Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of sonography-estimated fetal weight(EFW)and to determine the potential factors influencing EFW accuracy in the Chinese population.Methods:Eleven widely used formulae were chosen to ...Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of sonography-estimated fetal weight(EFW)and to determine the potential factors influencing EFW accuracy in the Chinese population.Methods:Eleven widely used formulae were chosen to evaluate the accuracy of EFW in 7016 cases in a retrospective cohort study.Nine potential factors(prenatal body mass index[BMI],gestational age[GA],birth weight[BW],fetal sex,fetal presentation,amniotic fluid volume[AFV],seniority of sonographers,the time interval between ultrasonic measurement and delivery,and diabetes mellitus)were analyzed by binary logistic regression to determine whether they influenced sonography-EFW.Results:All 11 models had high correlation coefficients between EFW and BW(r=0.819–0.843).Model 3 was the most accurate formula for the Chinese population.Compared to fetuses with EFW of 2500–3999g,the accuracy of EFW decreased by 69.10%(P<0.001)for fetuses less than 2500g,and decreased by 54.10%(P<0.001)for fetuses larger than 4000g.The accuracy of EFW in female fetuses decreased by 12.70%compared with male fetuses(P=0.021).Compared to the EFW calculated 1-3 days before delivery,the accuracy of the EFW performed 4–7 days before delivery showed a significant decrease(P=0.014).The accuracy of EFW was influenced by the individual measurement accuracy of the sonographers.Maternal BMI,DM,GA,fetal presentation,and AFV did not influence the accuracy of EFW after adjustment.Conclusion:Model 3 was the most accurate model for the Chinese population.The BW,fetal sex,time interval,and technique of the sonographers had different influences on the accuracy of EFW.展开更多
Choosing a fetal growth standard or reference is crucial when defining normal and abnormal fetal growth.We reviewed the recently published standards and compared them with a customized fetal growth chart based on a na...Choosing a fetal growth standard or reference is crucial when defining normal and abnormal fetal growth.We reviewed the recently published standards and compared them with a customized fetal growth chart based on a nationwide population in China.There were substantial discrepancies in the fetal growth pattern,suggesting that these standards may not be applicable to Chinese fetuses.Developing a Chinese-specific standard may better meet our clinical requirements.We also discuss the steps to establish a Chinese fetal growth standard and the potential challenges,including regional disparities and accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight.Standardized ultrasound measurement protocol and the introduction of new ultrasonography technology may be helpful in developing a more precise standard than existing ones for the Chinese population.展开更多
基金the Natural Science Foundation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University(BXQN202222)。
文摘Objective:To evaluate the accuracy of sonography-estimated fetal weight(EFW)and to determine the potential factors influencing EFW accuracy in the Chinese population.Methods:Eleven widely used formulae were chosen to evaluate the accuracy of EFW in 7016 cases in a retrospective cohort study.Nine potential factors(prenatal body mass index[BMI],gestational age[GA],birth weight[BW],fetal sex,fetal presentation,amniotic fluid volume[AFV],seniority of sonographers,the time interval between ultrasonic measurement and delivery,and diabetes mellitus)were analyzed by binary logistic regression to determine whether they influenced sonography-EFW.Results:All 11 models had high correlation coefficients between EFW and BW(r=0.819–0.843).Model 3 was the most accurate formula for the Chinese population.Compared to fetuses with EFW of 2500–3999g,the accuracy of EFW decreased by 69.10%(P<0.001)for fetuses less than 2500g,and decreased by 54.10%(P<0.001)for fetuses larger than 4000g.The accuracy of EFW in female fetuses decreased by 12.70%compared with male fetuses(P=0.021).Compared to the EFW calculated 1-3 days before delivery,the accuracy of the EFW performed 4–7 days before delivery showed a significant decrease(P=0.014).The accuracy of EFW was influenced by the individual measurement accuracy of the sonographers.Maternal BMI,DM,GA,fetal presentation,and AFV did not influence the accuracy of EFW after adjustment.Conclusion:Model 3 was the most accurate model for the Chinese population.The BW,fetal sex,time interval,and technique of the sonographers had different influences on the accuracy of EFW.
文摘Choosing a fetal growth standard or reference is crucial when defining normal and abnormal fetal growth.We reviewed the recently published standards and compared them with a customized fetal growth chart based on a nationwide population in China.There were substantial discrepancies in the fetal growth pattern,suggesting that these standards may not be applicable to Chinese fetuses.Developing a Chinese-specific standard may better meet our clinical requirements.We also discuss the steps to establish a Chinese fetal growth standard and the potential challenges,including regional disparities and accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight.Standardized ultrasound measurement protocol and the introduction of new ultrasonography technology may be helpful in developing a more precise standard than existing ones for the Chinese population.
