BACKGROUND Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events are associated with poor outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)patients.There is conflicting evidence on the effects of chronic anticoagulation on mortality an...BACKGROUND Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events are associated with poor outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)patients.There is conflicting evidence on the effects of chronic anticoagulation on mortality and severity of COVID-19 disease.AIM To summarize the body of evidence on the effects of pre-hospital anticoagulation on outcomes in COVID-19 patients.METHODS A Literature search was performed on LitCovid PubMed,WHO,and Scopus databases from inception(December 2019)till June 2023 for original studies reporting an association between prior use of anticoagulants and patient outcomes in adults with COVID-19.The primary outcome was the risk of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients taking anticoagulants.Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 disease severity,in terms of intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation requirement in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection,and mortality.The random effects models were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios(aORs)with 95%confidence intervals(95%CIs).RESULTS Forty-six observational studies met our inclusion criteria.The unadjusted analysis found no association between prior anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk[n=43851,9 studies,odds ratio(OR)=0.67(0.22,2.07);P=0.49;I2=95%].The association between prior anticoagulation and disease severity was non-significant[n=186782;22 studies,OR=1.08(0.78,1.49);P=0.64;I2=89%].However,pre-hospital anticoagulation significantly increased all-cause mortality risk[n=207292;35 studies,OR=1.72(1.37,2.17);P<0.00001;I2=93%].Pooling adjusted estimates revealed a statistically non-significant association between pre-hospital anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk[aOR=0.87(0.42,1.80);P=0.71],mortality[aOR=0.94(0.84,1.05);P=0.31],and disease severity[aOR=0.96(0.72,1.26);P=0.76].CONCLUSION Prehospital anticoagulation was not significantly associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events,improved survival,and lower disease severity in COVID-19 patients.展开更多
Objective:The study aimed to discuss the treatment of acute thromboembolic event(TE)during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms.Methods:Between April 2013 and April 2019,158 patients with 167 intracrani...Objective:The study aimed to discuss the treatment of acute thromboembolic event(TE)during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms.Methods:Between April 2013 and April 2019,158 patients with 167 intracranial aneurysms were treated with endovascular embolization in our hospital,in which 9 cases of acute TEs occurred during the embolization procedures.The clinical data,radiological findings and treatments of the 9 patients were reviewed and analyzed.Results:The TEs occurred at the aneurysmal neck in 3 patients,at distal part of the parent artery in 3,in the stent in 2,and at the proximal part of the parent artery in 1.Intra-arterial(IA)infusion of tirofiban were performed in 6 patients,mechanical thromboectomy(MT)with a stent in 2 patients,and combined use of the two methods in 1 patients.According to the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction(mTICI)score,7 patients had recanalization of 2b/3a,1 patients had recanalization of 1,and 1 patients had recanalization of 0.At discharge,the mRS score was 0 in 3 patients,1 in 3 patients,and 2,3,4 in 1 patient each.6 months after the endovascular treatment,the mRS score was 0 in 5 patients,1 in 2 patients,and 3 in 1 patient.Conclusions:IA tirofiban and MT are effective remedies for the acute TE during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysm,reasonable selection of which may improve the prognosis of patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND The May-Hegglin anomaly is among a group of genetic disorders known as MYH9-related disease.Patients with inherited platelet disorders such as May-Hegglin anomaly are at a variably increased risk for bleedi...BACKGROUND The May-Hegglin anomaly is among a group of genetic disorders known as MYH9-related disease.Patients with inherited platelet disorders such as May-Hegglin anomaly are at a variably increased risk for bleeding due to a combination of platelet dysfunction and thrombocytopenia.Patients admitted to the hospital with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)infection are at an increased risk for a venous thromboembolism event(VTE).The National Institutes of Health COVID-19 treatment guidelines recommend using a prophylactic dose of heparin as VTE prophylaxis for adults who are receiving high-flow oxygen.We describe a patient admitted for COVID-19 infection with pneumonia and a history of May-Hegglin anomaly.The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as there are no clear guidelines for this patient population.