BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)refers to hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance or insufficient insulin secretion during pregnancy.Patients with GDM have a high risk of pregnancy complications,which ...BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)refers to hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance or insufficient insulin secretion during pregnancy.Patients with GDM have a high risk of pregnancy complications,which can adversely affect both maternal and fetal health.Therefore,early diagnosis,treatment and monitoring of GDM are essential.In recent years,a new treatment scheme represented by insulin aspart combined with metformin has received increasing attention.AIM To explore the effects of insulin aspart combined with metformin on patients with GDM and inflammatory markers.METHODS From April 2020 to September 2022,124 patients with GDM in Sanya Women and Children’s Hospital Managed by Shanghai Children’s Medical Center were collected and analyzed retrospectively.The control group(CG)comprised 62 patients treated with insulin aspart alone,and 62 patients treated with insulin aspart and metformin formed the observation group(OG).Before and after treatment,improvement of blood-glucose-related indexes[fasting blood glucose(FBG),2-h postprandial glucose(2h PG)and hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c)],serum related factor[serum homocysteine(Hcy)],serum inflammatory cytokines[tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-α,interleukin(IL)-6 and C-reactive protein(CRP)]were compared between the two groups.The clinical efficacy,adverse pregnancy outcomes and incidence of pregnancy complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS After treatment,the levels of FBG,2h PG,HbA1c,Hcy,TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP in both groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05),and the levels of FBG,2h PG,HbA1c,Hcy,TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP in the OG were lower than in the CG(P<0.05).The total clinical effectiveness in the OG was higher than that in the CG(P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications in the OG was significantly lower than in the CG(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Insulin aspart combined with metformin are effective for treatment of GDM,which can reduce blood-glucoserelated indexes,Hcy and serum inflammatory cytokines,and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications.展开更多
Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec and liraglutide injection(IDegLira)compared with insulin glargine plus insulin aspart(IGar plus IAsp)in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)ba...Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec and liraglutide injection(IDegLira)compared with insulin glargine plus insulin aspart(IGar plus IAsp)in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)based on the price of IDegLira before and after it was successfully admitted to the National Reimbursable Drug List(NRDL).Methods Cost and effectiveness parameters were obtained through systematic retrieval from PubMed,ScienceDirect,CNKI,and Wanfang database.A cost-effectiveness analysis(CEA)model was established to analyze the economics using IDegLira for T2DM patients with 1 to 5 years of medication.Results and Conclusion Before IDegLira was admitted to NRDL,its economic advantages over the IGlar plus Iasp regimen became more significant as patients’medication time prolonged.After being admitted to NRDL,with 1 year of medication,the medical cost of IDegLira decreased by 2853.91 yuan and the quality adjusted life years(QALY)increased by 0.12055 than IGar plus IAsp.The sensitivity analysis was highly consistent with the results of the baseline result.After being admitted to NRDL,for patients with T2DM who have poor blood glucose control,IDegLira is absolutely an economic advantage scheme compared with IGar plus IAsp.展开更多
