BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly requiring surgery worldwide.The operative mainstay of intra-capsular hip fractures is arthroplasty with a smaller proportion for fixation.AIM T...BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly requiring surgery worldwide.The operative mainstay of intra-capsular hip fractures is arthroplasty with a smaller proportion for fixation.AIM To determine the most beneficial method of fixation for patients with intracapsular hip fractures.METHODS A registered audit from 2012-2018 was conducted on all intra-capsular hip fractures treated with 2 commonly used fixation methods.Patient notes,electronic records and clinical codes for cost benefit were evaluated.A validated quality of life measure was collected at least 1 year after surgery.RESULTS A total of 83 patients were identified with intra-capsular fractures undergoing fixation during the retrospective period.There were 47 cannulated cancellous screw and 36 sliding hip screw fixations with the case mix comparable for age,gender,co-morbidities and fracture configuration.There was no significant difference in blood loss,tip apex distance,radiation exposure,length of stay,radiological union time,collapse,avascular necrosis or re-operation between fixation methods.Logistic regression analysis demonstrated displaced intracapsular hip fractures correlated significantly with an undesirable outcome conferring a relative odds ratio of 7.25.There were 9(19%)and 4(11%)patients respectively,who required re-operation.There was no significant difference in health resource group tariff and implant cost with comparable EQ-5D and visual CONCLUSION No significant advantage was identified with differing fixation type,but irrespective there were a high number of patients requiring re-operation.This was predicted by initial fracture displacement and patient age.Arthroplasty may need to be carefully considered for health economics and patient benefit.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services...BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services.AIM To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway(TP)vs medical pathway(MP).METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures(AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31)who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021.There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP.To ensure comparability between groups,66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age,sex,HF type,HF surgery,and American Society of Anesthesiology score.The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis,group characteristics,and bivariate correlation comparisons with theχ^(2)test and t-test.RESULTS After propensity matching,the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old,62%of both groups were females,the main HF type was intertrochanteric(TP 52%vs MP 62%),open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery(TP 68%vs MP 71%),and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP.The majority of patients in TP and MP(71%vs 74%)were geriatric(≥65-years-old).Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups(77%vs 97%,P=0.001).There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use(49%vs 41%),admission day of the week,or insurance status.The incidence of comorbidities was equal(94%for both)with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups(71%vs 73%).The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP,with the most common consultation being cardiology in both(44%and 36%).HF displacement occurred more among TP patients(76%vs 39%,P=0.000).Time to surgery was not statistically different(23 h in both),but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP(59 min vs 41 min,P=0.000).Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different(5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both).There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality(3%vs 0%).CONCLUSION There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP.The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.展开更多
BACKGROUND As the perioperative risk of elderly patients with extremely unstable hip fractures(EUHFs)is relatively high and therapeutic effect is not satisfactory,new therapeutic strategies need to be proposed urgentl...BACKGROUND As the perioperative risk of elderly patients with extremely unstable hip fractures(EUHFs)is relatively high and therapeutic effect is not satisfactory,new therapeutic strategies need to be proposed urgently to improve the efficacy and clinical outcomes of such patients.AIM To determine the influence of two surgical treatment modalities on postoperative cognitive function(CF)and delirium in elderly patients with EUHFs.METHODS A total of 60 elderly patients consecutively diagnosed with EUHF between September 2020 and January 2022 in the Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital were included.Of them,30 patients received conventional treatment(control group;general consultation+fracture type-guided internal fixation),and the other 30 received novel treatment(research group;perioperative multidisciplinary treatment diagnosis and treatment+individualized surgical plan+risk prediction).Information on hip function[Harris hip score(HHS)],perioperative risk of orthopedic surgery[Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity(POSSUM)],CF[Montreal cognitive assessment scale(MoCA)],postoperative delirium[mini-cognitive(Mini-Cog)],adverse events(AEs;internal fixation failure,infection,nonunion,malunion,and postoperative delirium),and clinical indicators[operation time(OT),postoperative hospital length of stay(HLOS),ambulation time,and intraoperative blood loss(IBL)]were collected from both groups for comparative analyses.RESULTS The HHS scores were similar between both groups.The POSSUM score at 6 mo after surgery was significantly lower in the research group compared with the control group,and MoCA and Mini-Cog scores were statistically higher.In addition,the overall postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the research than in the control group,including reduced OT,postoperative HLOS,ambulation time,and IBL.CONCLUSION The new treatment modality has more clinical advantages over the conventional treatment,such as less IBL,faster functional recovery,more effectively optimized perioperative quality control,improved postoperative CF,mitigated postoperative delirium,and reduced operation-related AEs.展开更多
Objective:To assess the utility and validation of the Surgical Apgar Score(SAS)in predicting postoperative complications of hip fractures.Methods:This prospective observational study included patients who received ope...Objective:To assess the utility and validation of the Surgical Apgar Score(SAS)in predicting postoperative complications of hip fractures.Methods:This prospective observational study included patients who received operations for hip fractures from 1st March 2017 to 30th June 2018 at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery,Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College.Patients were followed at the outpatient department,and complications and mortality were recorded through phone calls.The predictability of SAS for postoperative complications was assessed.Results:SAS≤4 was found as a significant predictor for postoperative pulmonary(P=0.008)and cardiac complications(P=0.042)as well as blood transfusion required to optimize postoperative hemoglobin(P=0.03)in the patients with hip fractures.Conclusions:SAS provides reliable feedback information about patients'postoperative risk during the surgery.Hip fracture patients with scores≤4 should be monitored for major complications both during the hospital admission and after the discharge.展开更多
Objective To discuss the hip fracture in elderly patients with nosocomial infection,to take effective prevention and control measures. Methods Retrospective analysis of data of the elderly hip fracture combined with n...Objective To discuss the hip fracture in elderly patients with nosocomial infection,to take effective prevention and control measures. Methods Retrospective analysis of data of the elderly hip fracture combined with nosocomial infection during 2009 - 2010 was performed. Results A total of 180 cases of femoral neck展开更多
BACKGROUND The care discrepancy for patients presenting to a hospital on the weekend relative to the work week is well documented.With respect to hip fractures,however,there is no consensus about the presence of a so-...BACKGROUND The care discrepancy for patients presenting to a hospital on the weekend relative to the work week is well documented.With respect to hip fractures,however,there is no consensus about the presence of a so-called“weekend effect”.This study sought to determine the effects,if any,of weekend admission on care of geriatric hip fractures admitted to a large tertiary care hospital.It was hypothesized that geriatric hip fracture patients admitted on a weekend would have longer times to medical optimization and surgery and increased complication and mortality rates relative to those admitted on a weekday.AIM To determine if weekend admission of geriatric hip fractures is associated with poor outcome measures and surgical delay.METHODS A retrospective chart review of operative geriatric hip fractures treated from 2015-2017 at a large tertiary care hospital was conducted.Two cohorts were compared:patients who arrived at the emergency department on a weekend,and those that arrived at the emergency department on a weekday.Primary outcome measures included mortality rate,complication rate,transfusion rate,and length of stay.Secondary outcome measures included time from emergency department arrival to surgery,time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization,and time from medical optimization to surgery.RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in length of stay(P=0.2734),transfusion rate(P=0.9325),or mortality rate(P=0.3460)between the weekend and weekday cohorts.Complication rate was higher in patients who presented on a weekend compared to patients who presented on a weekday(13.3%vs 8.3%;P=0.044).Time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization(22.7 h vs 20.0 h;P=0.0015),time from medical optimization to surgery(13.9 h vs 10.8 h;P=0.0172),and time from emergency department arrival to surgery(42.7 h vs 32.5 h;P<0.0001)were all significantly longer in patients who presented to the hospital on a weekend compared to patients who presented to the hospital on a weekday.CONCLUSION This study provided insight into the“weekend effect”for geriatric hip fractures and found that day of presentation has a clinically significant impact on delivered care.