Background & Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) leads to high morbidity and mortality. Various models have been proposed for predicting the outcome of patients with HCC. We aim to compare the prognostic ab...Background & Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) leads to high morbidity and mortality. Various models have been proposed for predicting the outcome of patients with HCC. We aim to compare the prognostic abilities of Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na, and ALBI scores for predicting in-hospital mortality of HCC. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and HCC from May 2017 through May 2018. We further divided eligible patients into hepatitis B virus (HBV), patients without ascites, and patients with ascites subgroups. Areas under the characteristic curves (AUCs) were analyzed. Results: A total of 495 patients were included in the study. We collected data on patients at admission. A majority of patients were infected with HBV (91.5%). None of them were complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. Only 14.9% of patients presented with ascites. In the whole population, AUCs with 95% confidence interval (CI) of Child-Pugh, ALBI, MELD, and MELD-Na scores in predicting in-hospital mortality were 0.889 (95% CI: 0.858 - 0.915), 0.849 (95% CI: 0.814 - 0.879), 0.669 (95% CI: 0.626 - 0.711), and 0.721 (95% CI: 0.679 - 0.760), respectively. In the patients without ascites subgroup, Child-Pugh showed better discriminatory ability than ALBI score in predicting in-hospital mortality (P = 0.0002), while there were no significant differences among other comparisons. Conclusions: Child-Pugh and ALBI may be useful predictors for predicting in-hospital mortality in whole patients, in patients with HBV infection, and in patients without ascites. In HCC patients with ascites, MELD-Na may be effective for predicting in-hospital mortality.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hepatic encephalopathy(HE)remains an enormous challenge in patients who undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)implantation.The preoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min(IC...BACKGROUND Hepatic encephalopathy(HE)remains an enormous challenge in patients who undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)implantation.The preoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min(ICG-R15),as one of the liver function assessment tools,has been developed as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgery,but there are limited data on its role in TIPS.AIM To determine whether the ICG-R15 can be used for prediction of post-TIPS HE in decompensated cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension(PHT)and compare the clinical value of ICG-R15,Child-Pugh score(CPS),and model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)score in predicting post-TIPS HE with PHT.METHODS This retrospective study included 195 patients with PHT who underwent elective TIPS at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019.All patients underwent the ICG-R15 test,CPS evaluation,and MELD scoring 1 wk before TIPS.According to whether they developed HE or not,the patients were divided into two groups:HE group and non-HE group.The prediction of one-year post-TIPS HE by ICG-R15,CPS and MELD score was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves(AUCs).RESULTS A total of 195 patients with portal hypertension were included and 23%(45/195)of the patients developed post-TIPS HE.The ICG-R15 was identified as an independent predictor of post-TIPS HE.The AUCs for the ICG-R15,CPS,and MELD score for predicting post-TIPS HE were 0.664(95%confidence interval[CI]:0.557-0.743,P=0.0046),0.596(95%CI:0.508-0.679,P=0.087),and 0.641(95%CI:0.554-0.721,P=0.021),respectively.The non-parametric approach(Delong-Delong&Clarke-Pearson)showed that there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score(P=0.0229).CONCLUSION The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.展开更多
The“six-and-twelve”(6&12)score is a new hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)prognostic index designed for recommended transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)candidates.Quick and easy to use by the sum of tumor size(cm)an...The“six-and-twelve”(6&12)score is a new hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)prognostic index designed for recommended transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)candidates.Quick and easy to use by the sum of tumor size(cm)and number,this model identifies three groups with different survival time(the sum is≤6;or>6 but≤12;or>12);a survival benefit with TACE can be expected for HCC patients with a score not exceeding twelve.Recently,Wang ZW et al showed that the“6&12”model was the best system correlated with radiological response after the first TACE.Thus,we wanted to assess its survival prediction ability as well as its prognostic value and compared it to other systems(Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer,Hong Kong Liver Cancer(HKLC)staging,Albumin-Bilirubin grade,tumor nodularity,infiltrative nature of the tumor,alpha-fetoprotein,Child-Pugh class,and Performance Status score,Cancer of the Liver Italian Program,Model to Estimate Survival for HCC scores,up-to-seven criteria)different from Wang ZW et al study in a multicenter French cohort of HCC including only recommended TACE candidates retrospectively enrolled.As previously demonstrated,we show that the"6&12”score can classify survival within this French cohort,with a prognostic value comparable to that of other systems,except HKLC staging.More importantly,the“6&12”score simplicity and ability in patients’stratification outperform other systems for a routine clinical practice.展开更多
