After the Cold War ended, former traditional security threats withered while non-traditional ones sprouted. More recently as both traditional and non-traditional security threats bloom, concern spreads over whether in...After the Cold War ended, former traditional security threats withered while non-traditional ones sprouted. More recently as both traditional and non-traditional security threats bloom, concern spreads over whether international security governance can be effective. Worse still, major Western countries' zeal for global governance has cooled,while they turn from being advocates of global governance to obstacles,making the future dimmer.展开更多
Today,the world faces daunting challenges in security governance.What security order the world needs and how to deliver global security governance are humanity’s major issues.This article takes stock of relevant conc...Today,the world faces daunting challenges in security governance.What security order the world needs and how to deliver global security governance are humanity’s major issues.This article takes stock of relevant concepts and practical guidelines embedded in the efforts of the Communist Party of China to promote a fairer and more equitable international order and the existing theses and theories of Eastern and Western civilizations on the meaning of fairness and equity.It proposes five principles-equality,fairness,consent,efficiency,and compensation-as the requirements and foundations of fairness and equity.Furthermore,it verifies the applicability of these principles to major practical issues,including the Ukraine crisis,climate change,and China’s stance on global security governance,expounding the policy implications of fairness and equity as a norm or value orientation.Championing a fair and equitable global security order will help build consensus on Chinese solutions and facilitate historical peace,development,and win-win cooperation trends.展开更多
文摘After the Cold War ended, former traditional security threats withered while non-traditional ones sprouted. More recently as both traditional and non-traditional security threats bloom, concern spreads over whether international security governance can be effective. Worse still, major Western countries' zeal for global governance has cooled,while they turn from being advocates of global governance to obstacles,making the future dimmer.
文摘Today,the world faces daunting challenges in security governance.What security order the world needs and how to deliver global security governance are humanity’s major issues.This article takes stock of relevant concepts and practical guidelines embedded in the efforts of the Communist Party of China to promote a fairer and more equitable international order and the existing theses and theories of Eastern and Western civilizations on the meaning of fairness and equity.It proposes five principles-equality,fairness,consent,efficiency,and compensation-as the requirements and foundations of fairness and equity.Furthermore,it verifies the applicability of these principles to major practical issues,including the Ukraine crisis,climate change,and China’s stance on global security governance,expounding the policy implications of fairness and equity as a norm or value orientation.Championing a fair and equitable global security order will help build consensus on Chinese solutions and facilitate historical peace,development,and win-win cooperation trends.