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hemiarthroplasty(HA)has traditionally been the treatment of choice for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.Ideal treatment for younger,ambulatory patients is not as clear.Total hip arthro...BACKGROUND Hemiarthroplasty(HA)has traditionally been the treatment of choice for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.Ideal treatment for younger,ambulatory patients is not as clear.Total hip arthroplasty(THA)has been increasingly utilized in this population however the factors associated with undergoing HA or THA have not been fully elucidated.AIM To examine what patient characteristics are associated with undergoing THA or HA.To determine if outcomes differ between the groups.METHODS We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample(NIS)for patients that underwent HA or THA for a femoral neck fracture between 2005 and 2014.The NIS comprises a large representative sample of inpatient hospitalizations in the United States.International Classifications of Disease,Ninth Edition(ICD-9)codes were used to identify patients in our sample.Demographic variables,hospital characteristics,payer status,medical comorbidities and mortality rates were compared between the two procedures.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors of treatment utilized.RESULTS Of the total 502060 patients who were treated for femoral neck fracture,51568(10.3%)underwent THA and the incidence of THA rose from 8.3%to 13.7%.Private insurance accounted for a higher percentage of THA than hemiarthroplasty.THA increased most in urban teaching hospitals relative to urban non-teaching hospitals.Mean length of stay(LOS)was longer for HA.The mean charges were less for HA,however charges decreased steadily for both groups.HA had a higher mortality rate,however,after adjusting for age and comorbidities HA was not an independent risk factor for mortality.Interestingly,private insurance was an independent predictor for treatment with THA.CONLUSION There has been an increase in the use of THA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the United States,most notably in urban hospitals.HA and THA are decreasing in total charges and LOS.展开更多
BACKGROUND In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care.Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a ...BACKGROUND In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care.Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a financial risk on the hospitals that accept these patients.AIM To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility(SNF)with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention.METHODS A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015.Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture.Exclusion criteria included pathologic,periprosthetic,and fracture non-union.Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department,patients from skilled nursing facilities,and patients from an outside hospital.RESULTS A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria.135(60.54%)of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department,58 patients(26.01%)were transferred from an outside hospital,and 30 patients(13.43%)were transferred from a SNF.Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization($43302)compared to emergency department patients($28875,P=0.000)and SNF patients($28282,P=0.000).CONCLUSION Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF.This is a strong argument for riskadjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.展开更多
<b>Introduction:</b> Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fractures. The supra-inguinal approach to fascia iliaca block (FIB) can potentially provide superior ...<b>Introduction:</b> Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fractures. The supra-inguinal approach to fascia iliaca block (FIB) can potentially provide superior analgesia compared to femoral nerve block (FNB) by blocking the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of single shot FIB and FNB for surgical fixation of hip fractures. <b>Methods:</b> After obtaining ethics approval and written, informed consent, 30 patients undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. Patients received either a single shot FIB or FNB with 0.5% Ropivacaine 30 mls, and a subarachnoid block. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively, post-block, in recovery and at 24 hours post-operatively. Time to first analgesic, oxynorm consumption, opioid related side effects and block related complications were assessed at 24 hours. <b>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant difference in post-block pain scores, median (IQR) of 0 (0 - 0) versus 0 (0 - 0) at rest and 3 (2 - 6) versus 5 (2 - 6) on positioning for spinal;and 24 hour pain scores were 0 (0 - 0) versus 0 (0 - 0) at rest and 4 (2 - 5) versus 5 (2 - 6) on movement for FIB and FNB groups respectively. 5 patients from each group required post-operative opioids, post-operative opioids requirement were similar. <b>Conclusions:</b> Though ultrasound guided supra-inguinal FIB was more consistent in blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve then a femoral nerve block, this did not translate to any difference in terms of pain scores, opioid consumption and side effects.展开更多
Purpose:Hip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies.During COVID-19 pandemic time,many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources,the risk of...Purpose:Hip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies.During COVID-19 pandemic time,many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources,the risk of infection and redirection of medical attention to a severe infective health problem.Methods:A search of electronic databases(PubMed,Medline,CINAHL,EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)with the keywords"COVID","COVID-19","SARS-COV-2","Corona","pandemic","hip fracture","trochanteric fracture"and"neck femur fracture"revealed 64 studies evaluating treatment of hip fracture in elderly patients during COVID-19 pandemic time.The 30-day mortality rate,inpatient mortality rate,critical care/special care need,readmission rate and complications rate in both groups were evaluated.Data were analyzed using Review Manager(RevMan)V.5.3.Results:After screening,7 studies were identified that described the mortality and morbidity in hip fractures in both COVID-19 infected(COVID-19+)and non-infected(COVID-19-)patients.There were significantly increased risks of 30-day mortality(32.23%COVID-19+deathvs.8.85%COVID-19-death)and inpatient mortality(29.33%vs.2.62%)among COVID-19+patients with odds ratio(OR)of 4.84(95%CI:3.13-7.47,p<0.001)and 15.12(95%CI:6.12-37.37,p<0.001),respectively.The COVID-19+patients needed more critical care admission(OR=5.08,95%CI:1.49-17.30,p<0.009)and they remain admitted for a longer time in hospital(mean difference=3.6,95% CI:1.74-5.45,p<0.001);but there was no difference in readmission rate between these 2 groups.The risks of overall complications(OR=17.22),development of pneumonia(OR=22.25),and acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute respiratory failure(OR=32.96)were significantly high among COVID-19+patients compared to COVID-19-patients.Conclusions:There are increased risks of the 30-day mortality,inpatient mortality and critical care admission among hip fracture patients who are COVID-19+.The chances of developing pneumonia and acute respiratory failure are more in COVID-19+patients than in COVID-19-patients.展开更多
Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our...Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.展开更多
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical effects of Xinkeshu combined with levosimendan on perioperative heart failure in oldest-old patients with hip fractures.METHODS:Oldest-old patients over 80 years old with perioper...OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical effects of Xinkeshu combined with levosimendan on perioperative heart failure in oldest-old patients with hip fractures.METHODS:Oldest-old patients over 80 years old with perioperative heart failure and hip fractures were randomly divided into the control and observation groups,with 50 patients in each group.All patients in both groups were treated with conventional anti-heart failure therapy and levosimendan,whereas patients in the observation group additionally received Xinkeshu tablets.Clinical manifestations;left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF);left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD);left ventricular end-systolic dimension(LVESD);B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP),superoxide dismutase(SOD),malondialdehyde(MDA),nitric oxide(NO),and endothelin-1(ET-1)levels;and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)scores were compared between before and after treatment to evaluate the curative effects of Xinkeshu combined with levosimendan.RESULTS:After treatment,the efficacy rate was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group.LVEF and the levels of SOD and NO were higher in the observation group than in the control group after treatment.However,LVEDD;LVESD;BNP,MDA,and ET-1 levels;and the SAS and SDS scores were lower after treatment in the observation group than in the control group.CONCLUSION:Levosimendan combined with Xinkeshu can improve cardiac function,alleviate oxidative stress,and relieve anxiety and depression in oldest-old patients with perioperative heart failure and hip fracture.展开更多
