期刊文献+
共找到431篇文章
< 1 2 22 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Effect of remimazolam vs. propofol on hemodynamics during general anesthesia induction in elderly patients: Single-center, randomized controlled trial 被引量:1
1
作者 Mingfeng He Chanjuan Gong +2 位作者 Yinan Chen Rongting Chen Yanning Qian 《The Journal of Biomedical Research》 CAS CSCD 2024年第1期66-75,共10页
The current study aimed to compare the effects between remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during the induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients.We used propofol at a rate of 60 mg/(kg·h)in... The current study aimed to compare the effects between remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability during the induction of general anesthesia in elderly patients.We used propofol at a rate of 60 mg/(kg·h)in the propofol group(group P)or remimazolam at a rate of 6 mg/(kg·h)in the remimazolam group(group R)for the induction.A processed electroencephalogram was used to determine whether the induction was successful and when to stop the infusion of the study drug.We measured when patients entered the operating room(T_(0)),when the induction was successful(T_(1)),and when before(T_(2))and 5 min after successful endotracheal intubation(T_(3)).We found that mean arterial pressure(MAP)was lower at T_(1–3),compared with T_(0) in both groups,but higher at T_(2) in the group R,whileΔMAP_(T0–T2) andΔMAP_(max) were smaller in the group R(ΔMAP_(T0–T2):the difference between MAP at time point T_(0) and T_(2),ΔMAP_(max):the difference between MAP at time point T_(0) and the lowest value from T_(0) to T_(3)).Cardiac index and stroke volume index did not differ between groups,whereas systemic vascular resistance index was higher at T_(1–3) in the group R.These findings show that remimazolam,compared with propofol,better maintains hemodynamic stability during the induction,which may be attributed to its ability to better maintain systemic vascular resistance levels. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam PROPOFOL elderly patients HYPOTENSION left ventricular systolic function systematic vascular resistance
下载PDF
Safety and efficacy comparison of remimazolam and propofol for intravenous anesthesia during gastroenteroscopic surgery of older patients:A meta-analysis 被引量:1
2
作者 Fang-Zhuo Li Cheng Zhao +1 位作者 Yi-Xun Tang Ji-Tong Liu 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2024年第7期1272-1283,共12页
BACKGROUND Remimazolam is characterized by rapid action and inactive metabolites.It is used as the general anesthetic for many clinical surgeries.In this study,we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether remimazo... BACKGROUND Remimazolam is characterized by rapid action and inactive metabolites.It is used as the general anesthetic for many clinical surgeries.In this study,we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether remimazolam is superior to propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older patients.AIM To compare the adverse events and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during gastroenteroscopy in older adults.METHODS The PubMed,Web of Science,the Cochrane Library databases were queried for the relevant key words"remimazolam,""and propofol,""and gastrointestinal endoscopy or gastroscopy."The search scope was"Title and Abstract,"and the search was limited to human studies and publications in English.Seven studies wherein remimazolam and propofol were compared were included for the metaanalysis.RESULTS We selected seven randomized controlled trials involving 1445 cases for the analysis.Remimazolam reduced the hypotension(relative risk,RR=0.44,95%CI:0.29-0.66,P=0.000),respiratory depression(RR=0.46,95%CI:0.30-0.70,P=0.000),injection pain(RR=0.12,95%CI:0.05-0.25,P=0.000),bradycardia(RR=0.37,95%CI:0.24-0.58,P=0.000),and time to discharge[weighted mean difference(WMD)=-0.58,95%CI:-0.97 to-0.18,P=0.005],compared to those after propofol administration.No obvious differences were observed for postoperative nausea and vomiting(RR=1.09,95%CI:0.97-1.24,P=0.151),dizziness(RR=0.77,95%CI:0.43-1.36,P=0.361),successful sedation rate(RR=0.96,95%CI:0.93-1.00,P=0.083),or the time to become fully alert(WMD=0.00,95%CI:-1.08-1.08,P=0.998).CONCLUSION Remimazolam appears to be safer than propofol for gastroenteroscopy in older adults.However,further studies are required to confirm these findings. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam PROPOFOL Gastroenteroscopy ANESTHESIA Older adults SEDATION Adverse events
