期刊文献+
共找到593篇文章
< 1 2 30 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Single port laparoscopy in gastroenterology and hepatology: A fine step forward 被引量:3
1
作者 Christof Mittermair Jan Schirnhofer +4 位作者 Eberhard Brunner Katharina Pimpl Christian Obrist Michael Weiss Helmut G Weiss 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2014年第42期15599-15607,共9页
Single incision laparoscopy(SIL) has become an emerging technology aiming at a further reduction of abdominal wall trauma in minimally invasive surgery. Available data is encouraging for the safe application of standa... Single incision laparoscopy(SIL) has become an emerging technology aiming at a further reduction of abdominal wall trauma in minimally invasive surgery. Available data is encouraging for the safe application of standardized SIL in a wide range of procedures in gastroenterology and hepatology. Compared to technically simple SIL procedures, the merit of SIL in advanced surgeries, such as liver or colorectal interventions, compared to conventional laparsocopy is self-evident without any doubt. SIL has already passed the learning curve and is routinely utilized in expert centers. This minimized approach has allowed to enter a new era of surgical management that can not be acceded without a fruitful combination of prudent training, consistent day-to-day work and enthusiastic motivation for technical innovations. Both, basic and novel technical specifics as well as particular procedures are described herein. The focus is on the most important surgical interventions in gastroenterology and aims at reviewingthe current literature and shares our experience in a high volume center. 展开更多
关键词 Minimal invasive surgery Single port surgery Single incision laparoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY HEPATOLOGY
下载PDF
Clinical Application of Primary Suture Following Three-Port Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: A Report of 176 Cases 被引量:2
2
作者 Shengze Li Huihua Cai +8 位作者 Donglin Sun Xuemin Chen Shengyong Liu Xinquan Wu Yong An Jing Chen Chun Yang Yaping Sun Xiaoyan Lu 《Surgical Science》 2015年第1期1-6,共6页
Objective: To investigate the feasibility, safety and the clinical value of primary suture following 3-port laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: From January 2012 to September 2014, 176 patients... Objective: To investigate the feasibility, safety and the clinical value of primary suture following 3-port laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE). Methods: From January 2012 to September 2014, 176 patients suffered from choledocholithiasis were treated with primary suture following 3-port LCBDE and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: All cases were operated successfully and none was converted to open surgery. The duration of operation was 92.2 ± 18.8 min and the length of postoperative hospital stay was 4.4 ± 3.7 d. Postoperative bile leakage occurred in 2 cases and these patients recovered by simple drainage for 3 to 7 days without re-operation. All patients recovered smoothly without any serious complications. Conclusions: Primary suture following 3-port LCBDE is safe, effective and mini-invasive, which is worthy of further clinical application. 展开更多
关键词 laparoscopy Common BILE DUCT Exploration PRIMARY SUTURE three-port
下载PDF
经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘10例报告 被引量:17
3