Purpose:Venous thromboembolism(VTE)is a major health issue among hip fracture patients.This study aimed to develop an information platform based on a mobile application and then evaluate whether information platform-b...Purpose:Venous thromboembolism(VTE)is a major health issue among hip fracture patients.This study aimed to develop an information platform based on a mobile application and then evaluate whether information platform-based nursing could improve patient’’s drug compliance and reduce the incidence of VTE in hip fracture patients.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed hip fracture patients who were treated with conventional prevention and intervention methods for VTE(control group)between January 2008 and November 2012,and prospectively analyzed hip fracture patients who were treated with nursing intervention based on the information platform(study group)between January 2016 and September 2017.All the patients included in the both groups were hip fracture patients who had an age over 50 years,treated with surgery,and hospitalized≥48 h.Patients were excluded if they admitted to hospital due to old fractures,had a severe bleeding after 72 h of admission,diagnosed with any type of VTE,or refused to participate in the study.The information platform was divided into medical,nursing,and patient interface.Based on the information platform,medical practitioners and nurses could perform risk assessments,monitoring management and early warnings,preventions and treatments,health educations,follow-up,and other aspects of nursing interventions for patients.This study compared essential characteristics,drug compliance,VTE occurrence,and mean length of hospitalization between the two groups.Besides,a subgroup analysis was performed in the study group according to different drug compliances.SPSS 18.0 software(IBM Corp.,NY,and USA)was used for statistical analysis.Results:Altogether 1177 patients were included in the control group,and 491 patients in the study group.Regarding baseline data,patients in the study group had more morbidities than those in the control group(p<0.05).The difference of drug compliance between the two groups was statistically significant(p<0.001):761(64.7%)of the patients in the control group and only 30(6.1%)patients in the study group had poor drug compliance.In terms of VTE,10.7%patients(126/1177)in the control group had VTE,and the rate in the study group was 7.1%(35/491),showing a statistically significant difference(p=0.02).Moreover,the average length of hospitalization in the study group was also significantly lower than that in the control group(10.4 daysvs.13.7 days,p<0.001).Subgroup analyses of the study group showed that the incidence of VTE in patients with poor,partial,and good compliances were 56.7%(17/30),5.8%(10/171),and 2.8%(8/290),respectively,revealing a significantly huge difference(p<0.001).Conclusions:Poor drug compliance leads to higher VTE occurrence.The information platform-based nursing can effectively improve the compliance of hip fracture patients and thus considerably reduce the incidence of VTE.The mobile application may be an effective tool to prevent VTE in hip fracture patients.展开更多
Purpose:The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection.Typically,death fr...Purpose:The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection.Typically,death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms,but this period can extend up to 8 weeks.This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture.Methods:A multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8%of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April,2020 was performed.Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for"fragility hip fractures"were included in the study.Patients'120-day mortality was assessed relative to their perioperative COVID-19 status.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.Results:A total of 746 patients were included in this study,of which 87(11.7%)were COVID-19 positive.Mortality rates at 30-and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients(p<0.001).However,mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different(p=0.107),16.1%and 9.4%respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients,odds ratio 1.855(95%CI 0.865-3.978).Conclusion:Hip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection,provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury,have no significant difference in 120-day mortality.Despite the growing awareness and concern of "long-COVID"and its widespread prevalence,this does not appear to increase mediumterm mortality rates after a hip fracture.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hip fractures and proximal humerus fractures are known to be associated with increased mortality,but the impact on mortality of combining these two common injuries is not well known.AIM To compare mortality...BACKGROUND Hip fractures and proximal humerus fractures are known to be associated with increased mortality,but the impact on mortality of combining these two common injuries is not well known.AIM To compare mortality,inpatient stay and discharge destination for patients with combined hip and proximal humerus fractures with those sustaining isolated hip fractures.METHODS Using the United Kingdom national hip fracture database,we identified all hip fracture patients over the age of 60 admitted to a single trauma unit from 2010-2016.Patients sustaining a proximal humerus fracture in addition to their hip fracture were identified using hospital coding data.We calculated the 30-d and one-year mortality for both the hip fracture cohort and the combined hip and proximal humerus fracture cohort.Other variables recorded included age,gender and whether the proximal humerus was treated with or without an operation.RESULTS We identified 4131 patients with hip fractures within the study period and out of those 40 had sustained both a hip and a proximal humerus fracture.Mean age in the hip fracture cohort was 80.9 years and in the combined fracture group 80.3 years.Out of the 40 patients in the combined group four were treated operatively.The 30-d mortality for our hip fracture cohort was 7.2%compared to the mortality of our combined cohort of 12.5%(P=0.163).The one-year mortality for our hip fracture cohort was 26.4%compared to 40%for the combined fracture cohort(P=0.038).We also found patients with combined injuries were less likely to return to their own home.CONCLUSION The 30-d and one-year mortality is higher for those patients who have sustained a combined hip and proximal humerus fracture when compared to those with a hip fracture alone.展开更多
BACKGROUND Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals,and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications.Machine learning(ML)has become prevalent in clin...BACKGROUND Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals,and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications.Machine learning(ML)has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models.This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay(eLOS)among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.AIM To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures,identify associated risk factors,and compare the performance of each model.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre,enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022.The study collected various patient characteristics,encompassing demographic data,general health status,injury-related data,laboratory examinations,surgery-related data,and length of stay.Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified.The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.RESULTS The study included 763 patients,with 380 experiencing eLOS.Among the models,the decision tree,random forest,and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance.Notably,the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results.After cross-validation,the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance.Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery,D-dimer level,American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA)classification,type of surgery,and sex.CONCLUSION ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures.The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery,D-dimer level,ASA classification,type of surgery,and sex.This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.展开更多
