BACKGROUND GRACE and SYNTAX scores are important tools to assess prognosis in non-STelevation acute coronary syndrome(NSTE-ACS).However,there have been few studies on their value in patients receiving different types ...BACKGROUND GRACE and SYNTAX scores are important tools to assess prognosis in non-STelevation acute coronary syndrome(NSTE-ACS).However,there have been few studies on their value in patients receiving different types of therapies.AIM To explore the value of GRACE and SYNTAX scores in predicting the prognosis of patients with NSTE-ACS receiving different types of therapies.METHODS The data of 386 patients with NSTE-ACS were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into different groups.A total of 195 patients who received agents alone comprised the medication group,156 who received medical therapy combined with stents comprised the stent group,and 35 patients who were given agents and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)comprised the CABG group.General information was compared among the three groups.GRACE and SYNTAX scores were calculated.The association between the relationship between GRACE and SYNTAX scores and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs)was analyzed.Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to determine the factors influencing prognosis in patients with NSTE-ACS.Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze the predictive value of GRACE and SYNTAX scores for predicting prognosis in patients with NSTE-ACS using the Cox proportional-hazards model.RESULTS The incidence of MACE increased with the elevation of GRACE and SYNTAX scores(all P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 18.5%,36.5%,and 42.9%in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively.By comparison,the incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the medication group than in the stent and CABG groups(all P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 6.2%,28.0%and 40.0%in patients with a low GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 31.0%,30.3%and 42.9%in patients with a medium GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P>0.05).The incidence of MACE was 16.9%,46.2%,and 43.8%in patients with a high GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 16.2%,35.4%and 60.0%in patients with a low SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 37.5%,40.9%,and 41.7%in patients with a medium SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P>0.05).MACE incidence was 50.0%,75.0%,and 25.0%in patients with a high SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that both GRACE score(hazard ratio[HR]=1.212,95%confidence interval[CI]:1.083 to 1.176;P<0.05)and SYNTAX score(HR=1.160,95%CI:1.104 to 1.192;P<0.05)were factors influencing MACE(all P<0.05).Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that GRACE(HR=1.091,95%CI:1.015 to 1.037;P<0.05)and SYNTAX scores(HR=1.031,95%CI:1.076 to 1.143;P<0.05)were independent predictors of MACE(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION GRACE and SYNTAX scores are of great value for evaluating the prognosis of NSTE-ACS patients,and prevention and early intervention strategies should be used in clinical practice targeting different risk scores.展开更多
Objectives: The role of SYNTAX (SX) score in assessing the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. In this study we investigate the relationship between conventional risk factors of CAD with i...Objectives: The role of SYNTAX (SX) score in assessing the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. In this study we investigate the relationship between conventional risk factors of CAD with its complexity using SX score. Methods: The study consisted of 52 patients with CAD who were admitted to Cardiology Department—Menoufia University Hospitals for elective coronary angiography. The overall SX score was calculated prospectively using the SX score algorithm. Then comparison was done between populations with and without each risk factor. Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and smoking with SX score results (p 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis, including conventional risk factors of CAD as independent covariates, it revealed that aging, having diabetes mellitus and smoking were identified as significant independent risk factors for CAD complexity. Conclusion: Advanced age, having diabetes mellitus and cigarette smoking are considered to be independent risk factors for the complexity of CAD. Therefore, when these factors present, we expect that the SX score of the patient to be high indicating a complex CAD.展开更多
The syntax score devised as a tool to grade complexity of coronary artery disease with a view to its suitability for PCI or otherwise on deeper introspection is fraught with some inherent limitations and fallacies lar...The syntax score devised as a tool to grade complexity of coronary artery disease with a view to its suitability for PCI or otherwise on deeper introspection is fraught with some inherent limitations and fallacies largely as a result of the variability in coronary anatomy and the fixed nomenclature of the devised scoring system. We, in this special report, bring out the limitations and fallacies in the same and possible remedies presented as a viewpoint which may be useful to the interventional community at large.展开更多
