Objective:To illustrate the academic influence of Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western medicine,and provide suggestions for further development of the Journal.Methods:Taking the China National Knowled...Objective:To illustrate the academic influence of Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western medicine,and provide suggestions for further development of the Journal.Methods:Taking the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)database as main source and the Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)as reference,the researchers retrieved the related data of the Journal such as its publication quantity,citations,fund projects,authors,institutions and regions from 1981 to 2018,analyzed these data by means of bibliometrics and information visualization with EXCEL,SPSS,VISIO,MATLAB and other softwares.Results:Through the analysis of the main indicators,the relevant indicators of the Journal’s academic influence revealed the developing trend of the Journal.Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases,endocrine,digestive system,pharmacological research of Chinese medicine and gynecology,as the hot topics in the discipline and academic,were clarified.Conclusions:All indicators show that the Journal is a high-quality journal reflecting the excellent achievements in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine in China.Through further analysis of relevant indicators,the authors put forward some specific suggestions on how to run the Journal well.展开更多
目的应用CONSORT声明修订版和Jadad评分标准等评价《中国循证医学杂志》发表的中医药随机对照试验(RCT)的报告质量,并与前期调查结果进行比较,了解中医药RCT报告质量的改善情况。方法手工检索《中国循证医学杂志》2001～2008年刊载的中...目的应用CONSORT声明修订版和Jadad评分标准等评价《中国循证医学杂志》发表的中医药随机对照试验(RCT)的报告质量,并与前期调查结果进行比较,了解中医药RCT报告质量的改善情况。方法手工检索《中国循证医学杂志》2001～2008年刊载的中医药RCT,采用CONSORT标准修订版Jadad评分量表和自拟指标进行质量评价。结果共检索出RCT57篇,其中中医药RCT17篇。摘要、纳入/排除标准、干预措施的具体实施、随机化顺序产生、统计方法描述、基线描述、结果与估计及解释结果等CONSORT标准评价项目的报告率均达100%;随机化分配隐藏、随机化实施、流程图的使用及依从性等项目的报告率明显高于本课题组前期研究结果;仅3篇有了致谢(17.6%),有1篇未记录中医证型,采用模拟剂的仅有4篇(23.5%)。17篇RCT的Jadad总评分为4.35±1.11,有11篇评分达到5分(64.7%)。结论《中国循证医学杂志》2001～2008年发表的中医药RCT的报告质量高于本课题组前期对13种中医药期刊在1999～2004年发表的RCT质量。可见,随着CONSORT标准的不断完善和中医药CONSORT声明(CONSORT for traditional Chinese medicine,CONSORT for TCM)的发表,中医药RCT质量在提高,我们期待中医药临床试验报告规范不断完善。展开更多
文摘Objective:To illustrate the academic influence of Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western medicine,and provide suggestions for further development of the Journal.Methods:Taking the China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI)database as main source and the Chinese Science Citation Database(CSCD)as reference,the researchers retrieved the related data of the Journal such as its publication quantity,citations,fund projects,authors,institutions and regions from 1981 to 2018,analyzed these data by means of bibliometrics and information visualization with EXCEL,SPSS,VISIO,MATLAB and other softwares.Results:Through the analysis of the main indicators,the relevant indicators of the Journal’s academic influence revealed the developing trend of the Journal.Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases,endocrine,digestive system,pharmacological research of Chinese medicine and gynecology,as the hot topics in the discipline and academic,were clarified.Conclusions:All indicators show that the Journal is a high-quality journal reflecting the excellent achievements in the field of integrated Chinese and Western medicine in China.Through further analysis of relevant indicators,the authors put forward some specific suggestions on how to run the Journal well.
文摘目的应用CONSORT声明修订版和Jadad评分标准等评价《中国循证医学杂志》发表的中医药随机对照试验(RCT)的报告质量,并与前期调查结果进行比较,了解中医药RCT报告质量的改善情况。方法手工检索《中国循证医学杂志》2001～2008年刊载的中医药RCT,采用CONSORT标准修订版Jadad评分量表和自拟指标进行质量评价。结果共检索出RCT57篇,其中中医药RCT17篇。摘要、纳入/排除标准、干预措施的具体实施、随机化顺序产生、统计方法描述、基线描述、结果与估计及解释结果等CONSORT标准评价项目的报告率均达100%;随机化分配隐藏、随机化实施、流程图的使用及依从性等项目的报告率明显高于本课题组前期研究结果;仅3篇有了致谢(17.6%),有1篇未记录中医证型,采用模拟剂的仅有4篇(23.5%)。17篇RCT的Jadad总评分为4.35±1.11,有11篇评分达到5分(64.7%)。结论《中国循证医学杂志》2001～2008年发表的中医药RCT的报告质量高于本课题组前期对13种中医药期刊在1999～2004年发表的RCT质量。可见,随着CONSORT标准的不断完善和中医药CONSORT声明(CONSORT for traditional Chinese medicine,CONSORT for TCM)的发表,中医药RCT质量在提高,我们期待中医药临床试验报告规范不断完善。