BACKGROUND Failure to fix unstable intertrochanteric fractures impairs return to daily activities.AIM To simulate five different internal fixation methods for unstable proximal femoral fractures.METHODS A three-dimens...BACKGROUND Failure to fix unstable intertrochanteric fractures impairs return to daily activities.AIM To simulate five different internal fixation methods for unstable proximal femoral fractures.METHODS A three-dimensional model of the femur was established from sectional computed tomography images,and an internal fixation model was established.Finite element analysis of the femur model was established,and three intertrochanteric fracture models,medial defect,lateral defect,and medial-lateral defects,were simulated.Displacement and stress distribution after fixation with a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail(PFNA),integrated dual-screw fixation(ITN),PFNA+wire,PFNA+plate,and PFNA+wire+plate were compared during daily activities.RESULTS The maximum displacement and stress of PFNA and ITN were 3.51 mm/473 MPa and 2.80 mm/588 MPa for medial defects;2.55 mm/288 MPa and 2.10 mm/307 MPa for lateral defects;and 3.84 mm/653 MPa and 3.44 mm/641 MPa for mediallateral defects,respectively.For medial-lateral defects,reconstructing the medial side alone changed the maximum displacement and stress to 2.79 mm/515 MPa;reconstructing the lateral side changed them to 3.72 mm/608 MPa,when both sides were reconstructed,they changed to 2.42 mm/309 MPa.CONCLUSION For medial defects,intramedullary fixation would allow early low-intensity rehabilitation exercise,and ITN rather than PFNA reduces the risk of varus and cut-out;for lateral wall defects or weakness,intram-edullary fixation allows higher-intensity rehabilitation exercise,and ITN reduces the risk of varus.For both medial and lateral defects,intramedullary fixation alone will not allow early functional exercise,but locating lateral or medial reconstruction will.For defects in both the inner and outer sides,if reconstruction cannot be completed,ITN is more stable.展开更多
BACKGROUND Hip fractures are the most common reason for inpatient orthopaedic trauma admission.Urgent surgical intervention for hip fractures has remained a clinical priority throughout the coronavirus disease 2019(CO...BACKGROUND Hip fractures are the most common reason for inpatient orthopaedic trauma admission.Urgent surgical intervention for hip fractures has remained a clinical priority throughout the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic.Despite this,there is a paucity of clinical guidance addressing the informed consent process for hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 positive patients.This is of paramount medicolegal importance in a high-risk patient population.AIM To quantify the additional perioperative risks for COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and provide clinicians with an evidence-based framework to establish an informed consent process.METHODS Two hundred and fifty nine consecutive patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip fractures in four hospitals in the United Kingdom were recruited.51 patients were confirmed positive for COVID-19.Predefined outcomes were analyzed over a 30-d postoperative period.COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients were compared after adjustment for confounding factors.RESULTS COVID-19 positive patients had more intensive care admissions(27%vs 5%,P<0.001),longer inpatient stays(median 23 d vs 9 d,P<0.001)and a higher 30-d mortality(29%vs 10%,P=0.001)than COVID-19 negative patients.Postoperative complications were evident in 74.5%of COVID-19 positive patients.35.3%of COVID-19 positive patients suffered postoperative lower respiratory tract infections with 13.7%developing acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)and 9.8%experiencing symptomatic thromboembolic events.CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has created uncertainty in the medical community worldwide and poses unique challenges in providing informed consent for surgery.COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery should be consented for the additional risk of postoperative complications(including lower respiratory tract infection,ARDS,deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism),increased requirement for intensive care admission,longer inpatient stay and higher risk of mortality.Further,clinicians must be transparent about the potential for unknown risks as research into the long-term surgical outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients continues to evolve.展开更多
BACKGROUND Elderly patients tend to have poor self-efficacy and poor confidence in postoperative rehabilitation for hip fractures,and are prone to negative emotions,which affect treatment compliance.AIM To evaluate th...BACKGROUND Elderly patients tend to have poor self-efficacy and poor confidence in postoperative rehabilitation for hip fractures,and are prone to negative emotions,which affect treatment compliance.AIM To evaluate the effects of evidence-based intervention on postoperative fear,compliance,and self-efficacy in elderly patients with hip fractures.METHODS A total of 120 patients with hip fracture surgically treated from June 2018 to June 2020 at the orthopedic department of our hospital were selected and divided into intervention and routine groups(n=60 each)according to different nursing methods.The basic rehabilitation methods of the two groups were consistent,but patients in the intervention group received evidence-based nursing interventions at the same time.Differences between groups in the scores of motion phobia,pain fear,rehabilitation training compliance,self-efficacy,nursing satisfaction,and hip joint function were compared before and after the intervention.RESULTS Before the intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in motion phobia and pain fear scores between the groups(all P>0.05).However,motion phobia scores at 1 wk after intervention initiation(P<0.05),and pain fear scores at 1 wk and 2 wk after intervention initiation(all P<0.05),were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the routine group.On the first day of intervention,there was no significant difference in rehabilitation treatment compliance between the groups(P>0.05);however,at 2 wk after intervention initiation,rehabilitation compliance was significantly better in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).Before the intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in the scores for the two self-efficacy dimensions(overcoming difficulties and rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy)and the total self-efficacy score between the groups(all P>0.05).After 2 wk of intervention,the scores for these two dimensions of self-efficacy and the total self-efficacy score were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the routine group(all P<0.05).At 3 and 6 mo after surgery,hip function as evaluated by the Harris hip score,was significantly better in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).Additionally,overall nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Evidence-based nursing intervention can alleviate fear of postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery,and improve rehabilitation treatment compliance and patient self-efficacy,which promote hip function recovery.展开更多
BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY Th...BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY This report established that hip surgical procedures can be performed with a fascia iliaca compartment block(FICB)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)while avoiding neuraxial or general anesthesia.This was a preliminary experience with two geriatric patients with hip fracture,American Society of Anesthesiologists status III,and with many comorbidities.Neither patient could be operated on within 48 h after admission.Both general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia were high-risk procedures and had contraindications.Hence,we chose nerve block combined with a small amount of sedation.Intraoperative analgesia was provided by single-injection ultrasound-guided FICB.Light intravenous sedation was added.Surgical exposure was satisfactory,and neither patient complained of any symptoms during the procedure.CONCLUSION This report showed that hip surgery for geriatric patients can be performed with FICB and MAC,although complications and contraindications are common.The anesthetic program was accompanied by stable respiratory and circulatory system responses and satisfactory analgesia while avoiding the adverse effects and problems associated with either neuraxial or general anesthesia.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Hip fracture is a common musculoskeletal injury in the elderly requiring surgery worldwide.The operative mainstay of intra-capsular hip fractures is arthroplasty with a smaller proportion for fixation.AIM To determine the most beneficial method of fixation for patients with intracapsular hip fractures.METHODS A registered audit from 2012-2018 was conducted on all intra-capsular hip fractures treated with 2 commonly used fixation methods.Patient notes,electronic records and clinical codes for cost benefit were evaluated.A validated quality of life measure was collected at least 1 year after surgery.RESULTS A total of 83 patients were identified with intra-capsular fractures undergoing fixation during the retrospective period.There were 47 cannulated cancellous screw and 36 sliding hip screw fixations with the case mix comparable for age,gender,co-morbidities and fracture configuration.There was no significant difference in blood loss,tip apex distance,radiation exposure,length of stay,radiological union time,collapse,avascular necrosis or re-operation between fixation methods.Logistic regression analysis demonstrated displaced intracapsular hip fractures correlated significantly with an undesirable outcome conferring a relative odds ratio of 7.25.There were 9(19%)and 4(11%)patients respectively,who required re-operation.There was no significant difference in health resource group tariff and implant cost with comparable EQ-5D and visual CONCLUSION No significant advantage was identified with differing fixation type,but irrespective there were a high number of patients requiring re-operation.This was predicted by initial fracture displacement and patient age.Arthroplasty may need to be carefully considered for health economics and patient benefit.