Background The Syntax score was recently developed as a comprehensive, angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease （CAD）. It aims to assist in patient selection and risk stratification of pat...Background The Syntax score was recently developed as a comprehensive, angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease （CAD）. It aims to assist in patient selection and risk stratification of patients with extensive CAD undergoing revascularization. However, the prognostic value of the Syntax score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has not been validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate its role in predicting long-term incidences of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE） in patients undergoing PCI for 3-vessel disease.Methods Two hundred and three consecutive patients with de novo 3-vessel CAD undergoing PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents were studied. Their angiograms were scored according to the Syntax score. The patients were divided into tertiles according to the Syntax score： lowest Syntax score tertile （Syntax score 〈22）, intermediate Syntax score tertile （Syntax score of 23 to 32）, and the highest Syntax score tertile （Syntax score 〉33）. During the 1-year follow-up, the MACCE-free survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between the Syntax score and the incidence of MACCE. Performance of the Syntax score was studied with respect to predicting the rate of MACCE by receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curves with an area under the curve.Results The overall Syntax score ranged from 6 to 66 with mean ± standard deviation of 27.9±12.6 and a median of 26. At 1 year, the Syntax score significantly predicted the risk of MACCE （HR 1.07/U increase, 95% Cl 1.04 to 1.11, P 〈0.001）. The rate of MACCE was significantly increased among patients in the highest Syntax score tertile （17.9%） as compared with those with the lowest Syntax score tertile （1.4%, P 〈0.001） or intermediate Syntax score tertile （6.2%, P=0.041）. After the adjustment for all potential confounders, the Syntax score remained a significant predictor of the rate of MACCE （adjusted HR 1.12/U increase, 95% Cl 1.05 to 1.20, P 〈0.001）. The Syntax score accurately predicted MACCE with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.77 （95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, P 〈0.001）. A Syntax score of 29.5 was identified as the optimal cutoff to predict MACCE with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 65.6%. Conclusion The Syntax score predicts the risk of MACCE in patients with 3-vessel disease undergoing PCI.展开更多
Background::Imprecise interpretation of coronary angiograms was reported and resulted in inappropriate revascularization.Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery(SYNTAX)score i...Background::Imprecise interpretation of coronary angiograms was reported and resulted in inappropriate revascularization.Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery(SYNTAX)score is a comprehensive system to evaluate the complexity of the overall lesions.We hypothesized that a real-time SYNTAX score feedback from image analysts may rectify the mis-estimation and improve revascularization appropriateness in patients with stable coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods::In this single-center,historical control study,patients with stable CAD with coronary lesion stenosis≥50%were consecutively recruited.During the control period,SYNTAX scores were calculated by treating cardiologists.During the intervention period,SYNTAX scores were calculated by image analysts immediately after coronary angiography and were provided to cardiologists in real-time to aid decision-making.The primary outcome was revascularization deemed inappropriate by Chinese appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.Results::A total of 3245 patients were enrolled and assigned to the control group(08/2016-03/2017,n=1525)or the intervention group(03/2017-09/2017,n=1720).For SYNTAX score tertiles,17.9%patients were overestimated and 4.3%were underestimated by cardiologists in the control group.After adjustment,inappropriate revascularization significantly decreased in the intervention group compared with the control group(adjusted odds ratio[OR]:0.83;95%confidence interval[CI]:0.73-0.95;P=0.007).Both inappropriate percutaneous coronary intervention(adjusted OR:0.82;95%CI:0.74-0.92;P<0.001)and percutaneous coronary intervention utilization(adjusted OR:0.88;95%CI:0.79-0.98;P=0.016)decreased significantly in the intervention group.There was no significant difference in 1-year adverse cardiac events between the control group and the intervention group.Conclusions::Real-time SYNTAX score feedback significantly reduced inappropriate coronary revascularization in stable patients with CAD.Clinical trial registration::Nos.NCT03068858 and NCT02880605;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.展开更多
Background The SYNTAX score was developed to assess the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease and was determined to be effective in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） in patients with STelevat...Background The SYNTAX score was developed to assess the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease and was determined to be effective in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） in patients with STelevation myocardial infarction（STEMI） and non-STEMI（NSTEMI）. However, the relationship between SYNTAX score and CIN of patients with CTO undergoing PCI has been unclear. