Background The clinical significance of complete revascularization for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） pa- tients during admission is still debatable. Methods A total of 1406 STEMI patients from t...Background The clinical significance of complete revascularization for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） pa- tients during admission is still debatable. Methods A total of 1406 STEMI patients from the Korean Myocardial Infarction Registry with multivessel diseases without cardiogenic shock who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PPCI） were analyzed. We used propensity score matching （PSM） to control differences of baseline characteristics between culprit only intervention （CP） and multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions （MP）, and between double vessel disease （DVD） and triple vessel disease （TVD）. The major adverse cardiac event （MACE） was analyzed for one year after discharge. Results TVD patients showed higher incidence of MACE （14.2% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.01）, any cause of revascularization （10.6% vs. 5.9%, P - 0.01）, and repeated PCI （9.5% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.02）, as compared to DVD patients during one year after discharge. MP reduced MACE effectively （7.3% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.03）, as compared to CP for one year, but all cause of death （1.6% vs. 3.2%, P= 0.38）, Ml （0.4% vs. 0.8%, P = 1.00）, and any cause ofrevascularization （5.3% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.09） were comparable in the two treatment groups. Conclusions STEMI patients with TVD showed higher rate of MACE, as compared to DVD MP performed during PPCI or ad hoc during admission for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock showed lower rate of MACE in this large scaled database. Therefore, MP could be considered as an effective treatment option for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.展开更多
Background Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prog- nosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with multives...Background Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prog- nosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged re- vascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. Methods A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups （〈 1 week, 1- weeks, and 2-12 weeks after primary PCI）. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events （MACE）, a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. Results During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups （〈 1 week： 23.0%; 1-2 weeks： 33.0%; 2-12 weeks： 40.0%; P = 0.001）. In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and l-2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio （HR）： 0.40, 95% confidence intervals （CI）： 0.24-4）.65; HR： 0.54, 95% CI： 0.3 lq3.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization （HR： 0.41, 95% CI： 0.24-0.70; HR： 0.36, 95% CI： 0.18-0.7）, compared with a strategy of 2-12 weeks later of primary PCI. Conclusions The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients.展开更多
Objective To explore the impact of a ＂one-week＂ staged muhivessel percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） versus culprit-only PCI on deaths and major adverse cardiac events （MACE）. Methods We retrospectively an...Objective To explore the impact of a ＂one-week＂ staged muhivessel percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） versus culprit-only PCI on deaths and major adverse cardiac events （MACE）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 447 patients with multivessel disease who experienced a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） within 12 h before undergoing PCI between July 26, 2008 and Septem- ber 25, 201 l. After completion of PCI in the infarct artery, 201 patients still in the hospital agreed to undergo PCI in non-infarct arteries with more than 70% stenosis for a ＂one-week＂ staged multivessel PCI. A total of 246 patients only received intervention for the culprit vessel. Follow-up ended on September 9, 2014. This study examined the differences in deaths from any cause （i.e., cardiac and noncardiac） and MACE between the two treatment groups. Results Compared to a culprit-only PCI treatment approach, the ＂one-week＂ staged multivessel PCI was strongly associated with greater benefits for 55-month all cause death [41 （16.7%） vs. 13 （6.5%）, P = 0.004] and MACE [82 （33.3%） vs. 40 （19.9%）, P = 0.002] rates. In addition, there were significant differences in the number of myocardial infarctions [43 （17.5%） vs. 20 （10.0%）, P = 0.023], coronary-artery bypass grafting [CABG; 20 （8.1%） vs. 6 （3.0%）, P = 0.021], and PCI [31 （12.6%） vs. 12 （6.0%）, P - 0.018]. Patients undergoing culprit-only PCI compared to ＂one-week＂ PCI had the same number of stent thrombosis events [7 （2.8%） vs. 3 （1.5%）, P - 0.522]. Conclusions Compared to a culprit-only PCI treatment approach, ＂one-week＂ staged multi-vessel PCI was a safe and effective selection for STEMI and multi-vessel PCL展开更多
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ＂one-time＂ versus staged multivessel stenting in elderly （〉 60 years）patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome （NSTE-ACS） and multivessel disease （MV...Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ＂one-time＂ versus staged multivessel stenting in elderly （〉 60 years）patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome （NSTE-ACS） and multivessel disease （MVD）. Methods We analyzed data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） who were enrolled in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region between 2008 and 2012. A total of 1090 eligible patients aged 〉 60 were further categorized into ＂one-time＂ group （n = 623） and staged PCI group （n = 467） according to intervention strategy. The primary endpoint was composite outcome of myocardial infarction （MI） or cardiac death during 3-year follow-up. Results The estimated 3-year composite rate of cardiac death or MI was 7.0% in the staged PCI group and 9.5% in the ＂one-time＂ group （P = 0.110）. Multivariate analysis confmned the benefit of staged PCI on the primary events in the elderly （HR： 0.638, 95% CI： 0.408-3.998, P = 0.049）. In a propensity score matched cohort, staged PCI was associated with lower rates of primary events （6.1% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.046） and MI （3.4% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.037） at three years. In addition, there were reduced trends in the stent thrombosis at 30 days （0.3% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.177） and at three years （1.1% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.199） in the staged PCI group. There was no significant difference in the 3-year target vessel revascularization （15.5% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.746）. Conclusions In elderly NSTE-ACS patients with MVD, staged PCI might be an optimal strategy associated with reduced long-term cardiac death or MI compared with ＂one-time＂ PCI strategy, which needs further confirmation.展开更多