下载PDF
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam in bronchoscopic sedation:A meta-analysis
3
作者 Ying Zhou Cheng Zhao +1 位作者 Yi-Xun Tang Ji-Tong Liu 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2024年第6期1120-1129,共10页
BACKGROUND Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia.Several studies have used remimazolam for bendable bronchoscopy.AIM To assess the safety and efficacy of remimazolam f... BACKGROUND Remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine used for procedural sedation and general anesthesia.Several studies have used remimazolam for bendable bronchoscopy.AIM To assess the safety and efficacy of remimazolam for sedation in patients undergoing bendable bronchoscopy by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials(RCTs).METHODS We searched the EMBASE,PubMed,Cochrane Library,and Web of Science databases for RCTs on bendable bronchoscopic procedural sedation with remimazolam vs conventional sedatives(CS).RESULTS Five studies with 1080 cases were included.Remimazolam had the same sedation success rate compared with CS[relative risk(RR):1.35,95%CI:0.60-3.05,P=0.474,I2=99.6%].However,remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of hypotension(RR:0.61;95%CI:0.40-0.95,P=0.027;I2=65.1%)and a lower incidence of respiratory depression(RR:0.50,95%CI:0.33-0.77,P=0.002,I2=42.3%).A subgroup analysis showed a higher success rate of sedation with remimazolam than midazolam(RR:2.45,95%CI:1.76-3.42,P<0.001).Compared with propofol,the incidence of hypotension(RR:0.45,95%CI:0.32-0.64,P<0.001,I2=0.0%),respiratory depression(RR:0.48,95%CI:0.30-0.76,P=0.002,I2=78.4%),hypoxemia(RR:0.36,95%CI:0.15-0.87,P=0.023),and injection pain(RR:0.04,95%CI:0.01-0.28,P=0.001)were lower.CONCLUSION Remimazolam is safe and effective during bronchoscopy.The sedation success rate was similar to that in the CS group.However,remimazolam has a higher safety profile,with fewer inhibitory effects on respiration and circulation. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam BRONCHOSCOPY Procedural sedation META-ANALYSIS
下载PDF
Comparative observation of the effectiveness and safety of remimazolam besylate versus dexmedetomidine in gastrointestinal surgery in obese patients
4
作者 Yu-Fu Deng Xue-Run Jiang Zeng-Guang Feng 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery》 SCIE 2024年第5期1320-1327,共8页
BACKGROUND Surgery for obese patients carries a higher risk of anesthesia complications compared with surgery for nonobese patients.Thus,a safe and effective anesthesia strategy is necessary to improve the medical exp... BACKGROUND Surgery for obese patients carries a higher risk of anesthesia complications compared with surgery for nonobese patients.Thus,a safe and effective anesthesia strategy is necessary to improve the medical experience of such patients and ensure their safety.AIM To compared the effectiveness and safety of remimazolam besylate versus dexmedetomidine(DEX)in gastrointestinal surgery in obese patients.METHODS The study cohort included 60 obese patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery between July 2021 and April 2023,comprising 30 patients who received DEX intervention(control group)and 30 patients who received remimazolam besylate intervention(research group).Heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),mean arterial pressure(MAP),blood oxygen saturation(SpO_(2)),safety(nausea and vomiting,bradycardia,hypotension,and apnea),anesthesia and examination indices[induction time,anesthesia recovery time,and postanesthesia care unit(PACU)discharge time],sedation effect(Ramsay Sedation Scale),and postoperative pain visual analog scale were comparatively analyzed before anesthesia(T0),during anesthesia(T1),and after anesthesia(T2).RESULTS At T1,the research group showed significantly smaller changes in HR,RR,MAP,and SpO_(2) than the control group,with a significantly lower adverse reaction rate and shorter induction,anesthesia recovery,and PACU discharge times.Additionally,the intra-and postoperative Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were statistically higher in the research group than in the control group.CONCLUSION Remimazolam besylate was significantly more effective than DEX in gastrointestinal surgery in obese patients and had a higher safety profile and value in clinical promotion. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam besylate DEXMEDETOMIDINE OBESITY Gastrointestinal surgery EFFECTIVENESS SAFETY
