BACKGROUND The prognosis of critically ill patients is closely linked to their gastrointestinal(GI)function.The acute GI injury(AGI)grading system,established in 2012,is extensively utilized to evaluate GI dysfunction...BACKGROUND The prognosis of critically ill patients is closely linked to their gastrointestinal(GI)function.The acute GI injury(AGI)grading system,established in 2012,is extensively utilized to evaluate GI dysfunction and forecast outcomes in clinical settings.In 2021,the GI dysfunction score(GIDS)was developed,building on the AGI grading system,to enhance the accuracy of GI dysfunction severity assessment,improve prognostic predictions,reduce subjectivity,and increase reproducibility.AIM To compare the predictive capabilities of GIDS and the AGI grading system for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at the general intensive care unit(ICU)of a regional university hospital.All data were collected during the first week of ICU admission.The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.Multivariable logistic regression analyzed whether GIDS and AGI grade were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.The predictive abilities of GIDS and AGI grade were compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve,with DeLong’s test assessing differences between the curves’areas.RESULTS The incidence of AGI in the first week of ICU admission was 92.13%.There were 85 deaths(47.75%)within 28 days of ICU admission.There was no initial 24-hour difference in GIDS between the non-survival and survival groups.Both GIDS(OR 2.01,95%CI:1.25-3.24;P=0.004)and AGI grade(OR 1.94,95%CI:1.12-3.38;P=0.019)were independent predictors of 28-day mortality.No significant difference was found between the predictive accuracy of GIDS and AGI grade for 28-day mortality during the first week of ICU admission(Z=-0.26,P=0.794).CONCLUSION GIDS within the first 24 hours was an unreliable predictor of 28-day mortality.The predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality from both systems during the first week was comparable.展开更多
BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factor...BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI and their interactive effects.METHODS We selected 168 SAP patients admitted to our hospital between December 2019 and June 2022.They were divided into AGI group and non-AGI group according to whether AGI was present.Demographic data and laboratory test data were compared between the two groups.The risk factors for SAP with concomitant AGI were analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression,and an analysis of the interaction of the risk factors was performed.RESULTS The percentage of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,acute physiological and chronic health scoring system II(APACHE II)score,white blood cell count and creatinine(CRE)level was higher in the AGI group than in the non-AGI group.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that an APACHE II score>15 and CRE>100μmol/L were risk factors for SAP complicating AGI.The interaction index of APACHE II score and CRE level was 3.123.CONCLUSION An APACHE II score>15 and CRE level>100μmol/L are independent risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI,and there is a positive interaction between them.展开更多
BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal(GI)dysfunction is a common and important complication of acute pancreatitis(AP),especially in patients with severe AP.Despite this,there is no consensus means of obtaining a precise assessm...BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal(GI)dysfunction is a common and important complication of acute pancreatitis(AP),especially in patients with severe AP.Despite this,there is no consensus means of obtaining a precise assessment of GI function.AIM To determine the association between acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)grade and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AP.METHODS Patients with AP admitted to our pancreatic intensive care unit from May 2017 to May 2019 were enrolled.GI function was assessed according to the AGI grade proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine in 2012,which is mainly based on GI symptoms,intra-abdominal pressure,and feeding intolerance in the first week of admission to the intensive care unit.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between AGI grade and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AP.RESULTS Among the 286 patients included,the distribution of patients with various AGI grades was 34.62%with grade I,22.03%with grade II,32.52%with grade III,and 10.84%with grade IV.The distribution of mortality was 0%among those with grade I,6.35%among those with grade II,30.11%among those with grade III,and 61.29%among those with grade IV,and AGI grade was positively correlated with mortality(χ2=31.511,P<0.0001).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age,serum calcium level,AGI grade,persistent renal failure,and persistent circulatory failure were independently associated with mortality.Compared with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score(area under the curve:0.739 vs 0.854;P<0.05)and Ranson score(area under the curve:0.72 vs 0.854;P<0.01),the AGI grade was more useful for predicting mortality.CONCLUSION AGI grade is useful for identifying the severity of GI dysfunction and can be used as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with AP.