文摘BACKGROUND Hip fractures(HF)are common among the aging population,and surgery within 48 h is recommended.Patients can be hospitalized for surgery through different pathways,either trauma or medicine admitting services.AIM To compare management and outcomes among patients admitted through the trauma pathway(TP)vs medical pathway(MP).METHODS This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study included 2094 patients with proximal femur fractures(AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association Type 31)who underwent surgery at a level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021.There were 69 patients admitted through the TP and 2025 admitted through the MP.To ensure comparability between groups,66 of the 2025 MP patients were propensity matched to 66 TP patients by age,sex,HF type,HF surgery,and American Society of Anesthesiology score.The statistical analyses included multivariable analysis,group characteristics,and bivariate correlation comparisons with theχ^(2)test and t-test.RESULTS After propensity matching,the mean age in both groups was 75-years-old,62%of both groups were females,the main HF type was intertrochanteric(TP 52%vs MP 62%),open reduction internal fixation was the most common surgery(TP 68%vs MP 71%),and the mean American Society of Anesthesiology score was 2.8 for TP and 2.7 for MP.The majority of patients in TP and MP(71%vs 74%)were geriatric(≥65-years-old).Falls were the main mechanism of injury in both groups(77%vs 97%,P=0.001).There were no significant differences in pre-surgery anticoagulation use(49%vs 41%),admission day of the week,or insurance status.The incidence of comorbidities was equal(94%for both)with cardiac comorbidities being dominant in both groups(71%vs 73%).The number of preoperative consultations was similar for TP and MP,with the most common consultation being cardiology in both(44%and 36%).HF displacement occurred more among TP patients(76%vs 39%,P=0.000).Time to surgery was not statistically different(23 h in both),but length of surgery was significantly longer for TP(59 min vs 41 min,P=0.000).Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were not statistically different(5 d vs 8 d and 6 d for both).There were no statistical differences in discharge disposition and mortality(3%vs 0%).CONCLUSION There were no differences in outcomes of surgeries between admission through TP vs MP.The focus should be on the patient’s health condition and on prompt surgical intervention.
基金Supported by the Chongqing Medical Scientific Research Project(Joint Project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau),No.2020FYYX211Medical Research Project of Wanzhou District(Joint Project of Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau),No.wzstc-kw2020023.
文摘BACKGROUND As the perioperative risk of elderly patients with extremely unstable hip fractures(EUHFs)is relatively high and therapeutic effect is not satisfactory,new therapeutic strategies need to be proposed urgently to improve the efficacy and clinical outcomes of such patients.AIM To determine the influence of two surgical treatment modalities on postoperative cognitive function(CF)and delirium in elderly patients with EUHFs.METHODS A total of 60 elderly patients consecutively diagnosed with EUHF between September 2020 and January 2022 in the Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital were included.Of them,30 patients received conventional treatment(control group;general consultation+fracture type-guided internal fixation),and the other 30 received novel treatment(research group;perioperative multidisciplinary treatment diagnosis and treatment+individualized surgical plan+risk prediction).Information on hip function[Harris hip score(HHS)],perioperative risk of orthopedic surgery[Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity(POSSUM)],CF[Montreal cognitive assessment scale(MoCA)],postoperative delirium[mini-cognitive(Mini-Cog)],adverse events(AEs;internal fixation failure,infection,nonunion,malunion,and postoperative delirium),and clinical indicators[operation time(OT),postoperative hospital length of stay(HLOS),ambulation time,and intraoperative blood loss(IBL)]were collected from both groups for comparative analyses.RESULTS The HHS scores were similar between both groups.The POSSUM score at 6 mo after surgery was significantly lower in the research group compared with the control group,and MoCA and Mini-Cog scores were statistically higher.In addition,the overall postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the research than in the control group,including reduced OT,postoperative HLOS,ambulation time,and IBL.CONCLUSION The new treatment modality has more clinical advantages over the conventional treatment,such as less IBL,faster functional recovery,more effectively optimized perioperative quality control,improved postoperative CF,mitigated postoperative delirium,and reduced operation-related AEs.
文摘Objective:To assess the utility and validation of the Surgical Apgar Score(SAS)in predicting postoperative complications of hip fractures.Methods:This prospective observational study included patients who received operations for hip fractures from 1st March 2017 to 30th June 2018 at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery,Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College.Patients were followed at the outpatient department,and complications and mortality were recorded through phone calls.The predictability of SAS for postoperative complications was assessed.Results:SAS≤4 was found as a significant predictor for postoperative pulmonary(P=0.008)and cardiac complications(P=0.042)as well as blood transfusion required to optimize postoperative hemoglobin(P=0.03)in the patients with hip fractures.Conclusions:SAS provides reliable feedback information about patients'postoperative risk during the surgery.Hip fracture patients with scores≤4 should be monitored for major complications both during the hospital admission and after the discharge.
文摘Objective To discuss the hip fracture in elderly patients with nosocomial infection,to take effective prevention and control measures. Methods Retrospective analysis of data of the elderly hip fracture combined with nosocomial infection during 2009 - 2010 was performed. Results A total of 180 cases of femoral neck
文摘BACKGROUND The care discrepancy for patients presenting to a hospital on the weekend relative to the work week is well documented.With respect to hip fractures,however,there is no consensus about the presence of a so-called“weekend effect”.This study sought to determine the effects,if any,of weekend admission on care of geriatric hip fractures admitted to a large tertiary care hospital.It was hypothesized that geriatric hip fracture patients admitted on a weekend would have longer times to medical optimization and surgery and increased complication and mortality rates relative to those admitted on a weekday.AIM To determine if weekend admission of geriatric hip fractures is associated with poor outcome measures and surgical delay.METHODS A retrospective chart review of operative geriatric hip fractures treated from 2015-2017 at a large tertiary care hospital was conducted.Two cohorts were compared:patients who arrived at the emergency department on a weekend,and those that arrived at the emergency department on a weekday.Primary outcome measures included mortality rate,complication rate,transfusion rate,and length of stay.Secondary outcome measures included time from emergency department arrival to surgery,time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization,and time from medical optimization to surgery.RESULTS There were no statistically significant differences in length of stay(P=0.2734),transfusion rate(P=0.9325),or mortality rate(P=0.3460)between the weekend and weekday cohorts.Complication rate was higher in patients who presented on a weekend compared to patients who presented on a weekday(13.3%vs 8.3%;P=0.044).Time from emergency department arrival to medical optimization(22.7 h vs 20.0 h;P=0.0015),time from medical optimization to surgery(13.9 h vs 10.8 h;P=0.0172),and time from emergency department arrival to surgery(42.7 h vs 32.5 h;P<0.0001)were all significantly longer in patients who presented to the hospital on a weekend compared to patients who presented to the hospital on a weekday.CONCLUSION This study provided insight into the“weekend effect”for geriatric hip fractures and found that day of presentation has a clinically significant impact on delivered care.