Background: Changes in the day-to-day variability in the glucose-lowering effect of insulin [fluctuations of blood glucose levels (BG) seen during the same time period] that occur when insulin glargine (glargine) is r...Background: Changes in the day-to-day variability in the glucose-lowering effect of insulin [fluctuations of blood glucose levels (BG) seen during the same time period] that occur when insulin glargine (glargine) is replaced with insulin degludec (degludec) have not been sufficiently evaluated. Subjects: Five diabetics with unstable BG undergoing basal-bolus treatment using insulin glargine as basal insulin. Methods: Basal insulin was changed from glargine to same-dose degludec. The subjects’ HbA1c, glycoalbumin, and 1.5-anhydro-D-glucitol were measured before and after the switchover. Fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG) and predinner blood glucose concentration (PDBG) were measured continuously for 28 days immediately before the switchover, and 28 days immediately thereafter, to compare and evaluate 1) the changes in their mean values and standard deviations (SDs) before and after the switchover, and 2) the frequency of appearance of BG of over 180 mg/dL (BG ≥ 180) and under 70 mg/dL (BG Results: The levels of HbA1c, glycoalbumin, FBG’s mean value, SDs, BG ≥ 180 and BG Conclusion: The possibility was shown that degludec, to a greater extent than glargine, suppressed daily fluctuations of FBG and PDBG, suppressed the occurrence frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and exerted more steady hypoglycemic actions.展开更多
Objective: To analyse the safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in a Jordanian subgroup of the 24-week, non-interventional A1chieve study. Methods: A total of 509 Jordanian patients with ty...Objective: To analyse the safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in a Jordanian subgroup of the 24-week, non-interventional A1chieve study. Methods: A total of 509 Jordanian patients with type 2 diabetes (392 insulin-naive and 117 insulin-experienced) starting BIAsp30, alone or in combination with oral glucose-lowering drugs, were included. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were analysed over 24 weeks. Results: Patients had a mean age of 55.8 years, body mass index of 28.8 kg/m2 and diabetes duration of 9.4 years at baseline. Two serious adverse drug reactions of hypoglycaemia were reported. The proportion of patients who reported major hypoglycaemic events decreased (2.4% at baseline vs. 0.2% at Week 24, p = 0.0039). The proportion of patients reporting overall hypoglycaemia increased marginally (6.3% at baseline vs. 9.9% at Week 24, p = 0.0378), primarily attributed to a rise in minor and nocturnal hypoglycaemia reported in insulin-naive patients. From baseline to Week 24, the mean ± SD glycated haemoglobin A1c level decreased from 9.8% ± 1.4% to 7.4% ± 0.9% (p < 0.001). Significant reductions after 24 weeks were also noted in the mean fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, lipids, systolic blood pressure and quality of life (all p < 0.001), while the mean body weight increased by 1.8 ± 6.5 kg (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, BIAsp 30 therapy was well-tolerated and resulted in improved glycaemic control in this Jordanian subgroup over 24 weeks.展开更多
Dear Dr. Martin Hovland, We learned from the literature that premixed insulins are short-acting insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogue mixed with intermediate-acting insulin in a fixed ratio, addressing FBG and PPBG...Dear Dr. Martin Hovland, We learned from the literature that premixed insulins are short-acting insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogue mixed with intermediate-acting insulin in a fixed ratio, addressing FBG and PPBG in one injection. There are two categories;high-mix and low-mix premixed insulins. We, a Saudi task force, gathered to develop an explicit, evidence-based consensus for the use of the low-mix premixed insulin for better glycemic control. The treatment with premixed aspart 30 was non-inferior to treatment with premixed insulin lispro 25. In addition, Self-monitored blood glucose