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate whether electroacupuncture(EA) would improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury(TBI) complicocted by acute gastrointestinal injury(AG...Objective: To evaluate whether electroacupuncture(EA) would improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury(TBI) complicocted by acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI). Methods: This multicenter, single-blind trial included patients with TBI and AGI admitted to 5Chinese hospitals from September 2018 to December 2019. A total of 500 patients were randomized to the control or acupuncture groups using a random number table, 250 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional treatment, including mannitol, nutritional support, epilepsy and infection prevention, and maintenance of water, electrolytes, and acid-base balance. While patients in the acupuncture group received EA intervention at bilateral Zusanli(ST 36), Shangjuxu(ST 37), Xiajuxu(ST 39), Tianshu(ST 25), and Zhongwan(RN 12) acupoints in addition to the conventional treatment, 30 min per time, twice daily,for 7 d. The primary endpoint was 28-d mortality. The secondary endpoints were serum levels of D-lactic acid(D-lac), diamine oxidase(DAO), lipopolysaccharide(LPS), motilin(MTL) and gastrin(GAS), intra-abdominal pressure(IAP), bowel sounds, abdominal circumference, AGI grade, scores of gastrointestinal failure(GIF),Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHE Ⅱ), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA), and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome(MODS), mechanical ventilation time,intense care unit(ICU) stay, and the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Results: The 28-d mortality in the acupuncture group was lower than that in the control group(22.80% vs. 33.20%, P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the acupuncture group at 7 d showed lower GIF, APACHE Ⅱ, SOFA, MODS scores, D-lac,DAO, LPS, IAP, and abdominal circumference and higher GCS score, MTL, GAS, and bowel sound frequency(all P<0.05). In addition, the above indices showed simillar changes at 7 d compared with days 1 and 3 in the EA group(all P<0.05). Conclusion: Early EA can improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe TBI complicated by AGI.(Registration No. ChiCTR2000032276)展开更多
Background In 2012,the working group on abdominal problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine （ESICM） proposed a definition and also guidelines for the grading system and treatment of acute gastroint...Background In 2012,the working group on abdominal problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine （ESICM） proposed a definition and also guidelines for the grading system and treatment of acute gastrointestinal injury （AGI）.Until now,clinical reports on this topic have not been available,and the practicality of using the AGI grading system requires further validation in the clinic.Therefore,we conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the current AGI grading system in a clinical environment,and to provide evidence for its usefulness in assessing the severity and prognosis of critically ill patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction.Methods A total of 133 patients were examined for the presence or absence of AGI,their scores on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE） Ⅱ and Lausanne Intestinal Failure Estimation （LIFE） test,and 28 days mortality.The presence and severity of AGI was based on guidelines provided by the ESICM.The patients were assigned to a NOAGI group （n=50） or an AGI group （n=83）.The AGI group was then further divided into three subgroups,consisting ofAGI Ⅰ （risk group,n=38）,AGI Ⅱ （gastrointestinal dysfunction group,n=33） and AGI Ⅲ＋AGI Ⅳ （gastrointestinal failure group,n=12）.These subgroups were then compared for differences in AGI indicators.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the AGI group and the NO-AGI group in terms of age,gender,APACHE Ⅱ score or LIFE score （P ＞ 0.05）; however,the two groups showed a significant difference in their respective rates of 28 days mortality （32.5％ in the AGI group vs.8.0％ in the NO-AGI group （P ＜ 0.05））.Patients in the three AGI subgroups showed significant differences in their 28 d mortality rates,APACHE Ⅱ,and LIFE scores.AGI grading system showed strong positive correlations with APACHE Ⅱ and LIFE scores （P ＜ 0.05）.Conclusions The currentAGI grading system can be used to identify and evaluate gastrointestinal dysfunction in critically ill patients,and also to provide a preliminary assessment regarding the prognosis for patients with different grades of AGI.展开更多