作者 龚文敬 赵希忠 +4 位作者 任叔阳 安辉 蓝海波 赵美珠 杨向东 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2017年第1期72-75,88,共5页
目的探讨经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘的安全性与可行性。方法 2014年12月~2015年6月我院采用经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘10例,记录术后疼痛及腹壁美容满意度评分,采用Wexner便... 目的探讨经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘的安全性与可行性。方法 2014年12月~2015年6月我院采用经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘10例,记录术后疼痛及腹壁美容满意度评分,采用Wexner便秘评分、便秘症状严重程度评分和胃肠生活质量指数评价便秘治疗的疗效。结果均顺利完成手术,手术时间(217±35)min,术中出血量(36±11)ml。均无术后出血、吻合口漏、腹腔感染、肠梗阻及肛门失禁等并发症发生。首次排气、排便时间分别为(2.4±0.8)d和(2.9±0.6)d,术后切口疼痛VAS评分(3.3±0.5)分,术后腹壁美容满意度评分(4.3±0.5)分。术后6个月Wexner便秘评分(4.5±1.0)分,显著低于术前(22.0±1.9)分(t=26.087,P=0.000);便秘症状严重程度评分(5.5±0.5)分较术前(23.2±0.9)分,明显降低(t=52.836,P=0.000);胃肠生活质量指数(105.7±3.9)分,较术前(77.4±6.0)分明显提高(t=-12.457,P=0.000)。结论经脐单孔SILS-Port腹腔镜结肠次全切除术治疗慢传输型便秘安全可行,腹壁美容效果好,近期疗效满意。 展开更多
关键词 经脐单孔SILS-port 经自然腔道内镜手术 腹腔镜 结肠次全切除术 慢传输型便秘
下载PDF
用SilsPort行单一切口腹腔镜胃内手术的可行性研究 被引量:4
4
作者 朱江帆 忻颖 +1 位作者 李潇娴 胡海 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 2011年第2期181-183,共3页
目的探讨SilsPort行单一切口胃内手术的可行性、安全性与有效性。方法 6头家猪作为实验对象,将SilsPort经腹壁切口置入胃内。3头猪用超声刀切开胃后壁黏膜层,切开长度3 cm,3-0可吸收线间断缝合;另3头猪用抓钳抓取胃后壁组织,用直线切割... 目的探讨SilsPort行单一切口胃内手术的可行性、安全性与有效性。方法 6头家猪作为实验对象,将SilsPort经腹壁切口置入胃内。3头猪用超声刀切开胃后壁黏膜层,切开长度3 cm,3-0可吸收线间断缝合;另3头猪用抓钳抓取胃后壁组织,用直线切割吻合器切除。结果所有模拟操作均顺利完成,无明显术中出血与并发症。放置SilsPort所用时间为8~40 min,(16.2±12.2)min。3头猪用直线切割吻合器行模拟切除总手术时间分别为75、45、38 min;另3头猪用超声刀模拟切除缝合所用时间分别为80、85、70 min。术后活检见胃前壁缝合良好,胃内模拟切除部位缝合(或钉合)满意,局部无出血。结论用SilsPort进行胃内手术可行、安全,提供了将腹腔镜与器械置入胃内进行手术操作简便、稳定的平台。 展开更多
关键词 胃内手术 腔内手术 腹腔镜 单切口手术
下载PDF
Initial experience of single-incision plus one port left-side approach totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction 被引量:9
5
作者 Wei Zhou Chang-Zheng Dong +4 位作者 Yi-Feng Zang Ying Xue Xing-Guo Zhou Yu Wang Yin-Lu Ding 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2020年第31期4669-4679,共11页
BACKGROUND Single incision plus one port left-side approach(SILS+1/L)totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy(TLDG)is an emerging technique for the treatment of gastric cancer.Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has ... BACKGROUND Single incision plus one port left-side approach(SILS+1/L)totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy(TLDG)is an emerging technique for the treatment of gastric cancer.Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has a number of potential advantages for patients compared with conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy:relieving postoperative pain,shortening hospital stay and offering a better cosmetic outcome.Nevertheless,there are no previous reports on the use of SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut Roux-en-Y(uncut R-Y)reconstruction.AIM To investigate the initial feasibility of SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction(uncut R-Y reconstruction)to treat distal gastric cancer.METHODS A total of 21 patients who underwent SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut R-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer were enrolled.All patients were treated at The Second Hospital of Shandong University.Reconstructions were performed intracorporeally with 60 mm endoscopic linear stapler and 45 mm no-knife stapler.The clinicopathological characteristics,surgical details,postoperative short-term outcomes,postoperative follow-up upper gastrointestinal radiography findings and endoscopy results were analyzed retrospectively.RESULTS