Dear Sir,Iam Dr.Yin-Hung Chang from the Department of Otolaryngology,Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital,the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.I would like to present a case of inverted papilloma with carcinoma change of lacrim...Dear Sir,Iam Dr.Yin-Hung Chang from the Department of Otolaryngology,Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital,the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.I would like to present a case of inverted papilloma with carcinoma change of lacrimal drainage apparatus and nasal cavity that had been successfully treated by endoscopic surgery.Lacrimal drainage apparatus tumors are rare but important展开更多
Inverted papilloma is an uncommon histopathological finding of maxillary sinus tumor. We reported here a rare case of inverted papilloma of maxillary sinus presented initially with ipsilateral proptosis. A middle-aged...Inverted papilloma is an uncommon histopathological finding of maxillary sinus tumor. We reported here a rare case of inverted papilloma of maxillary sinus presented initially with ipsilateral proptosis. A middle-aged lady with history of having allergic rhinitis presented with progressive left eye proptosis. Assessment revealed presence of orbital mass arising from paranasal sinus, in which the histopathological examination was initially inconclusive, and later it turned up to be inverted papilloma, partly with malignant transformation. High index of suspicion is necessary especially in those patients with recurrent non-specific sinonasal symptoms, which may need repeated biopsy and histopathological examination. Ocular manifestation signifies a more advance disease.展开更多
Background Distinguishing inverted papilloma （IP） from malignant tumors in the nasal cavity is difficult in a substantial number of cases,thus hindering the administration of appropriate therapeutic strategies.This ...Background Distinguishing inverted papilloma （IP） from malignant tumors in the nasal cavity is difficult in a substantial number of cases,thus hindering the administration of appropriate therapeutic strategies.This study aimed to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging （MRI）,including dynamic contrast enhanced MRI （DCE-MRI）,could improve differentiation between IP and malignant tumors,and to identify which MRI features were the best in discriminating IP from malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Methods Non-enhanced,static,and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI was performed in 88 patients with an IP or a malignant tumor in the nasal cavity that had been confirmed by histological results.MRI features of IP and malignant tumors including side,margin,T1 signal intensity,T1 homogeneity,T2 signal intensity,T2 homogeneity,lobulation signs,convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,pattern of enhancement,Tpeak,Tmax,Clmax,and TIC type were evaluated and correlated with histological findings.Results There were significant differences between IP and malignant tumors in T2 homogeneity,Iobulation signs,convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,Tpeak,Tmax and TIC types.A convoluted cerebriform pattern had a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of IP while washout-type TIC had a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Non-enhanced combined with static and dynamic enhancement MRI was significantly superior to non-enhanced combined with static enhancement MRI in the differentiation of IP and malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the best MRI features were a convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,and washout-type TIC for both observers （Wang XY and Zhang ZY）.Conclusion Non-enhanced and static combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves differentiation of IP and malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.展开更多
Background Quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement MR imaging （DCE-MRI）,used to measure properties of tissue microvasculature and tumor angiogenesis,is a promising method for distinguishing benign and malignant tu...Background Quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement MR imaging （DCE-MRI）,used to measure properties of tissue microvasculature and tumor angiogenesis,is a promising method for distinguishing benign and malignant tumors and characterizing tumor response to antiangiogenic treatment.The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of quantitative parameters derived from clinically used DCE-MRI for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors in the sinonasal area,which may be potentially useful for prediction and monitoring of treatment response to chemoradiotherapy of sinonasal tumors.Methods One hundred and forty-three patients with sinonasal tumors,including 78 malignant tumors and 65 benign tumors and tumor-like lesions,underwent clinically used DCE-MRI.Parametric maps were obtained for quantitative parameters including Ktrans,kep and ve.Two radiologists reviewed these maps and measured Ktrans,kep and ve in the tumor tissue.Data were analyzed using independent T-test or Mann-Whitney U test analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves.Results Ktrans,kep and ve showed significant differences between benign and malignant tumors in the sinonasal area （P=-0.000 1）.The accuracy of Ktrans,kep and ve in differentiation between benign and malignant sinonasal tumors were 72.0％,76.2％ and 67.1％,respectively.There were significant differences in kep and ve between malignant epithelial sinonasal tumors and lymphomas （P ＜0.05）.Using a ve value of 0.213 as the threshold value differentiated malignant epithelial tumors from lymphomas with an accuracy of 78.3％,sensitivity of 88.2％,specificity of 68.0％,positive predictive value of 66.7％,and negative predictive value of 90.9％.However,no significant difference in Ktrans and kep was found between malignant epithelial and non-epithelial tumors in the sinonasal area （P ＞0.05）.Conclusions It is feasible that quantitative parameters of tumors can be derived from clinically used DCE-MRI in the sinonasal region.Preliminary findings suggest an increased value for quantitative DCE-MRI in the evaluation of sinonasal tumors in clinical practice.展开更多
基金Supported by Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital,the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
文摘Dear Sir,Iam Dr.Yin-Hung Chang from the Department of Otolaryngology,Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital,the Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation.I would like to present a case of inverted papilloma with carcinoma change of lacrimal drainage apparatus and nasal cavity that had been successfully treated by endoscopic surgery.Lacrimal drainage apparatus tumors are rare but important
文摘Inverted papilloma is an uncommon histopathological finding of maxillary sinus tumor. We reported here a rare case of inverted papilloma of maxillary sinus presented initially with ipsilateral proptosis. A middle-aged lady with history of having allergic rhinitis presented with progressive left eye proptosis. Assessment revealed presence of orbital mass arising from paranasal sinus, in which the histopathological examination was initially inconclusive, and later it turned up to be inverted papilloma, partly with malignant transformation. High index of suspicion is necessary especially in those patients with recurrent non-specific sinonasal symptoms, which may need repeated biopsy and histopathological examination. Ocular manifestation signifies a more advance disease.
