期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
DIN50602夹杂物评定方法的应用
1
作者 潘文娜 《河南冶金》 2019年第3期43-46,共4页
对比国标GB/T10561与德标DIN50602,总结了两个标准的相同点和不同点,重点介绍了国标A法与德标K法检验结果的区别,国标GB/T10561中的A法评定的是夹杂物的最大级别,而德标DIN50602中的K法评定的是规定级别以上夹杂物出现的频次,并着重介... 对比国标GB/T10561与德标DIN50602,总结了两个标准的相同点和不同点,重点介绍了国标A法与德标K法检验结果的区别,国标GB/T10561中的A法评定的是夹杂物的最大级别,而德标DIN50602中的K法评定的是规定级别以上夹杂物出现的频次,并着重介绍了德标DIN50602中K法夹杂物尺寸系数的评定方法和评定原则,以及其在实际运用中遇到的问题及解决方法。 展开更多
关键词 din50602 GB/T10561 夹杂物 评定方法
下载PDF
钢中夹杂物检验及DIN 50602—1985标准中夹杂物评定方法
2
作者 王艳阳 胡浩斌 +3 位作者 赵志海 魏中洁 王怀伟 程亚南 《理化检验(物理分册)》 CAS 2023年第8期17-21,共5页
介绍了钢中夹杂物的评定方法,分析了DIN 50602—1985标准中夹杂物宽度、长度和OG型夹杂物的评定方法。结果表明:DIN 50602—1985标准规定用夹杂物面积评定夹杂物级别,这样更能凸显夹杂物对钢性能的影响;对于超长的单个串条状夹杂物,建... 介绍了钢中夹杂物的评定方法,分析了DIN 50602—1985标准中夹杂物宽度、长度和OG型夹杂物的评定方法。结果表明:DIN 50602—1985标准规定用夹杂物面积评定夹杂物级别,这样更能凸显夹杂物对钢性能的影响;对于超长的单个串条状夹杂物,建议采用夹杂物整体长度和宽度对夹杂物进行评级,不进行分割降级和额外标注尺寸;根据DIN 50602—1985标准中图1计算了夹杂物面积,再根据该标准中表3计算夹杂物的面积,得出二者对OG型夹杂物的评定界限值基本相同,由此可根据OG型夹杂物的直径来评定夹杂物的级别。 展开更多
关键词 夹杂物 面积 宽度影响因子 DIN 50602—1985 OG型夹杂物
下载PDF
图像分析法在DIN 50602-K法夹杂物检测中的应用研究
3
作者 杨峥 牟祖茂 +1 位作者 王德宝 徐辉 《安徽冶金科技职业学院学报》 2019年第2期44-46,共3页
主要讨论图像分析法在DIN50602 K法夹杂物检测中的应用,其过程是通过对图像灰度的识别对夹杂物进行分类和提取,并计算夹杂物的面积,确定夹杂物种类及级别,最终得到试样的夹杂物总参数值。
关键词 din50602 K法 夹杂物 图像灰度
下载PDF
Challenges in determination of microscopic degree of cleanliness in ultra-clean gear steels 被引量:1
4
作者 D.Fuchs T.Tobie K.Stahl 《Journal of Iron and Steel Research International》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2022年第10期1583-1600,共18页
Shot-peened,case-hardened gears can fail in the tooth root due to crack initiation below the surface of the steel matrix.Here,the crack is initiated at a non-metallic inclusion in the center of a so-called fisheye.Thi... Shot-peened,case-hardened gears can fail in the tooth root due to crack initiation below the surface of the steel matrix.Here,the crack is initiated at a non-metallic inclusion in the center of a so-called fisheye.This failure type can lead to a reduced endurance fatigue limit of the gears.It is for this reason that,over the last decade,much effort has been invested by steel manufacturers to reduce the non-metallic inclusion content of gear steels so as to mitigate or even completely prevent such crack initiation.These ultra-clean gear steels were achieved by various measures in the steel production process.However,as a result,the remaining non-metallic inclusions are inhomogeneously distributed in the steel volume in terms of both size and location.However,due to the inhomogeneity of ultra-clean steels,the question arose if the values derived according to the standards are still representative of ultra-clean steel batches.The results show that the standards can still be applied,but more effort must be applied.To determine the degree of cleanliness,six microsections are currently evaluated according to steel test specification(SEP)1571,method K.It is shown that an examination of 24 microsections starting from size class 0 seems beneficial to get more reliable and comparable results of the degree of cleanliness of these ultra-clean gear steels.In addition,it is shown that a high degree of cleanliness has been achieved for all steel batches investigated with the measures taken in the steel production process. 展开更多
关键词 Degree of cleanliness Non-metallic inclusion Evaluation of inclusion SEP 1571 DIN 50602 Ultrasonic immersion testing Ultra-clean gear steel Gear
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部