BACKGROUND Vasoplegia is a common complication of cardiac surgery but its causal relationship with preoperative use of renin angiotensin system(RAS)blockers[angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs)and angiotens...BACKGROUND Vasoplegia is a common complication of cardiac surgery but its causal relationship with preoperative use of renin angiotensin system(RAS)blockers[angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs)and angiotensin receptor blockers(ARB)]is still debated.AIM To update and summarize data on the effect of preoperative use of RAS blockers on incident vasoplegia.METHODS All published studies from MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Web of Science providing relevant data through January 13,2021 were identified.A random-effects metaanalysis method was used to pool estimates,and post-cardiac surgery shock was differentiated from vasoplegia.RESULTS Ten studies reporting on a pooled population of 15672 patients(none looking at ARBs exclusively)were included in the meta-analysis.All were case-control studies.Use of ACEIs was associated with an increased risk of vasoplegia[pooled adjusted odds ratio(Aor)of 2.06,95%CI:1.45-2.93]and increased inotropic/vasopressor support requirement(pooled aOR 1.19,95%CI:1.10-1.29).Post-cardiac surgery shock was increased in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction(pooled aOR 2.32,95%CI:1.60-3.36;I249%)but not increased by the use of beta blockers(pooled aOR 0.78,95%CI:0.36-1.69;I277%).Two randomized control trials(RCTs),not eligible for the meta-analysis,did not show an association between continuation of RAS blockers and vasoplegia.CONCLUSION Preoperative continuation of ACEIs is associated with an increased need for inotropic support postoperatively and with an increased risk of vasoplegia in observational studies but not in RCTs.The absence of a consensus definition of vasoplegia should lead to the use of perioperative cardiovascular monitoring when designing RCTs to better understand this discrepancy.展开更多
BACKGROUNDVasoplegic shock is a challenging complication of cardiac surgery and is oftenresistant to conventional therapies for shock. Norepinephrine and epinephrine arestandards of care for vasoplegic shock, but vaso...BACKGROUNDVasoplegic shock is a challenging complication of cardiac surgery and is oftenresistant to conventional therapies for shock. Norepinephrine and epinephrine arestandards of care for vasoplegic shock, but vasopressin has increasingly been usedas a primary pressor in vasoplegic shock because of its unique pharmacology andlack of inotropic activity. It remains unclear whether vasopressin has distinctbenefits over standard of care for patients with vasoplegic shock.AIMTo summarize the available literature evaluating vasopressin vs non-vasopressinalternatives on the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of vasoplegic shock inadult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.METHODSThis was a systematic review of vasopressin in adults (≥ 18 years) with vasoplegicshock after cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts,and retrospective cohorts comparing vasopressin to norepinephrine, epinephrine,methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, or other pressors were included. The primaryoutcomes of interest were 30-d mortality, atrial/ventricular arrhythmias, stroke,ICU length of stay, duration of vasopressor therapy, incidence of acute kidneyinjury stage II-III, and mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h.RESULTSA total of 1161 studies were screened for inclusion with 3 meeting inclusioncriteria with a total of 708 patients. Two studies were randomized controlled trials and one was a retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes of 30-d mortality,stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, and duration of mechanical ventilation weresimilar between groups. Conflicting results were observed for acute kidney injurystage II-III, atrial arrhythmias, duration of vasopressors, and ICU length of staywith higher certainty of evidence in favor of vasopressin serving a protective rolefor these outcomes.CONCLUSIONVasopressin was not found to be superior to alternative pressor therapy for any ofthe included outcomes. Results are limited by mixed methodologies, small overallsample size, and heterogenous populations.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Vasoplegia is a common complication of cardiac surgery but its causal relationship with preoperative use of renin angiotensin system(RAS)blockers[angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs)and angiotensin receptor blockers(ARB)]is still debated.AIM To update and summarize data on the effect of preoperative use of RAS blockers on incident vasoplegia.METHODS All published studies from MEDLINE,EMBASE,and Web of Science providing relevant data through January 13,2021 were identified.A random-effects metaanalysis method was used to pool estimates,and post-cardiac surgery shock was differentiated from vasoplegia.RESULTS Ten studies reporting on a pooled population of 15672 patients(none looking at ARBs exclusively)were included in the meta-analysis.All were case-control studies.Use of ACEIs was associated with an increased risk of vasoplegia[pooled adjusted odds ratio(Aor)of 2.06,95%CI:1.45-2.93]and increased inotropic/vasopressor support requirement(pooled aOR 1.19,95%CI:1.10-1.29).Post-cardiac surgery shock was increased in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction(pooled aOR 2.32,95%CI:1.60-3.36;I249%)but not increased by the use of beta blockers(pooled aOR 0.78,95%CI:0.36-1.69;I277%).Two randomized control trials(RCTs),not eligible for the meta-analysis,did not show an association between continuation of RAS blockers and vasoplegia.CONCLUSION Preoperative continuation of ACEIs is associated with an increased need for inotropic support postoperatively and with an increased risk of vasoplegia in observational studies but not in RCTs.The absence of a consensus definition of vasoplegia should lead to the use of perioperative cardiovascular monitoring when designing RCTs to better understand this discrepancy.
文摘BACKGROUNDVasoplegic shock is a challenging complication of cardiac surgery and is oftenresistant to conventional therapies for shock. Norepinephrine and epinephrine arestandards of care for vasoplegic shock, but vasopressin has increasingly been usedas a primary pressor in vasoplegic shock because of its unique pharmacology andlack of inotropic activity. It remains unclear whether vasopressin has distinctbenefits over standard of care for patients with vasoplegic shock.AIMTo summarize the available literature evaluating vasopressin vs non-vasopressinalternatives on the clinical and patient-centered outcomes of vasoplegic shock inadult intensive care unit (ICU) patients.METHODSThis was a systematic review of vasopressin in adults (≥ 18 years) with vasoplegicshock after cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohorts,and retrospective cohorts comparing vasopressin to norepinephrine, epinephrine,methylene blue, hydroxocobalamin, or other pressors were included. The primaryoutcomes of interest were 30-d mortality, atrial/ventricular arrhythmias, stroke,ICU length of stay, duration of vasopressor therapy, incidence of acute kidneyinjury stage II-III, and mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h.RESULTSA total of 1161 studies were screened for inclusion with 3 meeting inclusioncriteria with a total of 708 patients. Two studies were randomized controlled trials and one was a retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes of 30-d mortality,stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, and duration of mechanical ventilation weresimilar between groups. Conflicting results were observed for acute kidney injurystage II-III, atrial arrhythmias, duration of vasopressors, and ICU length of staywith higher certainty of evidence in favor of vasopressin serving a protective rolefor these outcomes.CONCLUSIONVasopressin was not found to be superior to alternative pressor therapy for any ofthe included outcomes. Results are limited by mixed methodologies, small overallsample size, and heterogenous populations.