BACKGROUND Even though percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)improved the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction,still multivessel coronary artery disease remains an important factor burdening prognosi...BACKGROUND Even though percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)improved the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction,still multivessel coronary artery disease remains an important factor burdening prognosis and it is being associated with a worse prognosis compared to single-vessel disease(SVD).AIM To compare the clinical profile and outcomes after the primary PCI in young patients with SVD vs multivessel disease(MVD).METHODS The retrospective cohort of patients were divided into two groups:SVD and MVD group.The study population consisted of both male and female young(≤45 years)patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease,Karachi,Pakistan and undergone primary PCI from 1 st July 2017 to 31 st March 2018.Pre and postprocedure management of the patients was as per the guidelines and institutional protocols.RESULTS A total of 571 patients with STEMI,≤45 years were stratified into two groups by the number of vessels involved,342(59.9%)with SVD and 229(40.1%)with MVD.The average age of these patients was 39.04±4.86 years.A lower prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was observed in SVD as compare to MVD group(25.1%vs 38%,P<0.01;11.7%vs 27.5%,P<0.001)respectively.While,smoking was more prevalent among the SVD group as compare to MVD group(36.3%vs 28.4%,P=0.05).The high-C Lesion was observed in a significantly higher number of younger patients with MVD as compared to SVD group(48.8%vs 39.2%,P=0.021).Post-procedure thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade was found to be not associated with the number of diseased vessels with a P value of 0.426 and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade III was observed in 98%vs 96.5%of the patients is SVD vs MVD group.CONCLUSION The MVD comprised of around 40%of the young patients presented with STEMI.Also,this study shows that diabetes and hypertension have a certain role in the pathogenesis of multivessel diseases,therefore,preventive measures for diabetes and hypertension can be effective strategies in reducing the burden of premature STEMI.展开更多
Multivessel batch distillation(MVBD) is mainly used to separate mixtures with more than two components. In this article, a new operation mode with MVBD is proposed for separation of binary mixtures under total reflux....Multivessel batch distillation(MVBD) is mainly used to separate mixtures with more than two components. In this article, a new operation mode with MVBD is proposed for separation of binary mixtures under total reflux. A mathematic model is setup for the simulation. The proposed operation policy and the regular operation with constant reflux are compared theoretically and experimentally. The results show that the new operation mode has great advantages in time saving and operation flexibility. MVBD presents great potential for separation with high efficiency.展开更多
Background Many studies have indicated that medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention have similar effects in terms of the long-term prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease. This study i...Background Many studies have indicated that medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention have similar effects in terms of the long-term prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease. This study investigated the effects of optimal medical therapy （OMT） and revascularization-plus-OMT in elderly patients with high-risk angina. Methods In this prospective non-randomized study, 241 consecutive high-risk elderly male patients （65-92 years of age） with angiographically confirmed multivessel disease were enrolled in the registry from January 2004 to April 2005. Of these, 98 patients underwent OMT and 143 underwent revascularization therapy plus OMT. Results After 6.5 years of follow-up, we found that the rate of long-term cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients who under- went OMT than in those who underwent revascularization （6.5-year unadjusted mortality rate, 14.3% for OMT vs. 7.0% for revascularization patients; log-rank P = 0.04）. However, the overall risks of major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events （MACCE） were similar among all patients （6.5-year unadjusted mortality rate, 29.6% for OMT vs. 27.3% for revascularization patients; log-rank P = 0.67）. Conclusions OMT was associated with an increase in cardiac death but a similar 6.5-year risk of MACCE compared with revascularization in high-risk elderly male patients with coronary multivessel disease.展开更多
Several studies have shown that coronary artery bypass graft surgery （CABG） is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with diabetes and multi-vessel disease. Whether this advantage of CAB...Several studies have shown that coronary artery bypass graft surgery （CABG） is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with diabetes and multi-vessel disease. Whether this advantage of CABG over PCI is confined to diabetics who require insulin is unknown. We review the published literature comparing CABG with PCI in diabetics including 8 cohorts and 4,786 patients. There was a lower rate for all-cause mortality （Relative risk （RR）： 0.78, 95% confidence interval （CI）： 0.62-0.99）, and for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE, RR： 0.59, 95% CI： 0.47-0.75） for CABG compared to PCI. Composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction and stoke was similar between CABG and PCI （RR： 0.87, 95% CI： 0.54-1.42）. Visual inspection of the forest plots showed that in most analyses, the point estimates of the RR are similar between the insulin requiring group and non-insulin requiring group. On meta-regression, there was no interaction between status of insulin requirement and revascularization strategies （P 〉 0.05 for all）. The pre- sented data on the still unpublished analysis of the FREEDOM trial showed similar results. Thus, in the current era, CABG is superior to PCI with lower mortality and MACCE rates, but the state of insulin requirement had no effect on the outcomes from the two revascularization strategies.展开更多