下载PDF
Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy:A comprehensive review
5
作者 Dushyant Singh Dahiya Ganesh Kumar +13 位作者 Syeda Parsa Manesh Kumar Gangwani Hassam Ali Amir Humza Sohail Saqr Alsakarneh Umar Hayat Sheza Malik Yash R Shah Bhanu Siva Mohan Pinnam Sahib Singh Islam Mohamed Adishwar Rao Saurabh Chandan Mohammad Al-Haddad 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy》 2024年第7期385-395,共11页
Worldwide,a majority of routine endoscopic procedures are performed under some form of sedation to maximize patient comfort.Propofol,benzodiazepines and opioids continue to be widely used.However,in recent years,Remim... Worldwide,a majority of routine endoscopic procedures are performed under some form of sedation to maximize patient comfort.Propofol,benzodiazepines and opioids continue to be widely used.However,in recent years,Remimazolam is gaining immense popularity for procedural sedation in gastrointestinal(GI)endoscopy.It is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2020 for use in procedural sedation.Remimazolam has shown a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile in terms of its non-specific metabolism by tissue esterase,volume of distribution,total body clearance,and negligible drug-drug interactions.It also has satisfactory efficacy and has achieved high rates of successful sedation in GI endoscopy.Furthermore,studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of Remimazolam is non-inferior to Propofol,which is currently a gold standard for procedural sedation in most parts of the world.However,the use of Propofol is associated with hemodynamic instability and respiratory depression.In contrast,Remimazolam has lower incidence of these adverse effects intra-procedurally and hence,may provide a safer alternative to Propofol in procedural sedation.In this comprehensive narrative review,highlight the pharmacologic characteristics,efficacy,and safety of Remimazolam for procedural sedation.We also discuss the potential of Remimazolam as a suitable alternative and how it can shape the future of procedural sedation in gastroenterology. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam ENDOSCOPY SEDATION OUTCOMES EFFICACY Safety PHARMACOKINETICS
下载PDF
Remimazolam in intensive care unit:Potential applications and considerations
6
作者 Praveen Reddy Elmati Teja Nagaradona +1 位作者 Gowthami Sai Kogilathota Jagirdhar Salim Surani 《World Journal of Critical Care Medicine》 2024年第3期25-31,共7页
This manuscript explores the potential use of Remimazolam in the intensive care unit(ICU)and critical care units,considering its pharmacological characteristics,clinical applications,advantages,and comparative effecti... This manuscript explores the potential use of Remimazolam in the intensive care unit(ICU)and critical care units,considering its pharmacological characteristics,clinical applications,advantages,and comparative effectiveness over current sedatives and anesthetics.We reviewed existing PubMed and Google Scholar literature to find relevant studies on Remimazolam in ICU.We created search criteria using a combination of free text words,including Remimazolam,critical care,intensive care,sedation,anesthesia,pharmacokinetics,and pharmacodynamics.Relevant articles published in the English language were analyzed and incorporated.Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine derivative promising for sedation and anesthesia.It is a safer option for hemodynamically unstable,elderly,or liver or kidney issues.It also has comparable deep sedation properties to propofol in the ICU.Furthermore,it reduces post-procedural delirium and patient comfort and reduces the need for additional sedatives in pediatric patients.In conclusion,Remimazolam is an excellent alternative to current sedatives and anesthetics in the ICU.Its cost is comparable to that of current medications.Further research on its long-term safety in the ICU and its broader application and incorporation into routine use is necessary. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam Intensive care Critical care ANESTHESIA SEDATION Mechanical ventilation BENZODIAZEPINE