文摘Background & Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) leads to high morbidity and mortality. Various models have been proposed for predicting the outcome of patients with HCC. We aim to compare the prognostic abilities of Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na, and ALBI scores for predicting in-hospital mortality of HCC. Methods: We enrolled patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis and HCC from May 2017 through May 2018. We further divided eligible patients into hepatitis B virus (HBV), patients without ascites, and patients with ascites subgroups. Areas under the characteristic curves (AUCs) were analyzed. Results: A total of 495 patients were included in the study. We collected data on patients at admission. A majority of patients were infected with HBV (91.5%). None of them were complicated with hepatic encephalopathy. Only 14.9% of patients presented with ascites. In the whole population, AUCs with 95% confidence interval (CI) of Child-Pugh, ALBI, MELD, and MELD-Na scores in predicting in-hospital mortality were 0.889 (95% CI: 0.858 - 0.915), 0.849 (95% CI: 0.814 - 0.879), 0.669 (95% CI: 0.626 - 0.711), and 0.721 (95% CI: 0.679 - 0.760), respectively. In the patients without ascites subgroup, Child-Pugh showed better discriminatory ability than ALBI score in predicting in-hospital mortality (P = 0.0002), while there were no significant differences among other comparisons. Conclusions: Child-Pugh and ALBI may be useful predictors for predicting in-hospital mortality in whole patients, in patients with HBV infection, and in patients without ascites. In HCC patients with ascites, MELD-Na may be effective for predicting in-hospital mortality.
基金Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commision,No.Z181100001718097.
文摘BACKGROUND Hepatic encephalopathy(HE)remains an enormous challenge in patients who undergo transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt(TIPS)implantation.The preoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min(ICG-R15),as one of the liver function assessment tools,has been developed as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing surgery,but there are limited data on its role in TIPS.AIM To determine whether the ICG-R15 can be used for prediction of post-TIPS HE in decompensated cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension(PHT)and compare the clinical value of ICG-R15,Child-Pugh score(CPS),and model for end-stage liver disease(MELD)score in predicting post-TIPS HE with PHT.METHODS This retrospective study included 195 patients with PHT who underwent elective TIPS at Beijing Shijitan Hospital from January 2018 to June 2019.All patients underwent the ICG-R15 test,CPS evaluation,and MELD scoring 1 wk before TIPS.According to whether they developed HE or not,the patients were divided into two groups:HE group and non-HE group.The prediction of one-year post-TIPS HE by ICG-R15,CPS and MELD score was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves(AUCs).RESULTS A total of 195 patients with portal hypertension were included and 23%(45/195)of the patients developed post-TIPS HE.The ICG-R15 was identified as an independent predictor of post-TIPS HE.The AUCs for the ICG-R15,CPS,and MELD score for predicting post-TIPS HE were 0.664(95%confidence interval[CI]:0.557-0.743,P=0.0046),0.596(95%CI:0.508-0.679,P=0.087),and 0.641(95%CI:0.554-0.721,P=0.021),respectively.The non-parametric approach(Delong-Delong&Clarke-Pearson)showed that there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score(P=0.0229).CONCLUSION The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.
文摘The“six-and-twelve”(6&12)score is a new hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)prognostic index designed for recommended transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)candidates.Quick and easy to use by the sum of tumor size(cm)and number,this model identifies three groups with different survival time(the sum is≤6;or>6 but≤12;or>12);a survival benefit with TACE can be expected for HCC patients with a score not exceeding twelve.Recently,Wang ZW et al showed that the“6&12”model was the best system correlated with radiological response after the first TACE.Thus,we wanted to assess its survival prediction ability as well as its prognostic value and compared it to other systems(Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer,Hong Kong Liver Cancer(HKLC)staging,Albumin-Bilirubin grade,tumor nodularity,infiltrative nature of the tumor,alpha-fetoprotein,Child-Pugh class,and Performance Status score,Cancer of the Liver Italian Program,Model to Estimate Survival for HCC scores,up-to-seven criteria)different from Wang ZW et al study in a multicenter French cohort of HCC including only recommended TACE candidates retrospectively enrolled.As previously demonstrated,we show that the"6&12”score can classify survival within this French cohort,with a prognostic value comparable to that of other systems,except HKLC staging.More importantly,the“6&12”score simplicity and ability in patients’stratification outperform other systems for a routine clinical practice.
