Type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) is one of the common endocrinology diseases that greatly affects the health care sector and economy. Application of hypoglycemic drugs has its own drawbacks and the use of non-drug thera...Type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) is one of the common endocrinology diseases that greatly affects the health care sector and economy. Application of hypoglycemic drugs has its own drawbacks and the use of non-drug therapy on treating T2DM has drawn much attention recently. This paper reviewed the research development of the non-pharmacological interventions on T2DM in recent years, including dietary therapy, exercise therapy, psychotherapy, acupuncture and moxibustion therapies and so on. The authors mentioned the problems in the research of non-drug treatment for blood glucose control of T2DM and put forward new ideas for the research in the future. Further well-designed trials with large sample size and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm current conclusions.展开更多
目的:研究由计算机技术控制,将心理语言和胃电起搏同步输出协同强化治疗方法(coordinated treatment of psychological language and gastric pacing,CTPG)治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效.方法:根据罗马Ⅲ标准选取60例功能性消化不良患者...目的:研究由计算机技术控制,将心理语言和胃电起搏同步输出协同强化治疗方法(coordinated treatment of psychological language and gastric pacing,CTPG)治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效.方法:根据罗马Ⅲ标准选取60例功能性消化不良患者,随机分为2组:CTPG组(心理语言结合胃电起搏强化治疗组,n=30)和对照组(单纯胃电起搏治疗组,n=30),两组患者均置于安静的环境中,CTPG组采用心理语言与胃电起搏同步输出,语音贯穿治疗并引导胃电起搏电流输出的治疗方法,对照组采用单纯胃电起搏治疗,两组每人均治疗1次/d,20min/次,连续7d为一疗程,在治疗前后采用研究者症状评分和患者症状自评分对患者餐后腹胀、早饱感、上腹痛、上腹烧灼感及恶心5个症状进行评分,差值越大,治疗效果越好,比较两组受试者以及临床疗效总有效率的差异.结果:两组治疗前后在研究者评分及患者自评分中均有下降,但与对照组相比CTPG组下降更为明显,在临床研究者评分中,症状总积分(4.033±1.903vs1.700±1.579,t=5.169,P<0.05),餐后腹胀(0.967±0.850vs0.533±0.776,t=2.062,P<0.05),早饱感(0.933±0.785vs0.300±0.466,t=3.800,P<0.05),上腹痛(0.900±0.759vs0.400±0.563,t=2.898,P<0.05),上腹烧灼感(0.700±0.702vs0.300±0.535,t=2.482,P<0.05),恶心(0.533±0.776vs0.200±0.407,t=2.482,P<0.05),临床疗效总有效率较对照组亦明显升高(96.7%vs70.0%,2=7.68,P<0.05);患者自评分中,CTPG组评分与对照组相比也明显下降,差值较大,症状总积分(12.633±5.714vs6.767±4.232,t=4.519,P<0.05),餐后腹胀(3.200±2.188vs2.100±1.729,t=2.161,P<0.05),早饱感(2.633±2.025vs1.500±0.563,t=2.461,P<0.05),上腹痛(2.567±1.942vs1.267±1.437,t=2.948,P<0.05),上腹烧灼感2.500±2.403vs1.033±1.189,t=2.996,P<0.05),恶心(1.733±1.946vs0.833±1.177,t=2.167,P<0.05),临床疗效总有效率较对照组亦明显增高(90.0%vs80.0%,2=1.18,P<0.05).结论:心理语言结合胃电起搏协同强化治疗功能性消化不良疗效优于单纯胃电治疗对照组,是非药物治疗功能性消化不良的一种新选择,也提示了心理调试在治疗功能性消化不良方面的必要性.展开更多
文摘Type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) is one of the common endocrinology diseases that greatly affects the health care sector and economy. Application of hypoglycemic drugs has its own drawbacks and the use of non-drug therapy on treating T2DM has drawn much attention recently. This paper reviewed the research development of the non-pharmacological interventions on T2DM in recent years, including dietary therapy, exercise therapy, psychotherapy, acupuncture and moxibustion therapies and so on. The authors mentioned the problems in the research of non-drug treatment for blood glucose control of T2DM and put forward new ideas for the research in the future. Further well-designed trials with large sample size and long-term follow-up are needed to confirm current conclusions.
文摘目的:研究由计算机技术控制,将心理语言和胃电起搏同步输出协同强化治疗方法(coordinated treatment of psychological language and gastric pacing,CTPG)治疗功能性消化不良的临床疗效.方法:根据罗马Ⅲ标准选取60例功能性消化不良患者,随机分为2组:CTPG组(心理语言结合胃电起搏强化治疗组,n=30)和对照组(单纯胃电起搏治疗组,n=30),两组患者均置于安静的环境中,CTPG组采用心理语言与胃电起搏同步输出,语音贯穿治疗并引导胃电起搏电流输出的治疗方法,对照组采用单纯胃电起搏治疗,两组每人均治疗1次/d,20min/次,连续7d为一疗程,在治疗前后采用研究者症状评分和患者症状自评分对患者餐后腹胀、早饱感、上腹痛、上腹烧灼感及恶心5个症状进行评分,差值越大,治疗效果越好,比较两组受试者以及临床疗效总有效率的差异.结果:两组治疗前后在研究者评分及患者自评分中均有下降,但与对照组相比CTPG组下降更为明显,在临床研究者评分中,症状总积分(4.033±1.903vs1.700±1.579,t=5.169,P<0.05),餐后腹胀(0.967±0.850vs0.533±0.776,t=2.062,P<0.05),早饱感(0.933±0.785vs0.300±0.466,t=3.800,P<0.05),上腹痛(0.900±0.759vs0.400±0.563,t=2.898,P<0.05),上腹烧灼感(0.700±0.702vs0.300±0.535,t=2.482,P<0.05),恶心(0.533±0.776vs0.200±0.407,t=2.482,P<0.05),临床疗效总有效率较对照组亦明显升高(96.7%vs70.0%,2=7.68,P<0.05);患者自评分中,CTPG组评分与对照组相比也明显下降,差值较大,症状总积分(12.633±5.714vs6.767±4.232,t=4.519,P<0.05),餐后腹胀(3.200±2.188vs2.100±1.729,t=2.161,P<0.05),早饱感(2.633±2.025vs1.500±0.563,t=2.461,P<0.05),上腹痛(2.567±1.942vs1.267±1.437,t=2.948,P<0.05),上腹烧灼感2.500±2.403vs1.033±1.189,t=2.996,P<0.05),恶心(1.733±1.946vs0.833±1.177,t=2.167,P<0.05),临床疗效总有效率较对照组亦明显增高(90.0%vs80.0%,2=1.18,P<0.05).结论:心理语言结合胃电起搏协同强化治疗功能性消化不良疗效优于单纯胃电治疗对照组,是非药物治疗功能性消化不良的一种新选择,也提示了心理调试在治疗功能性消化不良方面的必要性.