levels were comparable. Safety profiles were similar between both treatments, as was the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes. The switch between both products of the low-mix family can be carried out without any problem. Both products of the low-mix premixed insulin analogues aspart 30/70 and premixed insulin lispro 25/75 have comparable efficacy and safety as shown from the medical literature. Therefore, we can change from one to another safely as demonstrated by the US FDA statement. In addition, the ergonomic features of KwikPen’s design and function may offer important advantages for the user during insulin administration.展开更多
目的分析2型糖尿病患者使用德谷门冬双胰岛素注射液联合二甲双胍治疗后的血糖水平、不良反应,判断其治疗效果。方法选择76例2型糖尿病患者为研究对象,随机分成对照组和观察组,每组38例。对照组患者给予二甲双胍治疗,观察组在对照组基础...目的分析2型糖尿病患者使用德谷门冬双胰岛素注射液联合二甲双胍治疗后的血糖水平、不良反应,判断其治疗效果。方法选择76例2型糖尿病患者为研究对象,随机分成对照组和观察组,每组38例。对照组患者给予二甲双胍治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予德谷门冬双胰岛素注射液治疗。比较两组治疗前后的血糖[空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)]水平,不良反应发生率,治疗前后的胰岛功能[空腹胰岛素(FINS)、胰岛β细胞功能指数(HOMA-β)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)]、疗效。结果两组治疗后FPG、HbA1c、2 h PG均低于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后FPG(6.30±1.12)mmol/L、HbA1c(6.37±0.49)%、2 h PG(8.05±1.12)mmol/L明显低于对照组的(7.29±1.34)mmol/L、(7.32±0.83)%、(9.62±1.70)mmol/L,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的23.68%相比,观察组治疗期间不良反应发生率5.26%明显较低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的FINS、HOMA-β、HOMA-IR均较治疗前改善,且观察组患者FINS(14.03±1.52)mU/L、HOMA-β(80.35±10.36)明显高于对照组的(11.52±1.30)mU/L、(72.15±9.21),HOMA-IR(3.19±0.21)明显低于对照组的(3.81±0.42),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的73.68%相比,观察组患者治疗总有效率92.11%明显较高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经过德谷门冬双胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗后,2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平明显改善,安全性高,总体疗效较好,对于治疗2型糖尿病有着重大意义。展开更多
目的探究二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗2型糖尿病(Diabetes Mellitus Type 2,T2DM)对血糖的控制效果。方法选取2021年6月—2023年6月吉林省人民医院收治的100例T2DM患者为研究对象,以投掷硬币法分为参照组(n=50,二甲双胍治疗)、观察组(n...目的探究二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗2型糖尿病(Diabetes Mellitus Type 2,T2DM)对血糖的控制效果。方法选取2021年6月—2023年6月吉林省人民医院收治的100例T2DM患者为研究对象,以投掷硬币法分为参照组(n=50,二甲双胍治疗)、观察组(n=50,二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗)。比较两组临床治疗效果、不良反应总发生率、血糖控制情况及血清炎性因子水平。结果观察组治疗总有效率(96.00%)高于参照组(84.00%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.000,P<0.05)。两组不良反应总发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与治疗前相比,两组治疗半年后血糖水平、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-12水平均降低、白细胞介素-10水平升高,且观察组上述指标优于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗T2DM患者时可提高疗效,患者血糖控制情况更佳,血清炎性因子水平也得到明显改善,安全性较高。展开更多
目的探究利拉鲁肽联合德谷胰岛素对肥胖2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖、血脂及微炎症的影响。方法选取2020年12月至2022年12月的九江市第一人民医院收治的72例肥胖T2DM患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36例)和研究组(36例)...目的探究利拉鲁肽联合德谷胰岛素对肥胖2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖、血脂及微炎症的影响。方法选取2020年12月至2022年12月的九江市第一人民医院收治的72例肥胖T2DM患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36例)和研究组(36例)。对照组患者采用德谷胰岛素注射液治疗,研究组患者采用德谷胰岛素注射液联合利拉鲁肽注射液治疗,两组患者均连续治疗3个月。比较两组患者的临床疗效、体重指数(BMI)、血糖指标[空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]、血脂指标[总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、三酰甘油(TG)]、微炎症指标[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)]和不良反应的发生情况。结果研究组的治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的BMI和FPG、2 h PG、HbA1c均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的TC、TG、LDL-C均低于对照组,HDL-C高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的IL-6、TNF-α、hs-CRP、SAA均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对肥胖T2DM患者应用利拉鲁肽联合德谷胰岛素治疗,可改善其血糖、血脂指标,缓解临床症状,降低BMI,利于减轻机体微炎症状态,促进病情改善,提高治疗效果,且安全性较高。展开更多
