研究目标:分析我国胃肠间质瘤领域高被引文献的计量特征。研究方法:涉及检索中国学术期刊全文数据库。使用Excel2019对1998年至2023年间的胃肠间质瘤文献按普赖斯定律进行高被引文献的确定,并进行被引数量的统计分析。在这份文献中,包括...研究目标:分析我国胃肠间质瘤领域高被引文献的计量特征。研究方法:涉及检索中国学术期刊全文数据库。使用Excel2019对1998年至2023年间的胃肠间质瘤文献按普赖斯定律进行高被引文献的确定,并进行被引数量的统计分析。在这份文献中,包括了102篇高被引文章,被引次数在13到306次之间不等,累计被引次数相当可观。这些文章的信息包括了年份、期刊、作者、工作单位、关键词和基金支持。从2001年到2010年,文献数量逐渐增加,达到11篇最高点,之后开始缓慢下降。文献总被引次数达到3275次,平均每篇文献被引用32.11次。这些文献分布在49个来源上。《中国实用外科杂志》、《临床肿瘤学杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》在文献数量上名列前三。《肿瘤学杂志》、《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》是被引频次排名靠前的期刊。《临床肿瘤学杂志》、《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》在被引用频次上均位居前三名。这些文献的作者共计280人。署名次数共计320次,总合作率74.3%,李健和汪明分别是署名次数最多的前两位作者。总共有186个机构参与了本研究,其中医院占比为72.5%。在21家核心发文机构中,院校占比达60.87%,其中包括北京大学肿瘤医院、北京市肿瘤防治研究所的消化肿瘤内科。关于瘤细胞发病机制及转化研究的两个重点实验室,其署名文献数和折合文献数均位列前两位。相关研究涉及231个关键词。有基金资助的文献总数为20篇,其中提到胃肠间质瘤和伊马替尼的次数超过其他研究。这些文献中共援引了39项基金资助,覆盖了部省级以上的基金项目。在被引用高的文献中,CNKI数据库的比例为70.6%。由此可以得出结论:《中国实用外科杂志》和《临床肿瘤学杂志》在CNKI数据库中的胃肠间质瘤研究领域具有显著影响。《中华胃肠外科杂志》和《中华外科杂志》是权威期刊,主要发表院校相关机构的研究成果,研究方向以胃肠间质瘤治疗为主。该基金的主要特点是其资助的项目主要来自省部级以上单位,李健、汪明等人组成了核心团队,但关键词的使用不够规范。Objective: To analyze the quantitative characteristics of highly cited literature in the field of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in China. Research methods: It involves searching the full-text database of Chinese academic journals. Excel2019 was used to identify highly cited literature on gastrointestinal stromal tumors from 1998 to 2023 according to Price’s law, and the number of citations was statistically analyzed. In this literature, 102 highly cited articles are included, with citations ranging from 13 to 306 times, and the cumulative citations are quite considerable. Information on the articles includes the year, journal, author, employer, keywords and funding. From 2001 to 2010, the number of articles increased gradually, reaching a peak of 11, and then began to decline slowly. The total number of citations reached 3275, and each paper was cited 32.11 times on average. The literature is distributed across 49 sources. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology ranked the top three in terms of literature quantity. “Journal of Oncology”, “Electronic Journal of Integrative Oncology” and “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” are the most frequently cited journals. “Journal of Clinical Oncology”, “Electronic Journal of Integrative Oncology” and “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” all ranked the top three in terms of citation frequency. There were 280 authors of these papers. The number of signatures totaled 320 times, with a total cooperation rate of 74.3%. Li Jian and Wang Ming were the top two authors with the most signatures respectively. A total of 186 institutions participated in the study, 72.5% of which were hospitals. Among the 21 core institutions, colleges and universities accounted for 60.87%, including Peking University Cancer Hospital and the digestive Oncology Department of Beijing Institute of Cancer Prevention and Treatment. The two key laboratories on the pathogenesis and transformation of tumor cells ranked first and second in the number of signed literatures and the number of equivalent literatures. The study involved 231 keywords. The total number of funded articles was 20, which mentioned gastrointestinal stromal tumors and imatinib more frequently than other studies. A total of 39 fund grants were cited in these documents, covering fund projects above the ministry and provincial level. Among the literatures with high citations, the CNKI database accounted for 70.6%. It can be concluded that the Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery and the Journal of Clinical Oncology have a significant impact on the field of gastrointestinal stromal tumor research in the CNKI database. “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” and “Chinese Journal of Surgery” are authoritative journals, mainly publishing research results of related institutions, mainly in the direction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor treatment. The main feature of the fund is that its funded projects are mainly from provincial and ministerial level units, Li Jian, Wang Ming and other people formed the core team, but the use of keywords is not standardized.展开更多