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 667 patients with CTO who underwent our institution′s basic PCI protocol between January 2010 and September 2012. The patients were divided into 3 groups： a low-risk group（SYNTAX score 〈 23; n = 231）, a moderate-risk group（SYNTAX score = 23-32; n = 214）, and a high-risk group（SYNTAX score〉32; n = 222）. CIN was defined as an absolute increase in SCr of ≥ 0.5 mg/d L over baseline values within 48-72 h after administration of contrast medium. We observed the correlation between SYNTAX score and the CIN rates. Results CIN developed in 74（11.09%） of the 667 study patients. The CIN rate showed a positive trend in the 3 groups based on the SYNTAX score, the higher SYNTAX score corresponds to the higher incidence of CIN（6.93%,13.08%,13.51%P = 0.044）. In the multivariate analysis, SYNTAX score was identified as an independent predictor of CIN（OR：1.956,95% CI： 1.014-3.773; P = 0.045; OR： 1.942,95% CI： 1.005-3.752; P = 0.048）. The incidence of in-hospital（1.3% vs. 4, 21% vs. 5.86%, P = 0.035） and long-term MACE（4.59% vs. 7.88% vs. 11.66%, P = 0.046） rates were more frequent in the higner SYNTAX score groups. Conclusions SYNTAX score is an independent predictor of CIN among patients with CTO undergoing PCI.展开更多
Complex coronary heart disease(CHD)has become a hot spot in medicine due to its complex coronary anatomy,variable clinical factors,difficult hemodynamic reconstruction,and limited effect of conservative drug treatment...Complex coronary heart disease(CHD)has become a hot spot in medicine due to its complex coronary anatomy,variable clinical factors,difficult hemodynamic reconstruction,and limited effect of conservative drug treatment.Identifying complex CHD and selecting optimal treatment methods have become more scientific as revascularization technology has improved,and coronary risk stratification scores have been introduced.SYNTAX and its derivative scores are decision-making tools that quantitatively describe the characteristics of coronary lesions in patients based on their complexity and severity.The SYNTAX and its derivative scores could assist clinicians in rationalizing the selection of hemodynamic reconstruction treatment strategies,and have demon-strated outstanding value in evaluating the prognosis of patients with complex CHD undergoing revascularization treatment.The authors in this article summary the practical application of SYNTAX and its derivative scores in complex CHD in order to deepen the understanding of the relationship between the choice of different revascularization strategies and SYNTAX and its derived scores in complex CHD and provide a further reference for clinical treatment of complex CHD.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND GRACE and SYNTAX scores are important tools to assess prognosis in non-STelevation acute coronary syndrome(NSTE-ACS).However,there have been few studies on their value in patients receiving different types of therapies.AIM To explore the value of GRACE and SYNTAX scores in predicting the prognosis of patients with NSTE-ACS receiving different types of therapies.METHODS The data of 386 patients with NSTE-ACS were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into different groups.A total of 195 patients who received agents alone comprised the medication group,156 who received medical therapy combined with stents comprised the stent group,and 35 patients who were given agents and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG)comprised the CABG group.General information was compared among the three groups.GRACE and SYNTAX scores were calculated.The association between the relationship between GRACE and SYNTAX scores and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs)was analyzed.Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to determine the factors influencing prognosis in patients with NSTE-ACS.Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to analyze the predictive value of GRACE and SYNTAX scores for predicting prognosis in patients with NSTE-ACS using the Cox proportional-hazards model.RESULTS The incidence of MACE increased with the elevation of GRACE and SYNTAX scores(all P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 18.5%,36.5%,and 42.9%in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively.By comparison,the incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the medication group than in the stent and CABG groups(all P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 6.2%,28.0%and 40.0%in patients with a low GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 31.0%,30.3%and 42.9%in patients with a medium GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P>0.05).The incidence of MACE was 16.9%,46.2%,and 43.8%in patients with a high GRACE score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 16.2%,35.4%and 60.0%in patients with a low SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).The incidence of MACE was 37.5%,40.9%,and 41.7%in patients with a medium SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P>0.05).MACE incidence was 50.0%,75.0%,and 25.0%in patients with a high SYNTAX score in the medication group,stent group,and CABG group,respectively(P<0.05).Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that both GRACE score(hazard ratio[HR]=1.212,95%confidence interval[CI]:1.083 to 1.176;P<0.05)and SYNTAX score(HR=1.160,95%CI:1.104 to 1.192;P<0.05)were factors influencing MACE(all P<0.05).Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that GRACE(HR=1.091,95%CI:1.015 to 1.037;P<0.05)and SYNTAX scores(HR=1.031,95%CI:1.076 to 1.143;P<0.05)were independent predictors of MACE(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION GRACE and SYNTAX scores are of great value for evaluating the prognosis of NSTE-ACS patients,and prevention and early intervention strategies should be used in clinical practice targeting different risk scores.