BACKGROUND Coronary artery spasm is a major cause of myocardial ischemia.Although coronary artery spasm has been known for a long time,its mechanism has not yet been identified.Many clinicians,especially young clinici...BACKGROUND Coronary artery spasm is a major cause of myocardial ischemia.Although coronary artery spasm has been known for a long time,its mechanism has not yet been identified.Many clinicians,especially young clinicians pay less attention to coronary artery spasm,which may lead to some patients not being appropriately diagnosed and treated in time.We report a patient with spontaneous multivessel coronary artery spasm for more than 30 years diagnosed with intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)imaging.CASE SUMMARY A 66-year-old Chinese male patient had chest squeezing at rest for more than 30 years.He had a history of cigarette smoking for more than 40 years and hypertension for 10 years.Before presenting at our institution,the patient had undergone coronary angiography 4 times and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures twice at other hospitals without a diagnosis of coronary artery spasm.However,his chest symptoms worsened.Spontaneous multivessel coronary artery spasm occurred during IVUS without provocation testing,and the IVUS image was recorded.Thus,the diagnosis of multifocal spontaneous coronary artery spasm was confirmed.The patient was placed on oral diltiazem,isosorbide mononitrate,and nicorandil to suppress coronary artery spasms.All medications were given at the maximum dosages tolerated by the patient.He was discharged after 5 d without complications.During the six-month follow-up period,the patient was symptom-free.CONCLUSION Coronary artery spasm is still prevalent in Eastern countries.It is essential for clinicians to be aware of coronary artery spasm,which may be hard to detect and can be lethal,in order to diagnose and treat patients appropriately.展开更多
Objective The optimal strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of our study is ...Objective The optimal strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of our study is to evaluate the short- and long-term effect of complete revas- cularization （CR） versus infarct-related artery revascularization （IR） following primary PCI. Methods We identified randomized controlled studies （RCTs） by systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov Website, Cochrane Library and Google scholar Database. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events （MACE）. Result Nine RCTs （2198 patients） with mean follow-up of 21.1 months were retrieved. Overall, CR was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE compared with IR therapy when followed by long-term duration （≥ 12 months） （RR： 0.56; 95% Ch 0.47-0.68; I^2 = 58.5%）. Additionally, CR was associated with equivalent rates of all-cause mortality （RR： 0.76; 95% CI： 0.53-1.08; I^2= 0.0%） and myocardial infarction （RR： 0.81; 95% CI： 0.57-1.16; I^2= 26.4%） compared with control. Meanwhile, risk of stroke was similar between groups （RR： 0.73; 95% CI： 0.24-2.19; I^2= 0.0%）. However, rates of cardiac death and target vessel revascularization were significantly decreased in the CR group （RR： 0.41; 95% CI： 0.23-0.72; I^2 = 0.0% and RR： 0.46; 95% CI： 0.37-0.57; I^2= 47.4%）. Conclusion Complete revascularization appears to have long-term clinical benefit with regard to adverse cardiac events following primary PCI. However, more studies are needed to confirm these findings.展开更多
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-elating stents （DES） implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease （MVD） compared with coronary artery bypass graft （CABG） on th...Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-elating stents （DES） implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease （MVD） compared with coronary artery bypass graft （CABG） on the clinical outcomes. Methods From May 2003 to April 2005, 150 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients with MVD underwent revascularization, 84 by percutaneous coronary intervention （PC1） with DES and 66 by CABG. The study end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events （MACEs） during hospital interval after procedure and follow-up. Results Most preoperative characteristics were similar in two groups, but left main disease （30% vs 4%, P = 0. 001 ） and three-vessel disease （ 70% vs 54%, P = 0. 045 ） were more prevalent in CABG group. Complete revascularization was achieved in more patients in CABG group than that in PC1 group （82% vs 67%, P =0. 037）. Cumulative incidence of MACEs in hospital was similar between two groups （2.4% PC1 vs 9. 1% CABG , P =0. 069） despite the higher early morbidity （6. 1% vs 0%, P =0. 022） associated with CABG. Patients were followed up clinically for a mean of 18 - 8 months （ range 13- 36 months）. The incidence of MACEs remained higher after PC1 with multiple DES （21.4% vs 9. 1%, P =0. 041 ） mainly driven by a more require for repeat revascularization （ 13. 1% vs 3. 0%, P = 0. 030 ）. Conclusion PC1 with DES implantation, combined with tight glycemic control, aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification and antiplatelet treatment, may be a safe and feasible alternative to CABG for selected diabetic patients with multivessel disease.展开更多
Background Multivessel disease(MVD)is common in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).But there is controversy over how to manage significant lesions in non-infarct-related artery(...Background Multivessel disease(MVD)is common in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).But there is controversy over how to manage significant lesions in non-infarct-related artery(non-IRA).Methods A total of 221 patients diagnosed with STEMI and MVD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)at our cardiology department between January 2018 and June 2021 were included in this study.Among them,115 patients underwent complete revascularization within 30 days and were assigned to the complete revascularization group,while 106 patients who did not undergo complete revascularization within 30 days were assigned to the IRA-only revascularization group.Patients were followed up at 12 months.The primary endpoint event was adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs).Results There was no significant statistical difference in MACEs between the two groups of patients,but the incidence of heart failure in the IRA-Only group was significantly higher than that in the complete revascularization group.In the complete revascularization group,the number of stents,Killip class Ⅱ/Ⅲ on admission,and complete revascularization time were independent predictors of MACEs.Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)curve analysis showed that complete revascularization time had good predictive power for MACEs(Area under the curve:0.74695%CI:0.680-0.801),with a cut-off value of 10.3 days.Conclusions For STEMI patients with concurrent MVD,complete revascularization can reduce the incidence of heart failure.What's more,short-term staged(within 10 days)complete revascularization may further improve clinical outcomes.展开更多
