoting vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)formation and increasing vascular permeability,which induces DME.Moreover,cell hypoxia can accelerate the rate of apoptosis,which leads to the aging of patients.In severe cases,optic cell apoptosis or retinal fibrosis and permanent blindness may occur.AIM To investigate and compare the efficacy,mechanism,and differences between two anti-VEGF drugs(Compaq and ranibizumab)in DME patients.METHODS Ninety-six patients with DME who attended our hospital from April 2018 to February 2020 were included and randomly divided into two groups(Compaq group and ranibizumab group).The groups received vitreal cavity injections of 0.5 mg Compaq and 0.5 mg ranibizumab,respectively,once a month.The best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),intraocular pressure(IOP),macular retinal thickness(CMT),macular choroidal thickness(SFCT),foveal no perfusion area(FAZ),superficial capillary density,deep capillary density,treatment effect,and adverse reactions were compared before and after treatment and between the two groups.RESULTS Before treatment and 1-mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated BCVA in both groups(P>0.05).BCVA decreased in the Compaq group 3 mo after treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,and 1 mo and 3 mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated IOP in either group(P>0.05).Before treatment and 1-mo post-treatment,there was no statistically significant difference in the estimated CMT,SFCT,or FAZ in either group(P>0.05).CMT and SFCT values decreased in the Compaq group 3 mo post-treatment,and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Before treatment,and 1 mo and 3 mo post-treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in vascular density in the shallow or deep capillary plexi of the fovea,parafovea,or overall macular area between the two groups(P>0.05).Marked efficient,effective,and invalid rates were 70.83%and 52.08%,27.08%and 39.58%,and 2.08%and 8.33%in the Compaq and ranibizumab groups,respectively.The differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Anti-VEGF drugs can effectively improve CMT and SFCT,without affecting microcirculation,thus providing an effective and safe treatment for patients with DME.
文摘Diabetic macular edema(DME)is a very important and well-known cause of visual loss in diabetics.Blood-retina barrier disruption and consequent intraretinal fluid accumulation may lead to retinal thickening at the posterior pole namely DME.Even though it is not clearly understood,current evidence suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation characterized with various cytokines has a major role in the occurrence of DME.Clinical trials are continuously shaping our treatment approaches for the eyes with DME.Today,vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF)inhibitor and steroid administrations are the main alternatives in DME treatment.Dexamethasone(DEX)implant(Ozurdex®;Allergan,Inc.,Irvine,CA,United States)was approved by the United States Food&Drug Administration in 2014 for DME treatment.The implant is made up of a biodegradable solid copolymer that is broken down by releasing its active ingredient into the vitreous cavity over time.Biphasic release feature of this sustained-release drug delivery system ensures its efficacy for up to 6 mo with an acceptable and manageable safety profile.DEX implant provides a favorable anatomical and functional outcome in DME as shown in several randomized-controlled studies but has a relatively higher ocular side-effect profile such as increased risk of cataract formation and raised intraocular pressure when compared to the gold standard anti-VEGF agents.Thus,DEX implant becomes the second-line treatment option demonstrating inadequate clinical response to anti-VEGF therapy.However,it can be preferred as the first-line treatment in vitrectomized and pseudophakic eyes.Even in some selected conditions DEX implant is favored over anti-VEGF agents where the use of VEGF-inhibitors is either inappropriate or contraindicated such as the patients with a recent history of a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event,pregnancy and noncompliant to frequent visits.This mini-review briefly overviews the efficacy,safety profile and complications of DEX implant and summarizes the outcome of DEX implant administration in major clinical studies on DME treatment.
