Background and Objective:Corneal neurotization is a novel surgical technique used to restore corneal sensation in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy.Neurotrophic keratopathy is a disorder characterized by dysfunct...Background and Objective:Corneal neurotization is a novel surgical technique used to restore corneal sensation in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy.Neurotrophic keratopathy is a disorder characterized by dysfunction of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve,which provides sensory innervation to the cornea.Without sensation,the cornea is at risk of infection,ulceration,perforation,and ultimately,vision loss.Corneal neurotization has emerged as an innovative technique to reinnervate anesthetized corneas by transferring a healthy donor nerve to the affected eye around the corneoscleral limbus.As the field of corneal neurotization rapidly grows,there is a need to synthesize the existing body of literature on corneal neurotization and identify important areas for further research.In this review,we will discuss neurotrophic keratopathy and its current management strategies,followed by an overview of corneal neurotization techniques,outcomes,surgical considerations,and future directions.Methods:PubMed and Google Scholar searches were conducted to retrieve and analyze relevant original papers and reviews on neurotrophic keratopathy and corneal neurotization up until April 2022.Key Content and Findings:Currently,numerous techniques for corneal neurotization exist,including direct nerve transfers,as well as indirect neurotization via interposition nerve grafts.So far,corneal neurotization has been shown to be highly successful in restoring corneal sensation,improving visual acuity,and improving corneal epithelial health.To date,there have been no significant differences in outcomes between direct versus indirect neurotization techniques,different donor nerves,or autologous versus allogeneic interposition grafts.However,there is some evidence that corneal neurotization procedures may be more successful in pediatric patients.Conclusions:Corneal neurotization shows great promise in treating neurotrophic corneas and represents the first management option to date that addresses the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of neurotrophic keratopathy by restoring corneal sensation.As the use of corneal neurotization continues to broaden,additional studies will become important to compare techniques in a systematic manner,with larger sample sizes,as well as standardized outcome measures and follow-up time.展开更多
This review summarizes the current status of the small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)procedure.Following the early work by Sekundo et al.and Shah et al.,SMILE has become increasingly popular.The accuracy of the ...This review summarizes the current status of the small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)procedure.Following the early work by Sekundo et al.and Shah et al.,SMILE has become increasingly popular.The accuracy of the creation of the lenticule with the VisuMax femtosecond laser(Carl Zeiss Meditec)has been verified using very high-frequency(VHF)digital ultrasound and optical coherence tomography(OCT).Visual and refractive outcomes have been shown to be similar to those achieved with laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK),notably in a large population reported by Hjortdal,Vestergaard et al.Safety in terms of the change in corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA)has also been shown to be similar to LASIK.It was expected that there would be less postoperative dry eye after SMILE compared to LASIK because the anterior stroma is disturbed only by the small incision,meaning that the anterior corneal nerves should be less affected.A number of studies have demonstrated a lower reduction and faster recovery of corneal sensation after SMILE than LASIK.Some studies have also used confocal microscopy to demonstrate a lower decrease in subbasal nerve fiber density after SMILE than LASIK.The potential biomechanical advantages of SMILE have been modeled by Reinstein et al.based on the non-linearity of tensile strength through the stroma.Studies have reported a similar change in Ocular Response Analyzer(Reichert)parameters after SMILE and LASIK,however,these have previously been shown to be unreliable as a representation of corneal biomechanics.Retreatment options after SMILE are discussed.Tissue addition applications of the SMILE procedure are also discussed including the potential for cryo-preservation of the lenticule for later reimplantation(Mohamed-Noriega,Angunawela,Lim et al.),and a new procedure referred to as endokeratophakia in which a myopic SMILE lenticule is implanted into a hyperopic patient(Pradhan et al.).Finally,studies reporting microdistortions in Bowman’s layer and corneal wound healing responses are also described.展开更多
文摘Background and Objective:Corneal neurotization is a novel surgical technique used to restore corneal sensation in patients with neurotrophic keratopathy.Neurotrophic keratopathy is a disorder characterized by dysfunction of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve,which provides sensory innervation to the cornea.Without sensation,the cornea is at risk of infection,ulceration,perforation,and ultimately,vision loss.Corneal neurotization has emerged as an innovative technique to reinnervate anesthetized corneas by transferring a healthy donor nerve to the affected eye around the corneoscleral limbus.As the field of corneal neurotization rapidly grows,there is a need to synthesize the existing body of literature on corneal neurotization and identify important areas for further research.In this review,we will discuss neurotrophic keratopathy and its current management strategies,followed by an overview of corneal neurotization techniques,outcomes,surgical considerations,and future directions.Methods:PubMed and Google Scholar searches were conducted to retrieve and analyze relevant original papers and reviews on neurotrophic keratopathy and corneal neurotization up until April 2022.Key Content and Findings:Currently,numerous techniques for corneal neurotization exist,including direct nerve transfers,as well as indirect neurotization via interposition nerve grafts.So far,corneal neurotization has been shown to be highly successful in restoring corneal sensation,improving visual acuity,and improving corneal epithelial health.To date,there have been no significant differences in outcomes between direct versus indirect neurotization techniques,different donor nerves,or autologous versus allogeneic interposition grafts.However,there is some evidence that corneal neurotization procedures may be more successful in pediatric patients.Conclusions:Corneal neurotization shows great promise in treating neurotrophic corneas and represents the first management option to date that addresses the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of neurotrophic keratopathy by restoring corneal sensation.As the use of corneal neurotization continues to broaden,additional studies will become important to compare techniques in a systematic manner,with larger sample sizes,as well as standardized outcome measures and follow-up time.
文摘This review summarizes the current status of the small incision lenticule extraction(SMILE)procedure.Following the early work by Sekundo et al.and Shah et al.,SMILE has become increasingly popular.The accuracy of the creation of the lenticule with the VisuMax femtosecond laser(Carl Zeiss Meditec)has been verified using very high-frequency(VHF)digital ultrasound and optical coherence tomography(OCT).Visual and refractive outcomes have been shown to be similar to those achieved with laser in situ keratomileusis(LASIK),notably in a large population reported by Hjortdal,Vestergaard et al.Safety in terms of the change in corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA)has also been shown to be similar to LASIK.It was expected that there would be less postoperative dry eye after SMILE compared to LASIK because the anterior stroma is disturbed only by the small incision,meaning that the anterior corneal nerves should be less affected.A number of studies have demonstrated a lower reduction and faster recovery of corneal sensation after SMILE than LASIK.Some studies have also used confocal microscopy to demonstrate a lower decrease in subbasal nerve fiber density after SMILE than LASIK.The potential biomechanical advantages of SMILE have been modeled by Reinstein et al.based on the non-linearity of tensile strength through the stroma.Studies have reported a similar change in Ocular Response Analyzer(Reichert)parameters after SMILE and LASIK,however,these have previously been shown to be unreliable as a representation of corneal biomechanics.Retreatment options after SMILE are discussed.Tissue addition applications of the SMILE procedure are also discussed including the potential for cryo-preservation of the lenticule for later reimplantation(Mohamed-Noriega,Angunawela,Lim et al.),and a new procedure referred to as endokeratophakia in which a myopic SMILE lenticule is implanted into a hyperopic patient(Pradhan et al.).Finally,studies reporting microdistortions in Bowman’s layer and corneal wound healing responses are also described.