Background The hybrid procedure for coronary heart disease combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） and is an alternative to revascularization...Background The hybrid procedure for coronary heart disease combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） and is an alternative to revascularization treatment. We sought to assess the predictive value of four risk-stratification models for risk assessment of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE） in patients with multivessel disease undergoing hybrid coronary revascularization. Methods The data of 120 patients were retrospectively collected and the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and the Global Risk Classification （GRC） calculated for each patient. The outcomes of interest were 2.7-year incidences of MACCE, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any-vessel revascularization. Results During a mean of 2.7-year follow-up, actuarial survival was 99.17%, and no myocardial infarctions occurred. The discriminatory power （area under curve （AUC）） of the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC for 2.7-year MACCE was 0.60 （95% confidence interval 0.42-0.77）, 0.65 （0.47-0.82）, 0.57 （0.39-0.75） and 0.65 （0.46-0.83）, respectively. The calibration characteristics of the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC were 3.92 （P=0.86）, 5.39 （P=0.37）, 13.81 （P=0.32） and 0.02 （P=0.89）, respectively. Conclusions In patients with multivessel disease undergoing a hybrid procedure, the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC were inaccurate in predicting MACCE. Modifying risk-stratification models to improve the predictive value for a hybrid procedure is needed.展开更多
Coronary artery spasm is typically a transient and marked narrowing of a single coronary artery lumen that induces myocardial ischemia.In general,patients with coronary spastic angina have a good prognosis.Herein,we d...Coronary artery spasm is typically a transient and marked narrowing of a single coronary artery lumen that induces myocardial ischemia.In general,patients with coronary spastic angina have a good prognosis.Herein,we described a case of recurrent diffuse multivessel coronary artery spasm presented as myocardial infarction,which was a very rare form of coronary heart disease.Although several similar ones have been reported worldwide,this is the first case rechecked by coronary angiography （CAG） in the follow-up period.展开更多
Background Contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） occurs frequently in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI） for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI） and is associated with ...Background Contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） occurs frequently in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI） for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI） and is associated with poor outcomes. Multivessel coronary artery disease（MVCAD） is considered to be a potentially important risk factor for CIN. There are still no data on CIN in patients undergoing staged PCI for STEMI and MVCAD. Therefore, we explored the incidence, risk factors, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of CIN in this special population. Methods From 2011 to 2018, we enrolled 103 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent staged PCI for MVCAD. CIN was defined as a relative increase of 〉 25% or an absolute increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL in SCr from the baseline value 72 h after exposure to the contrast medium. The incidence, risk factors, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of CIN in this special population were studied. Results We found1） the incidence of CIN after primary PCI and staged PCI was 16.50% and 25.20%, respectively. 2） patients with CIN had worse in-hospital and follow-up outcomes. 3） in multivariate logistic analysis, independent risk factors for CIN included：（1） lower creatinine clearance at baseline;（2） atrioventricular block requiring temporary cardiac pacemaker implantation;（3） use of IABP at baseline;（4） total contrast volume administered（ primary PCI ＋staged PCI）;（5） shorter time interval between primary PCI and staged PCI. Conclusions CIN is a frequent complication in patients with STEMI and MVCAD undergoing staged PCI. The development of CIN is associated with worse in-hospital and follow-up outcomes.展开更多
文摘Background The clinical significance of complete revascularization for ST segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） pa- tients during admission is still debatable. Methods A total of 1406 STEMI patients from the Korean Myocardial Infarction Registry with multivessel diseases without cardiogenic shock who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PPCI） were analyzed. We used propensity score matching （PSM） to control differences of baseline characteristics between culprit only intervention （CP） and multivessel percutaneous coronary interventions （MP）, and between double vessel disease （DVD） and triple vessel disease （TVD）. The major adverse cardiac event （MACE） was analyzed for one year after discharge. Results TVD patients showed higher incidence of MACE （14.2% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.01）, any cause of revascularization （10.6% vs. 5.9%, P - 0.01）, and repeated PCI （9.5% vs. 5.7%, P = 0.02）, as compared to DVD patients during one year after discharge. MP reduced MACE effectively （7.3% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.03）, as compared to CP for one year, but all cause of death （1.6% vs. 3.2%, P= 0.38）, Ml （0.4% vs. 0.8%, P = 1.00）, and any cause ofrevascularization （5.3% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.09） were comparable in the two treatment groups. Conclusions STEMI patients with TVD showed higher rate of MACE, as compared to DVD MP performed during PPCI or ad hoc during admission for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock showed lower rate of MACE in this large scaled database. Therefore, MP could be considered as an effective treatment option for STEMI patients without cardiogenic shock.
