Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).M...Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A retrospective cohort follow-up study of 506 couples with RPL was conducted between April 2014 and March 2017.Couples were allocated to two groups according to their decision to choose PGT-A or not.The primary outcome was LBR per start/transfer cycle;secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate.Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age.Results:LBR per start(26.6%vs.15.4%,relative risk[RR]:2.66,95%confidence interval[CI][1.69-4.20],P<0.0001;adjusted RR[aRR]:2.40,95%CI[1.49-3.86],P=0.0004)and per transfer(44.9%vs.25.1%,RR:3.00,95%CI[1.96-4.60],P<0.0001;aRR:2.64,95%CI[1.68-4.14],P<0.0001)was significantly higher in the PGT-A group than in the non-PGT-A group.The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the PGT-A group compared to the non-PGT-A group(15.7%vs.34.6%,RR:0.27,95%CI[0.13-0.57],P=0.00005;aRR:0.26,95%CI[0.12-0.57],P=0.0007).Conclusions:LBR per start cycle following PGT-A is significantly higher,and risk of miscarriage is significantly lower among infertile couples with RPL,irrespective of maternal age.PGT-A should be recommended to infertile couples with RPL.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)in infertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in a univ...Objective:To evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)in infertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in a university-affiliated fertility center in Shanghai,China.Patients in the PGT-A group underwent blastocyst biopsy followed by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based PGT-A and single euploid blastocyst transfer,whereas patients in the control group underwent routine in vitro fertilization/ICSI procedures and frozen embryo transfer of 1-2 embryos selected according to morphological standards.Results:Two hundred and seven infertile patients with RPL were included in this study and randomly assigned to either the control or the PGT-A group.Baseline variables and cycle characteristics were comparable between the two groups.The results showed that PGT-A significantly improved the ongoing pregnancy rate(55.34%vs.29.81%)as well as the live birth rate(48.54%vs.27.88%)and significantly reduced the miscarriage rate(0.00%vs.14.42%)on a per-patient analysis.A significant increase in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates over time was observed in the PGT-A group.Subgroup analysis showed that the significant benefit diminished for patients who attempted≥2 PGT-A cycles.Conclusions:PGT-A significantly improved the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate,while reduced miscarriage rate in infertile RPL patients.However,the significance diminished in patients attempting≥2 cycles;thus,further studies are warranted to explore the most cost-effective number of attempts in these patients to avoid overuse.展开更多
基金This study was supported by Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Project(No.201640365)Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center Municipal Hospital New Frontier Technology Joint Project(SHDC12017105).
文摘Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A retrospective cohort follow-up study of 506 couples with RPL was conducted between April 2014 and March 2017.Couples were allocated to two groups according to their decision to choose PGT-A or not.The primary outcome was LBR per start/transfer cycle;secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate.Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age.Results:LBR per start(26.6%vs.15.4%,relative risk[RR]:2.66,95%confidence interval[CI][1.69-4.20],P<0.0001;adjusted RR[aRR]:2.40,95%CI[1.49-3.86],P=0.0004)and per transfer(44.9%vs.25.1%,RR:3.00,95%CI[1.96-4.60],P<0.0001;aRR:2.64,95%CI[1.68-4.14],P<0.0001)was significantly higher in the PGT-A group than in the non-PGT-A group.The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the PGT-A group compared to the non-PGT-A group(15.7%vs.34.6%,RR:0.27,95%CI[0.13-0.57],P=0.00005;aRR:0.26,95%CI[0.12-0.57],P=0.0007).Conclusions:LBR per start cycle following PGT-A is significantly higher,and risk of miscarriage is significantly lower among infertile couples with RPL,irrespective of maternal age.PGT-A should be recommended to infertile couples with RPL.
基金Shanghai Shenkang Hospital Development Center Program(SHDC12017105).
文摘Objective:To evaluate the effect of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)in infertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed in a university-affiliated fertility center in Shanghai,China.Patients in the PGT-A group underwent blastocyst biopsy followed by single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based PGT-A and single euploid blastocyst transfer,whereas patients in the control group underwent routine in vitro fertilization/ICSI procedures and frozen embryo transfer of 1-2 embryos selected according to morphological standards.Results:Two hundred and seven infertile patients with RPL were included in this study and randomly assigned to either the control or the PGT-A group.Baseline variables and cycle characteristics were comparable between the two groups.The results showed that PGT-A significantly improved the ongoing pregnancy rate(55.34%vs.29.81%)as well as the live birth rate(48.54%vs.27.88%)and significantly reduced the miscarriage rate(0.00%vs.14.42%)on a per-patient analysis.A significant increase in cumulative ongoing pregnancy rates over time was observed in the PGT-A group.Subgroup analysis showed that the significant benefit diminished for patients who attempted≥2 PGT-A cycles.Conclusions:PGT-A significantly improved the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rate,while reduced miscarriage rate in infertile RPL patients.However,the significance diminished in patients attempting≥2 cycles;thus,further studies are warranted to explore the most cost-effective number of attempts in these patients to avoid overuse.
