BACKGROUND Multilevel artificial cervical disc replacement and anterior hybrid surgery have been introduced as reliable treatments for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.Surgical techniques are important fo...BACKGROUND Multilevel artificial cervical disc replacement and anterior hybrid surgery have been introduced as reliable treatments for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.Surgical techniques are important for resolving patients’symptoms and maintaining the normal functioning of cervical implants.However,the use of inappropriate surgical strategies could lead to complications such as implant migration and neurological deficit.In this paper,we summarize our surgical strategies used in multilevel cervical disc replacement and hybrid surgery into five major notes.CASE SUMMARY We share the key notes and our surgical procedures in the form of four typical case presentations.All patients were diagnosed with cervical degenerative disc disease with myelopathy or radiculopathy and needed multilevel cervical spine surgery.The first case demonstrated that index levels indicating the presence of highly serious spinal cord compression required a prioritized decompression.The second case demonstrated that the disc replacement should be performed before fusion in cervical hybrid surgery.The third and forth cases demonstrated that a top-down implantation sequence was needed in continuous two-level cervical disc replacement.The symptoms of all patients were significantly relieved after surgery.CONCLUSION We hope that our surgical strategies can help improve the performance and outcomes of multilevel cervical spine surgery.展开更多
The ideal lumbar and cervical discs should provide six degrees of freedom andtri-planar (three-dimensional) motion. Although all artificial discs are intended toachieve the same goals, there is considerable heterogene...The ideal lumbar and cervical discs should provide six degrees of freedom andtri-planar (three-dimensional) motion. Although all artificial discs are intended toachieve the same goals, there is considerable heterogeneity in the design oflumbar and cervical implants. The “second generation total disc replacements”are non-articulating viscoelastic implants aiming at the reconstruction ofphysiologic levels of shock absorption and flexural stiffness. This review aims togive an overview of the available implants detailing the concepts and thefunctional results experimentally and clinically. These monobloc prostheses raisenew challenges concerning the choice of materials for the constitution of theviscoelastic cushion, the connection between the components of the internalstructure and the metal endplates and even the bone anchoring mode. Newobjectives concerning the quality of movement and mobility control must bedefined.展开更多
BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with...BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods.Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure.Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure,ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia,and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures.The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach;in general,patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head.AIM To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.METHODS In the modified position group,the patients had a soft pillow under their neck,and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape.The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss,position setting time,total operation time,and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.RESULTS Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups(P>0.05).Compared with the traditional position group,the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time(P<0.05).However,the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group,thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time.The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Multilevel artificial cervical disc replacement and anterior hybrid surgery have been introduced as reliable treatments for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease.Surgical techniques are important for resolving patients’symptoms and maintaining the normal functioning of cervical implants.However,the use of inappropriate surgical strategies could lead to complications such as implant migration and neurological deficit.In this paper,we summarize our surgical strategies used in multilevel cervical disc replacement and hybrid surgery into five major notes.CASE SUMMARY We share the key notes and our surgical procedures in the form of four typical case presentations.All patients were diagnosed with cervical degenerative disc disease with myelopathy or radiculopathy and needed multilevel cervical spine surgery.The first case demonstrated that index levels indicating the presence of highly serious spinal cord compression required a prioritized decompression.The second case demonstrated that the disc replacement should be performed before fusion in cervical hybrid surgery.The third and forth cases demonstrated that a top-down implantation sequence was needed in continuous two-level cervical disc replacement.The symptoms of all patients were significantly relieved after surgery.CONCLUSION We hope that our surgical strategies can help improve the performance and outcomes of multilevel cervical spine surgery.
文摘The ideal lumbar and cervical discs should provide six degrees of freedom andtri-planar (three-dimensional) motion. Although all artificial discs are intended toachieve the same goals, there is considerable heterogeneity in the design oflumbar and cervical implants. The “second generation total disc replacements”are non-articulating viscoelastic implants aiming at the reconstruction ofphysiologic levels of shock absorption and flexural stiffness. This review aims togive an overview of the available implants detailing the concepts and thefunctional results experimentally and clinically. These monobloc prostheses raisenew challenges concerning the choice of materials for the constitution of theviscoelastic cushion, the connection between the components of the internalstructure and the metal endplates and even the bone anchoring mode. Newobjectives concerning the quality of movement and mobility control must bedefined.
文摘BACKGROUND Total cervical artificial disc replacement(TDR)has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods.Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure.Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure,ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia,and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures.The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach;in general,patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head.AIM To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.METHODS In the modified position group,the patients had a soft pillow under their neck,and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape.The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss,position setting time,total operation time,and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.RESULTS Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups(P>0.05).Compared with the traditional position group,the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time(P<0.05).However,the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group,thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time.The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery.