文摘Objectives: The role of SYNTAX (SX) score in assessing the complexity of coronary artery disease (CAD) is well established. In this study we investigate the relationship between conventional risk factors of CAD with its complexity using SX score. Methods: The study consisted of 52 patients with CAD who were admitted to Cardiology Department—Menoufia University Hospitals for elective coronary angiography. The overall SX score was calculated prospectively using the SX score algorithm. Then comparison was done between populations with and without each risk factor. Results: There was a statistically significant correlation between age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and smoking with SX score results (p 0.05). In a multivariate regression analysis, including conventional risk factors of CAD as independent covariates, it revealed that aging, having diabetes mellitus and smoking were identified as significant independent risk factors for CAD complexity. Conclusion: Advanced age, having diabetes mellitus and cigarette smoking are considered to be independent risk factors for the complexity of CAD. Therefore, when these factors present, we expect that the SX score of the patient to be high indicating a complex CAD.
文摘The syntax score devised as a tool to grade complexity of coronary artery disease with a view to its suitability for PCI or otherwise on deeper introspection is fraught with some inherent limitations and fallacies largely as a result of the variability in coronary anatomy and the fixed nomenclature of the devised scoring system. We, in this special report, bring out the limitations and fallacies in the same and possible remedies presented as a viewpoint which may be useful to the interventional community at large.
文摘Background The Syntax score was recently developed as a comprehensive, angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease （CAD）. It aims to assist in patient selection and risk stratification of patients with extensive CAD undergoing revascularization. However, the prognostic value of the Syntax score in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） has not been validated. The aim of this study was to evaluate its role in predicting long-term incidences of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE） in patients undergoing PCI for 3-vessel disease.Methods Two hundred and three consecutive patients with de novo 3-vessel CAD undergoing PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents were studied. Their angiograms were scored according to the Syntax score. The patients were divided into tertiles according to the Syntax score： lowest Syntax score tertile （Syntax score 〈22）, intermediate Syntax score tertile （Syntax score of 23 to 32）, and the highest Syntax score tertile （Syntax score 〉33）. During the 1-year follow-up, the MACCE-free survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relation between the Syntax score and the incidence of MACCE. Performance of the Syntax score was studied with respect to predicting the rate of MACCE by receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curves with an area under the curve.Results The overall Syntax score ranged from 6 to 66 with mean ± standard deviation of 27.9±12.6 and a median of 26. At 1 year, the Syntax score significantly predicted the risk of MACCE （HR 1.07/U increase, 95% Cl 1.04 to 1.11, P 〈0.001）. The rate of MACCE was significantly increased among patients in the highest Syntax score tertile （17.9%） as compared with those with the lowest Syntax score tertile （1.4%, P 〈0.001） or intermediate Syntax score tertile （6.2%, P=0.041）. After the adjustment for all potential confounders, the Syntax score remained a significant predictor of the rate of MACCE （adjusted HR 1.12/U increase, 95% Cl 1.05 to 1.20, P 〈0.001）. The Syntax score accurately predicted MACCE with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.77 （95% CI 0.65 to 0.90, P 〈0.001）. A Syntax score of 29.5 was identified as the optimal cutoff to predict MACCE with a sensitivity of 82.4% and specificity of 65.6%. Conclusion The Syntax score predicts the risk of MACCE in patients with 3-vessel disease undergoing PCI.
基金This work was supported by grants from the Capital’S Funds for Health Improvement and Research(No.2016-1-4031)National Key Research and Development Program(No.2016YFC1302000)Beijing Municipal Commission of Science and Technology Project(No.D171100002917001).
