Distinguished participants,ladies and grntlemen:It gives me great pleasure,on behalf of the United Nations Ecomomic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, to join you today at
Legislatively,the people’s assessors are defined as individuals who share judicial power.However,in the context of dispute resolutions,their role is restricted by the courts,which affects the extent of their assessor...Legislatively,the people’s assessors are defined as individuals who share judicial power.However,in the context of dispute resolutions,their role is restricted by the courts,which affects the extent of their assessorial activities.It is imperative to reconsider the implications of the people’s assessors’deep involvement in mediation from the standpoint of societal division of labor.To enhance this division of labor,it is advisable that the people’s assessors relinquish their mediation roles.It is necessary to redefine the distinctions between people’s assessors,judges,and people’s mediators,including specially invited mediators.This would not only make up the deficiencies in the role of professional judges but also relieve the tension between judicial professionalism and popular accountability.展开更多
近年来跨学科研究已成为基础研究发展的重要趋势和方向。本文基于Web of Science核心数据库,运用文献计量方法和社会网络分析法对比分析了2003—2017年间中国、美国、日本国际论文的跨学科特点和发展态势,研究内容包括跨学科论文产出特...近年来跨学科研究已成为基础研究发展的重要趋势和方向。本文基于Web of Science核心数据库,运用文献计量方法和社会网络分析法对比分析了2003—2017年间中国、美国、日本国际论文的跨学科特点和发展态势,研究内容包括跨学科论文产出特征、学科多样性、学科融合网络特征和主要学科融合组合。结果显示:我国跨学科论文绝对数量的增长速度高于美国和日本;与美国和日本不同的是,跨学科论文中跨学部论文的比例中国近几年呈下降趋势。中、美、日都以两个学科融合为主,尽管两个以上学科融合的比例中国高于美国和日本,但学科融合网络特征显示,中国学科融合网络的连通性、凝聚性和平均度数都要低于美国和日本。中、美、日主要的学科融合组合存在差异,工程学部在我国跨学科研究中占有重要地位。展开更多
文摘Distinguished participants,ladies and grntlemen:It gives me great pleasure,on behalf of the United Nations Ecomomic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, to join you today at
文摘Legislatively,the people’s assessors are defined as individuals who share judicial power.However,in the context of dispute resolutions,their role is restricted by the courts,which affects the extent of their assessorial activities.It is imperative to reconsider the implications of the people’s assessors’deep involvement in mediation from the standpoint of societal division of labor.To enhance this division of labor,it is advisable that the people’s assessors relinquish their mediation roles.It is necessary to redefine the distinctions between people’s assessors,judges,and people’s mediators,including specially invited mediators.This would not only make up the deficiencies in the role of professional judges but also relieve the tension between judicial professionalism and popular accountability.
文摘近年来跨学科研究已成为基础研究发展的重要趋势和方向。本文基于Web of Science核心数据库,运用文献计量方法和社会网络分析法对比分析了2003—2017年间中国、美国、日本国际论文的跨学科特点和发展态势,研究内容包括跨学科论文产出特征、学科多样性、学科融合网络特征和主要学科融合组合。结果显示:我国跨学科论文绝对数量的增长速度高于美国和日本;与美国和日本不同的是,跨学科论文中跨学部论文的比例中国近几年呈下降趋势。中、美、日都以两个学科融合为主,尽管两个以上学科融合的比例中国高于美国和日本,但学科融合网络特征显示,中国学科融合网络的连通性、凝聚性和平均度数都要低于美国和日本。中、美、日主要的学科融合组合存在差异,工程学部在我国跨学科研究中占有重要地位。
