目的:比较氧气驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗儿童哮喘急性发作期的疗效。方法:选取42例哮喘急性发作期儿童作为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,观察组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗。一周...目的:比较氧气驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗儿童哮喘急性发作期的疗效。方法:选取42例哮喘急性发作期儿童作为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,观察组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗。一周后比较2组患儿的总有效率、合并低氧血症者治疗后的总有效率与不合并低氧血症者的总有效率的差异、各项临床症状及体征(呼吸困难、喘息、咳嗽、哮鸣音)消失的时间及治疗前后最大呼气流速(PEF)的变化。结果:治疗一周后,观察组的总有效率为95.2%,明显高于对照组的61.9%,差异显著(P P P > 0.05;观察组各项临床症状及体征(呼吸困难、喘息、咳嗽、哮鸣音)消失的时间明显短于对照组(P P Objective: To compare the efficacy of oxygen driven nebulization inhalation and air compression pump nebulization inhalation in the treatment of acute asthma attacks in children. Method: 42 children with acute asthma attacks were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. The control group was treated with air compression pump nebulization inhalation, while the observation group was treated with oxygen driven nebulization inhalation. Compare the total effective rate of two groups of children one week later, the difference in total effective rate between patients with hypoxemia and those without hypoxemia after treatment, the time for various clinical symptoms and signs (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, wheezing) to disappear, and the changes in maximum expiratory flow rate (PEF) before and after treatment. Result: After one week of treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.2%, significantly higher than the control group’s 61.9%, with a significant difference (P P P > 0.05. The disappearance time of various clinical symptoms and signs (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, wheezing) in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P P < 0.05). Conclusion: Two different nebulization inhalation methods have achieved good therapeutic effects in treating acute asthma attacks in children, but the oxygen driven nebulization inhalation method is more effective, with more significant improvement in the patient’s condition and better prognosis.展开更多
目的分析中国居民经食物摄入和空气吸入微纳塑料(micro-and nanoplastics,MNPs)暴露特征。方法使用关键词检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、中国知网和万方数据知识服务平台等国内外数据库,建立数据集,结合中国人群食物消费量和人...目的分析中国居民经食物摄入和空气吸入微纳塑料(micro-and nanoplastics,MNPs)暴露特征。方法使用关键词检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、中国知网和万方数据知识服务平台等国内外数据库,建立数据集,结合中国人群食物消费量和人体呼吸参数,计算中国居民经食物摄入和空气吸入的MNPs暴露量,与国外数据比较分析其MNPs暴露特征。结果分析来自28篇研究的4511个样本数据显示,中国居民每年摄入约187000~328000个MNPs,考虑空气吸入,每年MNPs暴露量为192000~335000个MNPs,均高于美国居民暴露量。男性成年人MNPs摄入量最高。生活饮用水、海产品、瓶装水和空气是中国居民每日主要MNPs暴露源。中国居民经食物摄入MNPs类型以聚乙烯、聚丙烯和聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯为主,而经空气吸入MNPs类型以聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯、尼龙和聚丙烯腈为主。结论相比于美国居民,中国居民具有更高的MNPs暴露风险,削减饮用水和海产品中MNPs含量,可有效降低中国居民MNPs暴露风险。展开更多
文摘目的:比较氧气驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗儿童哮喘急性发作期的疗效。方法:选取42例哮喘急性发作期儿童作为研究对象,将其随机分为对照组和观察组,对照组采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗,观察组采用氧气驱动雾化吸入治疗。一周后比较2组患儿的总有效率、合并低氧血症者治疗后的总有效率与不合并低氧血症者的总有效率的差异、各项临床症状及体征(呼吸困难、喘息、咳嗽、哮鸣音)消失的时间及治疗前后最大呼气流速(PEF)的变化。结果:治疗一周后,观察组的总有效率为95.2%,明显高于对照组的61.9%,差异显著(P P P > 0.05;观察组各项临床症状及体征(呼吸困难、喘息、咳嗽、哮鸣音)消失的时间明显短于对照组(P P Objective: To compare the efficacy of oxygen driven nebulization inhalation and air compression pump nebulization inhalation in the treatment of acute asthma attacks in children. Method: 42 children with acute asthma attacks were selected as the research subjects and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group. The control group was treated with air compression pump nebulization inhalation, while the observation group was treated with oxygen driven nebulization inhalation. Compare the total effective rate of two groups of children one week later, the difference in total effective rate between patients with hypoxemia and those without hypoxemia after treatment, the time for various clinical symptoms and signs (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, wheezing) to disappear, and the changes in maximum expiratory flow rate (PEF) before and after treatment. Result: After one week of treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 95.2%, significantly higher than the control group’s 61.9%, with a significant difference (P P P > 0.05. The disappearance time of various clinical symptoms and signs (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, wheezing) in the observation group was significantly shorter than that in the control group (P P < 0.05). Conclusion: Two different nebulization inhalation methods have achieved good therapeutic effects in treating acute asthma attacks in children, but the oxygen driven nebulization inhalation method is more effective, with more significant improvement in the patient’s condition and better prognosis.
文摘目的分析中国居民经食物摄入和空气吸入微纳塑料(micro-and nanoplastics,MNPs)暴露特征。方法使用关键词检索PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、中国知网和万方数据知识服务平台等国内外数据库,建立数据集,结合中国人群食物消费量和人体呼吸参数,计算中国居民经食物摄入和空气吸入的MNPs暴露量,与国外数据比较分析其MNPs暴露特征。结果分析来自28篇研究的4511个样本数据显示,中国居民每年摄入约187000~328000个MNPs,考虑空气吸入,每年MNPs暴露量为192000~335000个MNPs,均高于美国居民暴露量。男性成年人MNPs摄入量最高。生活饮用水、海产品、瓶装水和空气是中国居民每日主要MNPs暴露源。中国居民经食物摄入MNPs类型以聚乙烯、聚丙烯和聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯为主,而经空气吸入MNPs类型以聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯、尼龙和聚丙烯腈为主。结论相比于美国居民,中国居民具有更高的MNPs暴露风险,削减饮用水和海产品中MNPs含量,可有效降低中国居民MNPs暴露风险。