文摘Background::Imprecise interpretation of coronary angiograms was reported and resulted in inappropriate revascularization.Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery(SYNTAX)score is a comprehensive system to evaluate the complexity of the overall lesions.We hypothesized that a real-time SYNTAX score feedback from image analysts may rectify the mis-estimation and improve revascularization appropriateness in patients with stable coronary artery disease(CAD).Methods::In this single-center,historical control study,patients with stable CAD with coronary lesion stenosis≥50%were consecutively recruited.During the control period,SYNTAX scores were calculated by treating cardiologists.During the intervention period,SYNTAX scores were calculated by image analysts immediately after coronary angiography and were provided to cardiologists in real-time to aid decision-making.The primary outcome was revascularization deemed inappropriate by Chinese appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization.Results::A total of 3245 patients were enrolled and assigned to the control group(08/2016-03/2017,n=1525)or the intervention group(03/2017-09/2017,n=1720).For SYNTAX score tertiles,17.9%patients were overestimated and 4.3%were underestimated by cardiologists in the control group.After adjustment,inappropriate revascularization significantly decreased in the intervention group compared with the control group(adjusted odds ratio[OR]:0.83;95%confidence interval[CI]:0.73-0.95;P=0.007).Both inappropriate percutaneous coronary intervention(adjusted OR:0.82;95%CI:0.74-0.92;P<0.001)and percutaneous coronary intervention utilization(adjusted OR:0.88;95%CI:0.79-0.98;P=0.016)decreased significantly in the intervention group.There was no significant difference in 1-year adverse cardiac events between the control group and the intervention group.Conclusions::Real-time SYNTAX score feedback significantly reduced inappropriate coronary revascularization in stable patients with CAD.Clinical trial registration::Nos.NCT03068858 and NCT02880605;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.
文摘Background The SYNTAX score was developed to assess the severity and complexity of coronary artery disease and was determined to be effective in predicting contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） in patients with STelevation myocardial infarction（STEMI） and non-STEMI（NSTEMI）. However, the relationship between SYNTAX score and CIN of patients with CTO undergoing PCI has been unclear. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 667 patients with CTO who underwent our institution′s basic PCI protocol between January 2010 and September 2012. The patients were divided into 3 groups： a low-risk group（SYNTAX score 〈 23; n = 231）, a moderate-risk group（SYNTAX score = 23-32; n = 214）, and a high-risk group（SYNTAX score〉32; n = 222）. CIN was defined as an absolute increase in SCr of ≥ 0.5 mg/d L over baseline values within 48-72 h after administration of contrast medium. We observed the correlation between SYNTAX score and the CIN rates. Results CIN developed in 74（11.09%） of the 667 study patients. The CIN rate showed a positive trend in the 3 groups based on the SYNTAX score, the higher SYNTAX score corresponds to the higher incidence of CIN（6.93%,13.08%,13.51%P = 0.044）. In the multivariate analysis, SYNTAX score was identified as an independent predictor of CIN（OR：1.956,95% CI： 1.014-3.773; P = 0.045; OR： 1.942,95% CI： 1.005-3.752; P = 0.048）. The incidence of in-hospital（1.3% vs. 4, 21% vs. 5.86%, P = 0.035） and long-term MACE（4.59% vs. 7.88% vs. 11.66%, P = 0.046） rates were more frequent in the higner SYNTAX score groups. Conclusions SYNTAX score is an independent predictor of CIN among patients with CTO undergoing PCI.
文摘Complex coronary heart disease(CHD)has become a hot spot in medicine due to its complex coronary anatomy,variable clinical factors,difficult hemodynamic reconstruction,and limited effect of conservative drug treatment.Identifying complex CHD and selecting optimal treatment methods have become more scientific as revascularization technology has improved,and coronary risk stratification scores have been introduced.SYNTAX and its derivative scores are decision-making tools that quantitatively describe the characteristics of coronary lesions in patients based on their complexity and severity.The SYNTAX and its derivative scores could assist clinicians in rationalizing the selection of hemodynamic reconstruction treatment strategies,and have demon-strated outstanding value in evaluating the prognosis of patients with complex CHD undergoing revascularization treatment.The authors in this article summary the practical application of SYNTAX and its derivative scores in complex CHD in order to deepen the understanding of the relationship between the choice of different revascularization strategies and SYNTAX and its derived scores in complex CHD and provide a further reference for clinical treatment of complex CHD.