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we describe the case of a 39-year-old woman admitted with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia.She had a history of May-Hegglin anomaly and demonstrated risk for bleeding since childhood,including a life-threatening bleeding event at the age of 9 years requiring blood and platelet transfusions.Her baseline platelet count was 40-50×109/L throughout her adult life.Her family history was also notable for May-Hegglin disorder in her mother,maternal uncle,maternal grandfather and her son.Computed tomography/pulmonary angiography revealed bilateral consolidative opacities consistent with multifocal pneumonia.Complete blood count was notable for platelet count of 54×109/L.She was admitted for inpatient respiratory support with high-flow oxygen per nasal cannula and was managed with guideline-directed therapy for COVID-19,including baricitinib and dexamethasone.The Hematology/Oncology consultation team was requested to assist with management of VTE prophylaxis in the setting of active COVID-19 infection and an inherited bleeding disorder.After review of the literature and careful consideration of risks and benefits,it was decided to treat the patient with prophylactic enoxaparin.She was closely monitored in the hospital for bleeding and worsening thrombocytopenia.She had no bleeding or signs of VTE.Her respiratory status improved,and she was discharged home after 5 d of hospitalization with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula and dexamethasone.At the 6-month follow-up,the patient successfully discontinued her home oxygen use after only a few weeks following discharge.CONCLUSION The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as anticoagulation guidelines exist for patients with COVID-19,but there are no clear guidelines for management of patients with COVID-19 and inherited bleeding disorders,particularly those with MYH9-related disease.She was discharged after recovery from the COVID-19 infection without bleeding or thrombosis.As there are no published guidelines for this situation,we present a pragmatic,informed approach to a patient with MYH9-related disease who had an indication for anticoagulation.展开更多
Objectives To investigate the relationship between serum uric acid （SUA） and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast （LA-SEC） in non-valvular atrial fibrillation （AF） patients. Methods We retrospectively screened ...Objectives To investigate the relationship between serum uric acid （SUA） and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast （LA-SEC） in non-valvular atrial fibrillation （AF） patients. Methods We retrospectively screened 1,476 consecutive hospitalized patients with AF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation, left atrial appendage closure and electric cardiover- sion at Guangdong General Hospital. Data on the clinical baseline characteristics of all patients were collected from electronic medical re- cords and analyzed. Results After exclusion of patients with left atrial thrombus, 1,354 patients entered into present study and 57 were LA-SEC. The mean female SUA level （380.88 ± 94.35 μmol/L vs. 323.37 ± 72.19μmol/L, P 〈 0.001） and male SUA level （416.97 ± 98.87 μmol/L vs. 367.88 ＋ 68.50 μmol/L, P = 0.008） were both significantly higher in patients with LA-SEC than in the controls. The mean left atrial dimension （41.32 ± 5.12 mm vs. 36.12 ± 5.66 mm, P 〈 0.001） was markedly larger in patients with LA-SEC. In multivariate regression analysis, SUA level was an independent risk factor for LA-SEC （OR： 1.008, P 〈 0.001）. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the corresponding area under the curve for SUA predicting LA-SEC in female and male were 0.670 and 0.657, respectively. SUA level is significantly higher in non-valvular AF patients with LA-SEC. Conclusion SUA level is an independent risk factor and has a moderate predictive value for LA-SEC among non-valvular AF patients in Southern China.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Coagulopathy and thromboembolic events are associated with poor outcomes in coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)patients.There is conflicting evidence on the effects of chronic anticoagulation on mortality and severity of COVID-19 disease.AIM To summarize the body of evidence on the effects of pre-hospital anticoagulation on outcomes in COVID-19 patients.METHODS A Literature search was performed on LitCovid PubMed,WHO,and Scopus databases from inception(December 2019)till June 2023 for original studies reporting an association between prior use of anticoagulants and patient outcomes in adults with COVID-19.The primary outcome was the risk of thromboembolic events in COVID-19 patients taking anticoagulants.Secondary outcomes included COVID-19 disease severity,in terms of intensive care unit admission or invasive mechanical ventilation/intubation requirement in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection,and mortality.The random effects models were used to calculate crude and adjusted odds ratios(aORs)with 95%confidence intervals(95%CIs).RESULTS Forty-six observational studies met our inclusion criteria.The unadjusted analysis found no association between prior anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk[n=43851,9 studies,odds ratio(OR)=0.67(0.22,2.07);P=0.49;I2=95%].The association between prior anticoagulation and disease severity was non-significant[n=186782;22 studies,OR=1.08(0.78,1.49);P=0.64;I2=89%].However,pre-hospital anticoagulation significantly increased all-cause mortality risk[n=207292;35 studies,OR=1.72(1.37,2.17);P<0.00001;I2=93%].Pooling adjusted estimates revealed a statistically non-significant association between pre-hospital anticoagulation and thromboembolic event risk[aOR=0.87(0.42,1.80);P=0.71],mortality[aOR=0.94(0.84,1.05);P=0.31],and disease severity[aOR=0.96(0.72,1.26);P=0.76].CONCLUSION Prehospital anticoagulation was not significantly associated with reduced risk of thromboembolic events,improved survival,and lower disease severity in COVID-19 patients.
