Background and Aims:The National Centralized Drug Procurement(NCDP)policy was launched in China's Mainland in April 2019,with entecavir(ETV)and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)being included in the procurement l...Background and Aims:The National Centralized Drug Procurement(NCDP)policy was launched in China's Mainland in April 2019,with entecavir(ETV)and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)being included in the procurement list.We conducted the current study to investigate the impact of the NCDP policy on the utilization and expenditures of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B(CHB)in China.Methods:Procurement records,including monthly purchase volume,expenditure,and price of nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs),were derived from the National Healthcare Security Administration from April 2018 to March 2021.The changes in volumes and expenditures of the first-line NAs and bid-winning products were calculated.The effects of price,volume,and structure related to drug expenditure were calculated by the Addis and Magrini(AM)Index System Analysis.Results:The purchase volume of NAs significantly increased from 134.3 to 318.3 million DDDs,whereas the expenditure sharply decreased from 1,623.41 to 490.43 million renminbi(RMB)or 241.94 to 73.09 million US dollars(USD).The proportions of firstline NAs rose from 72.51%(ETV:69.00%,TDF:3.51%)to 94.97%(ETV:77.42%,TDF:17.55%).AM analysis showed that the NCDP policy decreased the expenditure of all NAs(S=0.91)but increased that of the first-line NAs in the bidwinning list(S=1.13).Assuming the population size of CHB patients remains stable and a compliance rate of≥75%,the proportion of CHB patients receiving first-line antiviral therapy would increase from 6.36–8.48%to 11.56–15.41%.Conclusions:The implementation of the NCDP policy significantly increased the utilization of first-line NAs for CHB patients at a lower expenditure.The findings provided evidence for optimizing antiviral therapy strategy and allocating medical resources in China.展开更多
Objective To study the influence of national drug centralized procurement policy on pharmaceutical enterprises manufacturing generic drugs and original drugs,so as to provide a reference for them to make different str...Objective To study the influence of national drug centralized procurement policy on pharmaceutical enterprises manufacturing generic drugs and original drugs,so as to provide a reference for them to make different strategic choices.Methods Through the literature research on the related policies and the bidding data,the national drug centralized policies were studied systematically.Combined with the bid-winning price and price reduction range of the winning enterprises in the three rounds of centralized procurement,their difficulties,strategic choices and the winning factors were investigated.Besides,a model was established to clarify the optimal price of enterprises in the process of drug procurement.Results and Conclusion The strategic choices of enterprises in participating national drug centralized procurement are influenced by many factors such as the market share of the original varieties,active pharmaceutical ingredients(APIs)and cost.Therefore,corresponding strategies should be formulated according to the characteristics and interests of enterprises.展开更多
目的评价药品集中带量采购对糖尿病患者住院总费用及各类构成费用的影响。方法基于研究医院的9852份糖尿病患者病案首页数据,整理患者基本信息、医疗服务利用信息及各项医疗费用信息,综合运用普通最小二乘法(ordinary least square,OLS...目的评价药品集中带量采购对糖尿病患者住院总费用及各类构成费用的影响。方法基于研究医院的9852份糖尿病患者病案首页数据,整理患者基本信息、医疗服务利用信息及各项医疗费用信息,综合运用普通最小二乘法(ordinary least square,OLS)和倾向性得分匹配法(propensity score matching,PSM)进行数据分析。结果集中带量采购政策确实能够降低糖尿病住院患者的药品费用(t=-2.27,P<0.05),但是对住院总费用、医疗服务性费用影响不显著。OLS回归低估了药品集中带量采购对患者检查化验耗材费用的增费效应(t=2.26,P<0.05)。结论在进一步加强宣传教育的同时,要有序扩大药品集中带量采购,系统推动医药领域集约式改革,持续放大改革红利,实现患者总体医疗负担减轻,让政策福利遍及更多患者。展开更多
Objective To put forward some suggestions for improving the procurement policy of Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group.Methods The literature research and comparative research were used to compare the policies between Guangd...Objective To put forward some suggestions for improving the procurement policy of Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group.Methods The literature research and comparative research were used to compare the policies between Guangdong’s centralized drug procurement and Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group’s procurement so as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages.Results and Conclusion The purchasing model of Shenzhen group purchasing organization(GPO)can ensure the timely supply of medicines.Besides,the cross-regional alliance system helps to achieve a true price-for-quantity exchange,and a market-based price linkage mechanism can effectively reduce drug prices.However,the online drug catalogue of Shenzhen GPO cannot fully cover the actual needs of hospitals for procurement.The market-based price linkage may lead to problems of drug quality or shortage of drugs.Therefore,the number of batches of drugs should be increased online appropriately.Meanwhile,a mechanism must be established to guarantee the supply and quality of low-priced drugs.展开更多
基金This work was supported by the National Healthcare Security Administration,The Key Technical and Executive Measures to Improve Early Phase Clinical Trials on Innovative Drugs for Liver Diseases(No.Z191100007619037)High-level Public Health Technical Talents of the Beijing Municipal Health Commission(XUEKEGUGAN-010-018).
