期刊文献+
共找到4篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
The Empirical Investigation and Improvement Path of Judicial Protection of Civil Litigation Rights in China
1
作者 李艳 胡月 JIANG Yu(Translated) 《The Journal of Human Rights》 2021年第5期831-850,共20页
The close coupling of civil litigation rights and human rights mean how well litigation rights are realized can directly or indirectly affect the judicial protection of human rights.Therefore,human rights protection i... The close coupling of civil litigation rights and human rights mean how well litigation rights are realized can directly or indirectly affect the judicial protection of human rights.Therefore,human rights protection in the field of civil litigation should take the right of civil litigation as the starting point and core.Based on a sample questionnaire survey of judges and lawyers,this paper conducts an empirical analysis and proposes that the exercise of this right should be taken as the main line to build a comprehensive protection mechanism for this right to realize its role in providing an institutional guarantee for human rights protection.It specifies three aspects:first,the process of filing a case should uphold the freedom and equality of the right to initiate litigation,remove substantial obstacles that affect the filing of the case,and ensure access to justice for disadvantaged groups;second,the trial procedure should have strengthened checks and balances on judicial power to ensure the right of litigation is compromised,and respects the procedural subject status of the two parties to realize equal protection of both parties;the third is to promote the implementation and improvement of relief for this right in the supervisory procedure,clarify the boundary of its relief by procuratorial supervision,and enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the relief. 展开更多
关键词 civil litigation rights freedom and equality of litigation rights checks and balances of litigation rights relief of litigation rights
原文传递
LOCALIZATION PATH OF THE RESEARCH PARADIGMS OF LEGAL COMMENTARY IN CHINA—FOCUSING ON THE PUBLIC LEGAL SERVICE FUNCTION OF THE CASE-COMMENTARY RESEARCH ON THE STYLE OF CIVIL LITIGATION DOCUMENTS
2
作者 杨凯 《Frontiers of Law in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities》 2019年第4期560-590,共31页
Conducting case-commentary research on the style of civil litigation documents is a key method for judges to produce legal documents,develop professional writing and creative skills,and enhance legal thinking.Such a s... Conducting case-commentary research on the style of civil litigation documents is a key method for judges to produce legal documents,develop professional writing and creative skills,and enhance legal thinking.Such a study is an important way to deepen the reform of the judicial power operation mechanism and to improve the trial management mode.Considering the background of the judicial responsibility system reform,the localization of the research paradigms and case-commentary methods of the style of litigation documents can help reach the consensus of the legal professional community.It also helps promote judgment rules and the spirit of the law.Legal commentaries convey the important functions of public legal services to the public.It is necessary to integrate the Style of Civil Litigation Documents,the"one-stop"litigation service with the reform practice of judicial committees in China,and conduct detailed research on the procedural ruling function and guiding function of the style of civil litigation documents.By studying the guiding function of civil litigation document style for judicial behavior,litigation procedure,and entity processing,it is good for judges to broaden their ideas and methods to write civil litigation documents,enabling an examination of the localization path and method of the legal commentary research paradigm and demonstrating how to continue using the paradigm within the context of the comprehensive reform of the judicial system.Moreover,the study emphasizes how to exert the function of public legal services integrated with the style of civil litigation documents. 展开更多
关键词 style of civil litigation documents legal commentary research paradigm public legal service
原文传递
Application and Regulation of Legal Science and Technology on the Pilot Program of the Reform of Separation between Complicated Cases and Simple Ones in Civil Procedure in the Basic People’s Courts
3
作者 Yang Hui Xu Yifei 《Contemporary Social Sciences》 2021年第5期68-82,共15页
Blockchain,artificial intelligence,and other technologies have been increasingly integrated with the law,and the construction of smart justice and Internet courts in various places has a prominent effect on court info... Blockchain,artificial intelligence,and other technologies have been increasingly integrated with the law,and the construction of smart justice and Internet courts in various places has a prominent effect on court informatization.The Supreme People’s Court is currently carrying out the pilot reform of separation between complicated and simple cases in civil procedure,and legal technology will inevitably become a major means to enable the reform.In the field of electronic litigation,legal technology itself has become a goal of the reform.Regarding the trials of pilot basic courts,legal technology has been more deeply applied in many links such as trial activities and trial management,playing an essential role in improving judicial efficiency,and becoming an important way to solve judicial dilemmas such as“litigation explosion.”However,the history of modern society reminds us that we should be reasonably optimistic about the development of technology,especially in the field of justice. 展开更多
关键词 legal science and technology the basic court civil litigation separation between complicated and simple cases in civil procedure
下载PDF
民事检察监督的反思与改革——加强当事人诉权保护来监督审判权
4
作者 易佳 《南昌高专学报》 2007年第3期8-10,18,共4页
我国实行经济体制改革,带来了由“国家本位主义”观念向“尊重市场主体意志自由”观念的变化,反映到诉讼领域中表现为诉讼模式的转变——从职权主义模式向当事人主义模式的转变。在这一历史背景下,建议取消我国民事检察抗诉制度,以正当... 我国实行经济体制改革,带来了由“国家本位主义”观念向“尊重市场主体意志自由”观念的变化,反映到诉讼领域中表现为诉讼模式的转变——从职权主义模式向当事人主义模式的转变。在这一历史背景下,建议取消我国民事检察抗诉制度,以正当程序原则作为审判的基准,通过加强当事人诉权保障来制约和监督审判权。 展开更多
关键词 民事检察监督 当事人主义 诉权保障 审判监督权
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部