All SILS+1/L operations were performed by SILS+1/L TLDG successfully.The patient population included 13 men and 8 women with a mean age of 48.2 years(ranged from 40 years to 70 years)and median body mass index of 22.8 kg/m^2.There were no conversions to open laparotomy,and no other port was placed.The mean operation time was 146 min(ranged 130-180 min),and the estimated mean blood loss was 54 mL(ranged 20-110 mL).The mean duration to flatus and discharge was 2.3(ranged 1-3.5)and 7.3(ranged 6-9)d,respectively.The mean number of retrieved lymph nodes was 42(ranged 30-47).Two patients experienced mild postoperative complications,including surgical site infection(wound at the navel incision)and mild postoperative pancreatic fistula(grade A).Follow-up upper gastrointestinal radiography and endoscopy were carried out at 3 mo postoperatively.No patients experienced moderate or severe food stasis,alkaline gastritis or bile reflux during the follow-up period.No recanalization of the biliopancreatic limb was found.CONCLUSION SILS+1/L TLDG with uncut R-Y reconstruction could be safely performed as a reduced port surgery. 展开更多
关键词 laparoscopy Distal gastrectomy Single-incision plus one port Uncut Rouxen-Y gastrojejunostomy Reduced port surgery Gastric cancer
下载PDF
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy:A non-randomized,agematched single center trial 被引量:3
6
作者 Yoen TK van der Linden Koop Bosscha +1 位作者 Hubert A Prins Daniel J Lips 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery》 SCIE CAS 2015年第8期145-151,共7页
AIM: To compare the safety of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies with standard four-port cholecystectomies.METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2012 datas were gathered from 100 consecutive patients who ... AIM: To compare the safety of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomies with standard four-port cholecystectomies.METHODS: Between January 2011 and December 2012 datas were gathered from 100 consecutive patients who received a single-port cholecystectomy. Patient baseline characteristics of all 100 single-port cholecystectomies were collected(body mass index, age, etc.) in a database. This group was compared with 100 age-matched patients who underwent a conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the same period. Retrospectively, per- and postoperative data were added. The two groups were compared to each other using independent t-tests and χ2-tests, P values below 0.05 were considered significantly different.RESULTS: No differences were found between both groups regarding baseline characteristics. Operating time was significantly shorter in the total single-port group(42 min vs 62 min, P < 0.05); in procedures performed by surgeons the same trend was seen(45 min vs 59 min, P < 0.05). Peroperative complications between both groups were equal(3 in the single-port group vs 5 in the multiport group; P = 0.42). Although not significant less postoperative complications were seen in the single-port group compared with the multiport group(3 vs 9; P = 0.07). No statistically significant differences were found between both groupswith regard to length of hospital stay, readmissions and mortality. CONCLUSION: Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy has the potential to be a safe technique with a low complication rate, short in-hospital stay and comparable operating time. Single-port cholecystectomy provides the patient an almost non-visible scar while preserving optimal quality of surgery. Further prospective studies are needed to prove the safety of the single-port technique. 展开更多