文摘研究目标:分析我国胃肠间质瘤领域高被引文献的计量特征。研究方法:涉及检索中国学术期刊全文数据库。使用Excel2019对1998年至2023年间的胃肠间质瘤文献按普赖斯定律进行高被引文献的确定,并进行被引数量的统计分析。在这份文献中,包括了102篇高被引文章,被引次数在13到306次之间不等,累计被引次数相当可观。这些文章的信息包括了年份、期刊、作者、工作单位、关键词和基金支持。从2001年到2010年,文献数量逐渐增加,达到11篇最高点,之后开始缓慢下降。文献总被引次数达到3275次,平均每篇文献被引用32.11次。这些文献分布在49个来源上。《中国实用外科杂志》、《临床肿瘤学杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》在文献数量上名列前三。《肿瘤学杂志》、《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》是被引频次排名靠前的期刊。《临床肿瘤学杂志》、《肿瘤综合治疗电子杂志》和《中华胃肠外科杂志》在被引用频次上均位居前三名。这些文献的作者共计280人。署名次数共计320次,总合作率74.3%,李健和汪明分别是署名次数最多的前两位作者。总共有186个机构参与了本研究,其中医院占比为72.5%。在21家核心发文机构中,院校占比达60.87%,其中包括北京大学肿瘤医院、北京市肿瘤防治研究所的消化肿瘤内科。关于瘤细胞发病机制及转化研究的两个重点实验室,其署名文献数和折合文献数均位列前两位。相关研究涉及231个关键词。有基金资助的文献总数为20篇,其中提到胃肠间质瘤和伊马替尼的次数超过其他研究。这些文献中共援引了39项基金资助,覆盖了部省级以上的基金项目。在被引用高的文献中,CNKI数据库的比例为70.6%。由此可以得出结论:《中国实用外科杂志》和《临床肿瘤学杂志》在CNKI数据库中的胃肠间质瘤研究领域具有显著影响。《中华胃肠外科杂志》和《中华外科杂志》是权威期刊,主要发表院校相关机构的研究成果,研究方向以胃肠间质瘤治疗为主。该基金的主要特点是其资助的项目主要来自省部级以上单位,李健、汪明等人组成了核心团队,但关键词的使用不够规范。Objective: To analyze the quantitative characteristics of highly cited literature in the field of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in China. Research methods: It involves searching the full-text database of Chinese academic journals. Excel2019 was used to identify highly cited literature on gastrointestinal stromal tumors from 1998 to 2023 according to Price’s law, and the number of citations was statistically analyzed. In this literature, 102 highly cited articles are included, with citations ranging from 13 to 306 times, and the cumulative citations are quite considerable. Information on the articles includes the year, journal, author, employer, keywords and funding. From 2001 to 2010, the number of articles increased gradually, reaching a peak of 11, and then began to decline slowly. The total number of citations reached 3275, and each paper was cited 32.11 times on average. The literature is distributed across 49 sources. Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology ranked the top three in terms of literature quantity. “Journal of Oncology”, “Electronic Journal of Integrative Oncology” and “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” are the most frequently cited journals. “Journal of Clinical Oncology”, “Electronic Journal of Integrative Oncology” and “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” all ranked the top three in terms of citation frequency. There were 280 authors of these papers. The number of signatures totaled 320 times, with a total cooperation rate of 74.3%. Li Jian and Wang Ming were the top two authors with the most signatures respectively. A total of 186 institutions participated in the study, 72.5% of which were hospitals. Among the 21 core institutions, colleges and universities accounted for 60.87%, including Peking University Cancer Hospital and the digestive Oncology Department of Beijing Institute of Cancer Prevention and Treatment. The two key laboratories on the pathogenesis and transformation of tumor cells ranked first and second in the number of signed literatures and the number of equivalent literatures. The study involved 231 keywords. The total number of funded articles was 20, which mentioned gastrointestinal stromal tumors and imatinib more frequently than other studies. A total of 39 fund grants were cited in these documents, covering fund projects above the ministry and provincial level. Among the literatures with high citations, the CNKI database accounted for 70.6%. It can be concluded that the Chinese Journal of Practical Surgery and the Journal of Clinical Oncology have a significant impact on the field of gastrointestinal stromal tumor research in the CNKI database. “Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery” and “Chinese Journal of Surgery” are authoritative journals, mainly publishing research results of related institutions, mainly in the direction of gastrointestinal stromal tumor treatment. The main feature of the fund is that its funded projects are mainly from provincial and ministerial level units, Li Jian, Wang Ming and other people formed the core team, but the use of keywords is not standardized.
