When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, the random experiment is considered the ＂gold standard＂. Randomization is considered the gold standard because it provides a way of decreasing the chan...When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, the random experiment is considered the ＂gold standard＂. Randomization is considered the gold standard because it provides a way of decreasing the chance that systematic differences, other than type of intervention, will be obtained between treatment and control groups. What has received little attention in the literature, however, is the fact that even with random assignment researchers may end up facing problems similar to those faced with data from a study that did not use randomization. This is because attrition may result in the values of potentially confounding variables no longer being ＂balanced＂ between （or among） the groups under investigation. This means that in order to estimate the effect of the treatment, one must find some way of adjusting for these potential confounders. Although multiple regression modeling is the way social science researchers typically control for the effects of potentially confounding variables, this paper argues that a modification of multiple regression modeling that uses propensity scores, under some conditions, may provide more parsimonious and better fitting models.展开更多
In this paper the influence of the differently distributed phase-randontized to the data obtained in dynamic analysis for critical value is studied.The calculation results validate that the sufficient phase-randomized...In this paper the influence of the differently distributed phase-randontized to the data obtained in dynamic analysis for critical value is studied.The calculation results validate that the sufficient phase-randomized of the different distributed random numbers are less influential on the critical value . This offers the theoretical foundation of the feasibility and practicality of the phase-randomized method.展开更多
This paper examines the impacts of information about COVID-19 on pig farmers'production willingness by using endorsement experiments and follow-up surveys conducted in 2020 and 2021 in China.Our results show that,...This paper examines the impacts of information about COVID-19 on pig farmers'production willingness by using endorsement experiments and follow-up surveys conducted in 2020 and 2021 in China.Our results show that,first,farmers were less willing to scale up production when they received information about COVID-19.The information in 2020 that the second wave of COVID-19 might occur without a vaccine reduced farmers'willingness to scale up by 13.4%,while the information in 2021 that COVID-19 might continue to spread despite the introduction of vaccine reduced farmers'willingness by 4.4%.Second,farmers whose production was affected by COVID-19 were considerably less willing to scale up,given the access to COVID-19 information.Third,farmers'production willingness can predict their actual production behavior.展开更多
文摘When it comes to evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, the random experiment is considered the ＂gold standard＂. Randomization is considered the gold standard because it provides a way of decreasing the chance that systematic differences, other than type of intervention, will be obtained between treatment and control groups. What has received little attention in the literature, however, is the fact that even with random assignment researchers may end up facing problems similar to those faced with data from a study that did not use randomization. This is because attrition may result in the values of potentially confounding variables no longer being ＂balanced＂ between （or among） the groups under investigation. This means that in order to estimate the effect of the treatment, one must find some way of adjusting for these potential confounders. Although multiple regression modeling is the way social science researchers typically control for the effects of potentially confounding variables, this paper argues that a modification of multiple regression modeling that uses propensity scores, under some conditions, may provide more parsimonious and better fitting models.
文摘In this paper the influence of the differently distributed phase-randontized to the data obtained in dynamic analysis for critical value is studied.The calculation results validate that the sufficient phase-randomized of the different distributed random numbers are less influential on the critical value . This offers the theoretical foundation of the feasibility and practicality of the phase-randomized method.
基金supported by the National Social Science Fund of China(23&ZD045)the Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China(21YJC790087)+1 种基金the Center for Social Welfare and Public Governance of Zhejiang University,Chinathe Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,China。
文摘This paper examines the impacts of information about COVID-19 on pig farmers'production willingness by using endorsement experiments and follow-up surveys conducted in 2020 and 2021 in China.Our results show that,first,farmers were less willing to scale up production when they received information about COVID-19.The information in 2020 that the second wave of COVID-19 might occur without a vaccine reduced farmers'willingness to scale up by 13.4%,while the information in 2021 that COVID-19 might continue to spread despite the introduction of vaccine reduced farmers'willingness by 4.4%.Second,farmers whose production was affected by COVID-19 were considerably less willing to scale up,given the access to COVID-19 information.Third,farmers'production willingness can predict their actual production behavior.