关键词 SINGLE-port MINIMAL INVASIVE laparoscopy Safety Fe
下载PDF
Technical and instrumental prerequisites for single-port laparoscopic solo surgery:state of art 被引量:2
7
作者 Say-June Kim Sang Chul Lee 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第15期4440-4446,共7页
With the aid of advanced surgical techniques and instruments, single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS) can be accomplished with just two surgical members: an operator and a camera assistant. Under these circumstances, t... With the aid of advanced surgical techniques and instruments, single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS) can be accomplished with just two surgical members: an operator and a camera assistant. Under these circumstances, the reasonable replacement of a human camera assistant by a mechanical camera holder has resulted in a new surgical procedure termed singleport solo surgery(SPSS). In SPSS, the fixation and coordinated movement of a camera held by mechanicaldevices provides fixed and stable operative images that are under the control of the operator. Therefore, SPSS primarily benefits from the provision of the operator's eye-to-hand coordination. Because SPSS is an intuitive modification of SPLS, the indications for SPSS are the same as those for SPLS. Though SPSS necessitates more actions than the surgery with a human assistant, these difficulties seem to be easily overcome by the greater provision of static operative images and the need for less lens cleaning and repositioning of the camera. When the operation is expected to be difficult and demanding, the SPSS process could be assisted by the addition of another instrument holder besides the camera holder. 展开更多
关键词 Camera holder laparoscopy Single-portlaparoscopic SURGERY SINGLE-port SOLO SURGERY Solosurgery
下载PDF
Single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid volvulus
8
作者 Byung Jo Choi Won Jun Jeong +1 位作者 Say-June Kim Sang Chul Lee 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS 2015年第8期2381-2386,共6页
AIM:To report our experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS)for sigmoid volvulus(SV).METHODS:Between October 2009 and April 2013,10patients underwent SPLS for SV.SPLS was performed transumbilically or thro... AIM:To report our experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery(SPLS)for sigmoid volvulus(SV).METHODS:Between October 2009 and April 2013,10patients underwent SPLS for SV.SPLS was performed transumbilically or through a predetermined stoma site.Conventional straight and rigid-type laparoscopic instruments were used.After intracorporeal,segmental resection of the affected sigmoid colon,the specimen was extracted through the single-incision site.Patientdemographics and perioperative data were analyzed.RESULTS:SPLS for SV was successful in all 10 patients(4,resection and primary anastomosis;6,Hartmann’s procedure).The median operative time and postoperative hospitalization period were 168(range,85-315)min and 6.5(range,4-29)d,respectively.No intraoperative complications were noted;there were 2 postoperative complications,including 1 anastomotic leak.CONCLUSION:SPLS was a safe and feasible therapeutic approach for SV,when performed by a surgeon experienced in conventional laparoscopic surgery. 展开更多