文摘Objective:The study aimed to discuss the treatment of acute thromboembolic event(TE)during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms.Methods:Between April 2013 and April 2019,158 patients with 167 intracranial aneurysms were treated with endovascular embolization in our hospital,in which 9 cases of acute TEs occurred during the embolization procedures.The clinical data,radiological findings and treatments of the 9 patients were reviewed and analyzed.Results:The TEs occurred at the aneurysmal neck in 3 patients,at distal part of the parent artery in 3,in the stent in 2,and at the proximal part of the parent artery in 1.Intra-arterial(IA)infusion of tirofiban were performed in 6 patients,mechanical thromboectomy(MT)with a stent in 2 patients,and combined use of the two methods in 1 patients.According to the modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction(mTICI)score,7 patients had recanalization of 2b/3a,1 patients had recanalization of 1,and 1 patients had recanalization of 0.At discharge,the mRS score was 0 in 3 patients,1 in 3 patients,and 2,3,4 in 1 patient each.6 months after the endovascular treatment,the mRS score was 0 in 5 patients,1 in 2 patients,and 3 in 1 patient.Conclusions:IA tirofiban and MT are effective remedies for the acute TE during endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysm,reasonable selection of which may improve the prognosis of patients.
文摘BACKGROUND The May-Hegglin anomaly is among a group of genetic disorders known as MYH9-related disease.Patients with inherited platelet disorders such as May-Hegglin anomaly are at a variably increased risk for bleeding due to a combination of platelet dysfunction and thrombocytopenia.Patients admitted to the hospital with coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)infection are at an increased risk for a venous thromboembolism event(VTE).The National Institutes of Health COVID-19 treatment guidelines recommend using a prophylactic dose of heparin as VTE prophylaxis for adults who are receiving high-flow oxygen.We describe a patient admitted for COVID-19 infection with pneumonia and a history of May-Hegglin anomaly.The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as there are no clear guidelines for this patient population.CASE SUMMARY Herein,we describe the case of a 39-year-old woman admitted with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 pneumonia.She had a history of May-Hegglin anomaly and demonstrated risk for bleeding since childhood,including a life-threatening bleeding event at the age of 9 years requiring blood and platelet transfusions.Her baseline platelet count was 40-50×109/L throughout her adult life.Her family history was also notable for May-Hegglin disorder in her mother,maternal uncle,maternal grandfather and her son.Computed tomography/pulmonary angiography revealed bilateral consolidative opacities consistent with multifocal pneumonia.Complete blood count was notable for platelet count of 54×109/L.She was admitted for inpatient respiratory support with high-flow oxygen per nasal cannula and was managed with guideline-directed therapy for COVID-19,including baricitinib and dexamethasone.The Hematology/Oncology consultation team was requested to assist with management of VTE prophylaxis in the setting of active COVID-19 infection and an inherited bleeding disorder.After review of the literature and careful consideration of risks and benefits,it was decided to treat the patient with prophylactic enoxaparin.She was closely monitored in the hospital for bleeding and worsening thrombocytopenia.She had no bleeding or signs of VTE.Her respiratory status improved,and she was discharged home after 5 d of hospitalization with supplemental oxygen by nasal cannula and dexamethasone.At the 6-month follow-up,the patient successfully discontinued her home oxygen use after only a few weeks following discharge.CONCLUSION The patient presented a challenge to determine prophylactic anticoagulation as anticoagulation guidelines exist for patients with COVID-19,but there are no clear guidelines for management of patients with COVID-19 and inherited bleeding disorders,particularly those with MYH9-related disease.She was discharged after recovery from the COVID-19 infection without bleeding or thrombosis.As there are no published guidelines for this situation,we present a pragmatic,informed approach to a patient with MYH9-related disease who had an indication for anticoagulation.
文摘Objectives To investigate the relationship between serum uric acid （SUA） and left atrial spontaneous echo contrast （LA-SEC） in non-valvular atrial fibrillation （AF） patients. Methods We retrospectively screened 1,476 consecutive hospitalized patients with AF who underwent transesophageal echocardiography prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation, left atrial appendage closure and electric cardiover- sion at Guangdong General Hospital. Data on the clinical baseline characteristics of all patients were collected from electronic medical re- cords and analyzed. Results After exclusion of patients with left atrial thrombus, 1,354 patients entered into present study and 57 were LA-SEC. The mean female SUA level （380.88 ± 94.35 μmol/L vs. 323.37 ± 72.19μmol/L, P 〈 0.001） and male SUA level （416.97 ± 98.87 μmol/L vs. 367.88 ＋ 68.50 μmol/L, P = 0.008） were both significantly higher in patients with LA-SEC than in the controls. The mean left atrial dimension （41.32 ± 5.12 mm vs. 36.12 ± 5.66 mm, P 〈 0.001） was markedly larger in patients with LA-SEC. In multivariate regression analysis, SUA level was an independent risk factor for LA-SEC （OR： 1.008, P 〈 0.001）. In receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the corresponding area under the curve for SUA predicting LA-SEC in female and male were 0.670 and 0.657, respectively. SUA level is significantly higher in non-valvular AF patients with LA-SEC. Conclusion SUA level is an independent risk factor and has a moderate predictive value for LA-SEC among non-valvular AF patients in Southern China.
