BACKGROUND Cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)is rare but may result in uterine rupture during pregnancy or massive hemorrhage during abortion procedures.Awareness of this condition is increasing,and most patients with CSP a...BACKGROUND Cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)is rare but may result in uterine rupture during pregnancy or massive hemorrhage during abortion procedures.Awareness of this condition is increasing,and most patients with CSP are now diagnosed early and can be managed safely.However,some atypical patients are misdiagnosed,and their surgical risks are underestimated,increasing the risk of fatal hemorrhage.CASE SUMMARY A 27-year-old Asian woman visited our institution because of abnormal pregnancy,and she was diagnosed with a hydatidiform mole through transvaginal ultrasound(TVS).Under hysteroscopy,a large amount of placental tissue was found in the scar of the lower uterine segment,and a sudden massive hemorrhage occurred during the removal process.The bilateral internal iliac arteries were temporarily blocked under laparoscopy,and scar resection and repair were rapidly performed.She was discharged in good condition 5 d after the operation.CONCLUSION Although TVS is widely used in the diagnosis of CSP,delays in the diagnosis of atypical CSP remain.Surgical treatment following internal iliac artery temporary occlusion may be an appropriate management method for unanticipated massive hemorrhage during CSP surgery.展开更多
目的探讨颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉端侧吻合术中不同临时阻断技术的效果及可靠性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月—2023年4月南方医科大学南方医院神经外科收治的接受直接搭桥术治疗的烟雾病患者资料,根据临时阻断策略的不同将患者分为3组:①有垫...目的探讨颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉端侧吻合术中不同临时阻断技术的效果及可靠性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月—2023年4月南方医科大学南方医院神经外科收治的接受直接搭桥术治疗的烟雾病患者资料,根据临时阻断策略的不同将患者分为3组:①有垫片、多阻断夹阻断组(multi-clips+rubber pad group,M+R组);②无垫片、多阻断夹阻断组(multi-clips group,M组);③无垫片、单阻断夹阻断组(single-clip group,S组)。比较组间临时阻断时间、受体动脉切开后有无渗血、术中穿支血管损伤以及术后新发脑梗死情况。结果共355例患者、360个大脑半球纳入分析,按大脑半球统计患者360例,其中男性188例,女性172例,平均年龄为(43.8±0.7)岁。其中M+R组45例,M组191例,S组124例。3组平均阻断时间:M+R组为(37.9±9.8)min,M组为(20.9±9.0)min,S组为(11.0±3.5)min,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。阻断后受体动脉管腔内渗血以及术中穿支血管损伤发生率:M+R组为8.89%(阻断后受体动脉渗血4例),M组为14.66%(阻断后受体动脉渗血19例,术中穿支血管损伤8例,临时阻断部位有血栓形成1例),S组为5.65%(阻断后受体动脉渗血7例),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后新发脑梗死发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单阻断夹阻断策略安全、有效,能显著缩短临时阻断时间,可以优先考虑作为颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉端侧吻合过程中的临时阻断策略。展开更多
目的:探讨腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术学习曲线。方法:回顾分析常州市妇幼保健院2015年12月—2023年8月收治的151例进行腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术患者的临床资料。采用累计求和分析(cumu...目的:探讨腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术学习曲线。方法:回顾分析常州市妇幼保健院2015年12月—2023年8月收治的151例进行腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术患者的临床资料。采用累计求和分析(cumulative sum analysis,CUSUM)法绘制学习曲线,根据所得曲线的临界点将整个过程分为提高期(47例)和熟练期(104例),分析比较2组患者的临床资料和手术结果。结果:根据患者手术时间和手术例数形成手术时间序列图,拟合曲线为y=-27.17ln(x)+330.74(x=手术例数)。根据手术时间绘制的CUSUM曲线的最佳拟合曲线方程为y=-0.005x^(3)-1.387x^(2)+98.643x-253.571(x为手术例数,最优拟合系数R2=0.931,P<0.05),48例即为该手术达到熟练期所需累积的例数。提高期患者手术时间[(263.72±38.07)min vs.(201.65±48.03)min,P<0.001]、术后持续发热率(40.43%vs.22.12%,P=0.020)和术后体温[38.0(37.8,38.1)℃vs.37.7(37.5,38.0)℃,P=0.002]均高于熟练期患者。两阶段患者的术后血红蛋白水平和手术前后血红蛋白差值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:子宫动脉临时阻断能够有效控制术中出血量,术者约需完成48例腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术达到技术熟练,但仍需不断熟练手术操作,降低患者感染风险。展开更多
