文章基于《标准创新型企业梯度培育管理办法(试行)》,通过梳理政策培育要求、行业发展需求和实践导向,设计了“三三三”标准创新型企业培育模型,并构建出凸显行业特质的适用于电网企业的“2维3级”标准创新型企业评价体系,从标准创新的...文章基于《标准创新型企业梯度培育管理办法(试行)》,通过梳理政策培育要求、行业发展需求和实践导向,设计了“三三三”标准创新型企业培育模型,并构建出凸显行业特质的适用于电网企业的“2维3级”标准创新型企业评价体系,从标准创新的“流程”和“结果”两个维度出发,通过八个一级指标,实现对电网企业标准创新能力的科学合理评价,并基于四大模块构建出评价体系,实现路径模型,支撑评价体系发挥评价引领作用,支持培育工作高质高效开展。Based on the “Measures for the Gradient Cultivation and Management of Standard Innovative Enterprises (Trial)”, this paper designs a “Three-Three-Three” standard innovative enterprise cultivation model by sorting out policy cultivation requirements, industry development needs, and practice-oriented approaches. Furthermore, it constructs a “2-Dimension, 3-Level” evaluation system tailored for power grid enterprises, highlighting their industry-specific characteristics. This system assesses the standard innovation capabilities of power grid enterprises scientifically and reasonably from two dimensions: “process” and “outcome” of standard innovation. Eight primary indicators are employed to achieve this. Additionally, the paper establishes a realization path model for the evaluation system based on four modules, which support the system’s role in leading evaluations and facilitating high-quality and efficient cultivation efforts.展开更多
文摘文章基于《标准创新型企业梯度培育管理办法(试行)》,通过梳理政策培育要求、行业发展需求和实践导向,设计了“三三三”标准创新型企业培育模型,并构建出凸显行业特质的适用于电网企业的“2维3级”标准创新型企业评价体系,从标准创新的“流程”和“结果”两个维度出发,通过八个一级指标,实现对电网企业标准创新能力的科学合理评价,并基于四大模块构建出评价体系,实现路径模型,支撑评价体系发挥评价引领作用,支持培育工作高质高效开展。Based on the “Measures for the Gradient Cultivation and Management of Standard Innovative Enterprises (Trial)”, this paper designs a “Three-Three-Three” standard innovative enterprise cultivation model by sorting out policy cultivation requirements, industry development needs, and practice-oriented approaches. Furthermore, it constructs a “2-Dimension, 3-Level” evaluation system tailored for power grid enterprises, highlighting their industry-specific characteristics. This system assesses the standard innovation capabilities of power grid enterprises scientifically and reasonably from two dimensions: “process” and “outcome” of standard innovation. Eight primary indicators are employed to achieve this. Additionally, the paper establishes a realization path model for the evaluation system based on four modules, which support the system’s role in leading evaluations and facilitating high-quality and efficient cultivation efforts.
