期刊文献+
共找到5篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Estimation of USLE crop and management factor values for crop rotation systems in China 被引量:6
1
作者 GUO Qian-kun LIU Bao-yuan +2 位作者 XIE Yun LIU Ying-na YIN Shui-qing 《Journal of Integrative Agriculture》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第9期1877-1888,共12页
Soil erosion on cropland is a major source of environmental problems in China ranging from the losses of a non-renewable resource and of nutrients at the source to contamination of downstream areas. Regional soil loss... Soil erosion on cropland is a major source of environmental problems in China ranging from the losses of a non-renewable resource and of nutrients at the source to contamination of downstream areas. Regional soil loss assessments using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) would supply a scientiifc basis for soil conservation planning. However, a lack of in-formation on the cover and management (C) factor for cropland, one of the most important factors in the USLE, has limited accurate regional assessments in China due to the large number of crops grown and their complicated rotation systems. In this study, single crop soil loss ratios (SLRs) were col ected and quantiifed for 10 primary crops from past studies or re-ports. The mean annual C values for 88 crop rotation systems in 12 cropping system regions were estimated based on the combined effects of single crop SLRs and the percentage of annual rainfal erosivity (R) during the corresponding periods for each system. The C values in different cropping system regions were compared and discussed. The results indicated that the SLRs of the 10 primary crops ranged from 0.15 to 0.74. The mean annual C value for al 88 crop rotation systems was 0.34, with a standard deviation of 0.12. The mean C values in the single, double and triple cropping zones were 0.37, 0.36 and 0.28, respectively, and the C value in the triple zone was signiifcantly different from those in single and double zones. The C values of dryland crop systems exhibited signiifcant differences in the single and triple cropping system regions but the differences in the double regions were not signiifcant. This study is the ifrst report of the C values of crop rotation systems in China at the national scale. It wil provide necessary and practical parameters for accurately assessing regional soil losses from cropland to guide soil conservation plans and to optimize crop rotation systems. 展开更多
关键词 cover and management factor crop rotation system soil loss ratio rainfall erosivity cropping system region
下载PDF
Evaluation of C and P Factors in Universal Soil Loss Equation on Trapping Sediment: Case Study of Santubong River 被引量:3
2
作者 Kelvin K. K. Kuok Darrien Y. S. Mah P. C. Chiu 《Journal of Water Resource and Protection》 2013年第12期1149-1154,共6页
Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is the most comprehensive technique available to predict the long term average annual rate of erosion on a field slope. USLE was governed by five factors include soil erodibility fa... Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) is the most comprehensive technique available to predict the long term average annual rate of erosion on a field slope. USLE was governed by five factors include soil erodibility factor (K), rainfall and runoff erodibility index (R), crop/vegetation and management factor (C), support practice factor (P) and slope length-gradient factor (LS). In the past, K, R and LS factors are extensively studied. But the impacts of factors C and P to outfall Total Suspended Solid (TSS) and % reduction of TSS are not fully studied yet. Therefore, this study employs Buffer Zone Calculator as a tool to determine the sediment removal efficiency for different C and P factors. The selected study areas are Santubong River, Kuching, Sarawak. Results show that the outfall TSS is increasing with the increase of C values. The most effective and efficient land use for reducing TSS among 17 land uses investigated is found to be forest with undergrowth, followed by mixed dipt. forest, forest with no undergrowth, cultivated grass, logging 30, logging 10^6, wet rice, new shifting agriculture, oil palm, rubber, cocoa, coffee, tea and lastly settlement/cleared land. Besides, results also indicate that the % reduction of TSS is increasing with the decrease of P factor. The most effective support practice to reduce the outfall TSS is found to be terracing, followed by contour-strip cropping, contouring and lastly not implementing any soil conservation practice. 展开更多