文摘BACKGROUND Hemiarthroplasty(HA)has traditionally been the treatment of choice for elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures.Ideal treatment for younger,ambulatory patients is not as clear.Total hip arthroplasty(THA)has been increasingly utilized in this population however the factors associated with undergoing HA or THA have not been fully elucidated.AIM To examine what patient characteristics are associated with undergoing THA or HA.To determine if outcomes differ between the groups.METHODS We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample(NIS)for patients that underwent HA or THA for a femoral neck fracture between 2005 and 2014.The NIS comprises a large representative sample of inpatient hospitalizations in the United States.International Classifications of Disease,Ninth Edition(ICD-9)codes were used to identify patients in our sample.Demographic variables,hospital characteristics,payer status,medical comorbidities and mortality rates were compared between the two procedures.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then performed to identify independent risk factors of treatment utilized.RESULTS Of the total 502060 patients who were treated for femoral neck fracture,51568(10.3%)underwent THA and the incidence of THA rose from 8.3%to 13.7%.Private insurance accounted for a higher percentage of THA than hemiarthroplasty.THA increased most in urban teaching hospitals relative to urban non-teaching hospitals.Mean length of stay(LOS)was longer for HA.The mean charges were less for HA,however charges decreased steadily for both groups.HA had a higher mortality rate,however,after adjusting for age and comorbidities HA was not an independent risk factor for mortality.Interestingly,private insurance was an independent predictor for treatment with THA.CONLUSION There has been an increase in the use of THA for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the United States,most notably in urban hospitals.HA and THA are decreasing in total charges and LOS.
文摘BACKGROUND In 2016 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services proposed bundled payments for hip fractures to improve the quality and decrease costs of care.Patients transferred from other facilities may be imposing a financial risk on the hospitals that accept these patients.AIM To determine the costs associated with patients that either presented to the emergency department or were transferred from another hospital or skilled nursing facility(SNF)with the diagnosis of a hip fracture requiring operative intervention.METHODS A retrospective single institution review was conducted for all arthroplasty patients from 2010 to 2015.Inclusion criteria included a total or partial hip replacement for a hip fracture.Exclusion criteria included pathologic,periprosthetic,and fracture non-union.Data was collected to compare total observed costs for patients from the emergency department,patients from skilled nursing facilities,and patients from an outside hospital.RESULTS A total of 223 patients met the inclusion criteria.135(60.54%)of these patients presented primarily to the emergency department,58 patients(26.01%)were transferred from an outside hospital,and 30 patients(13.43%)were transferred from a SNF.Cost data analysis showed that outside hospital patients demonstrated significantly greater total cost for their hospitalization($43302)compared to emergency department patients($28875,P=0.000)and SNF patients($28282,P=0.000).CONCLUSION Patients transferred from an outside hospital incurred greater costs for their hospitalization than patients presenting from an emergency department or SNF.This is a strong argument for riskadjustment models when bundling payments for the care of hip fracture patients.
文摘<b>Introduction:</b> Regional anaesthesia techniques have been used for perioperative analgesia for hip fractures. The supra-inguinal approach to fascia iliaca block (FIB) can potentially provide superior analgesia compared to femoral nerve block (FNB) by blocking the obturator and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of single shot FIB and FNB for surgical fixation of hip fractures. <b>Methods:</b> After obtaining ethics approval and written, informed consent, 30 patients undergoing surgical fixation of hip fractures were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. Patients received either a single shot FIB or FNB with 0.5% Ropivacaine 30 mls, and a subarachnoid block. Pain scores were assessed pre-operatively, post-block, in recovery and at 24 hours post-operatively. Time to first analgesic, oxynorm consumption, opioid related side effects and block related complications were assessed at 24 hours. <b>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant difference in post-block pain scores, median (IQR) of 0 (0 - 0) versus 0 (0 - 0) at rest and 3 (2 - 6) versus 5 (2 - 6) on positioning for spinal;and 24 hour pain scores were 0 (0 - 0) versus 0 (0 - 0) at rest and 4 (2 - 5) versus 5 (2 - 6) on movement for FIB and FNB groups respectively. 5 patients from each group required post-operative opioids, post-operative opioids requirement were similar. <b>Conclusions:</b> Though ultrasound guided supra-inguinal FIB was more consistent in blocking the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve then a femoral nerve block, this did not translate to any difference in terms of pain scores, opioid consumption and side effects.
文摘Purpose:Hip fractures among elderly patients are surgical emergencies.During COVID-19 pandemic time,many such patients could not be operated at early time because of the limitation of the medical resources,the risk of infection and redirection of medical attention to a severe infective health problem.Methods:A search of electronic databases(PubMed,Medline,CINAHL,EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)with the keywords"COVID","COVID-19","SARS-COV-2","Corona","pandemic","hip fracture","trochanteric fracture"and"neck femur fracture"revealed 64 studies evaluating treatment of hip fracture in elderly patients during COVID-19 pandemic time.The 30-day mortality rate,inpatient mortality rate,critical care/special care need,readmission rate and complications rate in both groups were evaluated.Data were analyzed using Review Manager(RevMan)V.5.3.Results:After screening,7 studies were identified that described the mortality and morbidity in hip fractures in both COVID-19 infected(COVID-19+)and non-infected(COVID-19-)patients.There were significantly increased risks of 30-day mortality(32.23%COVID-19+deathvs.8.85%COVID-19-death)and inpatient mortality(29.33%vs.2.62%)among COVID-19+patients with odds ratio(OR)of 4.84(95%CI:3.13-7.47,p<0.001)and 15.12(95%CI:6.12-37.37,p<0.001),respectively.The COVID-19+patients needed more critical care admission(OR=5.08,95%CI:1.49-17.30,p<0.009)and they remain admitted for a longer time in hospital(mean difference=3.6,95% CI:1.74-5.45,p<0.001);but there was no difference in readmission rate between these 2 groups.The risks of overall complications(OR=17.22),development of pneumonia(OR=22.25),and acute respiratory distress syndrome/acute respiratory failure(OR=32.96)were significantly high among COVID-19+patients compared to COVID-19-patients.Conclusions:There are increased risks of the 30-day mortality,inpatient mortality and critical care admission among hip fracture patients who are COVID-19+.The chances of developing pneumonia and acute respiratory failure are more in COVID-19+patients than in COVID-19-patients.
基金Weifang Municipal Science and Technology Bureau(Medical)Project“Effects and Mechanisms of Oxycodone and Alfentanil on IgFs in Mouse Ovarian Granulosa Cells”(2021YX035)。
文摘Objective:To observe the analgesic effect of combined spinal and epidural anesthesia on older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Method:One hundred and twenty elderly hip fracture surgery patients treated in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected and randomly divided into two groups,with 60 cases in the experimental group and 60 in the control group.The experimental group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention measures,while the control group was given epidural anesthesia intervention measures.The analgesic effect,tumor necrosis factor-alpha(TNF-α),C-reactive protein(CRP)levels,and other observation indicators were analyzed after anesthesia intervention.Result:After the intervention,the analgesic effect and the evaluation results of the subjects in the experimental group were better than those in the control group(P<0.05);the obtained values of TNF-αand CRP levels in the experimental group were higher than those of the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia intervention demonstrated positive outcomes.The analgesic effect of patients during surgery and their inflammatory factor levels improved,which makes this intervention worthy of clinical application and promotion.
