AIM： To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy （H J） for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without...AIM： To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy （H J） for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1： hepatectomy＋HJ; group A2： choledochoctomy＋HJ; group B1： hepatectomy ＋ choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2： choledochoctomy ＋ T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS： There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group （0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01）. Hepatectomy ＋ choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy ＋ HJ （8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034）. The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group （16/23, 70.0%）, and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group （34/35, 97.1%）. The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION： The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.展开更多
AIM: To investigate the feasibility of compression anastomosis clip (CAC) for gastrointestinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction. METHODS: Sixty-six patients undergoing gastrointe-stinal anastomosis proxi...AIM: To investigate the feasibility of compression anastomosis clip (CAC) for gastrointestinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction. METHODS: Sixty-six patients undergoing gastrointe-stinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction were randomized into two groups according to the anastomotic method, CAC or stapler. RESULTS: The postoperative recovery of patients in CAC and stapled anastomosis groups was similar. No postoperative complication related to the anastomotic method was found in either group. Both upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography at the early postoperative course and endoscopic examination after a 6-mo follow-up showed a better healing at the compression anastomosis. CONCLUSION: CAC can be used not only in colonic surgery but also in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Our result strongly suggests that CAC anastomosis is safe in various complication circumstances. However, it should be further conf irmed with a larger patient sample.展开更多
文摘AIM： To evaluate the long-term outcome and surgical indications of hepaticojejunostomy （H J） for the treatment of hepatolithiasis. METHODS- Three hundred and fourteen elective cases with hepatolithiasis but without biliary stricture or cystic dilatation treated in the past 10 years were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into HJ group and T tube drainage group according to biliary drainage procedure. Furthermore, four subgroups were subdivided by hepatectomy as a balance factor, group A1： hepatectomy＋HJ; group A2： choledochoctomy＋HJ; group B1： hepatectomy ＋ choledochoctomy T tube drainage; group B2： choledochoctomy ＋ T tube drainage. The stone residual rate, surgical efficacy and long-term outcome were compared among different procedures. RESULTS： There was no surgical mortality among all patients. The total hospital mortality was 1.6%. The overall stone residual rate after surgical clearance was 25.9%. There was no statistical difference between HJ group and T tube drainage group in terms of stone residual rate after surgical clearance, however, after postoperative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, the total stone residual rate of T tube drainage group was significantly lower than that of HJ group （0.5% vs 16.7%, P 〈 0.01）. Hepatectomy ＋ choledochoctomy tube drainage achieved the optimal therapeutic effect, only 8.2% patients suffered from an attack of cholangitis postoperatively, which was significantly lower than that of hepatectomy ＋ HJ （8.2% vs 22.0%, P = 0.034）. The major reason for postoperative cholangitis was stone residual in the HJ group （16/23, 70.0%）, and stone recurrence in the T tube drainage group （34/35, 97.1%）. The operative times were significantly prolonged in those undergoing HJ, and the operative morbidity of HJ was higher than those of T tube drainage. CONCLUSION： The treatment result of HJ for hepatolithiasis is not satisfactory in this retrospective study due to high rate of stone residual and postoperative cholangi- tis. HJ could not drain residual stone effectively. HJ may hinder post-operative choledochoscopic lithotripsy, which is the optimal management for postoperative residual stone. The indications of HJ for hepatolithiasis should be strictly selected.
文摘AIM: To investigate the feasibility of compression anastomosis clip (CAC) for gastrointestinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction. METHODS: Sixty-six patients undergoing gastrointe-stinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction were randomized into two groups according to the anastomotic method, CAC or stapler. RESULTS: The postoperative recovery of patients in CAC and stapled anastomosis groups was similar. No postoperative complication related to the anastomotic method was found in either group. Both upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography at the early postoperative course and endoscopic examination after a 6-mo follow-up showed a better healing at the compression anastomosis. CONCLUSION: CAC can be used not only in colonic surgery but also in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Our result strongly suggests that CAC anastomosis is safe in various complication circumstances. However, it should be further conf irmed with a larger patient sample.