下载PDF
Effectiveness of Remimazolam Benzenesulfonate Combined with Alfentanil in Elderly Patients Undergoing Painless Gastroenteroscopy
7
作者 Rongfang Liu 《Journal of Clinical and Nursing Research》 2024年第8期92-98,共7页
Objective:To observe the effects of remimazolam benzenesulfonate combined with alfentanil during painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients.Methods:This study analyzes patients aged 60–85 years old undergoing pai... Objective:To observe the effects of remimazolam benzenesulfonate combined with alfentanil during painless gastroenteroscopy in elderly patients.Methods:This study analyzes patients aged 60–85 years old undergoing painless gastroenteroscopy.A total of 140 patients,examined between February 2023 and February 2024,voluntarily participated and were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group.The control group received alfentanil combined with propofol for anesthesia,while the experimental group received alfentanil combined with remimazolam benzenesulfonate.The relevant indices of both groups were separately analyzed.Results:Patients in the experimental group had a shorter awakening time,a faster discharge rate(P<0.05),and a shorter examination duration;however,the difference in examination time between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05).Before anesthesia,there was no significant difference in the basic information and vital signs of the two groups(P>0.05).Two minutes after anesthesia,both groups showed a decline in vital signs,but the vital signs of the experimental group remained more stable after the procedure,with the group’s indices showing improvement over the control group(P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse reactions in the experimental group was lower than in the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:In painless gastroenteroscopy for elderly patients,anesthesia using a combination of remimazolam benzenesulfonate and alfentanil improves anesthesia effectiveness,hastens patient recovery,enhances the stability of vital signs,and effectively controls adverse reactions,thereby improving patient comfort. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam benzenesulfonate ALFENTANIL Elderly patients Painless gastroenteroscopy
下载PDF
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam-based sedation for intensive care unit patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy:a cohort study 被引量:3
8
作者 Yuan-rui Zhao Ke-sheng Huang +6 位作者 Guo Hou Lan Yao Li-ping Lu Song Xu Ying-tao Lian Zhun Yao Zhui Yu 《World Journal of Emergency Medicine》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2023年第1期31-36,共6页
BACKGROUND:Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting sedative,but its safety and adverse events(AEs)in high-risk patients in the intensive care unit(ICU)setting remain unknown.METHODS:This was a single-center,retrospe... BACKGROUND:Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting sedative,but its safety and adverse events(AEs)in high-risk patients in the intensive care unit(ICU)setting remain unknown.METHODS:This was a single-center,retrospective study that compared remimazolam to propofol and midazolam in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.The primary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related AEs.The secondary outcomes were the time to extubation,the length of ICU stay,and the average cost of sedative per case.RESULTS:Of the 88 patients analyzed,47 were treated with remimazolam(mean dose,7.90±4.84mg),and 41 were treated with propofol(21.19±17.98 mg)or midazolam(3.08±2.17 mg).There was no statistically significant difference in the average duration of the endoscopic procedure(35.89±13.37 min vs.44.51±21.68 min,P=0.133)or the time to extubation(15.00±9.75 h vs.20.59±18.71 h,P=0.211)in the remimazolam group(group I)compared to the propofol or midazolam group(group II).ICU stays(5.40±2.93 d vs.4.63±3.31 d,P=0.072)and treatment-related AEs(48.61%vs.51.38%,P=0.056)were similar between groups.The average cost of sedative per case was significantly lower in the group I than in the group II(RMB 16.07±10.58 yuan vs.RMB 24.37±15.46 yuan,P=0.016).CONCLUSION:Remimazolam-based sedation was noninferior to the classic sedatives and had lower average cost per case,indicating that it may be used as a promising sedative for high-risk patients during endoscopic procedures in the ICU setting. 展开更多
