Objective:To explore the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block in elderly patients with lower limb fractures.Methods:From November 2017 to November 2020,50 elderly patients with lower limb fractures in ou...Objective:To explore the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block in elderly patients with lower limb fractures.Methods:From November 2017 to November 2020,50 elderly patients with lower limb fractures in our hospital were divided into experimental group(25 cases,general anesthesia+femoral nerve and sciatic nerve block)and control group(25 cases,general body anesthesia).Compare the MAP,HR,anesthesia effect,and adverse reactions between the two groups at each time period.Results:Before induction,the difference in MAP and HR between the two groups of patients did not form,p>0.05;the MAP and HR of the experimental group were compared with the control group at the time of skin incision,1 hour during the operation,and removal of the laryngeal mask,P<0.05;the time of extubation in the experimental group(14.28±3.18)min,awake time(5.57±1.32)min,orientation recovery time(11.89±2.23)min,propofol dosage(191.36±22.48)mg,remifentanil dosage(0.23±0.04)mg,Compared with the control group,P<0.05;the adverse reaction rate of the experimental group(8%,2/25)was lower than that of the control group(32%,8/25),P<0.05.Conclusion:The use of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve and sciatic nerve block for elderly patients with lower limb fractures can enhance the effect of anesthesia,effectively reduce the use of anesthetics,and have fewer adverse reactions.It is worthy of promotion.展开更多
BACKGROUND Lower extremity fractures are mainly treated by surgical reduction,but this operation is often affected by the patient’s level of agitation and the type of anesthesia used.The main treatment for lower-extr...BACKGROUND Lower extremity fractures are mainly treated by surgical reduction,but this operation is often affected by the patient’s level of agitation and the type of anesthesia used.The main treatment for lower-extremity fractures is operative reduction.However,operations can often be affected by both agitation and the degree of anesthesia.Therefore,it is of great importance to develop an effective anesthesia program to effectively ensure the progress of surgery.AIM To discuss the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine anesthesia in lower extremity fracture surgery.METHODS A total of 120 hospital patients with lower extremity fractures were selected for this retrospective study and divided into an observation group(n=60)and a control group(n=60)according to the anesthesia scheme;the control group received ultrasound-guided nerve block;the observation group was treated with dextromethomidine on the basis of the control group,and the mean arterial pressure,heart rate(HR),and blood oxygen saturation were observed in the two groups.RESULTS The mean arterial pressure of T1,T2 and T3 in the observation group were 94.40±7.10,90.84±7.21 and 91.03±6.84 mmHg,significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group’s HR at T1 was 76.60±7.52 times/min,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);The observation group’s HR at T2 and T3 was 75.40±8.03 times/min and 76.64±7.11 times/min,significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group’s visual analog score at 2 h,6 h and 12 h after operation was 3.55±0.87,2.84±0.65 and 2.05±0.40.the recovery time was 15.51±4.21 min,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Six hours post-anesthesia,epinephrine and norepinephrine in the observation group were 81.10±21.19 pg/mL and 510.20±98.27 pg/mL,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05),and the mini-mental state exam score of the observation group was 25.51±1.15,significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine has a good anesthetic effect in the operation of lower limb fractures and has little effect on the hemodynamics of patients.展开更多
