期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Influence of Weeding on the Performance of White Maize Varieties
1
作者 Shammi Akter Muhammad Abdul Mannan +3 位作者 Tahmina Ahmmed Sumayea Khan Mahrupa Tasnim Jafar Ullah 《American Journal of Plant Sciences》 2021年第7期1011-1022,共12页
The experiment was conducted at agronomy farm of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka <span style="font-family:Verdana;">from</span><span style="font-family:;" "="&... The experiment was conducted at agronomy farm of Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Dhaka <span style="font-family:Verdana;">from</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> November 2017 to April 2018 to investigate the influence of weeding regimes on the performance of white maize varieties. The experiment comprised two varieties </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">viz</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. YANGNUO-3000 and PSC-121, designated as V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> respectively combined with four weed control treatments </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">viz.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = No weeding, T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1</span></sub></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= One hand weeding at 60 DAS</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(days after sowing), T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sub></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= two hand weeding at 40 DAS and 60 DAS and T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= Weed free after 40 DAS. The experiment was laid out in RCBD (factorial) with three replications. PSC-121 showed the superior performance in terms of plant height, leaf number plant</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, number of grains cob</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (468.75), 100 grains weight (35.0837 g), grain yield (8.28 t ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), stover yield (6.56 t ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) and harvest index (55.58%) over YANGNUO-3000. In </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">case of weed control treatments, the highest plant height, leaf number plant</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, number of grains cob</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (464.54), 100 grains weight (37 g), grain yield (9.25 t ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) and stover yield (7.46 t ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) were reported from T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. All the parameters studied were found lowest with T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. However, in terms of interaction, no single interaction was superior </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> other alternatives. But in most of the cases V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> showed the highest values regarding the maximum plant height, leaf number plant</span></span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, number of grains cob</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (494.97) and 100 grains weight (38 g). V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> showed the highest grain yield (9.33 t ha</span></span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), whereas, V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> showed the lowest grain yield (5.49 t ha</span></span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">). The lowest weed density and weed biomass (12.17 no. m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-2</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and 4.33 g·m</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-2</span></sup><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) was recorded from T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The highest weed control efficiency (94.38%) was also recorded from T</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. In </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">case of variety V</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">2</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> showed better performance in terms of weed density, weed biomass and WCE (46.32%).</span></span> 展开更多
关键词 White Maize hand weeding YIELD PSC-121 Hybrid Variety
下载PDF
Effects of irrigation and weed-control methods on growth of weed and rice 被引量:6
2
作者 Jacob Jeremiah Towa Guo Xiangping 《International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS 2014年第5期22-33,共12页
A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of weeds control methods and an irrigation model on rice growth as well as water consumption and weed quantity in the paddy field.In conventional paddy rice produc... A field experiment was conducted to study the effects of weeds control methods and an irrigation model on rice growth as well as water consumption and weed quantity in the paddy field.In conventional paddy rice production,one of the most important irrigated crops,a significant amount of irrigation water is lost due to percolation and evaporation.A new irrigation model called the Rain-Catching and Controlled Irrigation(RCCI)model has been developed as a viable water-saving technology in the production of paddy rice.In this study the performance of the RCCI model has been analyzed under mulching,hand weeding and weedy conditions in Jiangsu Province of China.The experiment was laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design(RCBD)with three replications and nine treatments.The three replicates consisted of three water management regimes:high dry high flooding(HD-HF),high dry low flooding(HD-LF),and shallow and frequent irrigation(SF)water treatment.The RCCI model was adopted in HD-HF and HD-LF while Flooding Irrigation(CFI)was adopted in SF as a control.The nine treatments were equally divided under mulching,hand weeding and weedy conditions.The lowest and maximum irrigation water delivery was 244.86 mm in mulching and 429.22 mm in hand weeding,respectively at HD-HF.And the lowest and maximum irrigation water delivery was 300.1 mm in the mulching field and 680.72 mm under hand weeding,respectively at HD-LF.The Nanjing 44 rice variety was used.It was observed that weed density and dry weight were significantly influenced by the amount of irrigation water in all the mulching,hand weeding and weedy plots.Considering yield and the number of irrigations,the RCCI model produced better results than CFI.Mulching under RCCI was an effective method to control weeds and reduce labor cost.In addition,mulching decreases the use of herbicides and the risk of pollution.On the other hand,mulching could improve yield and save water. 展开更多
关键词 IRRIGATION weed control MULCHING hand weeding RCCI weed population agronomy traits paddy rice
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部