关键词 Endoscopic sedation Intensive care unit MIDAZOLAM PROPOFOL remimazolam
下载PDF
Successful remimazolam sedation-epidural block in an older patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease:A case report 被引量:2
9
作者 Jia-Jia Yu Huan-Shuang Pei Yu Meng 《World Journal of Clinical Cases》 SCIE 2023年第14期3330-3339,共10页
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide.Older patients have a degenerative cardiopulmonary function,weak compensatory capacity,and poor sur... BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD)is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates worldwide.Older patients have a degenerative cardiopulmonary function,weak compensatory capacity,and poor surgical tolerance.Therefore,the mode of anesthesia must be optimized.Remimazolam is a new ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine with a rapid onset of action,rapid metabolism,and mild effects on pulmonary circulation.Remimazolam sedation combined with an epidural block has not been reported in hypertensive older adults with severe COPD and inguinal mass resection.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 73-year-old man with hypertension and severe COPD,who underwent resection of an enlarged inguinal mass that he had noticed more than 7 mo before presentation.The patient presented with a“right inguinal mass”and was recommended to undergo an enlarged inguinal mass resection.Surgery was relatively challenging,due to the large mass(13 cm×8 cm×7 cm),hard texture,and poor mobility.Considering the advanced age of the patient,gradeⅢhypertension,and severe COPD,we administered remimazolam combined with an epidural block for anesthesia to ensure perioperative safety and careful consideration.The anesthetic effect was precise;the procedure was performed smoothly without any complications,and the patient was successfully anesthetized.However,anesthetic management in such cases has not yet been reported by previous studies.CONCLUSION Remimazolam sedation combined with an epidural block is safe and effective in older patients with hypertension and severe COPD. 展开更多
关键词 remimazolam Older adult Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Epidural block Case report
下载PDF
Application of remimazolam transversus abdominis plane block in gastrointestinal tumor surgery 被引量:1
10
作者 Jun Liu Jian-Min Tian +4 位作者 Guo-Ze Liu Jun-Na Sun Peng-Fei Gao Yong-Qiang Zhang Xiu-Qin Yue 《World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology》 SCIE 2023年第12期2101-2110,共10页
BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane block(TAPB)is a block of the abdominal afferent nerve fibers between the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominal muscle achieved with local anesthetics.It can effect... BACKGROUND Transversus abdominis plane block(TAPB)is a block of the abdominal afferent nerve fibers between the internal oblique muscle and the transverse abdominal muscle achieved with local anesthetics.It can effectively block the conduction of the anterior nerve of the abdominal wall and exert a good analgesic effect.However,the effect of combining the block with remimazolam on anesthesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is still unclear.AIM To examine the effects of combining TAPB with remimazolam on the stress response and postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal tumor surgery patients.METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 102 individuals diagnosed with gastrointestinal malignancies who underwent laparoscopic surgery under general anesthesia between April 2020 and June 2023.The patients were categorized into a control group(n=51),receiving remimazolam for general anesthesia,and an observation group(n=51),receiving TAPB combined with remimazolam for general anesthesia.A comparison was made between both groups in terms of hemodynamic parameters,stress markers,pain levels,recovery quality,analgesic effects,and adverse reactions during the perioperative period.RESULTS The observation