BACKGROUND Patients with sepsis are at high risk for acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but the diagnosis and treatment of AGI due to sepsis are unsatisfactory.Heparanase(HPA)plays an important role in septic AGI(S-AG...BACKGROUND Patients with sepsis are at high risk for acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but the diagnosis and treatment of AGI due to sepsis are unsatisfactory.Heparanase(HPA)plays an important role in septic AGI(S-AGI),but its specific mechanism is not completely understood,and few clinical reports are available.AIM To explore the effect and mechanism of HPA inhibition in S-AGI patients.METHODS In our prospective clinical trial,48 patients with S-AGI were randomly assigned to a control group to receive conventional treatment,whereas 47 patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group to receive conventional treatment combined with low molecular weight heparin.AGI grade,sequential organ failure assessment score,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score,D-dimer,activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),anti-Xa factor,interleukin-6,tumour necrosis factor-α,HPA,syndecan-1(SDC-1),LC3B(autophagy marker),intestinal fatty acid binding protein,D-lactate,motilin,gastrin,CD4/CD8,length of intensive care unit(ICU)stay,length of hospital stay and 28-d survival on the 1^(st),3^(rd) and 7^(th) d after treatment were compared.Correlations between HPA and AGI grading as well as LC3B were compared.Receiver operator characteristic(ROC)curves were generated to evaluate the diagnostic value of HPA,intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactate in S-AGI.RESULTS Serum HPA and SCD-1 levels were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group(P<0.05).In addition,intestinal fatty acid-binding protein,D-lactate,AGI grade,motilin,and gastrin levels and sequential organ failure assessment score were significantly decreased(P<0.05)in the intervention group.However,LC3B,APTT,anti-Xa factor,and CD4/CD8 were significantly increased(P<0.05)in the intervention group.No significant differences in interleukin-6,tumour necrosis factor-α,d-dimer,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score,length of ICU stay,length of hospital stay,or 28-d survival were noted between the two groups(P>0.05).Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between HPA and LC3B and a significant positive correlation between HPA and AGI grade.ROC curve analysis showed that HPA had higher specificity and sensitivity in diagnosis of S-AGI.CONCLUSION HPA has great potential as a diagnostic marker for S-AGI.Inhibition of HPA activity reduces SDC-1 shedding and alleviates S-AGI symptoms.The inhibitory effect of HPA in gastrointestinal protection may be achieved by enhanced autophagy.展开更多
Objective:To systematically review the clinical therapeutic effect of acupuncture on acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)in critically ill patients.Methods:The randomized control trials of acupuncture for AGI in critica...Objective:To systematically review the clinical therapeutic effect of acupuncture on acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)in critically ill patients.Methods:The randomized control trials of acupuncture for AGI in critically ill patients were retrieved from the databases,from inception to the cutoff date in August,2021,including China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang,VIP,China Biology Medicine disc(CBM),PubMed,Science Direct and Cochrane Library.Simultaneously,the accomplished and published RCTs were further searched from American clinical trial registry platform(https://clinicaltrials.gov)and Chinese clinical trial registry platform(www.chictr.org.cn).Two researchers extracted the data and performed the quality evaluation of the eligible articles independently.The meta-analysis was undertaken,by using RevMan 5.4.Results:Totally,15 papers were included,involving 1316 patients.The results of meta-analysis showed that after treated with acupuncture,the differences were statistical significance as compared with the routine treatment group in the score of the second edition of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHEII)(MD=-1.98,95%CI[-3.23,-0.73],P=0.002),gastrointestinal dysfunction score(MD=-0.33,95%CI[-0.41,-0.24],P<0.00001),the intra-abdominal pressure(mmHg)(MD=-2.74,95%CI[-3.81,-1.67],P<0.00001),intensive care unit(ICU)length of stay(MD=-3.15,95%CI[-5.99,-0.30],P<0.00001)and fatality rate in 28-day(RR=0.57,95%CI[0.39,0.85],P=0.006)in critically ill patients with AGI,respectively.Conclusion:The limited available evidence suggests that acupuncture relieves clinical symptoms and poor prognosis in the critically ill patients with AGI,thus,it is one of the potential therapies to AGI.Hence,acupuncture should be recommended into the regimen of AGI in critically ill patients and more highquality and multi-central trials can be undertaken in the further.展开更多
Sepsis is a common systemic disease characterized by various physiological and pathological disorders.It can result from infection by various pathogens,such as bacteria,viruses,and fungi.The rate of culture-negative s...Sepsis is a common systemic disease characterized by various physiological and pathological disorders.It can result from infection by various pathogens,such as bacteria,viruses,and fungi.The rate of culture-negative sepsis is almost 42%,indicating that most patients may have nonbacterial infections.With the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019,viral sepsis has attracted growing attention because many critically ill patients develop sepsis.Viral sepsis can be caused by viral infections and combined with,or secondary to,bacterial infections.Understanding the common types of viral sepsis and the main characteristics of its pathogenesis will be helpful for effective diagnosis and treatment,thereby reducing mortality.Early identification of the causative agent of viral sepsis can help reduce the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics.In this article,we reviewed the common viruses of sepsis,their potential pathophysiology,targets of diagnosis,and remedies for viral sepsis.展开更多
基金approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University(No.2024-KLS-369-02).