文摘Background Studies have shown that staged percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） for non-culprit lesions is beneficial for prog- nosis of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） patients with multivessel disease. However, the optimal timing of staged re- vascularization is still controversial. This study aimed to find the optimal timing of staged revascularization. Methods A total of 428 STEMI patients with multivessel disease who underwent primary PCI and staged PCI were included. According to the time interval between primary and staged PCI, patients were divided into three groups （〈 1 week, 1- weeks, and 2-12 weeks after primary PCI）. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events （MACE）, a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal re-infarction, repeat revascularization, and stroke. Cox regression model was used to assess the association between staged PCI timing and risk of MACE. Results During the follow-up, 119 participants had MACEs. There was statistical difference in MACE incidence among the three groups （〈 1 week： 23.0%; 1-2 weeks： 33.0%; 2-12 weeks： 40.0%; P = 0.001）. In the multivariable adjustment model, the timing interval of staged PCI ≤ 1 week and l-2 weeks were both significantly associated with a lower risk of MACE [hazard ratio （HR）： 0.40, 95% confidence intervals （CI）： 0.24-4）.65; HR： 0.54, 95% CI： 0.3 lq3.93, respectively], mainly attributed to a lower risk of repeat revascularization （HR： 0.41, 95% CI： 0.24-0.70; HR： 0.36, 95% CI： 0.18-0.7）, compared with a strategy of 2-12 weeks later of primary PCI. Conclusions The optimal timing of staged PCI for non-culprit vessels should be within two weeks after primary PCI for STEMI patients.
文摘Objective To explore the impact of a ＂one-week＂ staged muhivessel percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） versus culprit-only PCI on deaths and major adverse cardiac events （MACE）. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 447 patients with multivessel disease who experienced a ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction （STEMI） within 12 h before undergoing PCI between July 26, 2008 and Septem- ber 25, 201 l. After completion of PCI in the infarct artery, 201 patients still in the hospital agreed to undergo PCI in non-infarct arteries with more than 70% stenosis for a ＂one-week＂ staged multivessel PCI. A total of 246 patients only received intervention for the culprit vessel. Follow-up ended on September 9, 2014. This study examined the differences in deaths from any cause （i.e., cardiac and noncardiac） and MACE between the two treatment groups. Results Compared to a culprit-only PCI treatment approach, the ＂one-week＂ staged multivessel PCI was strongly associated with greater benefits for 55-month all cause death [41 （16.7%） vs. 13 （6.5%）, P = 0.004] and MACE [82 （33.3%） vs. 40 （19.9%）, P = 0.002] rates. In addition, there were significant differences in the number of myocardial infarctions [43 （17.5%） vs. 20 （10.0%）, P = 0.023], coronary-artery bypass grafting [CABG; 20 （8.1%） vs. 6 （3.0%）, P = 0.021], and PCI [31 （12.6%） vs. 12 （6.0%）, P - 0.018]. Patients undergoing culprit-only PCI compared to ＂one-week＂ PCI had the same number of stent thrombosis events [7 （2.8%） vs. 3 （1.5%）, P - 0.522]. Conclusions Compared to a culprit-only PCI treatment approach, ＂one-week＂ staged multi-vessel PCI was a safe and effective selection for STEMI and multi-vessel PCL
文摘Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of ＂one-time＂ versus staged multivessel stenting in elderly （〉 60 years）patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome （NSTE-ACS） and multivessel disease （MVD）. Methods We analyzed data of consecutive NSTE-ACS patients with multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） who were enrolled in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region between 2008 and 2012. A total of 1090 eligible patients aged 〉 60 were further categorized into ＂one-time＂ group （n = 623） and staged PCI group （n = 467） according to intervention strategy. The primary endpoint was composite outcome of myocardial infarction （MI） or cardiac death during 3-year follow-up. Results The estimated 3-year composite rate of cardiac death or MI was 7.0% in the staged PCI group and 9.5% in the ＂one-time＂ group （P = 0.110）. Multivariate analysis confmned the benefit of staged PCI on the primary events in the elderly （HR： 0.638, 95% CI： 0.408-3.998, P = 0.049）. In a propensity score matched cohort, staged PCI was associated with lower rates of primary events （6.1% vs. 10.4%, P = 0.046） and MI （3.4% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.037） at three years. In addition, there were reduced trends in the stent thrombosis at 30 days （0.3% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.177） and at three years （1.1% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.199） in the staged PCI group. There was no significant difference in the 3-year target vessel revascularization （15.5% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.746）. Conclusions In elderly NSTE-ACS patients with MVD, staged PCI might be an optimal strategy associated with reduced long-term cardiac death or MI compared with ＂one-time＂ PCI strategy, which needs further confirmation.