group had significantly higher heart rates at time points 1 min after induction and upon leaving the operating room than the control group(P<0.05).The mean arterial pressure at time point T1 in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group(P<0.05).Five minutes after extubation,the levels of the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline in the observation group were considerably lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).At 12 h,24 h,and 48 h following surgery,the visual analog scale scores of the observation group were considerably lower than those of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group had shorter awakening and extubation times and lower Riker sedation-agitation scale scores than the control group(P<0.05).The observation group exhibited considerably fewer effective pump presses,lower fentanyl dosages,and lower incidences of rescue analgesia within 24 h following surgery than the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The application effect of TAPB combined with remimazolam general anesthesia in anesthesia of patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery is good,which is helpful to promote faster recovery after operation. 展开更多
关键词 Transversus abdominis plane block remimazolam General anesthesia Gastrointestinal tumor surgery Stress response
下载PDF
瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的临床效果与安全性分析 被引量:2
11
作者 刘俊 孙俊娜 +3 位作者 李晓芳 田建民 赵际平 张永强 《中国内镜杂志》 2024年第1期7-15,共9页
目的探讨瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的临床效果与安全性。方法选择2021年10月-2023年2月该院拟行无痛胃肠镜检查的老年患者188例,采用随机数表法分为A组、B组、C组和D组,各47例。A组、B组和C组分别采用瑞马唑仑0.2... 目的探讨瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼在老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查中的临床效果与安全性。方法选择2021年10月-2023年2月该院拟行无痛胃肠镜检查的老年患者188例,采用随机数表法分为A组、B组、C组和D组,各47例。A组、B组和C组分别采用瑞马唑仑0.2、0.3和0.4 mg/kg+阿芬太尼3μg/kg,术中追加药物,给予瑞马唑仑2.5 mg/次;D组采用丙泊酚1.5 mg/kg+阿芬太尼3μg/kg,术中追加药物,单次给予丙泊酚0.5 mg/kg。比较4组不同时间点[麻醉给药前3 min(T_(0))、进镜即刻(T_(1))、进镜后3 min(T_(2))、检查结束时(T_(3))和苏醒时(T_(4))]血流动力学情况、麻醉起效时间、镇静成功率、胃肠镜检查时间、苏醒时间、离开观察室时间、术中/术后并发症和神经行为认知状态测试(NCSE)情况。结果A组T_(1)和T_(2)时点经皮动脉血氧饱和度(SpO_(2))高于C组和D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);A组、B组、C组及D组各时间点心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组与B组各时间点SpO_(2)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);4组镇静成功率、胃肠镜检查时间和离开观察室时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组麻醉起效时间长于B组、C组和D组,A组和B组苏醒时间短于C组和D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组苏醒时间与B组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);A组和B组心动过缓发生率低于D组,A组低氧血症、呼吸抑制、低血压和头晕发生率低于D组,A组、B组和C组注射痛发生率低于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);完全清醒后10 min,A组与B组计算能力和记忆力测试通过率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但A组计算能力与记忆力测试通过率高于C组和D组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在老年患者行无痛胃肠镜检查时,采用0.3mg/kg瑞马唑仑复合阿芬太尼的镇静效果较佳,患者血流动力学平稳,心动过缓和呼吸抑制等并发症发生率低,术后早期认知功能恢复良好。 展开更多
关键词 瑞马唑仑 阿芬太尼 丙泊酚 胃肠镜检查 老年
下载PDF
基于BIS和微旁流EtCO_(2)监护下甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在日间宫腔镜手术麻醉中的有效性和安全性 被引量:1
12
作者 张俊杰 杨晓春 +4 位作者 刘卓懿 吴若秋 李平 郭曲练 王锷 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第8期1047-1051,共5页
目的研究甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于日间宫腔镜手术麻醉中的有效性和安全性。方法采用随机对照设计,纳入行日间宫腔镜手术患者300例,采用随机数字随机分为两组。年龄18~60岁,BMI18.5~27 kg/m~2,ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级。R组应用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑,P组应用... 目的研究甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于日间宫腔镜手术麻醉中的有效性和安全性。方法采用随机对照设计,纳入行日间宫腔镜手术患者300例,采用随机数字随机分为两组。年龄18~60岁,BMI18.5~27 kg/m~2,ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级。R组应用甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑,P组应用丙泊酚作为对照。所有患者在手术开始前5 min予以舒芬太尼0.1μg/kg缓慢静脉注射。R组甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑首剂予以0.2 mg/kg缓慢静脉注射,根据镇静深度单次予以0.05 mg/kg追加。P组丙泊酚首剂予以1.5~2 mg/kg缓慢静脉注射,根据镇静深度单次予以0.5 mg/kg追加。所有患者入室后持续监测并记录心电图、SpO_(2)、NIBP、HR、BIS、微旁流EtCO_(2)。记录所有患者的麻醉效果相关指标(包括麻醉药物起效时间、手术时间、苏醒时间及离室时间),安全性指标(低血压、低氧饱和度、恶心呕吐等不良事件),医师和患者的满意度。结果甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于日间宫腔镜手术中镇静深度满足临床要求,低血压和注射痛发生率低(P<0.01),呼吸抑制更轻(P<0.05),手术时间、离室时间、恶心呕吐及满意度等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑用于日间宫腔镜检镇静深度合适,低血压、注射痛发生率低,呼吸抑制更轻微,甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼可安全有效地应用于日间宫腔镜手术的麻醉。 展开更多
