AIM:To determine and evaluate the features of highly cited articles(HCAs)in the ophthalmology category in the Science Citation Index Expanded(SCI-EXPANDED)from 1991 to 2020.METHODS:The Web of Science Core Collection d...AIM:To determine and evaluate the features of highly cited articles(HCAs)in the ophthalmology category in the Science Citation Index Expanded(SCI-EXPANDED)from 1991 to 2020.METHODS:The Web of Science Core Collection documents with at least 100 citations from their publication year until December 31,2020,were evaluated as highly cited.The examined features were the distribution of yearly output and its average number of per publication,HCAs,authors,institutions,journals,and nations.The publication performance of nations and organizations was assessed using six publication indicators.The Y-index was employed to compare the research outputs of various authors.RESULTS:Publications that had cited the most references were highly published in high-impact factor journals.The United States of America came out on top across all six publication indicators,and it was home to eight of the top 10 most productive institutions.The articles written by Breivik et al(2006)and Farrar et al(2001)were highly cited and had a significant impact in 2020.The authors had a higher number of highly cited articles published as corresponding authors than as first authors.CONCLUSION:The findings of the present study highlight the current scope of global research in ophthalmology.The findings can help policy-makers and advisory groups of research centers to develop future policies.In addition,the findings can guide researchers in this field.展开更多
1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 20...1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu) 3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 402-418(Xiangming Guan)展开更多
1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 201...1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu).3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 402-418 (XiangmingGuan).4. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects Acta PharmSin B 2015;5: 442-453 (Sandeep Kalepu, VijaykumarNekkanti).展开更多
Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on c...Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2017.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2017 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2017 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!展开更多
Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics...Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics of highly cited researchers are often linked to notions of breakthroughs,scientific excellence,and lone geniuses.Design/methodology/approach:In this study,we analyze a sample of individuals who appear on Clarivate Analytics’Highly Cited Researchers list.The main purpose is to juxtapose the characteristics of their research performance against the claim that the list captures a small fraction of the researcher population that contributes disproportionately to extending the frontier and gaining—on behalf of society—knowledge and innovations that make the world healthier,richer,sustainable,and more secure.Findings:The study reveals that the highly cited articles of the selected individuals generally have a very large number of authors.Thus,these papers seldom represent individual contributions but rather are the result of large collective research efforts conducted in research consortia.This challenges the common perception of highly cited researchers as individual geniuses who can be singled out for their extraordinary contributions.Moreover,the study indicates that a few of the individuals have not even contributed to highly cited original research but rather to reviews or clinical guidelines.Finally,the large number of authors of the papers implies that the ranking list is very sensitive to the specific method used for allocating papers and citations to individuals.In the"whole count"methodology applied by Clarivate Analytics,each author gets full credit of the papers regardless of the number of additional co-authors.The study shows that the ranking list would look very different using an alternative fractionalised methodology.Research limitations:The study is based on a limited part of the total population of highly cited researchers.Practical implications:It is concluded that"excellence"understood as highly cited encompasses very different types of research and researchers of which many do not fit with dominant preconceptions.Originality/value:The study develops further knowledge on highly cited researchers,addressing questions such as who becomes highly cited and the type of research that benefits by defining excellence in terms of citation scores and specific counting methods.展开更多