文摘OBJECTIVE:To investigate the clinical effects of Xinkeshu combined with levosimendan on perioperative heart failure in oldest-old patients with hip fractures.METHODS:Oldest-old patients over 80 years old with perioperative heart failure and hip fractures were randomly divided into the control and observation groups,with 50 patients in each group.All patients in both groups were treated with conventional anti-heart failure therapy and levosimendan,whereas patients in the observation group additionally received Xinkeshu tablets.Clinical manifestations;left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF);left ventricular end-diastolic dimension(LVEDD);left ventricular end-systolic dimension(LVESD);B-type natriuretic peptide(BNP),superoxide dismutase(SOD),malondialdehyde(MDA),nitric oxide(NO),and endothelin-1(ET-1)levels;and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)and self-rating depression scale(SDS)scores were compared between before and after treatment to evaluate the curative effects of Xinkeshu combined with levosimendan.RESULTS:After treatment,the efficacy rate was significantly higher in the observation group than in the control group.LVEF and the levels of SOD and NO were higher in the observation group than in the control group after treatment.However,LVEDD;LVESD;BNP,MDA,and ET-1 levels;and the SAS and SDS scores were lower after treatment in the observation group than in the control group.CONCLUSION:Levosimendan combined with Xinkeshu can improve cardiac function,alleviate oxidative stress,and relieve anxiety and depression in oldest-old patients with perioperative heart failure and hip fracture.
基金supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(Grant No.2019YFC0840705)the National Key R&D Program of China(Grant No.2018YFC2001405)。
文摘Purpose:Venous thromboembolism(VTE)is a major health issue among hip fracture patients.This study aimed to develop an information platform based on a mobile application and then evaluate whether information platform-based nursing could improve patient’’s drug compliance and reduce the incidence of VTE in hip fracture patients.Methods:This study retrospectively analyzed hip fracture patients who were treated with conventional prevention and intervention methods for VTE(control group)between January 2008 and November 2012,and prospectively analyzed hip fracture patients who were treated with nursing intervention based on the information platform(study group)between January 2016 and September 2017.All the patients included in the both groups were hip fracture patients who had an age over 50 years,treated with surgery,and hospitalized≥48 h.Patients were excluded if they admitted to hospital due to old fractures,had a severe bleeding after 72 h of admission,diagnosed with any type of VTE,or refused to participate in the study.The information platform was divided into medical,nursing,and patient interface.Based on the information platform,medical practitioners and nurses could perform risk assessments,monitoring management and early warnings,preventions and treatments,health educations,follow-up,and other aspects of nursing interventions for patients.This study compared essential characteristics,drug compliance,VTE occurrence,and mean length of hospitalization between the two groups.Besides,a subgroup analysis was performed in the study group according to different drug compliances.SPSS 18.0 software(IBM Corp.,NY,and USA)was used for statistical analysis.Results:Altogether 1177 patients were included in the control group,and 491 patients in the study group.Regarding baseline data,patients in the study group had more morbidities than those in the control group(p<0.05).The difference of drug compliance between the two groups was statistically significant(p<0.001):761(64.7%)of the patients in the control group and only 30(6.1%)patients in the study group had poor drug compliance.In terms of VTE,10.7%patients(126/1177)in the control group had VTE,and the rate in the study group was 7.1%(35/491),showing a statistically significant difference(p=0.02).Moreover,the average length of hospitalization in the study group was also significantly lower than that in the control group(10.4 daysvs.13.7 days,p<0.001).Subgroup analyses of the study group showed that the incidence of VTE in patients with poor,partial,and good compliances were 56.7%(17/30),5.8%(10/171),and 2.8%(8/290),respectively,revealing a significantly huge difference(p<0.001).Conclusions:Poor drug compliance leads to higher VTE occurrence.The information platform-based nursing can effectively improve the compliance of hip fracture patients and thus considerably reduce the incidence of VTE.The mobile application may be an effective tool to prevent VTE in hip fracture patients.
基金This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,commercial,or not-for-profit sectors.
文摘Purpose:The COVID-19 pandemic has caused 1.4 million deaths globally and is associated with a 3-4 times increase in 30-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture with concurrent COVID-19 infection.Typically,death from COVID-19 infection occurs between 15 and 22 days after the onset of symptoms,but this period can extend up to 8 weeks.This study aimed to assess the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on 120-day mortality after a fragility hip fracture.Methods:A multi-centre prospective study across 10 hospitals treating 8%of the annual burden of hip fractures in England between 1st March and 30th April,2020 was performed.Patients whose surgical treatment was payable through the National Health Service Best Practice Tariff mechanism for"fragility hip fractures"were included in the study.Patients'120-day mortality was assessed relative to their perioperative COVID-19 status.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.Results:A total of 746 patients were included in this study,of which 87(11.7%)were COVID-19 positive.Mortality rates at 30-and 120-day were significantly higher for COVID-19 positive patients relative to COVID-19 negative patients(p<0.001).However,mortality rates between 31 and 120-day were not significantly different(p=0.107),16.1%and 9.4%respectively for COVID-19 positive and negative patients,odds ratio 1.855(95%CI 0.865-3.978).Conclusion:Hip fracture patients with concurrent COVID-19 infection,provided that they are alive at day-31 after injury,have no significant difference in 120-day mortality.Despite the growing awareness and concern of "long-COVID"and its widespread prevalence,this does not appear to increase mediumterm mortality rates after a hip fracture.
文摘BACKGROUND Hip fractures and proximal humerus fractures are known to be associated with increased mortality,but the impact on mortality of combining these two common injuries is not well known.AIM To compare mortality,inpatient stay and discharge destination for patients with combined hip and proximal humerus fractures with those sustaining isolated hip fractures.METHODS Using the United Kingdom national hip fracture database,we identified all hip fracture patients over the age of 60 admitted to a single trauma unit from 2010-2016.Patients sustaining a proximal humerus fracture in addition to their hip fracture were identified using hospital coding data.We calculated the 30-d and one-year mortality for both the hip fracture cohort and the combined hip and proximal humerus fracture cohort.Other variables recorded included age,gender and whether the proximal humerus was treated with or without an operation.RESULTS We identified 4131 patients with hip fractures within the study period and out of those 40 had sustained both a hip and a proximal humerus fracture.Mean age in the hip fracture cohort was 80.9 years and in the combined fracture group 80.3 years.Out of the 40 patients in the combined group four were treated operatively.The 30-d mortality for our hip fracture cohort was 7.2%compared to the mortality of our combined cohort of 12.5%(P=0.163).The one-year mortality for our hip fracture cohort was 26.4%compared to 40%for the combined fracture cohort(P=0.038).We also found patients with combined injuries were less likely to return to their own home.CONCLUSION The 30-d and one-year mortality is higher for those patients who have sustained a combined hip and proximal humerus fracture when compared to those with a hip fracture alone.
基金Supported by Winfast Charity Foundation for Financial Support,No.YL20220525.
文摘BACKGROUND Geriatric hip fractures are one of the most common fractures in elderly individuals,and prolonged hospital stays increase the risk of death and complications.Machine learning(ML)has become prevalent in clinical data processing and predictive models.This study aims to develop ML models for predicting extended length of stay(eLOS)among geriatric patients with hip fractures and to identify the associated risk factors.AIM To develop ML models for predicting the eLOS among geriatric patients with hip fractures,identify associated risk factors,and compare the performance of each model.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at a single orthopaedic trauma centre,enrolling all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery between January 2018 and December 2022.The study collected various patient characteristics,encompassing demographic data,general health status,injury-related data,laboratory examinations,surgery-related data,and length of stay.Features that exhibited significant differences in univariate analysis were integrated into the ML model establishment and subsequently cross-verified.The study compared the performance of the ML models and determined the risk factors for eLOS.RESULTS The study included 763 patients,with 380 experiencing eLOS.Among the models,the decision tree,random forest,and extreme Gradient Boosting models demonstrated the most robust performance.Notably,the artificial neural network model also exhibited impressive results.After cross-validation,the support vector machine and logistic regression models demonstrated superior performance.Predictors for eLOS included delayed surgery,D-dimer level,American Society of Anaesthesiologists(ASA)classification,type of surgery,and sex.CONCLUSION ML proved to be highly accurate in predicting the eLOS for geriatric patients with hip fractures.The identified key risk factors were delayed surgery,D-dimer level,ASA classification,type of surgery,and sex.This valuable information can aid clinicians in allocating resources more efficiently to meet patient demand effectively.