关键词 日间手术 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑 丙泊酚 宫腔镜 注射痛 低血压
下载PDF
丙泊酚与苯磺酸瑞马唑仑在择期行无痛纤维支气管镜活检术患者血流动力学及苏醒质量的比较 被引量:2
13
作者 何孟林 杨婷 +2 位作者 陈明雪 邹远敏 张先杰 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS 2024年第12期84-89,共6页
目的探讨丙泊酚与苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于无痛纤维支气管镜活检术的临床价值。方法选取2020年1月—2022年12月什邡市人民医院拟接受无痛纤维支气管镜活检治疗的60例患者,采用随机数字表法分为丙泊酚组(P组)和苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(R组),每组3... 目的探讨丙泊酚与苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于无痛纤维支气管镜活检术的临床价值。方法选取2020年1月—2022年12月什邡市人民医院拟接受无痛纤维支气管镜活检治疗的60例患者,采用随机数字表法分为丙泊酚组(P组)和苯磺酸瑞马唑仑组(R组),每组30例。对比两组患者血流动力学指标变化趋势、麻醉效果指标、苏醒期质量指标、血糖和乳酸水平变化以及麻醉不良反应的差异。结果R组苏醒时间短于P组(P<0.05)。两组患者麻醉起效时间、苏醒后达离室标准时间比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者麻醉前、内镜检查开始时、开始后3 min、苏醒时的心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SpO_(2))、平均动脉压(MAP)比较,结果:(1)不同时间点的HR、SpO_(2)、MAP比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)两组患者MAP比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者HR、SpO_(2)比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)两组患者MAP变化趋势比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组患者HR、SpO_(2)变化趋势比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者麻醉效果分级比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者不同时间点Ramsay评分比较,结果:(1)不同时间点间Ramsay评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)两组患者Ramsay评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)两组患者Ramsay评分变化趋势比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术前、术后即刻、术后4 h血糖、乳酸比较,结果:(1)不同时间点血糖、乳酸比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)两组患者血糖、乳酸比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)两组患者血糖、乳酸变化趋势比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。R组不良反应发生率低于P组(P<0.05)。结论苯磺酸瑞马唑仑应用于无痛纤维支气管镜活检术较丙泊酚能更有利于血流动力学的稳定,可缩短苏醒时间,减少麻醉不良反应。 展开更多
关键词 麻醉效果 丙泊酚 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑 无痛纤维支气管镜 活检 血流动力学
下载PDF
remimazolam的药动学和临床研究进展 被引量:2
14
作者 任许利 夏海发 吕黄伟 《中国新药与临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第10期732-735,共4页
remimazolam是一种新型超短效水溶性苯二氮类衍生物。其镇静作用起效迅速、持续时间短,能迅速被组织酯酶水解为无活性的代谢产物,对心血管和呼吸系统影响小,患者认知能力恢复快且完全。有望成为一个新的安全有效的临床镇静催眠药。
关键词 remimazolam 催眠药和镇静药 药动学 治疗应用
原文传递
甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者炎症应激反应和认知功能的影响 被引量:1
15
作者 徐天 马兰 《中国计划生育学杂志》 2024年第6期1283-1289,共7页
目的:探究甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者炎症应激反应和认知功能的影响。方法:纳入2021年8月-2023年1月本院收治拟行腹腔镜子宫切除术患者85例,信封法随机分为瑞马唑仑组(n=46例,甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉)和丙泊酚组(n=39例,丙... 目的:探究甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉对腹腔镜子宫切除术患者炎症应激反应和认知功能的影响。方法:纳入2021年8月-2023年1月本院收治拟行腹腔镜子宫切除术患者85例,信封法随机分为瑞马唑仑组(n=46例,甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉)和丙泊酚组(n=39例,丙泊酚麻醉)。比较两组术前未麻醉时(T0)、麻醉后5 min(T1)、气管插管后10 min(T2)、拔管后即刻(T3)和手术结束前5 min时(T4)的血流动力学指标[心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)],术前1 h和术后12 h炎症应激指标[白介素(IL-6)、C蛋白反应(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)、去甲肾上腺素(NE)水平],认知能力[蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)分数、简明精神状态(MMSE)评分]以及术后不良发生率。结果:瑞马唑仑组HR水平在T3(86.6±7.4次/min)、T4(78.6±6.2次/min)均低于丙泊酚组(94.1±7.0次/min、82.6±6.9次/min),SBP水平T3时(132.9±7.1mmHg)高于丙泊酚组(128.5±6.8mmHg),DBP在T3、T4时(78.6±6.8mmHg、80.3±8.3mmHg)高于丙泊酚组(85.6±6.0mmHg、85.7±8.8mmHg)(均P<0.05)。瑞马唑仑组术后12 h,IL-6、CRP、TNF-α和NE水平(92.87±13.75ng/L、15.61±2.99mg/L、7.42±1.96ng/ml、74.14±11.96ng/L)均低于丙泊酚组(121.81±13.99ng/L、18.79±3.67mg/L、8.76±2.17ng/ml、82.57±15.53ng/L),术后3 d MoCA(29.85±1.66分)和MMSE(29.46±1.11分)均高于丙泊酚组(28.92±1.36分、28.62±1.06分),不良反应发生率(19.6%)低于丙泊酚组(41.0%)(均P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜子宫切除术应用甲磺酸瑞马唑仑麻醉对患者有稳定血流动力学、改善炎症应激负荷、保护认知的功效。 展开更多
关键词 腹腔镜子宫切除术 麻醉 甲磺酸瑞马唑仑 炎症应激 认知功能 不良反应
下载PDF
瑞马唑仑联合胸交感神经阻滞对心肌缺血再灌注大鼠的保护作用
16
作者 樊腾 李晓芳 +2 位作者 沈丹 张红伟 岳修勤 《中国动脉硬化杂志》 CAS 2024年第11期955-962,共8页