关键词 Universal Soil Loss Equation crop/Vegetation and management factor (c) Support Practice factor (P) OUTFALL TOTAL Suspended SOLID % Reduction of TOTAL Suspended SOLID
下载PDF
重庆市坡耕地植被覆盖与管理因子C值计算与分析 被引量:20
3
作者 唐寅 代数 +2 位作者 蒋光毅 史东梅 陈正发 《水土保持学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第6期53-59,共7页
植被覆盖与管理因子C值是评价植被因素抵抗土壤侵蚀能力及准确估算土壤侵蚀模数的重要参数,利用天然降雨径流小区径流泥沙观测资料,对重庆市坡耕地不同土地利用方式植被覆盖与管理因子C值变化及影响因素进行研究。结果表明:(1)在相同降... 植被覆盖与管理因子C值是评价植被因素抵抗土壤侵蚀能力及准确估算土壤侵蚀模数的重要参数,利用天然降雨径流小区径流泥沙观测资料,对重庆市坡耕地不同土地利用方式植被覆盖与管理因子C值变化及影响因素进行研究。结果表明:(1)在相同降雨侵蚀力条件下,坡耕地不同土地利用方式的水土保持效应差异很大,表现为:横坡植物篱耕地>横坡耕地>顺坡耕地>清耕休闲地,坡耕地表层植被盖度最差且降雨侵蚀力较大的时段为土壤侵蚀危险期,在该时段内采取相应的保护措施可有效控制水土流失。(2)基于实测侵蚀量的C值估算方法最为适宜重庆市坡耕地不同土地利用方式的C值计算,重庆地区小麦年C值为0.434 5,甘薯年C值为0.386 4,小麦/甘薯年C值为0.403 7,C值不同表明不同农作物对耕地土壤的防护作用不同,合理选择农作物种类对防治水土流失有明显的作用。(3)基于重庆市坡耕地不同土地利用方式植被盖度与C值的年内变化特征,该地区坡耕地水土流失防治应从提高地表植被覆盖度出发,优化种植模式,兼顾水土保持措施布置,实现坡耕地可持续利用。 展开更多
关键词 植被覆盖 管理因子 c 坡耕地 USLE模型 重庆市
下载PDF
三峡库区紫色土坡地作物覆盖与管理因子C值估算 被引量:5
4
作者 徐勤学 李春茂 +1 位作者 李朝霞 蔡崇法 《水土保持研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2019年第2期175-179,共5页
种植和管理因子C值作为地表覆盖和耕作管理的关键参数,对我国土壤侵蚀预报模型的基础研究具有重大意义。通过分析三峡库区紫色土坡地玉米、花生等主要农作物的农作期、种植模式、降雨侵蚀力的年内分布以及不同农作期的土壤流失比率,计... 种植和管理因子C值作为地表覆盖和耕作管理的关键参数,对我国土壤侵蚀预报模型的基础研究具有重大意义。通过分析三峡库区紫色土坡地玉米、花生等主要农作物的农作期、种植模式、降雨侵蚀力的年内分布以及不同农作期的土壤流失比率,计算得到了22种种植模式下的作物覆盖管理因子C值。结果表明:C值变化范围为0.16~0.65,不同种植模式的C值差别较大,其大小排序为:间/轮作<轮作<单作。在同种种植模式下,生长期和降雨侵蚀力的分布是导致差异的主要原因,而不同种植模式下,间/轮作、轮作可调整作物生长期和降雨侵蚀力分布的组合,使土壤流失率与农作期EI的乘积较小,其中间/轮作情况下土壤侵蚀可能性最小。将计算所得的大部分结果与观测结果和其他经验公式的计算结果进行了比较,基本相符。因此可以利用通用流失方程(USLE)结合降雨侵蚀力分布及作物生长周期和覆盖度变化计算所得的C值定量评价不同种植模式与清耕休闲情况的土壤侵蚀的对比。该研究为三峡库区紫色土坡地土壤侵蚀评价提供了依据。 展开更多
关键词 紫色土 作物覆盖与管理因子c 种植模式 降雨侵蚀力 农作期
下载PDF
Integration of RUSLE Model with Remote Sensing and GIS Tools for Soil Loss Estimation in the Kubanni Drainage Basin, Zaria, Nigeria
5
作者 Kenneth Onyemauche Ezenwa Reuben Jobien Jacob Sadiq Abdullahi Yelwa 《Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection》 2024年第11期173-190,共18页
The prevalence of unwholesome land use practices and population pressure exacerbates soil loss which is worsening the problem of sedimentation of the Kubanni dam. This study was conducted at the Kubanni drainage basin... The prevalence of unwholesome land use practices and population pressure exacerbates soil loss which is worsening the problem of sedimentation of the Kubanni dam. This study was conducted at the Kubanni drainage basin covering a spatial area of 56.7 Km2 in Samaru, Zaria, Nigeria to estimate annual soil loss using the RUSLE model. Satellite images of Landsat OLI for December 2014, 2016, 2018, February, July and November 2022;soil data, rainfall data from 2010 to 2022, and DEM of 30-meter resolution were utilized for the study. All factors of the RUSLE model were calculated for the basin using assembled data. The erosivity (R-factor) was discovered to be 553.437 MJ∙mm∙ha−1∙h−1∙yr−1. The average erodibility (K-factor) value was 0.1 Mg∙h∙h∙ha−1∙MJ−1∙mm−1∙yr−1. The Slope Length and Steepness factor (LS-factor) in the basin ranged between 0% and 13.47%. The Crop Management Factor (C-factor) values were obtained from a rescaling of the NDVI values derived for the study area and ranged from 0.26 to 0.55. Support practice (P-factors) were computed from the prevalent tillage practice in the basin and ranged from 0.27 to 0.40. The soil loss amount for the Kubanni basin was found to be 28441.482 tons∙ha−1∙yr−1, while the annual soil loss for the entire Kubanni drainage basin was found to be 49780.257 tons∙yr−1. The study has demonstrated the viability of coupling RUSLE model and Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System (GIS) techniques for the estimation of soil loss in the Kubanni drainage basin. 展开更多
关键词 Soil Loss Watershed Erosivity (R-factor) Erodibility (K-factor) cover management factor (c-factor) Slope Length and Steepness factor (LS-factor) Support Practice factor (P-factor)
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部