The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific r...The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific research at Shanghai Ocean University, make use of Bibliometric analysis to get the image and table of highly cited papers and hot papers. In this study, the scientific aspects in highly cited papers and hot papers, published in the last year in the core collection of Web of Science, were taken as objects, and office software was used as the main tool to carry out bibliometric and figure analysis. From the four aspects to find the difference in these fields, the production of specific fields and cited times is inconsistent. And suggest the department and management adjust the policy and method via elastic personnel and rewards to prompt the advancement of the research fields.展开更多
背景:基于主题文献的计量学和可视化分析对了解绝经后骨质疏松症研究基础与前沿尤为重要。目的:对近20年绝经后骨质疏松研究的高被引SCI论文进行文献计量、引证和可视化分析。方法:对Web of Science(WoS)中SCI-EXPANDED收录的2003-2022...背景:基于主题文献的计量学和可视化分析对了解绝经后骨质疏松症研究基础与前沿尤为重要。目的:对近20年绝经后骨质疏松研究的高被引SCI论文进行文献计量、引证和可视化分析。方法:对Web of Science(WoS)中SCI-EXPANDED收录的2003-2022年发表的前100篇高被引绝经后骨质疏松研究论文进行文献计量,用CiteSpace软件进行可视化分析。结果与结论:前100篇高被引论文在WoS核心合集中总被引量为67377次,每篇论文的年平均引用量为49.17次。绝经后骨质疏松研究主要涉及医学、工程技术、生物学和多学科等领域,小类学科则以内分泌学与代谢、医学:内科为主。国际上形成了稳定密切的核心合作网络关系,美国、加利福尼亚大学系统、Cummings,Steven R分别是高被引论文发文最多的国家、科研机构和作者。绝经后骨质疏松研究前沿主要涉及了钙剂、维生素D的补充治疗与骨折风险,双膦酸盐类药物治疗绝经后骨质疏松的临床研究,非典型股骨骨折,绝经后骨质疏松的新药临床研究与序贯治疗,骨折风险的预测指标,骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的中长期随访,基因多态性和遗传因素,绝经后骨质疏松临床实践指南的制定和更新等方面。大型的队列研究、高质量随机对照试验、系统综述和荟萃分析、临床实践指南是推动绝经后骨质疏松临床研究发展的巨大引擎。中国应在上述研究领域加大投入,以提高国际影响力。展开更多
文摘AIM:To determine and evaluate the features of highly cited articles(HCAs)in the ophthalmology category in the Science Citation Index Expanded(SCI-EXPANDED)from 1991 to 2020.METHODS:The Web of Science Core Collection documents with at least 100 citations from their publication year until December 31,2020,were evaluated as highly cited.The examined features were the distribution of yearly output and its average number of per publication,HCAs,authors,institutions,journals,and nations.The publication performance of nations and organizations was assessed using six publication indicators.The Y-index was employed to compare the research outputs of various authors.RESULTS:Publications that had cited the most references were highly published in high-impact factor journals.The United States of America came out on top across all six publication indicators,and it was home to eight of the top 10 most productive institutions.The articles written by Breivik et al(2006)and Farrar et al(2001)were highly cited and had a significant impact in 2020.The authors had a higher number of highly cited articles published as corresponding authors than as first authors.CONCLUSION:The findings of the present study highlight the current scope of global research in ophthalmology.The findings can help policy-makers and advisory groups of research centers to develop future policies.In addition,the findings can guide researchers in this field.
文摘1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 378-389(Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li) 2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu) 3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015; 5: 402-418(Xiangming Guan)
文摘1. HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5:378-389 (Georgina N. Masoud, Wei Li).2. Mechanisms of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 390-401(Lihua Huang, Liwu Fu).3. Cancer metastases: challenges and opportunities Acta Pharm Sin B 2015;5: 402-418 (XiangmingGuan).4. Insoluble drug delivery strategies: review of recent advances and business prospects Acta PharmSin B 2015;5: 442-453 (Sandeep Kalepu, VijaykumarNekkanti).
文摘Petroleum Science is pleased to announce the winners of the 2017 Highly Cited Paper Award in which we recognize highly cited papers published in our journal between 2015 and 2016.Citation data of papers are based on citations in Web of Science in 2017.Petroleum Science also announces the winners of the 2017 Best Reviewer Award who have made an outstanding contribution in 2017 as reviewer to Petroleum Science.Congratulations and thanks to all the winners!
