In this study, we investigated six types of mood state (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor, fatigue, and confusion) using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) with 40 Japanese university studen...In this study, we investigated six types of mood state (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor, fatigue, and confusion) using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) with 40 Japanese university students. We examined five main quality of life (QOL) domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health) using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-26). We also examined the total scale score. We examined Spearman’s rank correlations between POMS mood state and QOL scores and compared male and female students’ scores. The results indicated statistically significant correlations between all six mood states and three broad WHOQOL-26 domains (physical health, psychological health, and social relationships). Moreover, the relationship between mood state and QOL showed a gender difference. There were correlations between mood states and the QOL domains of social relationships and environmental health for males. In contrast, mood state correlated with the QOL domains of physical health and psychological health in females. The findings suggest that gender-specific health provision is needed to care for young university students in Japan. However, our study has several limitations;therefore, larger-scale studies with older subjects are needed in the future.展开更多
The purpose was to examine and compare the psychometric properties of a Mexican Spanish version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. The instrument was applied to 285 individuals aged over 60 years (mean = 69.26, SD = 6.52). All...The purpose was to examine and compare the psychometric properties of a Mexican Spanish version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. The instrument was applied to 285 individuals aged over 60 years (mean = 69.26, SD = 6.52). All participants completed a demographic data sheet, the WHOQOL-OLD, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS);182 of the 285 participants also completed a quality of life questionnaire for diabetic patients (DQOL). Acceptable levels of reliability were found, with Cronbach’s alpha values between 0.70 and 0.90 for overall quality of life and all domains except for autonomy, where the alpha value was low. The exploratory factor analysis carried out to examine the construct validity of the instrument yielded six domains: sensory abilities, autonomy, past/present/future activities, social participation, death and dying, and intimacy (explained variance of 62.95%). The mean overall quality of life score was 94.86 (SD = 13.68, range 50 to 120). The WHOQOL-OLD module showed criterion validity and concurrent validity with respect to the BDI (r = -0.516, p = 0.034), the GDS (r = -0.336, p = 0.002), and the DQOL (n = 182, r = 0.159, p = 0.032). Discriminant validity was also confirmed with respect to self-perceived health (t = 2.701, d.f. = 225, p = 0.007) and education (F(3, 280) = 9.015, p p > 0.05). We conclude that the Mexican Spanish version of the WHOQOL-OLD module has adequate psychometric properties.展开更多
目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组4...目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组45例。参照组采用常规护理方式展开疾病护理,研究组采用时间康复护理方式展开疾病护理,对比分析两组患者的护理总满意度、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)评分、洼田饮水试验评分。结果研究组护理总满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理前,两组患者WHOQOL-BREF评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组环境因素评分、社会关系评分、生理因素评分、心理因素评分均高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。护理前,两组患者的洼田饮水试验评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组洼田饮水试验评分为(1.29±0.29)分低于参照组的(2.53±0.65)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.687,P<0.05)。结论时间康复护理方式的合理运用,可显著提升脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者护理满意度、生存质量,有效改善吞咽功能。展开更多
文摘In this study, we investigated six types of mood state (tension-anxiety, depression-dejection, anger-hostility, vigor, fatigue, and confusion) using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) with 40 Japanese university students. We examined five main quality of life (QOL) domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environmental health) using the World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-26). We also examined the total scale score. We examined Spearman’s rank correlations between POMS mood state and QOL scores and compared male and female students’ scores. The results indicated statistically significant correlations between all six mood states and three broad WHOQOL-26 domains (physical health, psychological health, and social relationships). Moreover, the relationship between mood state and QOL showed a gender difference. There were correlations between mood states and the QOL domains of social relationships and environmental health for males. In contrast, mood state correlated with the QOL domains of physical health and psychological health in females. The findings suggest that gender-specific health provision is needed to care for young university students in Japan. However, our study has several limitations;therefore, larger-scale studies with older subjects are needed in the future.
文摘The purpose was to examine and compare the psychometric properties of a Mexican Spanish version of the WHOQOL-OLD module. The instrument was applied to 285 individuals aged over 60 years (mean = 69.26, SD = 6.52). All participants completed a demographic data sheet, the WHOQOL-OLD, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS);182 of the 285 participants also completed a quality of life questionnaire for diabetic patients (DQOL). Acceptable levels of reliability were found, with Cronbach’s alpha values between 0.70 and 0.90 for overall quality of life and all domains except for autonomy, where the alpha value was low. The exploratory factor analysis carried out to examine the construct validity of the instrument yielded six domains: sensory abilities, autonomy, past/present/future activities, social participation, death and dying, and intimacy (explained variance of 62.95%). The mean overall quality of life score was 94.86 (SD = 13.68, range 50 to 120). The WHOQOL-OLD module showed criterion validity and concurrent validity with respect to the BDI (r = -0.516, p = 0.034), the GDS (r = -0.336, p = 0.002), and the DQOL (n = 182, r = 0.159, p = 0.032). Discriminant validity was also confirmed with respect to self-perceived health (t = 2.701, d.f. = 225, p = 0.007) and education (F(3, 280) = 9.015, p p > 0.05). We conclude that the Mexican Spanish version of the WHOQOL-OLD module has adequate psychometric properties.
文摘目的探讨对脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者采用时间康复护理方式展开对应干预后获得的临床效果。方法回顾性选取2020年10月—2023年10月深圳市罗湖区人民医院收治的90例脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者的临床资料,依据不同护理方法分为参照组和研究组,每组45例。参照组采用常规护理方式展开疾病护理,研究组采用时间康复护理方式展开疾病护理,对比分析两组患者的护理总满意度、世界卫生组织生存质量测定量表简表(World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF,WHOQOL-BREF)评分、洼田饮水试验评分。结果研究组护理总满意度高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);护理前,两组患者WHOQOL-BREF评分对比,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组环境因素评分、社会关系评分、生理因素评分、心理因素评分均高于参照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。护理前,两组患者的洼田饮水试验评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,研究组洼田饮水试验评分为(1.29±0.29)分低于参照组的(2.53±0.65)分,差异有统计学意义(t=11.687,P<0.05)。结论时间康复护理方式的合理运用,可显著提升脑梗死后吞咽障碍患者护理满意度、生存质量,有效改善吞咽功能。