文摘BACKGROUND The prognosis of critically ill patients is closely linked to their gastrointestinal(GI)function.The acute GI injury(AGI)grading system,established in 2012,is extensively utilized to evaluate GI dysfunction and forecast outcomes in clinical settings.In 2021,the GI dysfunction score(GIDS)was developed,building on the AGI grading system,to enhance the accuracy of GI dysfunction severity assessment,improve prognostic predictions,reduce subjectivity,and increase reproducibility.AIM To compare the predictive capabilities of GIDS and the AGI grading system for 28-day mortality in critically ill patients.METHODS A retrospective study was conducted at the general intensive care unit(ICU)of a regional university hospital.All data were collected during the first week of ICU admission.The primary outcome was 28-day mortality.Multivariable logistic regression analyzed whether GIDS and AGI grade were independent risk factors for 28-day mortality.The predictive abilities of GIDS and AGI grade were compared using the receiver operating characteristic curve,with DeLong’s test assessing differences between the curves’areas.RESULTS The incidence of AGI in the first week of ICU admission was 92.13%.There were 85 deaths(47.75%)within 28 days of ICU admission.There was no initial 24-hour difference in GIDS between the non-survival and survival groups.Both GIDS(OR 2.01,95%CI:1.25-3.24;P=0.004)and AGI grade(OR 1.94,95%CI:1.12-3.38;P=0.019)were independent predictors of 28-day mortality.No significant difference was found between the predictive accuracy of GIDS and AGI grade for 28-day mortality during the first week of ICU admission(Z=-0.26,P=0.794).CONCLUSION GIDS within the first 24 hours was an unreliable predictor of 28-day mortality.The predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality from both systems during the first week was comparable.
基金This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Longyan First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University(Approved No.LYREC2023-k016-01).
文摘BACKGROUND There are many risk factors for severe acute pancreatitis(SAP)complicated with acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but few reports on the interaction between these risk factors.AIM To analyze the risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI and their interactive effects.METHODS We selected 168 SAP patients admitted to our hospital between December 2019 and June 2022.They were divided into AGI group and non-AGI group according to whether AGI was present.Demographic data and laboratory test data were compared between the two groups.The risk factors for SAP with concomitant AGI were analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression,and an analysis of the interaction of the risk factors was performed.RESULTS The percentage of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome,acute physiological and chronic health scoring system II(APACHE II)score,white blood cell count and creatinine(CRE)level was higher in the AGI group than in the non-AGI group.There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis indicated that an APACHE II score>15 and CRE>100μmol/L were risk factors for SAP complicating AGI.The interaction index of APACHE II score and CRE level was 3.123.CONCLUSION An APACHE II score>15 and CRE level>100μmol/L are independent risk factors for SAP complicated with AGI,and there is a positive interaction between them.
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81760120
文摘BACKGROUND Gastrointestinal(GI)dysfunction is a common and important complication of acute pancreatitis(AP),especially in patients with severe AP.Despite this,there is no consensus means of obtaining a precise assessment of GI function.AIM To determine the association between acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)grade and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AP.METHODS Patients with AP admitted to our pancreatic intensive care unit from May 2017 to May 2019 were enrolled.GI function was assessed according to the AGI grade proposed by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine in 2012,which is mainly based on GI symptoms,intra-abdominal pressure,and feeding intolerance in the first week of admission to the intensive care unit.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between AGI grade and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with AP.RESULTS Among the 286 patients included,the distribution of patients with various AGI grades was 34.62%with grade I,22.03%with grade II,32.52%with grade III,and 10.84%with grade IV.The distribution of mortality was 0%among those with grade I,6.35%among those with grade II,30.11%among those with grade III,and 61.29%among those with grade IV,and AGI grade was positively correlated with mortality(χ2=31.511,P<0.0001).Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age,serum calcium level,AGI grade,persistent renal failure,and persistent circulatory failure were independently associated with mortality.Compared with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score(area under the curve:0.739 vs 0.854;P<0.05)and Ranson score(area under the curve:0.72 vs 0.854;P<0.01),the AGI grade was more useful for predicting mortality.CONCLUSION AGI grade is useful for identifying the severity of GI dysfunction and can be used as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with AP.