关键词 SIGMOID VOLVULUS laparoscopy SINGLE-port Anastomos
下载PDF
Reduced port surgery for appendectomy:Early experience and surgical technique
9
作者 Shinichiro Mori Kenji Baba +9 位作者 Shigehiro Yanagita Yoshiaki Kita Kosei Maemura Yuko Mataki Yasuto Uchikado Hiroshi Okumura Tetsuhiro Nakajyo Shoji Natsugoe Sonshin Takao Kuniaki Aridome 《World Journal of Surgical Procedures》 2013年第2期8-12,共5页
AIM: To evaluate our experience and surgical technique of laparoscopic appendectomy via reduced port surgery(LARPS). METHODS: Sixteen patients(8 men and 8 women; median age: 31.0 years) who underwent LARPS between Nov... AIM: To evaluate our experience and surgical technique of laparoscopic appendectomy via reduced port surgery(LARPS). METHODS: Sixteen patients(8 men and 8 women; median age: 31.0 years) who underwent LARPS between November 2009 and May 2012 were included in the present study. We performed LARPS, in which access devices were inserted through an umbilical skin incision with 1 additional skin incision in the left lower abdomen. After setting access devices, pneumoperitoneum was maintained at 10 mmH g using CO2 and a 3 mm trocar was positioned(or direct puncture was performed by the Endo Relief system) under laparoscopic guidance. The mesoappendix was dissected using an ultrasonically activated device. After mesoappendix dissection, ligation was performed near the appendix base and the appendix was dissected using an ultrasonically activated device. The appendix was then removed. At the end of surgery, we administered local anesthesia with ropivacaine 1%(10 mL) for the skin incisions. The outcomes were evaluated in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of postoperative hospital stay and surgical complications. RESULTS: Our surgical procedure allowed operators to use instruments as in conventional laparoscopic appendectomy. The basic principle of triangulation of instrumentation was maintained to some degree. LARPS was performed in 9 patients with catarrhal appendicitis, 5 with phlegmonous appendicitis, and 2 with gangrenous appendicitis. The median surgery time was 60 min and the median intraoperative blood loss was 1.2 mL. The median length of postoperative hospitalization was 4 d. There were no conversions to open surgery, no operation-related complications or mortality. CONCLUSION: Our experience and surgical technique suggest that LARPS is a safe and feasible procedure for patients with appendicitis. 展开更多
关键词 REDUCED port SURGERY APPENDECTOMY laparoscopy COSMESIS Single INCISION
下载PDF
Evaluation of the Single-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Learning Curve
10
作者 Virgilio V. George Michael J. Guzman +3 位作者 Joshua A. Waters Andrea L. Jester Don J. Selzer Bruce W. Robb 《Surgical Science》 2013年第10期433-437,共5页
Background: The use of single-port laparoscopy has gained popularity within recent years. Part of the appeal in learning this approach is that it draws heavily from concepts mastered through conventional laparoscopy. ... Background: The use of single-port laparoscopy has gained popularity within recent years. Part of the appeal in learning this approach is that it draws heavily from concepts mastered through conventional laparoscopy. Various studies have shown the efficacy and feasibility of the single-port laparoscopic approach, but there are few that examine the learning curve in adopting this new technique. Objective: Our goal was to