目的比较德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液与重组甘精胰岛素注射液治疗2型糖尿病的效果。方法选取2021年10月至2022年12月辽宁省健康产业集团铁煤总医院内分泌科收治的70例2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,采用计算机随机数字表法将其分为研究组(n=...目的比较德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液与重组甘精胰岛素注射液治疗2型糖尿病的效果。方法选取2021年10月至2022年12月辽宁省健康产业集团铁煤总医院内分泌科收治的70例2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,采用计算机随机数字表法将其分为研究组(n=35)与常规组(n=35)。研究组患者应用德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗,常规组患者应用重组甘精胰岛素注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗。比较两组患者的血糖、不良反应、满意度以及临床各项指征。结果治疗后,研究组的空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)均低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的总满意度高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的不良反应总发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的血糖达标时间短于常规组,低血糖次数少于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗2型糖尿病患者,可以有效地控制患者的血糖水平,提高患者的满意度,促进其恢复,减少不良反应的发生,值得临床推广应用。展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM)refers to hyperglycemia caused by insulin resistance or insufficient insulin secretion during pregnancy.Patients with GDM have a high risk of pregnancy complications,which can adversely affect both maternal and fetal health.Therefore,early diagnosis,treatment and monitoring of GDM are essential.In recent years,a new treatment scheme represented by insulin aspart combined with metformin has received increasing attention.AIM To explore the effects of insulin aspart combined with metformin on patients with GDM and inflammatory markers.METHODS From April 2020 to September 2022,124 patients with GDM in Sanya Women and Children’s Hospital Managed by Shanghai Children’s Medical Center were collected and analyzed retrospectively.The control group(CG)comprised 62 patients treated with insulin aspart alone,and 62 patients treated with insulin aspart and metformin formed the observation group(OG).Before and after treatment,improvement of blood-glucose-related indexes[fasting blood glucose(FBG),2-h postprandial glucose(2h PG)and hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c)],serum related factor[serum homocysteine(Hcy)],serum inflammatory cytokines[tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-α,interleukin(IL)-6 and C-reactive protein(CRP)]were compared between the two groups.The clinical efficacy,adverse pregnancy outcomes and incidence of pregnancy complications were compared between the two groups.RESULTS After treatment,the levels of FBG,2h PG,HbA1c,Hcy,TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP in both groups were significantly decreased(P<0.05),and the levels of FBG,2h PG,HbA1c,Hcy,TNF-α,IL-6 and CRP in the OG were lower than in the CG(P<0.05).The total clinical effectiveness in the OG was higher than that in the CG(P<0.05).The total incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications in the OG was significantly lower than in the CG(P<0.05).CONCLUSION Insulin aspart combined with metformin are effective for treatment of GDM,which can reduce blood-glucoserelated indexes,Hcy and serum inflammatory cytokines,and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and complications.
文摘Objective To analyze the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec and liraglutide injection(IDegLira)compared with insulin glargine plus insulin aspart(IGar plus IAsp)in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)based on the price of IDegLira before and after it was successfully admitted to the National Reimbursable Drug List(NRDL).Methods Cost and effectiveness parameters were obtained through systematic retrieval from PubMed,ScienceDirect,CNKI,and Wanfang database.A cost-effectiveness analysis(CEA)model was established to analyze the economics using IDegLira for T2DM patients with 1 to 5 years of medication.Results and Conclusion Before IDegLira was admitted to NRDL,its economic advantages over the IGlar plus Iasp regimen became more significant as patients’medication time prolonged.After being admitted to NRDL,with 1 year of medication,the medical cost of IDegLira decreased by 2853.91 yuan and the quality adjusted life years(QALY)increased by 0.12055 than IGar plus IAsp.The sensitivity analysis was highly consistent with the results of the baseline result.After being admitted to NRDL,for patients with T2DM who have poor blood glucose control,IDegLira is absolutely an economic advantage scheme compared with IGar plus IAsp.