基金support of the staff members of the Clinical Research Department of the National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases(NICVD)Karachi,Pakistan.
文摘BACKGROUND Even though percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)improved the survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction,still multivessel coronary artery disease remains an important factor burdening prognosis and it is being associated with a worse prognosis compared to single-vessel disease(SVD).AIM To compare the clinical profile and outcomes after the primary PCI in young patients with SVD vs multivessel disease(MVD).METHODS The retrospective cohort of patients were divided into two groups:SVD and MVD group.The study population consisted of both male and female young(≤45 years)patients presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI)at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease,Karachi,Pakistan and undergone primary PCI from 1 st July 2017 to 31 st March 2018.Pre and postprocedure management of the patients was as per the guidelines and institutional protocols.RESULTS A total of 571 patients with STEMI,≤45 years were stratified into two groups by the number of vessels involved,342(59.9%)with SVD and 229(40.1%)with MVD.The average age of these patients was 39.04±4.86 years.A lower prevalence of hypertension and diabetes was observed in SVD as compare to MVD group(25.1%vs 38%,P<0.01;11.7%vs 27.5%,P<0.001)respectively.While,smoking was more prevalent among the SVD group as compare to MVD group(36.3%vs 28.4%,P=0.05).The high-C Lesion was observed in a significantly higher number of younger patients with MVD as compared to SVD group(48.8%vs 39.2%,P=0.021).Post-procedure thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade was found to be not associated with the number of diseased vessels with a P value of 0.426 and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade III was observed in 98%vs 96.5%of the patients is SVD vs MVD group.CONCLUSION The MVD comprised of around 40%of the young patients presented with STEMI.Also,this study shows that diabetes and hypertension have a certain role in the pathogenesis of multivessel diseases,therefore,preventive measures for diabetes and hypertension can be effective strategies in reducing the burden of premature STEMI.
文摘Multivessel batch distillation(MVBD) is mainly used to separate mixtures with more than two components. In this article, a new operation mode with MVBD is proposed for separation of binary mixtures under total reflux. A mathematic model is setup for the simulation. The proposed operation policy and the regular operation with constant reflux are compared theoretically and experimentally. The results show that the new operation mode has great advantages in time saving and operation flexibility. MVBD presents great potential for separation with high efficiency.
基金This study was supported by the grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China （No. 81100160, 81470504）. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
文摘Background Many studies have indicated that medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention have similar effects in terms of the long-term prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease. This study investigated the effects of optimal medical therapy （OMT） and revascularization-plus-OMT in elderly patients with high-risk angina. Methods In this prospective non-randomized study, 241 consecutive high-risk elderly male patients （65-92 years of age） with angiographically confirmed multivessel disease were enrolled in the registry from January 2004 to April 2005. Of these, 98 patients underwent OMT and 143 underwent revascularization therapy plus OMT. Results After 6.5 years of follow-up, we found that the rate of long-term cardiac mortality was significantly higher in patients who under- went OMT than in those who underwent revascularization （6.5-year unadjusted mortality rate, 14.3% for OMT vs. 7.0% for revascularization patients; log-rank P = 0.04）. However, the overall risks of major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events （MACCE） were similar among all patients （6.5-year unadjusted mortality rate, 29.6% for OMT vs. 27.3% for revascularization patients; log-rank P = 0.67）. Conclusions OMT was associated with an increase in cardiac death but a similar 6.5-year risk of MACCE compared with revascularization in high-risk elderly male patients with coronary multivessel disease.