[目的]探究瑞马唑仑(Re)联合胸交感神经阻滞(TSNB)对心肌缺血再灌注(MI/R)大鼠的保护作用。[方法]将大鼠随机分为对照组、MI/R组、Re组、TSNB组和Re+TSNB组,每组12只。除对照组外,其余大鼠采用冠状动脉左前降支(LAD)结扎术构建MI/R模型... [目的]探究瑞马唑仑(Re)联合胸交感神经阻滞(TSNB)对心肌缺血再灌注(MI/R)大鼠的保护作用。[方法]将大鼠随机分为对照组、MI/R组、Re组、TSNB组和Re+TSNB组,每组12只。除对照组外,其余大鼠采用冠状动脉左前降支(LAD)结扎术构建MI/R模型。Re组在大鼠缺血前30 min腹腔注射20 mg/kg的Re;TSNB组在大鼠缺血前30 min在胸段硬膜外导管注射0.2%罗哌卡因50μL;Re+TSNB组在大鼠缺血前30 min腹腔注射20 mg/kg的Re并在胸段硬膜外导管注射0.2%罗哌卡因50μL;对照组和MI/R组只注射生理盐水。对各组大鼠进行心功能和梗死面积评估,HE染色、TUNEL染色观察心肌组织病理改变和心肌细胞凋亡,检测血清心肌损伤标志物肌酸激酶(CK)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、心肌肌钙蛋白(cTnI)水平及心肌组织炎症因子白细胞介素8(IL-8)、肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)和氧化应激因子丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)水平,免疫印迹法检测心肌组织IL-8、TNF-α、B淋巴细胞瘤2相关X蛋白(Bax)和B淋巴细胞瘤2(Bcl-2)蛋白表达水平。[结果]与对照组相比,MI/R组大鼠心肌细胞水肿,心肌纤维紊乱,左心室发展压力(LVDP)、最大左心室压上升速率(+dp/dt_(max))和最大左心室压下降速率(-dp/dt_(max))、SOD活性、Bcl-2水平显著降低,心肌梗死面积、细胞凋亡率、cTnI、CK、AST、IL-8、TNF-α、MDA、Bax水平显著升高(均P<0.05);与MI/R组相比,Re组、TSNB组、Re+TSNB组大鼠心肌纤维和心肌细胞形态明显改善,LVDP、±dp/dt_(max)、SOD活性、Bcl-2水平显著升高,心肌梗死面积、细胞凋亡率、cTnI、CK、AST、IL-8、TNF-α、MDA、Bax水平显著降低(均P<0.05);相比于Re组和TSNB组,Re+TSNB组LVDP、±dp/dt_(max)、SOD活性、Bcl-2水平显著升高,心肌梗死面积、细胞凋亡率、cTnI、CK、AST、IL-8、TNF-α、MDA、Bax水平明显降低(均P<0.05)。[结论]Re联合TSNB可能通过减少心肌细胞凋亡,抑制炎症反应和氧化应激,对MI/R损伤的心肌发挥保护作用。 展开更多
关键词 瑞马唑仑 胸交感神经阻滞 心肌缺血再灌注 心肌细胞凋亡 氧化应激
下载PDF
不同性别对日间关节镜手术患者瑞马唑仑使用剂量及术后恢复质量的影响
17
作者 汤黎黎 孙月 +1 位作者 刘学胜 陆姚 《实用医学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2024年第8期1063-1068,共6页
目的 探讨性别对日间关节镜手术患者瑞马唑仑使用剂量以及术后24 h恢复质量(QoR)的影响。方法 选择预约在日间手术中心进行关节镜半月板修复术的患者50例,按照性别分为两组,其中男25例(M组),女25例(F组)。本研究主要观察两组在麻醉诱导... 目的 探讨性别对日间关节镜手术患者瑞马唑仑使用剂量以及术后24 h恢复质量(QoR)的影响。方法 选择预约在日间手术中心进行关节镜半月板修复术的患者50例,按照性别分为两组,其中男25例(M组),女25例(F组)。本研究主要观察两组在麻醉诱导失去意识和术中维持瑞马唑仑剂量的区别,以及采用QoR-15量表、阿森斯失眠(AIS)量表观察性别对术后睡眠和24 h恢复质量的影响。结果M组患者失去意识时瑞马唑仑剂量为0.14(0.13,0.15) mg/kg,麻醉维持剂量为0.80(0.60,0.96)mg/(kg·h);F组患者失去意识时瑞马唑仑剂量为0.14(0.12,0.16) mg/kg,麻醉维持剂量为0.90(0.79,1.12)mg/(kg·h),两组患者失去意识与麻醉维持的瑞马唑仑剂量差异均无统计学意义(P> 0.05)。两组对术后第1天睡眠的AIS总分影响差异无统计学意义(P> 0.05),但女性患者较男性患者更易发生低血压和PONV,术后比期望中更早醒及QoR-15总分、生理舒适度分数降低,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论 性别对日间关节镜患者瑞马唑仑麻醉诱导剂量及麻醉维持剂量影响较小,但女性患者术后睡眠清醒时间更早,男性患者术后24 h恢复质量较高。 展开更多
关键词 性别 瑞马唑仑 日间手术 关节镜手术 术后恢复质量
下载PDF
瑞马唑仑用于重症监护病房俯卧位通气深镇静诱导的半数有效剂量
18
作者 赵洁玉 郑祥德 +2 位作者 刘成 何江山 周文来 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 2024年第2期122-127,共6页
目的测定瑞马唑仑用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者俯卧位通气深镇静诱导的半数有效剂量(ED50)。方法选择2022年11月至2023年7月达州市中心医院收入ICU的早期中、重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)行俯卧位通气深镇静患者45例,给药舒芬太尼0.4μg... 目的测定瑞马唑仑用于重症监护病房(ICU)患者俯卧位通气深镇静诱导的半数有效剂量(ED50)。方法选择2022年11月至2023年7月达州市中心医院收入ICU的早期中、重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)行俯卧位通气深镇静患者45例,给药舒芬太尼0.4μg/kg使重症监护疼痛观察工具(CPOT)评分达0~1分后,使用瑞马唑仑诱导镇静,镇静达标后开始俯卧位通气。瑞马唑仑诱导镇静的剂量由改良Dixon序贯试验法确定,根据预试验确定瑞马唑仑的起始剂量为0.2 mg/kg,剂量梯度为0.025 mg/kg。镇静达标定义为给药后3 min内Richmond躁动-镇静评分(RASS)≤-4分且光谱熵(SE)≤50。但如俯卧位通气3 min之内出现明显的体动、皱眉、流泪、呛咳和吞咽等反应且RASS>-4分或SE>50,仍表示镇静不理想。镇静达标且理想则下一例患者在上一例的给药剂量基础上降低一个梯度,若镇静未达标或不理想,下一例给药剂量升高一个梯度。连续出现10次交叉后终止研究。运用Probit回归分析法,计算出瑞马唑仑的ED50和95%有效剂量(ED95)。记录给药前后心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、血氧饱和度(SpO_(2))及俯卧位通气中心动过缓和恶心呕吐等不良反应的发生情况。结果瑞马唑仑用于ICU患者俯卧位通气深镇静诱导的ED50为0.228 mg/kg(95%CI 0.208~0.248),ED95为0.365 mg/kg(95%CI 0.299-0.518)。与舒芬太尼镇痛达标后(T_(1))比较,瑞马唑仑诱导镇静后2 min(T_(2))和俯卧位通气后2 min(T_(3))各时间点的血氧饱和度(SpO_(2))差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);T_(3)时HR、MAP及RR较T_(1)和T_(2)时均有下降(P<0.05),但下降幅度在20%以内;T_(2)和T_(3)时镇静深度指标RASS及SE比T_(1)时显著下降(P<0.01)。诱导期间3例患者出现低血压,给予麻黄碱有效;2例患者出现心动过缓,给予阿托品有效,无其他不良反应。结论瑞马唑仑用于ICU患者俯卧位通气深镇静诱导的ED50为0.228 mg/kg,ED95为0.365 mg/kg,镇静效果确切,呼吸循环影响较小,不良反应少。 展开更多
关键词 俯卧位通气 瑞马唑仑 半数有效剂量(ED50) 95%有效剂量(ED95) 深镇静 Richmond躁动-镇静评分 光谱熵
下载PDF
瑞马唑仑对肝切除术患者术后苏醒质量及认知功能的影响
19
作者 卓明 刘金龙 +3 位作者 钟茂林 王辉 黄可女 叶军明 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2024年第5期46-50,共5页
目的:观察瑞马唑仑对肝切除术患者术后苏醒质量及认知功能的影响,探讨其临床价值。方法:选择赣南医学院第一附属医院2022年1月—2023年8月收治的需行肝切除手术患者60例,随机分为两组,对照组采取丙泊酚、芬太尼、顺阿曲库铵麻醉诱导,泵... 目的:观察瑞马唑仑对肝切除术患者术后苏醒质量及认知功能的影响,探讨其临床价值。方法:选择赣南医学院第一附属医院2022年1月—2023年8月收治的需行肝切除手术患者60例,随机分为两组,对照组采取丙泊酚、芬太尼、顺阿曲库铵麻醉诱导,泵注丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼麻醉维持;观察组静脉注射苯磺酸瑞马唑仑、芬太尼、顺阿曲库铵麻醉诱导,泵注苯磺酸瑞马唑仑、瑞芬太尼麻醉维持。比较两组不同时刻生命体征、苏醒质量指标、术后认知功能,并测定血浆中枢神经特异性蛋白(S100β)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)水平及统计两组不良反应发生情况。结果:两组入室后(T_(0))、麻醉诱导后(T_(1))、切皮时(T_(2))、手术1 h时(T_(3))、手术结束时(T_(4))、拔除气管导管时(T_(5))、出恢复室(T_(6))平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR),以及术前1 d、术后1 d、术后3 d简易智能量表(MMSE)评分、血浆S100β、NSE水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组T_(5)时刻的HR水平高于T_(0)时刻,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔管时间及恢复室停留时间均早于或者短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),且观察组不良反应发生率(10.0%)低于对照组(33.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:瑞马唑仑应用于肝切除术患者苏醒时间短,且不影响认知功能,不良反应发生率更低。 展开更多
关键词 瑞马唑仑 肝切除术 苏醒质量 认知功能
下载PDF
上一页 1 2 22 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部