The brain constitutes a formidably complicated structural network. There are three main types of connectivity used to describe neuronal networks, which reflect three parallel levels of investigation: anatomical connec...The brain constitutes a formidably complicated structural network. There are three main types of connectivity used to describe neuronal networks, which reflect three parallel levels of investigation: anatomical connectivity, functional connectivity and effective connectivity. Effective connectivity indicates the direct influence that a node exerts on another, and in the context of neuronal?circuits, a causal relationship between the activities of two nodes. Since its definition, effective?connectivity analysis has been used to describe causal relationship across multiple spatial scales in?PET imaging, fMRI, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), single-unit, and local field potential. There are diverse literatures which probe the anesthetized state?using effective connectivity analysis over the past two decades. The examination of effective connectivity in the anesthetized state is of relevance to both anesthesiologists and neuroscientists, as it has the potential to elucidate still unclear mechanisms of anesthesia while offering insight into intrinsic functional activity in the brain. The present review attempts to examine, elucidate, and integrate the insight that effective connectivity analysis of the anesthetized state has generated thus far.展开更多
To investigate the effects of continuous spinal anesthesia with different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine on the ultrastructure of the spinal cord and nerve roots.Methods Twenty-four male SD rats weighing 220...To investigate the effects of continuous spinal anesthesia with different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine on the ultrastructure of the spinal cord and nerve roots.Methods Twenty-four male SD rats weighing 220~280 g were anesthetized with intraperitoneal 10% chloral hydrate 300~350 mg/kg.A polyurethane microcatheter was inserted into the lumbar subarachnoid space according to the technique described by Yaksh.An 8 cm catheter segment was left in the subarachnoid space.The animals were randomized to receive normal saline,0.5%,0.75% or 1.0% ropivacaine 40 μl intrathecally 3 times at 1.5 h interval.Six hours after the first intrathecal administration the animals were decaptiated and L 1,2 segment of the spinal cord and nerve roots were immediately removed for electron microscopic examination.Results Electron microscopic examination revealed that in animals which received intrathecal (i.t.) normal saline,0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine the neurolemma of the nerve roots and the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum of the neurons in the spinal cord were intact,while in animals which received i.t. 10.% ropivacaine the neurolemma was stratified and partly disrupted and there were swelling of endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole degeneration.Conclusion Six hours continuous spinal anesthesia with 10.% ropivacaine may be injurious to the spinal cord and nerve roots.12 refs,8 figs,1 tab.展开更多
目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根...目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为研究组54例与常规组54例。研究组采用鞘内注射舒芬太尼,常规组采用鞘内注射芬太尼。比较两组手术时间、镇痛时间、术后6 h、12 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组镇痛时间长于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分低于常规组,且两组术后12 h VAS评分低于术后6 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相比芬太尼,舒芬太尼在高龄股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术患者中的镇痛作用显著,能缓解术后疼痛,还可降低不良反应发生率。展开更多
文摘Objective:To explore the anesthesia effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block in elderly patients with lower limb fractures.Methods:From November 2017 to November 2020,50 elderly patients with lower limb fractures in our hospital were divided into experimental group(25 cases,general anesthesia+femoral nerve and sciatic nerve block)and control group(25 cases,general body anesthesia).Compare the MAP,HR,anesthesia effect,and adverse reactions between the two groups at each time period.Results:Before induction,the difference in MAP and HR between the two groups of patients did not form,p>0.05;the MAP and HR of the experimental group were compared with the control group at the time of skin incision,1 hour during the operation,and removal of the laryngeal mask,P<0.05;the time of extubation in the experimental group(14.28±3.18)min,awake time(5.57±1.32)min,orientation recovery time(11.89±2.23)min,propofol dosage(191.36±22.48)mg,remifentanil dosage(0.23±0.04)mg,Compared with the control group,P<0.05;the adverse reaction rate of the experimental group(8%,2/25)was lower than that of the control group(32%,8/25),P<0.05.Conclusion:The use of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve and sciatic nerve block for elderly patients with lower limb fractures can enhance the effect of anesthesia,effectively reduce the use of anesthetics,and have fewer adverse reactions.It is worthy of promotion.