基金This work was supported by Beijing Excellent Talents Foundation （No. 2010D003034000033）, Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation （No. 7112030）, and High Levels of Health Technical Personnel in Beijing City （No. 2011-3-047）.
文摘Background Distinguishing inverted papilloma （IP） from malignant tumors in the nasal cavity is difficult in a substantial number of cases,thus hindering the administration of appropriate therapeutic strategies.This study aimed to evaluate whether magnetic resonance imaging （MRI）,including dynamic contrast enhanced MRI （DCE-MRI）,could improve differentiation between IP and malignant tumors,and to identify which MRI features were the best in discriminating IP from malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Methods Non-enhanced,static,and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI was performed in 88 patients with an IP or a malignant tumor in the nasal cavity that had been confirmed by histological results.MRI features of IP and malignant tumors including side,margin,T1 signal intensity,T1 homogeneity,T2 signal intensity,T2 homogeneity,lobulation signs,convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,pattern of enhancement,Tpeak,Tmax,Clmax,and TIC type were evaluated and correlated with histological findings.Results There were significant differences between IP and malignant tumors in T2 homogeneity,Iobulation signs,convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,Tpeak,Tmax and TIC types.A convoluted cerebriform pattern had a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of IP while washout-type TIC had a higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Non-enhanced combined with static and dynamic enhancement MRI was significantly superior to non-enhanced combined with static enhancement MRI in the differentiation of IP and malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that the best MRI features were a convoluted cerebriform pattern,extra-sinonasal involvement,and washout-type TIC for both observers （Wang XY and Zhang ZY）.Conclusion Non-enhanced and static combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI improves differentiation of IP and malignant tumors in the nasal cavity.
基金This work was supported by grants from Beijing Excellent Talents Foundation （No.2010D003034000033）,Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation （No.7112030）,High Levels of Health Technical Personnel in Beijing City （No.2011-3-047） and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation （No.2011M500026）.
文摘Background Quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement MR imaging （DCE-MRI）,used to measure properties of tissue microvasculature and tumor angiogenesis,is a promising method for distinguishing benign and malignant tumors and characterizing tumor response to antiangiogenic treatment.The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of quantitative parameters derived from clinically used DCE-MRI for distinguishing benign from malignant tumors in the sinonasal area,which may be potentially useful for prediction and monitoring of treatment response to chemoradiotherapy of sinonasal tumors.Methods One hundred and forty-three patients with sinonasal tumors,including 78 malignant tumors and 65 benign tumors and tumor-like lesions,underwent clinically used DCE-MRI.Parametric maps were obtained for quantitative parameters including Ktrans,kep and ve.Two radiologists reviewed these maps and measured Ktrans,kep and ve in the tumor tissue.Data were analyzed using independent T-test or Mann-Whitney U test analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves.Results Ktrans,kep and ve showed significant differences between benign and malignant tumors in the sinonasal area （P=-0.000 1）.The accuracy of Ktrans,kep and ve in differentiation between benign and malignant sinonasal tumors were 72.0％,76.2％ and 67.1％,respectively.There were significant differences in kep and ve between malignant epithelial sinonasal tumors and lymphomas （P ＜0.05）.Using a ve value of 0.213 as the threshold value differentiated malignant epithelial tumors from lymphomas with an accuracy of 78.3％,sensitivity of 88.2％,specificity of 68.0％,positive predictive value of 66.7％,and negative predictive value of 90.9％.However,no significant difference in Ktrans and kep was found between malignant epithelial and non-epithelial tumors in the sinonasal area （P ＞0.05）.Conclusions It is feasible that quantitative parameters of tumors can be derived from clinically used DCE-MRI in the sinonasal region.Preliminary findings suggest an increased value for quantitative DCE-MRI in the evaluation of sinonasal tumors in clinical practice.