文摘Several studies have shown that coronary artery bypass graft surgery （CABG） is superior to percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with diabetes and multi-vessel disease. Whether this advantage of CABG over PCI is confined to diabetics who require insulin is unknown. We review the published literature comparing CABG with PCI in diabetics including 8 cohorts and 4,786 patients. There was a lower rate for all-cause mortality （Relative risk （RR）： 0.78, 95% confidence interval （CI）： 0.62-0.99）, and for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE, RR： 0.59, 95% CI： 0.47-0.75） for CABG compared to PCI. Composite outcome of mortality, myocardial infarction and stoke was similar between CABG and PCI （RR： 0.87, 95% CI： 0.54-1.42）. Visual inspection of the forest plots showed that in most analyses, the point estimates of the RR are similar between the insulin requiring group and non-insulin requiring group. On meta-regression, there was no interaction between status of insulin requirement and revascularization strategies （P 〉 0.05 for all）. The pre- sented data on the still unpublished analysis of the FREEDOM trial showed similar results. Thus, in the current era, CABG is superior to PCI with lower mortality and MACCE rates, but the state of insulin requirement had no effect on the outcomes from the two revascularization strategies.
文摘BACKGROUND Coronary artery spasm is a major cause of myocardial ischemia.Although coronary artery spasm has been known for a long time,its mechanism has not yet been identified.Many clinicians,especially young clinicians pay less attention to coronary artery spasm,which may lead to some patients not being appropriately diagnosed and treated in time.We report a patient with spontaneous multivessel coronary artery spasm for more than 30 years diagnosed with intravascular ultrasound(IVUS)imaging.CASE SUMMARY A 66-year-old Chinese male patient had chest squeezing at rest for more than 30 years.He had a history of cigarette smoking for more than 40 years and hypertension for 10 years.Before presenting at our institution,the patient had undergone coronary angiography 4 times and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures twice at other hospitals without a diagnosis of coronary artery spasm.However,his chest symptoms worsened.Spontaneous multivessel coronary artery spasm occurred during IVUS without provocation testing,and the IVUS image was recorded.Thus,the diagnosis of multifocal spontaneous coronary artery spasm was confirmed.The patient was placed on oral diltiazem,isosorbide mononitrate,and nicorandil to suppress coronary artery spasms.All medications were given at the maximum dosages tolerated by the patient.He was discharged after 5 d without complications.During the six-month follow-up period,the patient was symptom-free.CONCLUSION Coronary artery spasm is still prevalent in Eastern countries.It is essential for clinicians to be aware of coronary artery spasm,which may be hard to detect and can be lethal,in order to diagnose and treat patients appropriately.
基金Acknowledgement This work is supported by grants from National Natural Science foundation of China （81570323） and Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine, Beijing, China （PXM2017_014226_000037）.
文摘Objective The optimal strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease is still controversial. Therefore, the aim of our study is to evaluate the short- and long-term effect of complete revas- cularization （CR） versus infarct-related artery revascularization （IR） following primary PCI. Methods We identified randomized controlled studies （RCTs） by systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov Website, Cochrane Library and Google scholar Database. Primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events （MACE）. Result Nine RCTs （2198 patients） with mean follow-up of 21.1 months were retrieved. Overall, CR was associated with significantly lower risk of MACE compared with IR therapy when followed by long-term duration （≥ 12 months） （RR： 0.56; 95% Ch 0.47-0.68; I^2 = 58.5%）. Additionally, CR was associated with equivalent rates of all-cause mortality （RR： 0.76; 95% CI： 0.53-1.08; I^2= 0.0%） and myocardial infarction （RR： 0.81; 95% CI： 0.57-1.16; I^2= 26.4%） compared with control. Meanwhile, risk of stroke was similar between groups （RR： 0.73; 95% CI： 0.24-2.19; I^2= 0.0%）. However, rates of cardiac death and target vessel revascularization were significantly decreased in the CR group （RR： 0.41; 95% CI： 0.23-0.72; I^2 = 0.0% and RR： 0.46; 95% CI： 0.37-0.57; I^2= 47.4%）. Conclusion Complete revascularization appears to have long-term clinical benefit with regard to adverse cardiac events following primary PCI. However, more studies are needed to confirm these findings.
文摘Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug-elating stents （DES） implantation in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease （MVD） compared with coronary artery bypass graft （CABG） on the clinical outcomes. Methods From May 2003 to April 2005, 150 consecutive type 2 diabetic patients with MVD underwent revascularization, 84 by percutaneous coronary intervention （PC1） with DES and 66 by CABG. The study end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events （MACEs） during hospital interval after procedure and follow-up. Results Most preoperative characteristics were similar in two groups, but left main disease （30% vs 4%, P = 0. 001 ） and three-vessel disease （ 70% vs 54%, P = 0. 045 ） were more prevalent in CABG group. Complete revascularization was achieved in more patients in CABG group than that in PC1 group （82% vs 67%, P =0. 037）. Cumulative incidence of MACEs in hospital was similar between two groups （2.4% PC1 vs 9. 1% CABG , P =0. 069） despite the higher early morbidity （6. 1% vs 0%, P =0. 022） associated with CABG. Patients were followed up clinically for a mean of 18 - 8 months （ range 13- 36 months）. The incidence of MACEs remained higher after PC1 with multiple DES （21.4% vs 9. 1%, P =0. 041 ） mainly driven by a more require for repeat revascularization （ 13. 1% vs 3. 0%, P = 0. 030 ）. Conclusion PC1 with DES implantation, combined with tight glycemic control, aggressive cardiovascular risk factor modification and antiplatelet treatment, may be a safe and feasible alternative to CABG for selected diabetic patients with multivessel disease.
