AIM: To evaluate the significance of extended radical operation and its indications.METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1998, 56inpatients with pancreatic head cancer received operation.Among them 35 patients (...AIM: To evaluate the significance of extended radical operation and its indications.METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1998, 56inpatients with pancreatic head cancer received operation.Among them 35 patients (group 1) experienced the Whipple operation, and 21 patients (group 2) received the extended radical operation. The 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two operative procedures. Clinical stage (CS) was assessed retrospectively with the help of CT. The indications for extended radical operation were discussed.RESULTS: There was no difference in hospital mortality and morbidity rates. Whereas the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were 84.8%, 62.8%, 39.9% in the extended radical operation group, and were 70.8%, 47.6%, 17.2%in the Whipple operation group, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P＜0.001, P＜0.001,P＜0.001, respectively). Most of the deaths within 3 years after operation were due to recurrence in the two groups.However, the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative rates of death due to local recurrence were decreased from 37.4% in patients that received the Whipple procedure to 23.8% in those who received by extended radical operation. Patients who survived for more than 3 years were only noted in those with CS1 in the Whipple procedure group and were founded in cases with CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 in the extended radical operation group.CONCLUSION: The extended radical operation appears to benefit patients with pancreatic head carcinoma which was indicated in CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 without severe invasion.展开更多
Objective: The aim of this study was to explore clinical value of thoracic small incision in radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer in assuring same treatment effects with conventional incision. Methods: Col...Objective: The aim of this study was to explore clinical value of thoracic small incision in radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer in assuring same treatment effects with conventional incision. Methods: Collected data of patients was given radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer in our department from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2007, and performed retrospective analysis, among them, small incision group (improved group) was 143 cases, and conventional group was 167 cases including 6 cases which was changed from small incision to conventional incision in operation. Compared operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage flow, number of lymph node dissected, recovery time of postoperative upper limb function, postoperative pain, postoperative complications etc. between both groups. Results: Compared with conventional group, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage flow, postoperative pain, recovery time of postoperative upper limb function in improved group was improved significantly, and there was no obvious difference in operation time and number of lymph node dissected between both groups. Conclusion: Small incision in radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer is small trauma, and quick recovery after operation, treatment effects of it is basically similar to that of conventional operation method, however, its application is limited in few cases.展开更多
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often misdiagnosed because they can involve any part of the body and have non-specific symptoms. Here, we report a case of a 39-year-old man with rectal neuroendocrine tumor (RNET) and...Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often misdiagnosed because they can involve any part of the body and have non-specific symptoms. Here, we report a case of a 39-year-old man with rectal neuroendocrine tumor (RNET) and hepatic metastases treated with a combination of radical surgery and Everolimus therapy. The patient complained of abdominal distension, pain, and constipation of one month duration. Enhanced CT scan of the abdomen, colonoscopy and Biopsy findings confirmed the diagnosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumor. As the anatomical structures were clear and the masses seemed to be resectable, we decided to initiate treatment with radical operation and Everolimus therapy. The patient has responded well to the treatment with no evidence of recurrence after 4 years of follow-up. This case is interesting because of the rarity of this neoplasm and its initial misdiagnosis as a giant hepatic carcinoma (hepatoma). It also demonstrates that a combination of curative surgical resection and Everolimus is a good option in a patient with large colorectal neuroendocrine tumors and massive hepatic metastases.展开更多
文摘AIM: To evaluate the significance of extended radical operation and its indications.METHODS: Between January 1995 and December 1998, 56inpatients with pancreatic head cancer received operation.Among them 35 patients (group 1) experienced the Whipple operation, and 21 patients (group 2) received the extended radical operation. The 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two operative procedures. Clinical stage (CS) was assessed retrospectively with the help of CT. The indications for extended radical operation were discussed.RESULTS: There was no difference in hospital mortality and morbidity rates. Whereas the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative survival rates were 84.8%, 62.8%, 39.9% in the extended radical operation group, and were 70.8%, 47.6%, 17.2%in the Whipple operation group, there was a significant difference between the two groups (P＜0.001, P＜0.001,P＜0.001, respectively). Most of the deaths within 3 years after operation were due to recurrence in the two groups.However, the 1-, 2-, 3-year cumulative rates of death due to local recurrence were decreased from 37.4% in patients that received the Whipple procedure to 23.8% in those who received by extended radical operation. Patients who survived for more than 3 years were only noted in those with CS1 in the Whipple procedure group and were founded in cases with CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 in the extended radical operation group.CONCLUSION: The extended radical operation appears to benefit patients with pancreatic head carcinoma which was indicated in CS1, CS2 and part of CS3 without severe invasion.
文摘Objective: The aim of this study was to explore clinical value of thoracic small incision in radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer in assuring same treatment effects with conventional incision. Methods: Collected data of patients was given radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer in our department from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2007, and performed retrospective analysis, among them, small incision group (improved group) was 143 cases, and conventional group was 167 cases including 6 cases which was changed from small incision to conventional incision in operation. Compared operation time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage flow, number of lymph node dissected, recovery time of postoperative upper limb function, postoperative pain, postoperative complications etc. between both groups. Results: Compared with conventional group, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage flow, postoperative pain, recovery time of postoperative upper limb function in improved group was improved significantly, and there was no obvious difference in operation time and number of lymph node dissected between both groups. Conclusion: Small incision in radical operation for lung and esophageal cancer is small trauma, and quick recovery after operation, treatment effects of it is basically similar to that of conventional operation method, however, its application is limited in few cases.
文摘Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often misdiagnosed because they can involve any part of the body and have non-specific symptoms. Here, we report a case of a 39-year-old man with rectal neuroendocrine tumor (RNET) and hepatic metastases treated with a combination of radical surgery and Everolimus therapy. The patient complained of abdominal distension, pain, and constipation of one month duration. Enhanced CT scan of the abdomen, colonoscopy and Biopsy findings confirmed the diagnosis of rectal neuroendocrine tumor. As the anatomical structures were clear and the masses seemed to be resectable, we decided to initiate treatment with radical operation and Everolimus therapy. The patient has responded well to the treatment with no evidence of recurrence after 4 years of follow-up. This case is interesting because of the rarity of this neoplasm and its initial misdiagnosis as a giant hepatic carcinoma (hepatoma). It also demonstrates that a combination of curative surgical resection and Everolimus is a good option in a patient with large colorectal neuroendocrine tumors and massive hepatic metastases.