better define the learning curve in performing a single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Design: A review of prospectively gathered operative data was performed to analyze the results of single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomies performed within our institution by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. The first 100 cases were divided into quintiles. Comparisons were made among the cohorts regarding patient demographics, operative time, length of stay, conversions, and complications. Results: There was no difference among quintiles with regard to age, sex, BMI, or ASA class. Operative time, conversions, length of stay, and number of complications did not significantly vary among each group of patients. There was a significant difference in estimated blood loss and length of stay between the fifth cohort and the others due to one patient’s poor outcome. Conclusions: The single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy learning curve for surgeons already skilled in laparoscopy is short. There are few differences in various outcome measures among groups at any stage in the learning curve. The skills utilized to perform conventional laparoscopic colorectal surgery readily translate to the single-port approach and result in proficiency from nearly the start. 展开更多
关键词 SINGLE-port laparoscopy LEARNING CURVE COLECTOMY
下载PDF
单孔腹腔镜治疗肠套叠中腹内复位与腹外复位的疗效对比 被引量:1
11
作者 刘红霞 宋翠萍 +2 位作者 李豪 饶旺 张海洋 《成都医学院学报》 CAS 2024年第1期80-83,88,共5页
目的探讨单孔腹腔镜治疗肠套叠中腹内复位与腹外复位的疗效。方法将新乡医学院第一附属医院2018年10月至2021年11月以彩色多普勒超声仪确诊的81例肠套叠患儿作为研究对象,所有患儿均行单孔腹腔镜治疗,治疗过程中根据复位方法不同分为腹... 目的探讨单孔腹腔镜治疗肠套叠中腹内复位与腹外复位的疗效。方法将新乡医学院第一附属医院2018年10月至2021年11月以彩色多普勒超声仪确诊的81例肠套叠患儿作为研究对象,所有患儿均行单孔腹腔镜治疗,治疗过程中根据复位方法不同分为腹内复位组和腹外复位组。收集患儿临床指标:血便、阵发性哭闹或腹痛、呕吐、腹部包块、肠套叠类型、病程;记录患儿手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后排气/排便时间;记录术后感染、出血、肠黏连、肠梗阻、肠穿孔、复发情况和患儿家属满意度情况。结果腹内复位组、腹外复位组临床特征、肠套叠类型、病程、术中出血量、术后排气/排便时间、住院时间、术后感染、出血、肠黏连、肠梗阻、肠穿孔情况差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患儿均未复发肠套叠;与腹内复位组相比,腹外复位组手术时间降低、患儿家属满意度增加(P<0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜治疗肠套叠中腹外复位患儿手术时间短、患儿家属满意度高,值得临床推广。 展开更多
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 肠套叠 腹内复位 腹外复位
下载PDF
常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术
12
作者 朱其舟 肖仲清 +3 位作者 龙生根 王丽君 杨晶 舒宽勇 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期98-101,共4页
目的探讨常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗宫颈病变的应用价值。方法选择2021年12月~2023年6月因宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)或宫颈癌ⅠA1期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术60例,按... 目的探讨常规器械免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术治疗宫颈病变的应用价值。方法选择2021年12月~2023年6月因宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变(high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion,HSIL)或宫颈癌ⅠA1期行腹腔镜全子宫切除术60例,按患者意愿行经脐单孔腹腔镜手术及多孔腹腔镜手术各30例,均使用常规器械,不使用举宫器,比较2组手术指标。结果2组均未出现中转开腹及泌尿系、肠道或大血管等损伤。单孔组出血量较少[(54.6±20.5)ml vs.(67.5±27.0)ml,P=0.041],排气较早[(27.6±8.0)h vs.(32.2±9.0)h,P=0.040],总住院时间较短[(4.4±1.5)d vs.(5.1±1.2)d,P=0.044]。2组子宫重量、手术时间以及术后并发症差异无显著性(P>0.05)。2组切口愈合良好,未出现与穿刺器相关的近期并发症(如穿刺孔感染、出血)或远期并发症(如脐疝、切口疝)。结论免举宫经脐单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术出血少,术后恢复快,瘢痕最小化,并发症与传统腹腔镜手术相似。 展开更多
关键词 经脐单孔腹腔镜手术 全子宫切除术 高级别鳞状上皮内病变 宫颈癌
下载PDF
经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术的临床应用效果
13
作者 费振浩 段兴福 +3 位作者 孙志为 王峻峰 陈业盛 唐建中 《肝胆胰外科杂志》 CAS 2024年第11期664-666,672,共4页