文摘BACKGROUND Failure to fix unstable intertrochanteric fractures impairs return to daily activities.AIM To simulate five different internal fixation methods for unstable proximal femoral fractures.METHODS A three-dimensional model of the femur was established from sectional computed tomography images,and an internal fixation model was established.Finite element analysis of the femur model was established,and three intertrochanteric fracture models,medial defect,lateral defect,and medial-lateral defects,were simulated.Displacement and stress distribution after fixation with a proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail(PFNA),integrated dual-screw fixation(ITN),PFNA+wire,PFNA+plate,and PFNA+wire+plate were compared during daily activities.RESULTS The maximum displacement and stress of PFNA and ITN were 3.51 mm/473 MPa and 2.80 mm/588 MPa for medial defects;2.55 mm/288 MPa and 2.10 mm/307 MPa for lateral defects;and 3.84 mm/653 MPa and 3.44 mm/641 MPa for mediallateral defects,respectively.For medial-lateral defects,reconstructing the medial side alone changed the maximum displacement and stress to 2.79 mm/515 MPa;reconstructing the lateral side changed them to 3.72 mm/608 MPa,when both sides were reconstructed,they changed to 2.42 mm/309 MPa.CONCLUSION For medial defects,intramedullary fixation would allow early low-intensity rehabilitation exercise,and ITN rather than PFNA reduces the risk of varus and cut-out;for lateral wall defects or weakness,intram-edullary fixation allows higher-intensity rehabilitation exercise,and ITN reduces the risk of varus.For both medial and lateral defects,intramedullary fixation alone will not allow early functional exercise,but locating lateral or medial reconstruction will.For defects in both the inner and outer sides,if reconstruction cannot be completed,ITN is more stable.
文摘BACKGROUND Hip fractures are the most common reason for inpatient orthopaedic trauma admission.Urgent surgical intervention for hip fractures has remained a clinical priority throughout the coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic.Despite this,there is a paucity of clinical guidance addressing the informed consent process for hip fracture surgery in COVID-19 positive patients.This is of paramount medicolegal importance in a high-risk patient population.AIM To quantify the additional perioperative risks for COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery and provide clinicians with an evidence-based framework to establish an informed consent process.METHODS Two hundred and fifty nine consecutive patients undergoing surgical intervention for hip fractures in four hospitals in the United Kingdom were recruited.51 patients were confirmed positive for COVID-19.Predefined outcomes were analyzed over a 30-d postoperative period.COVID-19 positive and COVID-19 negative patients were compared after adjustment for confounding factors.RESULTS COVID-19 positive patients had more intensive care admissions(27%vs 5%,P<0.001),longer inpatient stays(median 23 d vs 9 d,P<0.001)and a higher 30-d mortality(29%vs 10%,P=0.001)than COVID-19 negative patients.Postoperative complications were evident in 74.5%of COVID-19 positive patients.35.3%of COVID-19 positive patients suffered postoperative lower respiratory tract infections with 13.7%developing acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS)and 9.8%experiencing symptomatic thromboembolic events.CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has created uncertainty in the medical community worldwide and poses unique challenges in providing informed consent for surgery.COVID-19 positive patients undergoing hip fracture surgery should be consented for the additional risk of postoperative complications(including lower respiratory tract infection,ARDS,deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism),increased requirement for intensive care admission,longer inpatient stay and higher risk of mortality.Further,clinicians must be transparent about the potential for unknown risks as research into the long-term surgical outcomes of COVID-19 positive patients continues to evolve.
文摘BACKGROUND Elderly patients tend to have poor self-efficacy and poor confidence in postoperative rehabilitation for hip fractures,and are prone to negative emotions,which affect treatment compliance.AIM To evaluate the effects of evidence-based intervention on postoperative fear,compliance,and self-efficacy in elderly patients with hip fractures.METHODS A total of 120 patients with hip fracture surgically treated from June 2018 to June 2020 at the orthopedic department of our hospital were selected and divided into intervention and routine groups(n=60 each)according to different nursing methods.The basic rehabilitation methods of the two groups were consistent,but patients in the intervention group received evidence-based nursing interventions at the same time.Differences between groups in the scores of motion phobia,pain fear,rehabilitation training compliance,self-efficacy,nursing satisfaction,and hip joint function were compared before and after the intervention.RESULTS Before the intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in motion phobia and pain fear scores between the groups(all P>0.05).However,motion phobia scores at 1 wk after intervention initiation(P<0.05),and pain fear scores at 1 wk and 2 wk after intervention initiation(all P<0.05),were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the routine group.On the first day of intervention,there was no significant difference in rehabilitation treatment compliance between the groups(P>0.05);however,at 2 wk after intervention initiation,rehabilitation compliance was significantly better in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).Before the intervention,there were no statistically significant differences in the scores for the two self-efficacy dimensions(overcoming difficulties and rehabilitation exercise self-efficacy)and the total self-efficacy score between the groups(all P>0.05).After 2 wk of intervention,the scores for these two dimensions of self-efficacy and the total self-efficacy score were significantly higher in the intervention group than in the routine group(all P<0.05).At 3 and 6 mo after surgery,hip function as evaluated by the Harris hip score,was significantly better in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).Additionally,overall nursing satisfaction was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the routine group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Evidence-based nursing intervention can alleviate fear of postoperative rehabilitation in elderly patients who underwent hip fracture surgery,and improve rehabilitation treatment compliance and patient self-efficacy,which promote hip function recovery.
文摘BACKGROUND Major hip surgery usually requires neuraxial or general anesthesia with tracheal intubation and may be supplemented with a nerve block to provide intraoperative and postoperative pain relief.CASE SUMMARY This report established that hip surgical procedures can be performed with a fascia iliaca compartment block(FICB)and monitored anesthesia care(MAC)while avoiding neuraxial or general anesthesia.This was a preliminary experience with two geriatric patients with hip fracture,American Society of Anesthesiologists status III,and with many comorbidities.Neither patient could be operated on within 48 h after admission.Both general anesthesia and neuraxial anesthesia were high-risk procedures and had contraindications.Hence,we chose nerve block combined with a small amount of sedation.Intraoperative analgesia was provided by single-injection ultrasound-guided FICB.Light intravenous sedation was added.Surgical exposure was satisfactory,and neither patient complained of any symptoms during the procedure.CONCLUSION This report showed that hip surgery for geriatric patients can be performed with FICB and MAC,although complications and contraindications are common.The anesthetic program was accompanied by stable respiratory and circulatory system responses and satisfactory analgesia while avoiding the adverse effects and problems associated with either neuraxial or general anesthesia.