文摘Background and Aims:The National Centralized Drug Procurement(NCDP)policy was launched in China's Mainland in April 2019,with entecavir(ETV)and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF)being included in the procurement list.We conducted the current study to investigate the impact of the NCDP policy on the utilization and expenditures of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B(CHB)in China.Methods:Procurement records,including monthly purchase volume,expenditure,and price of nucleos(t)ide analogs(NAs),were derived from the National Healthcare Security Administration from April 2018 to March 2021.The changes in volumes and expenditures of the first-line NAs and bid-winning products were calculated.The effects of price,volume,and structure related to drug expenditure were calculated by the Addis and Magrini(AM)Index System Analysis.Results:The purchase volume of NAs significantly increased from 134.3 to 318.3 million DDDs,whereas the expenditure sharply decreased from 1,623.41 to 490.43 million renminbi(RMB)or 241.94 to 73.09 million US dollars(USD).The proportions of firstline NAs rose from 72.51%(ETV:69.00%,TDF:3.51%)to 94.97%(ETV:77.42%,TDF:17.55%).AM analysis showed that the NCDP policy decreased the expenditure of all NAs(S=0.91)but increased that of the first-line NAs in the bidwinning list(S=1.13).Assuming the population size of CHB patients remains stable and a compliance rate of≥75%,the proportion of CHB patients receiving first-line antiviral therapy would increase from 6.36–8.48%to 11.56–15.41%.Conclusions:The implementation of the NCDP policy significantly increased the utilization of first-line NAs for CHB patients at a lower expenditure.The findings provided evidence for optimizing antiviral therapy strategy and allocating medical resources in China.
文摘Objective To study the influence of national drug centralized procurement policy on pharmaceutical enterprises manufacturing generic drugs and original drugs,so as to provide a reference for them to make different strategic choices.Methods Through the literature research on the related policies and the bidding data,the national drug centralized policies were studied systematically.Combined with the bid-winning price and price reduction range of the winning enterprises in the three rounds of centralized procurement,their difficulties,strategic choices and the winning factors were investigated.Besides,a model was established to clarify the optimal price of enterprises in the process of drug procurement.Results and Conclusion The strategic choices of enterprises in participating national drug centralized procurement are influenced by many factors such as the market share of the original varieties,active pharmaceutical ingredients(APIs)and cost.Therefore,corresponding strategies should be formulated according to the characteristics and interests of enterprises.
文摘目的评价药品集中带量采购对糖尿病患者住院总费用及各类构成费用的影响。方法基于研究医院的9852份糖尿病患者病案首页数据,整理患者基本信息、医疗服务利用信息及各项医疗费用信息,综合运用普通最小二乘法(ordinary least square,OLS)和倾向性得分匹配法(propensity score matching,PSM)进行数据分析。结果集中带量采购政策确实能够降低糖尿病住院患者的药品费用(t=-2.27,P<0.05),但是对住院总费用、医疗服务性费用影响不显著。OLS回归低估了药品集中带量采购对患者检查化验耗材费用的增费效应(t=2.26,P<0.05)。结论在进一步加强宣传教育的同时,要有序扩大药品集中带量采购,系统推动医药领域集约式改革,持续放大改革红利,实现患者总体医疗负担减轻,让政策福利遍及更多患者。
文摘Objective To put forward some suggestions for improving the procurement policy of Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group.Methods The literature research and comparative research were used to compare the policies between Guangdong’s centralized drug procurement and Shenzhen Pharmaceutical Group’s procurement so as to analyze their advantages and disadvantages.Results and Conclusion The purchasing model of Shenzhen group purchasing organization(GPO)can ensure the timely supply of medicines.Besides,the cross-regional alliance system helps to achieve a true price-for-quantity exchange,and a market-based price linkage mechanism can effectively reduce drug prices.However,the online drug catalogue of Shenzhen GPO cannot fully cover the actual needs of hospitals for procurement.The market-based price linkage may lead to problems of drug quality or shortage of drugs.Therefore,the number of batches of drugs should be increased online appropriately.Meanwhile,a mechanism must be established to guarantee the supply and quality of low-priced drugs.