基金the Zhejiang Provincial TCM Science and Technology Plan Project(Nos.2012ZGG001 and 2019ZB039)。
文摘Objective: To evaluate whether electroacupuncture(EA) would improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe traumatic brain injury(TBI) complicocted by acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI). Methods: This multicenter, single-blind trial included patients with TBI and AGI admitted to 5Chinese hospitals from September 2018 to December 2019. A total of 500 patients were randomized to the control or acupuncture groups using a random number table, 250 cases in each group. Patients in the control group received conventional treatment, including mannitol, nutritional support, epilepsy and infection prevention, and maintenance of water, electrolytes, and acid-base balance. While patients in the acupuncture group received EA intervention at bilateral Zusanli(ST 36), Shangjuxu(ST 37), Xiajuxu(ST 39), Tianshu(ST 25), and Zhongwan(RN 12) acupoints in addition to the conventional treatment, 30 min per time, twice daily,for 7 d. The primary endpoint was 28-d mortality. The secondary endpoints were serum levels of D-lactic acid(D-lac), diamine oxidase(DAO), lipopolysaccharide(LPS), motilin(MTL) and gastrin(GAS), intra-abdominal pressure(IAP), bowel sounds, abdominal circumference, AGI grade, scores of gastrointestinal failure(GIF),Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHE Ⅱ), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment(SOFA), and Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome(MODS), mechanical ventilation time,intense care unit(ICU) stay, and the incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia. Results: The 28-d mortality in the acupuncture group was lower than that in the control group(22.80% vs. 33.20%, P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the acupuncture group at 7 d showed lower GIF, APACHE Ⅱ, SOFA, MODS scores, D-lac,DAO, LPS, IAP, and abdominal circumference and higher GCS score, MTL, GAS, and bowel sound frequency(all P<0.05). In addition, the above indices showed simillar changes at 7 d compared with days 1 and 3 in the EA group(all P<0.05). Conclusion: Early EA can improve gastrointestinal function and clinical prognosis in patients with severe TBI complicated by AGI.(Registration No. ChiCTR2000032276)
文摘Background In 2012,the working group on abdominal problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine （ESICM） proposed a definition and also guidelines for the grading system and treatment of acute gastrointestinal injury （AGI）.Until now,clinical reports on this topic have not been available,and the practicality of using the AGI grading system requires further validation in the clinic.Therefore,we conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the current AGI grading system in a clinical environment,and to provide evidence for its usefulness in assessing the severity and prognosis of critically ill patients with gastrointestinal dysfunction.Methods A total of 133 patients were examined for the presence or absence of AGI,their scores on the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE） Ⅱ and Lausanne Intestinal Failure Estimation （LIFE） test,and 28 days mortality.The presence and severity of AGI was based on guidelines provided by the ESICM.The patients were assigned to a NOAGI group （n=50） or an AGI group （n=83）.The AGI group was then further divided into three subgroups,consisting ofAGI Ⅰ （risk group,n=38）,AGI Ⅱ （gastrointestinal dysfunction group,n=33） and AGI Ⅲ＋AGI Ⅳ （gastrointestinal failure group,n=12）.These subgroups were then compared for differences in AGI indicators.Results There were no statistically significant differences between the AGI group and the NO-AGI group in terms of age,gender,APACHE Ⅱ score or LIFE score （P ＞ 0.05）; however,the two groups showed a significant difference in their respective rates of 28 days mortality （32.5％ in the AGI group vs.8.0％ in the NO-AGI group （P ＜ 0.05））.Patients in the three AGI subgroups showed significant differences in their 28 d mortality rates,APACHE Ⅱ,and LIFE scores.AGI grading system showed strong positive correlations with APACHE Ⅱ and LIFE scores （P ＜ 0.05）.Conclusions The currentAGI grading system can be used to identify and evaluate gastrointestinal dysfunction in critically ill patients,and also to provide a preliminary assessment regarding the prognosis for patients with different grades of AGI.
基金the Science and Technology Department of Gansu Province,No.20JR5RA35Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province,No.22JR10KA009+1 种基金Talent Innovation and Entrepreneurship Project of Science and Technology Bureau of Chengguan District,Lanzhou,No.2020RCCX0030Lanzhou Science and Technology Development Guiding Plan Project,No.2019-ZD-37.