文摘BACKGROUND Lower extremity fractures are mainly treated by surgical reduction,but this operation is often affected by the patient’s level of agitation and the type of anesthesia used.The main treatment for lower-extremity fractures is operative reduction.However,operations can often be affected by both agitation and the degree of anesthesia.Therefore,it is of great importance to develop an effective anesthesia program to effectively ensure the progress of surgery.AIM To discuss the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine anesthesia in lower extremity fracture surgery.METHODS A total of 120 hospital patients with lower extremity fractures were selected for this retrospective study and divided into an observation group(n=60)and a control group(n=60)according to the anesthesia scheme;the control group received ultrasound-guided nerve block;the observation group was treated with dextromethomidine on the basis of the control group,and the mean arterial pressure,heart rate(HR),and blood oxygen saturation were observed in the two groups.RESULTS The mean arterial pressure of T1,T2 and T3 in the observation group were 94.40±7.10,90.84±7.21 and 91.03±6.84 mmHg,significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group’s HR at T1 was 76.60±7.52 times/min,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05);The observation group’s HR at T2 and T3 was 75.40±8.03 times/min and 76.64±7.11 times/min,significantly higher than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group’s visual analog score at 2 h,6 h and 12 h after operation was 3.55±0.87,2.84±0.65 and 2.05±0.40.the recovery time was 15.51±4.21 min,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05).Six hours post-anesthesia,epinephrine and norepinephrine in the observation group were 81.10±21.19 pg/mL and 510.20±98.27 pg/mL,significantly lower than that of the control group(P<0.05),and the mini-mental state exam score of the observation group was 25.51±1.15,significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Ultrasound-guided nerve block combined with dexmedetomidine has a good anesthetic effect in the operation of lower limb fractures and has little effect on the hemodynamics of patients.
文摘The brain constitutes a formidably complicated structural network. There are three main types of connectivity used to describe neuronal networks, which reflect three parallel levels of investigation: anatomical connectivity, functional connectivity and effective connectivity. Effective connectivity indicates the direct influence that a node exerts on another, and in the context of neuronal?circuits, a causal relationship between the activities of two nodes. Since its definition, effective?connectivity analysis has been used to describe causal relationship across multiple spatial scales in?PET imaging, fMRI, electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), single-unit, and local field potential. There are diverse literatures which probe the anesthetized state?using effective connectivity analysis over the past two decades. The examination of effective connectivity in the anesthetized state is of relevance to both anesthesiologists and neuroscientists, as it has the potential to elucidate still unclear mechanisms of anesthesia while offering insight into intrinsic functional activity in the brain. The present review attempts to examine, elucidate, and integrate the insight that effective connectivity analysis of the anesthetized state has generated thus far.
文摘To investigate the effects of continuous spinal anesthesia with different concentrations and doses of ropivacaine on the ultrastructure of the spinal cord and nerve roots.Methods Twenty-four male SD rats weighing 220~280 g were anesthetized with intraperitoneal 10% chloral hydrate 300~350 mg/kg.A polyurethane microcatheter was inserted into the lumbar subarachnoid space according to the technique described by Yaksh.An 8 cm catheter segment was left in the subarachnoid space.The animals were randomized to receive normal saline,0.5%,0.75% or 1.0% ropivacaine 40 μl intrathecally 3 times at 1.5 h interval.Six hours after the first intrathecal administration the animals were decaptiated and L 1,2 segment of the spinal cord and nerve roots were immediately removed for electron microscopic examination.Results Electron microscopic examination revealed that in animals which received intrathecal (i.t.) normal saline,0.5% or 0.75% ropivacaine the neurolemma of the nerve roots and the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum of the neurons in the spinal cord were intact,while in animals which received i.t. 10.% ropivacaine the neurolemma was stratified and partly disrupted and there were swelling of endoplasmic reticulum and vacuole degeneration.Conclusion Six hours continuous spinal anesthesia with 10.% ropivacaine may be injurious to the spinal cord and nerve roots.12 refs,8 figs,1 tab.
文摘目的:对比鞘内注射舒芬太尼与芬太尼对高龄股骨粗隆骨折近端股骨钉抗旋(PFNA)内固定术患者的镇痛效果及安全性对比。方法:选取2019年1月—2022年12月于常熟市第五人民医院接受股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术的108例高龄患者作为研究对象,根据随机数表法将患者分为研究组54例与常规组54例。研究组采用鞘内注射舒芬太尼,常规组采用鞘内注射芬太尼。比较两组手术时间、镇痛时间、术后6 h、12 h视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分及不良反应发生情况。结果:两组手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组镇痛时间长于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分低于常规组,且两组术后12 h VAS评分低于术后6 h,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组不良反应发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:相比芬太尼,舒芬太尼在高龄股骨粗隆骨折PFNA内固定术患者中的镇痛作用显著,能缓解术后疼痛,还可降低不良反应发生率。