目的探讨经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2017年1月1日至2022年12月30日云南省第一人民医院行经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术治疗的10例患者的围手术期情况及术后恢复情况。结果本组10例患者全部... 目的探讨经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术的安全性和可行性。方法回顾性分析2017年1月1日至2022年12月30日云南省第一人民医院行经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术治疗的10例患者的围手术期情况及术后恢复情况。结果本组10例患者全部顺利施行经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术,无中转开腹病例,手术时间56~260 min,术中出血量20~400 mL,无术中并发症发生。术后第1天引流液淀粉酶值53~5400 U/L(中位数652.9 U/L);9例于术后第3天淀粉酶水平基本恢复正常;1例出现胰瘘(生化漏),经通畅引流后未出现后续并发症。2例出现血小板升高,经抗凝治疗后未出现后续并发症。术后住院时间5~17 d(中位时间9.2 d)。10例患者均门诊随访观察2~12个月,中位随访时间6个月,均无后续并发症。结论对于仅单纯行脾脏切除术的患者,经腹膜后入路单孔腹腔镜全脾切除术是安全可行的。 展开更多
关键词 单孔腹腔镜手术 腹膜后入路 全脾切除术 微创治疗
下载PDF
改良单孔腹腔镜小儿鞘状突未闭手术
14
作者 王盛 周敏 +1 位作者 吴博 王兰 《中国微创外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2024年第2期154-157,共4页
目的 探讨使用30°电切镜、针式钳和注水钩针的改良单孔腹腔镜小儿鞘状突未闭手术的应用价值。方法2021年8月~2022年12月,对36例鞘状突未闭患儿行改良单孔腹腔镜手术。30°电切镜替代腹腔镜由脐下缘置入腹腔,针式钳于脐和耻骨... 目的 探讨使用30°电切镜、针式钳和注水钩针的改良单孔腹腔镜小儿鞘状突未闭手术的应用价值。方法2021年8月~2022年12月,对36例鞘状突未闭患儿行改良单孔腹腔镜手术。30°电切镜替代腹腔镜由脐下缘置入腹腔,针式钳于脐和耻骨联合中点穿刺进入腹腔,注水钩针带2-0血管缝线经腹股沟内环体表点上方穿刺进入腹膜外间隙,在针式钳辅助下,边进针边注水,将精索血管、输精管以及周围腹壁与内环周围腹膜完全分离,带线钩针在不刺破腹膜的情况下将2-0血管缝线在水分离的间隙中环绕内环口,并引出体外完成结扎。结果 36例手术均顺利完成,无中转开放手术。手术时间:32例单侧5~16 min,平均9.2 min;4例双侧9~23 min,平均13.4 min。失访1例,余35例门诊随访1~6个月,电话随访12~28个月,中位数20个月,无阴囊血肿、睾丸萎缩、切口感染,无复发。结论 改良单孔腹腔镜小儿鞘状突未闭手术安全、可行。 展开更多
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 小儿 电切镜 针式钳 注水钩针
下载PDF
单孔腹腔镜胃癌根治术的治疗进展与争议
15
作者 韦小波 劳景茂 +2 位作者 刘广 邓伟 简文红 《中外医学研究》 2024年第7期168-171,共4页
胃癌是一种常见的发病率和死亡率均较高的消化道恶性肿瘤。随着人类居住环境越来越恶劣,胃癌的发病率呈逐年上升趋势,由于我国人口老龄化的加剧,我国该病发病率长期居高不下,对人们的生命安全造成严重的威胁。胃癌的发病机制目前尚未完... 胃癌是一种常见的发病率和死亡率均较高的消化道恶性肿瘤。随着人类居住环境越来越恶劣,胃癌的发病率呈逐年上升趋势,由于我国人口老龄化的加剧,我国该病发病率长期居高不下,对人们的生命安全造成严重的威胁。胃癌的发病机制目前尚未完全清楚,可能与遗传因素、地域因素、长期食用腌渍、过烫食品有关。随着腔镜技术的发展,以及医师操作水平的提高,单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)逐渐应用于临床,SILS胃癌根治术具有创伤小、恢复快等优势,深受外科医师和广大患者的喜欢。但是目前SILS胃癌根治术仍存在着难点、争议和困惑,而且国内、外报道文献较少,基于此,本文综合有关的文献、国内外的研究与临床实践经验,分别从SILS胃癌根治术的发展现状、评估、关键问题、对生活质量的影响、思考与争议等进行综述,以期为临床开展SILS胃癌根治术提供参考。 展开更多
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 手术 胃癌 根治术 治疗进展 争议
下载PDF
单孔腹腔镜联合内镜治疗胃血管球1例及国内外文献复习
16
作者 唐锦 杨婧 +1 位作者 杨钧淞 魏寿江 《现代医药卫生》 2024年第7期1139-1142,共4页
分析川北医学院附属医院胃肠外科2023年4月收治的1例罕见疾病[胃血管球瘤(GGT)]患者。该例患者术前临床诊断为胃间质瘤,术后通过免疫组织化学确诊为GGT,经单孔腹腔镜联合内镜治疗后痊愈出院。GGT术前难以确诊,且易误诊为胃间质瘤,手术... 分析川北医学院附属医院胃肠外科2023年4月收治的1例罕见疾病[胃血管球瘤(GGT)]患者。该例患者术前临床诊断为胃间质瘤,术后通过免疫组织化学确诊为GGT,经单孔腹腔镜联合内镜治疗后痊愈出院。GGT术前难以确诊,且易误诊为胃间质瘤,手术切除肿瘤是其唯一治疗方法。该文深入探讨GGT的临床表现、影像及病理特征、临床诊断、鉴别诊断及治疗方法,并复习国内外相关文献,以便为今后临床工作提供参考信息。 展开更多
关键词 单孔腹腔镜 内镜 胃血管球瘤 文献复习
下载PDF
经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的效果对比
17
作者 高晶晶 蔡蕾 徐俊 《实用妇科内分泌电子杂志》 2024年第1期38-40,共3页
目的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的方法与效果。方法选取60例妇科良性疾病患者,按照随机抽签法将其分为对照组与观察组,各30例,分别实施传统腹腔镜与经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗,对比两组手术效果。结果与对照组对比,观察... 目的分析经脐单孔腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病的方法与效果。方法选取60例妇科良性疾病患者,按照随机抽签法将其分为对照组与观察组,各30例,分别实施传统腹腔镜与经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗,对比两组手术效果。结果与对照组对比,观察组术后疼痛评分更低,术后住院时间更短,住院费用更少(P<0.05)。观察组治疗满意度96.67%较对照组的76.67%高(P<0.05)。结论经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗妇科良性疾病效果更加确切,能够提高患者手术质量与治疗满意度,值得临床推广。 展开更多
关键词 经脐单孔腹腔镜 传统腹腔镜 妇科良性疾病 临床效果
下载PDF
经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的临床分析 被引量:1
18
作者 许鑫玥 邓玉艳 +2 位作者 李俊强 马婉莹 李涛 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2024年第4期306-309,共4页