文摘BACKGROUND Patients with sepsis are at high risk for acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI),but the diagnosis and treatment of AGI due to sepsis are unsatisfactory.Heparanase(HPA)plays an important role in septic AGI(S-AGI),but its specific mechanism is not completely understood,and few clinical reports are available.AIM To explore the effect and mechanism of HPA inhibition in S-AGI patients.METHODS In our prospective clinical trial,48 patients with S-AGI were randomly assigned to a control group to receive conventional treatment,whereas 47 patients were randomly assigned to an intervention group to receive conventional treatment combined with low molecular weight heparin.AGI grade,sequential organ failure assessment score,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score,D-dimer,activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT),anti-Xa factor,interleukin-6,tumour necrosis factor-α,HPA,syndecan-1(SDC-1),LC3B(autophagy marker),intestinal fatty acid binding protein,D-lactate,motilin,gastrin,CD4/CD8,length of intensive care unit(ICU)stay,length of hospital stay and 28-d survival on the 1^(st),3^(rd) and 7^(th) d after treatment were compared.Correlations between HPA and AGI grading as well as LC3B were compared.Receiver operator characteristic(ROC)curves were generated to evaluate the diagnostic value of HPA,intestinal fatty acid binding protein and D-lactate in S-AGI.RESULTS Serum HPA and SCD-1 levels were significantly reduced in the intervention group compared with the control group(P<0.05).In addition,intestinal fatty acid-binding protein,D-lactate,AGI grade,motilin,and gastrin levels and sequential organ failure assessment score were significantly decreased(P<0.05)in the intervention group.However,LC3B,APTT,anti-Xa factor,and CD4/CD8 were significantly increased(P<0.05)in the intervention group.No significant differences in interleukin-6,tumour necrosis factor-α,d-dimer,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score,length of ICU stay,length of hospital stay,or 28-d survival were noted between the two groups(P>0.05).Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between HPA and LC3B and a significant positive correlation between HPA and AGI grade.ROC curve analysis showed that HPA had higher specificity and sensitivity in diagnosis of S-AGI.CONCLUSION HPA has great potential as a diagnostic marker for S-AGI.Inhibition of HPA activity reduces SDC-1 shedding and alleviates S-AGI symptoms.The inhibitory effect of HPA in gastrointestinal protection may be achieved by enhanced autophagy.
基金Supported by Shanghai Acupuncture and Moxibustion Specialist UnionZY(2018-2020)-FWTX-4008Shanghai Clinical Key Specialistshslczdzk04701Three Year Action Plan for Further Accelerating the Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine in ShanghaiZY(2018-2020)-FWTX-6012。
文摘Objective:To systematically review the clinical therapeutic effect of acupuncture on acute gastrointestinal injury(AGI)in critically ill patients.Methods:The randomized control trials of acupuncture for AGI in critically ill patients were retrieved from the databases,from inception to the cutoff date in August,2021,including China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),Wanfang,VIP,China Biology Medicine disc(CBM),PubMed,Science Direct and Cochrane Library.Simultaneously,the accomplished and published RCTs were further searched from American clinical trial registry platform(https://clinicaltrials.gov)and Chinese clinical trial registry platform(www.chictr.org.cn).Two researchers extracted the data and performed the quality evaluation of the eligible articles independently.The meta-analysis was undertaken,by using RevMan 5.4.Results:Totally,15 papers were included,involving 1316 patients.The results of meta-analysis showed that after treated with acupuncture,the differences were statistical significance as compared with the routine treatment group in the score of the second edition of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation(APACHEII)(MD=-1.98,95%CI[-3.23,-0.73],P=0.002),gastrointestinal dysfunction score(MD=-0.33,95%CI[-0.41,-0.24],P<0.00001),the intra-abdominal pressure(mmHg)(MD=-2.74,95%CI[-3.81,-1.67],P<0.00001),intensive care unit(ICU)length of stay(MD=-3.15,95%CI[-5.99,-0.30],P<0.00001)and fatality rate in 28-day(RR=0.57,95%CI[0.39,0.85],P=0.006)in critically ill patients with AGI,respectively.Conclusion:The limited available evidence suggests that acupuncture relieves clinical symptoms and poor prognosis in the critically ill patients with AGI,thus,it is one of the potential therapies to AGI.Hence,acupuncture should be recommended into the regimen of AGI in critically ill patients and more highquality and multi-central trials can be undertaken in the further.
文摘Sepsis is a common systemic disease characterized by various physiological and pathological disorders.It can result from infection by various pathogens,such as bacteria,viruses,and fungi.The rate of culture-negative sepsis is almost 42%,indicating that most patients may have nonbacterial infections.With the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019,viral sepsis has attracted growing attention because many critically ill patients develop sepsis.Viral sepsis can be caused by viral infections and combined with,or secondary to,bacterial infections.Understanding the common types of viral sepsis and the main characteristics of its pathogenesis will be helpful for effective diagnosis and treatment,thereby reducing mortality.Early identification of the causative agent of viral sepsis can help reduce the overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics.In this article,we reviewed the common viruses of sepsis,their potential pathophysiology,targets of diagnosis,and remedies for viral sepsis.