基金the Research Council of Norway,grant number 256223(the R-QUEST centre)。
文摘Purpose:The ranking lists of highly cited researchers receive much public attention.In common interpretations,highly cited researchers are perceived to have made extraordinary contributions to science.Thus,the metrics of highly cited researchers are often linked to notions of breakthroughs,scientific excellence,and lone geniuses.Design/methodology/approach:In this study,we analyze a sample of individuals who appear on Clarivate Analytics’Highly Cited Researchers list.The main purpose is to juxtapose the characteristics of their research performance against the claim that the list captures a small fraction of the researcher population that contributes disproportionately to extending the frontier and gaining—on behalf of society—knowledge and innovations that make the world healthier,richer,sustainable,and more secure.Findings:The study reveals that the highly cited articles of the selected individuals generally have a very large number of authors.Thus,these papers seldom represent individual contributions but rather are the result of large collective research efforts conducted in research consortia.This challenges the common perception of highly cited researchers as individual geniuses who can be singled out for their extraordinary contributions.Moreover,the study indicates that a few of the individuals have not even contributed to highly cited original research but rather to reviews or clinical guidelines.Finally,the large number of authors of the papers implies that the ranking list is very sensitive to the specific method used for allocating papers and citations to individuals.In the"whole count"methodology applied by Clarivate Analytics,each author gets full credit of the papers regardless of the number of additional co-authors.The study shows that the ranking list would look very different using an alternative fractionalised methodology.Research limitations:The study is based on a limited part of the total population of highly cited researchers.Practical implications:It is concluded that"excellence"understood as highly cited encompasses very different types of research and researchers of which many do not fit with dominant preconceptions.Originality/value:The study develops further knowledge on highly cited researchers,addressing questions such as who becomes highly cited and the type of research that benefits by defining excellence in terms of citation scores and specific counting methods.
文摘The data of this research was mainly collected from the Web of Science (WOS) and Incites database platform, which was filtered and cataloged according to the different platforms. For tracing the change in scientific research at Shanghai Ocean University, make use of Bibliometric analysis to get the image and table of highly cited papers and hot papers. In this study, the scientific aspects in highly cited papers and hot papers, published in the last year in the core collection of Web of Science, were taken as objects, and office software was used as the main tool to carry out bibliometric and figure analysis. From the four aspects to find the difference in these fields, the production of specific fields and cited times is inconsistent. And suggest the department and management adjust the policy and method via elastic personnel and rewards to prompt the advancement of the research fields.
文摘背景:基于主题文献的计量学和可视化分析对了解绝经后骨质疏松症研究基础与前沿尤为重要。目的:对近20年绝经后骨质疏松研究的高被引SCI论文进行文献计量、引证和可视化分析。方法:对Web of Science(WoS)中SCI-EXPANDED收录的2003-2022年发表的前100篇高被引绝经后骨质疏松研究论文进行文献计量,用CiteSpace软件进行可视化分析。结果与结论:前100篇高被引论文在WoS核心合集中总被引量为67377次,每篇论文的年平均引用量为49.17次。绝经后骨质疏松研究主要涉及医学、工程技术、生物学和多学科等领域,小类学科则以内分泌学与代谢、医学:内科为主。国际上形成了稳定密切的核心合作网络关系,美国、加利福尼亚大学系统、Cummings,Steven R分别是高被引论文发文最多的国家、科研机构和作者。绝经后骨质疏松研究前沿主要涉及了钙剂、维生素D的补充治疗与骨折风险,双膦酸盐类药物治疗绝经后骨质疏松的临床研究,非典型股骨骨折,绝经后骨质疏松的新药临床研究与序贯治疗,骨折风险的预测指标,骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的中长期随访,基因多态性和遗传因素,绝经后骨质疏松临床实践指南的制定和更新等方面。大型的队列研究、高质量随机对照试验、系统综述和荟萃分析、临床实践指南是推动绝经后骨质疏松临床研究发展的巨大引擎。中国应在上述研究领域加大投入,以提高国际影响力。