文摘Background: Changes in the day-to-day variability in the glucose-lowering effect of insulin [fluctuations of blood glucose levels (BG) seen during the same time period] that occur when insulin glargine (glargine) is replaced with insulin degludec (degludec) have not been sufficiently evaluated. Subjects: Five diabetics with unstable BG undergoing basal-bolus treatment using insulin glargine as basal insulin. Methods: Basal insulin was changed from glargine to same-dose degludec. The subjects’ HbA1c, glycoalbumin, and 1.5-anhydro-D-glucitol were measured before and after the switchover. Fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG) and predinner blood glucose concentration (PDBG) were measured continuously for 28 days immediately before the switchover, and 28 days immediately thereafter, to compare and evaluate 1) the changes in their mean values and standard deviations (SDs) before and after the switchover, and 2) the frequency of appearance of BG of over 180 mg/dL (BG ≥ 180) and under 70 mg/dL (BG Results: The levels of HbA1c, glycoalbumin, FBG’s mean value, SDs, BG ≥ 180 and BG Conclusion: The possibility was shown that degludec, to a greater extent than glargine, suppressed daily fluctuations of FBG and PDBG, suppressed the occurrence frequency of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, and exerted more steady hypoglycemic actions.
文摘Objective: To analyse the safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in a Jordanian subgroup of the 24-week, non-interventional A1chieve study. Methods: A total of 509 Jordanian patients with type 2 diabetes (392 insulin-naive and 117 insulin-experienced) starting BIAsp30, alone or in combination with oral glucose-lowering drugs, were included. Safety and effectiveness outcomes were analysed over 24 weeks. Results: Patients had a mean age of 55.8 years, body mass index of 28.8 kg/m2 and diabetes duration of 9.4 years at baseline. Two serious adverse drug reactions of hypoglycaemia were reported. The proportion of patients who reported major hypoglycaemic events decreased (2.4% at baseline vs. 0.2% at Week 24, p = 0.0039). The proportion of patients reporting overall hypoglycaemia increased marginally (6.3% at baseline vs. 9.9% at Week 24, p = 0.0378), primarily attributed to a rise in minor and nocturnal hypoglycaemia reported in insulin-naive patients. From baseline to Week 24, the mean ± SD glycated haemoglobin A1c level decreased from 9.8% ± 1.4% to 7.4% ± 0.9% (p < 0.001). Significant reductions after 24 weeks were also noted in the mean fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, lipids, systolic blood pressure and quality of life (all p < 0.001), while the mean body weight increased by 1.8 ± 6.5 kg (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, BIAsp 30 therapy was well-tolerated and resulted in improved glycaemic control in this Jordanian subgroup over 24 weeks.
文摘Dear Dr. Martin Hovland, We learned from the literature that premixed insulins are short-acting insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogue mixed with intermediate-acting insulin in a fixed ratio, addressing FBG and PPBG in one injection. There are two categories;high-mix and low-mix premixed insulins. We, a Saudi task force, gathered to develop an explicit, evidence-based consensus for the use of the low-mix premixed insulin for better glycemic control. The treatment with premixed aspart 30 was non-inferior to treatment with premixed insulin lispro 25. In addition, Self-monitored blood glucose levels were comparable. Safety profiles were similar between both treatments, as was the incidence of hypoglycemic episodes. The switch between both products of the low-mix family can be carried out without any problem. Both products of the low-mix premixed insulin analogues aspart 30/70 and premixed insulin lispro 25/75 have comparable efficacy and safety as shown from the medical literature. Therefore, we can change from one to another safely as demonstrated by the US FDA statement. In addition, the ergonomic features of KwikPen’s design and function may offer important advantages for the user during insulin administration.