基金Supported by Medical Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province,China,No.2020ZH003。
文摘BACKGROUND Cesarean scar pregnancy(CSP)is rare but may result in uterine rupture during pregnancy or massive hemorrhage during abortion procedures.Awareness of this condition is increasing,and most patients with CSP are now diagnosed early and can be managed safely.However,some atypical patients are misdiagnosed,and their surgical risks are underestimated,increasing the risk of fatal hemorrhage.CASE SUMMARY A 27-year-old Asian woman visited our institution because of abnormal pregnancy,and she was diagnosed with a hydatidiform mole through transvaginal ultrasound(TVS).Under hysteroscopy,a large amount of placental tissue was found in the scar of the lower uterine segment,and a sudden massive hemorrhage occurred during the removal process.The bilateral internal iliac arteries were temporarily blocked under laparoscopy,and scar resection and repair were rapidly performed.She was discharged in good condition 5 d after the operation.CONCLUSION Although TVS is widely used in the diagnosis of CSP,delays in the diagnosis of atypical CSP remain.Surgical treatment following internal iliac artery temporary occlusion may be an appropriate management method for unanticipated massive hemorrhage during CSP surgery.
文摘目的探讨颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉端侧吻合术中不同临时阻断技术的效果及可靠性。方法回顾性分析2015年1月—2023年4月南方医科大学南方医院神经外科收治的接受直接搭桥术治疗的烟雾病患者资料,根据临时阻断策略的不同将患者分为3组:①有垫片、多阻断夹阻断组(multi-clips+rubber pad group,M+R组);②无垫片、多阻断夹阻断组(multi-clips group,M组);③无垫片、单阻断夹阻断组(single-clip group,S组)。比较组间临时阻断时间、受体动脉切开后有无渗血、术中穿支血管损伤以及术后新发脑梗死情况。结果共355例患者、360个大脑半球纳入分析,按大脑半球统计患者360例,其中男性188例,女性172例,平均年龄为(43.8±0.7)岁。其中M+R组45例,M组191例,S组124例。3组平均阻断时间:M+R组为(37.9±9.8)min,M组为(20.9±9.0)min,S组为(11.0±3.5)min,组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。阻断后受体动脉管腔内渗血以及术中穿支血管损伤发生率:M+R组为8.89%(阻断后受体动脉渗血4例),M组为14.66%(阻断后受体动脉渗血19例,术中穿支血管损伤8例,临时阻断部位有血栓形成1例),S组为5.65%(阻断后受体动脉渗血7例),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后新发脑梗死发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论单阻断夹阻断策略安全、有效,能显著缩短临时阻断时间,可以优先考虑作为颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉端侧吻合过程中的临时阻断策略。
文摘目的:探讨腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术学习曲线。方法:回顾分析常州市妇幼保健院2015年12月—2023年8月收治的151例进行腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术患者的临床资料。采用累计求和分析(cumulative sum analysis,CUSUM)法绘制学习曲线,根据所得曲线的临界点将整个过程分为提高期(47例)和熟练期(104例),分析比较2组患者的临床资料和手术结果。结果:根据患者手术时间和手术例数形成手术时间序列图,拟合曲线为y=-27.17ln(x)+330.74(x=手术例数)。根据手术时间绘制的CUSUM曲线的最佳拟合曲线方程为y=-0.005x^(3)-1.387x^(2)+98.643x-253.571(x为手术例数,最优拟合系数R2=0.931,P<0.05),48例即为该手术达到熟练期所需累积的例数。提高期患者手术时间[(263.72±38.07)min vs.(201.65±48.03)min,P<0.001]、术后持续发热率(40.43%vs.22.12%,P=0.020)和术后体温[38.0(37.8,38.1)℃vs.37.7(37.5,38.0)℃,P=0.002]均高于熟练期患者。两阶段患者的术后血红蛋白水平和手术前后血红蛋白差值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:子宫动脉临时阻断能够有效控制术中出血量,术者约需完成48例腹腔镜下暂时阻断子宫动脉根治性挖除子宫腺肌病手术达到技术熟练,但仍需不断熟练手术操作,降低患者感染风险。