目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析成都市第三人民医院2021年10月至2022年9月收治的行经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗的72例良性巨大卵巢囊肿患者的临床资料,其中单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿31例(单... 目的:探讨经脐单孔腹腔镜体外剥除良性巨大卵巢囊肿的安全性和可行性。方法:回顾性分析成都市第三人民医院2021年10月至2022年9月收治的行经脐单孔腹腔镜治疗的72例良性巨大卵巢囊肿患者的临床资料,其中单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿31例(单孔体外剥除组),单孔腹腔镜体内剥除囊肿41例(单孔体内剥除组),比较两组手术时间、术中气腹使用时间、术中出血量、术中囊液渗漏率、术后肛门排气时间、术后24小时疼痛程度、术后住院时间等。结果:术中囊液渗漏率单孔体外剥除组(0 vs.21.1%)明显低于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。单孔体外剥除组手术时间(60.19±5.64分钟vs.72.02±6.89分钟)、术中气腹使用时间(15.23±2.69分钟vs.53.83±6.74分钟)及术后肛门排气时间(28.16±3.53小时vs.32.24±3.87小时)均短于单孔体内剥除组(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后24小时疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分及术后住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:单孔腹腔镜体外剥除囊肿手术在良性巨大卵巢囊肿剥除术中可以极大程度避免术中囊液腹腔内渗漏,更加遵循手术无瘤原则,同时缩短手术时间,促进术后快速康复,此手术方式安全可行,值得临床推广。 展开更多
关键词 良性巨大卵巢囊肿 经脐单孔腹腔镜 体外囊肿剥除
下载PDF
国产单孔机器人手术系统在儿童卵巢肿瘤切除术中的初步应用
19
作者 谢晨捷 谢周龙龙 +7 位作者 严志龙 李波 张剑蔚 潘振虹 杨律成 周琴 孙梦莲 姜大朋 《温州医科大学学报》 CAS 2024年第11期875-879,共5页
目的:评估国产(术锐)单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统首次应用于儿童卵巢肿瘤切除术的安全性及有效性。方法:收集2023年1月至11月收治于上海儿童医学中心普外科并接受国产(术锐)单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗的13例卵巢肿瘤患儿的临床资料,分... 目的:评估国产(术锐)单孔蛇形臂机器人手术系统首次应用于儿童卵巢肿瘤切除术的安全性及有效性。方法:收集2023年1月至11月收治于上海儿童医学中心普外科并接受国产(术锐)单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜治疗的13例卵巢肿瘤患儿的临床资料,分析该13例患儿围术期相关临床数据(身高、体质量、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间等)及随访结果。结果:13例患儿,中位年龄为12(7~16)岁,手术中位时间为105(95~130)min。所有手术均在该机器人手术系统辅助下安全顺利完成,无中转普通腹腔镜或中转开腹病例,术中出血量少且无明显副损伤,术后住院中位时间2d,所有病例均未出现手术相关并发症。术后病理结果:成熟畸胎瘤10例,皮样囊肿1例,浆液性囊肿1例,滤泡囊肿1例。所有病例随访5(1~10)个月均未发现复发且恢复良好。结论:国产(术锐)单孔机器人手术系统应用到儿童卵巢肿瘤切除术中,取得了初步的成功,且该系统安全有效。 展开更多
关键词 儿童 卵巢肿瘤 机器人手术 单孔腹腔镜
下载PDF
单孔+1孔对比传统多孔3D腹腔镜手术治疗进展期远端胃癌的近期疗效回顾性研究
20
作者 尚晨昊 唐锦 +6 位作者 吕其君 魏寿江 朱炜杰 郭鹏 黄玉亭 罗均林 曾瑜智 《四川医学》 CAS 2024年第5期480-485,共6页
目的对比单孔+1孔3D腹腔镜手术(SILS+1)与传统多孔3D腹腔镜手术(CLS)对进展期远端胃癌患者的近期疗效差异。方法回顾性分析2021年3月至2022年11月我院胃肠外科收治的245例进展期远端胃癌患者资料,按照手术方式的不同分为CLS组(n=125)和S... 目的对比单孔+1孔3D腹腔镜手术(SILS+1)与传统多孔3D腹腔镜手术(CLS)对进展期远端胃癌患者的近期疗效差异。方法回顾性分析2021年3月至2022年11月我院胃肠外科收治的245例进展期远端胃癌患者资料,按照手术方式的不同分为CLS组(n=125)和SILS+1组(n=120例),对比分析临床资料及指标包括:基线资料、手术时间、术中失血量及输血量、皮下气肿发生率、中转开腹情况、切除淋巴结总数、切缘阴性率、术后疼痛评分(VAS)、切口美容评分、术后肠内外营养时间、术后住院时间、围术期并发症发生率、总费用等。结果两组患者术前的年龄、性别、体质指数(BMI)、肿瘤术前分期、既往基础病史(高血压、糖尿病、COPD、冠心病、腹部手术史)、肿瘤位置及是否合并幽门梗阻方面等基线指标相比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。SILS+1组切口美容评分SCAR更高[(2.10±0.40)分vs.(3.29±0.51)分,P<0.05],术中失血量更少[(94.29±107.65)ml vs.(126.64±104.58)ml,P<0.05],术后胃肠道功能恢复更快[(2.59±0.56)d vs.(2.90±0.50)d,P<0.05]。SILS+1组手术耗时更长[(231.21±40.58)min vs.(203.66±54.78)min],气管插管时间也更长[(273.00±48.16)min vs.(249.22±62.72)min],但是其术中切除淋巴结总数更为彻底,切除数量更多[(28.14±12.02)vs.(24.14±11.53)],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。SILS+1组患者术后第1天、术后第2天、术后第4天VAS评分较CLS组更低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者肿瘤切缘均为阴性,在术中输血、中转开腹情况、皮下气肿发生率方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者在术后3天的腹腔引流量、肠内外营养时间、住院时长和住院费用上并无差异(P>0.05)。在术后并发症方面,SILS+1组出现4例深静脉血栓事件、CLS组出现5例,两组中均出现1例全身炎症反应综合征,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而SILS+1组肺部感染、腹腔感染、切口感染、吻合口瘘、术后出血、肠梗阻等不良事件的发生率要低于CLS组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论就围手术期并发症及术后早期恢复指标而言,SILS+1治疗进展期远端胃癌的近期疗效优于CLS,但SILS+1手术时间略长于CLS,SILS+1治疗进展期远端胃癌的价值亟待高质量的多中心随机对照试验进一步研究。 展开更多
关键词 单孔+1孔 胃癌 腹腔镜 远端胃切除术 近期疗效
下载PDF
上一页 1 2 30 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部