基金supported by Guangxi University Young and Middle-aged Teachers Scientific Research Basic Ability Improvement Project(No.2019KY0550).
文摘Background Multivessel disease(MVD)is common in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI).But there is controversy over how to manage significant lesions in non-infarct-related artery(non-IRA).Methods A total of 221 patients diagnosed with STEMI and MVD who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)at our cardiology department between January 2018 and June 2021 were included in this study.Among them,115 patients underwent complete revascularization within 30 days and were assigned to the complete revascularization group,while 106 patients who did not undergo complete revascularization within 30 days were assigned to the IRA-only revascularization group.Patients were followed up at 12 months.The primary endpoint event was adverse cardiovascular events(MACEs).Results There was no significant statistical difference in MACEs between the two groups of patients,but the incidence of heart failure in the IRA-Only group was significantly higher than that in the complete revascularization group.In the complete revascularization group,the number of stents,Killip class Ⅱ/Ⅲ on admission,and complete revascularization time were independent predictors of MACEs.Receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC)curve analysis showed that complete revascularization time had good predictive power for MACEs(Area under the curve:0.74695%CI:0.680-0.801),with a cut-off value of 10.3 days.Conclusions For STEMI patients with concurrent MVD,complete revascularization can reduce the incidence of heart failure.What's more,short-term staged(within 10 days)complete revascularization may further improve clinical outcomes.
文摘Background The hybrid procedure for coronary heart disease combines minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting （CABG） and percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI） and is an alternative to revascularization treatment. We sought to assess the predictive value of four risk-stratification models for risk assessment of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events （MACCE） in patients with multivessel disease undergoing hybrid coronary revascularization. Methods The data of 120 patients were retrospectively collected and the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and the Global Risk Classification （GRC） calculated for each patient. The outcomes of interest were 2.7-year incidences of MACCE, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and any-vessel revascularization. Results During a mean of 2.7-year follow-up, actuarial survival was 99.17%, and no myocardial infarctions occurred. The discriminatory power （area under curve （AUC）） of the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC for 2.7-year MACCE was 0.60 （95% confidence interval 0.42-0.77）, 0.65 （0.47-0.82）, 0.57 （0.39-0.75） and 0.65 （0.46-0.83）, respectively. The calibration characteristics of the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC were 3.92 （P=0.86）, 5.39 （P=0.37）, 13.81 （P=0.32） and 0.02 （P=0.89）, respectively. Conclusions In patients with multivessel disease undergoing a hybrid procedure, the SYNTAX score, EuroSCORE, SinoSCORE and GRC were inaccurate in predicting MACCE. Modifying risk-stratification models to improve the predictive value for a hybrid procedure is needed.
文摘Coronary artery spasm is typically a transient and marked narrowing of a single coronary artery lumen that induces myocardial ischemia.In general,patients with coronary spastic angina have a good prognosis.Herein,we described a case of recurrent diffuse multivessel coronary artery spasm presented as myocardial infarction,which was a very rare form of coronary heart disease.Although several similar ones have been reported worldwide,this is the first case rechecked by coronary angiography （CAG） in the follow-up period.
文摘Background Contrast-induced nephropathy（CIN） occurs frequently in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI） for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI） and is associated with poor outcomes. Multivessel coronary artery disease（MVCAD） is considered to be a potentially important risk factor for CIN. There are still no data on CIN in patients undergoing staged PCI for STEMI and MVCAD. Therefore, we explored the incidence, risk factors, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of CIN in this special population. Methods From 2011 to 2018, we enrolled 103 consecutive patients with STEMI who underwent staged PCI for MVCAD. CIN was defined as a relative increase of 〉 25% or an absolute increase of ≥ 0.5 mg/dL in SCr from the baseline value 72 h after exposure to the contrast medium. The incidence, risk factors, in-hospital and follow-up outcomes of CIN in this special population were studied. Results We found1） the incidence of CIN after primary PCI and staged PCI was 16.50% and 25.20%, respectively. 2） patients with CIN had worse in-hospital and follow-up outcomes. 3） in multivariate logistic analysis, independent risk factors for CIN included：（1） lower creatinine clearance at baseline;（2） atrioventricular block requiring temporary cardiac pacemaker implantation;（3） use of IABP at baseline;（4） total contrast volume administered（ primary PCI ＋staged PCI）;（5） shorter time interval between primary PCI and staged PCI. Conclusions CIN is a frequent complication in patients with STEMI and MVCAD undergoing staged PCI. The development of CIN is associated with worse in-hospital and follow-up outcomes.