文摘目的分析2型糖尿病患者使用德谷门冬双胰岛素注射液联合二甲双胍治疗后的血糖水平、不良反应,判断其治疗效果。方法选择76例2型糖尿病患者为研究对象,随机分成对照组和观察组,每组38例。对照组患者给予二甲双胍治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予德谷门冬双胰岛素注射液治疗。比较两组治疗前后的血糖[空腹血糖(FPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)]水平,不良反应发生率,治疗前后的胰岛功能[空腹胰岛素(FINS)、胰岛β细胞功能指数(HOMA-β)、胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)]、疗效。结果两组治疗后FPG、HbA1c、2 h PG均低于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组治疗后FPG(6.30±1.12)mmol/L、HbA1c(6.37±0.49)%、2 h PG(8.05±1.12)mmol/L明显低于对照组的(7.29±1.34)mmol/L、(7.32±0.83)%、(9.62±1.70)mmol/L,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的23.68%相比,观察组治疗期间不良反应发生率5.26%明显较低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患者的FINS、HOMA-β、HOMA-IR均较治疗前改善,且观察组患者FINS(14.03±1.52)mU/L、HOMA-β(80.35±10.36)明显高于对照组的(11.52±1.30)mU/L、(72.15±9.21),HOMA-IR(3.19±0.21)明显低于对照组的(3.81±0.42),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组的73.68%相比,观察组患者治疗总有效率92.11%明显较高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经过德谷门冬双胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗后,2型糖尿病患者的血糖水平明显改善,安全性高,总体疗效较好,对于治疗2型糖尿病有着重大意义。
文摘目的探究二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗2型糖尿病(Diabetes Mellitus Type 2,T2DM)对血糖的控制效果。方法选取2021年6月—2023年6月吉林省人民医院收治的100例T2DM患者为研究对象,以投掷硬币法分为参照组(n=50,二甲双胍治疗)、观察组(n=50,二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗)。比较两组临床治疗效果、不良反应总发生率、血糖控制情况及血清炎性因子水平。结果观察组治疗总有效率(96.00%)高于参照组(84.00%),差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.000,P<0.05)。两组不良反应总发生率对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与治疗前相比,两组治疗半年后血糖水平、白细胞介素-6、白细胞介素-12水平均降低、白细胞介素-10水平升高,且观察组上述指标优于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。结论二甲双胍与门冬胰岛素联合治疗T2DM患者时可提高疗效,患者血糖控制情况更佳,血清炎性因子水平也得到明显改善,安全性较高。
文摘目的探究利拉鲁肽联合德谷胰岛素对肥胖2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血糖、血脂及微炎症的影响。方法选取2020年12月至2022年12月的九江市第一人民医院收治的72例肥胖T2DM患者作为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(36例)和研究组(36例)。对照组患者采用德谷胰岛素注射液治疗,研究组患者采用德谷胰岛素注射液联合利拉鲁肽注射液治疗,两组患者均连续治疗3个月。比较两组患者的临床疗效、体重指数(BMI)、血糖指标[空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]、血脂指标[总胆固醇(TC)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、三酰甘油(TG)]、微炎症指标[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、淀粉样蛋白A(SAA)]和不良反应的发生情况。结果研究组的治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的BMI和FPG、2 h PG、HbA1c均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的TC、TG、LDL-C均低于对照组,HDL-C高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组治疗后的IL-6、TNF-α、hs-CRP、SAA均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者的不良反应总发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论对肥胖T2DM患者应用利拉鲁肽联合德谷胰岛素治疗,可改善其血糖、血脂指标,缓解临床症状,降低BMI,利于减轻机体微炎症状态,促进病情改善,提高治疗效果,且安全性较高。
文摘目的比较德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液与重组甘精胰岛素注射液治疗2型糖尿病的效果。方法选取2021年10月至2022年12月辽宁省健康产业集团铁煤总医院内分泌科收治的70例2型糖尿病患者作为研究对象,采用计算机随机数字表法将其分为研究组(n=35)与常规组(n=35)。研究组患者应用德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗,常规组患者应用重组甘精胰岛素注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗。比较两组患者的血糖、不良反应、满意度以及临床各项指征。结果治疗后,研究组的空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)均低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的总满意度高于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的不良反应总发生率低于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组的血糖达标时间短于常规组,低血糖次数少于常规组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论德谷胰岛素利拉鲁肽注射液联合阿卡波糖治疗2型糖尿病患者,可以有效地控制患者的血糖水平,提高患者的满意度,促进其恢复,减少不良反应的发生,值得临床推广应用。
