BACKGROUND Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis(UC)is becoming increasingly important.Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established,including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic...BACKGROUND Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis(UC)is becoming increasingly important.Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established,including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity(UCEIS)score and Mayo Endoscopic Subscore(MES).Furthermore,the Toronto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Global Endoscopic Reporting(TIGER)score for UC has recently been proposed;however,its clinical value remains unclear.AIM To investigate the clinical value of the TIGER score in UC by comparing it with the UCEIS score and MES.METHODS This retrospective study included 166 patients with UC who underwent total colonoscopy between January 2017 and March 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University(Qingdao,China).We retrospectively analysed endoscopic scores,laboratory and clinical data,treatment,and readmissions within 1 year.Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient,receiver operating characteristic curve,and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,version 26.0(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,United States)and GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows(GraphPad Software,Boston,Massachusetts,United States).RESULTS The TIGER score significantly correlated with the UCEIS score and MES(r=0.721,0.626,both P<0.001),showed good differentiating values for clinical severity among mild,moderate,and severe UC[8(4-112.75)vs 210(109–219)vs 328(219–426),all P<0.001],and exhibited predictive value in diagnosing patients with severe UC[area under the curve(AUC)=0.897,P<0.001].Additionally,the TIGER(r=0.639,0,551,0.488,0.376,all P<0.001)and UCEIS scores(r=0.622,0,540,0.494,and 0.375,all P<0.001)showed stronger correlations with laboratory and clinical parameters,including C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,length of hospitalisation,and hospitalisation costs,than MES(r=0.509,0,351,0.339,and 0.270,all P<0.001).The TIGER score showed the best predictability for patients'recent advanced treatment,including systemic corticosteroids,biologics,or immunomodulators(AUC=0.848,P<0.001)and 1-year readmission(AUC=0.700,P<0.001)compared with the UCEIS score(AUC=0.762,P<0.001;0.627,P<0.05)and MES(AUC=0.684,P<0.001;0.578,P=0.132).Furthermore,a TIGER score of≥317 was identified as an independent risk factor for advanced UC treatment(P=0.011).CONCLUSION The TIGER score may be superior to the UCIES score and MES in improving the accuracy of clinical disease severity assessment,guiding therapeutic decision-making,and predicting short-term prognosis.展开更多
Inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD)comprise two major forms:Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.The diagnosis of IBD is based on clinical symptoms combined with results found in endoscopic and radiological examinatio...Inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD)comprise two major forms:Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.The diagnosis of IBD is based on clinical symptoms combined with results found in endoscopic and radiological examinations.In addition,the discovery of biomarkers has significantly improved the diagnosis and management of IBD.Several potential genetic,serological,fecal,microbial,histological and immunological biomarkers have been proposed for IBD,and they have been evaluated for clinical routine and clinical trials.Ileocolonoscopy,especially with biopsy collection,has been considered the standard method to diagnose IBD and to assess clinical activity of the disease,but it is limited to the colon and terminal ileum and is considered invasive.For this reason,non-invasive biomarkers are necessary for this type of chronic inflammatory disease,which affects mostly young individuals,as they are expected to have a long follow-up.展开更多
BACKGROUND Although early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(EESCC)with cirrhosis is a relatively rare clinical phenomenon,the management of EESCC in cirrhotic patients continues to be a challenge.AIM To evaluate the ...BACKGROUND Although early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(EESCC)with cirrhosis is a relatively rare clinical phenomenon,the management of EESCC in cirrhotic patients continues to be a challenge.AIM To evaluate the feasibility,safety,efficacy and long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection(ESTD)for treating EESCC in patients with cirrhosis.METHODS This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.We examined 590 EESCC patients who underwent ESTD between July 14,2014,and May 26,2021,from a large-scale tertiary hospital.After excluding 25 patients with unclear lesion areas or pathological results,the remaining 565 patients were matched at a ratio of 1:3 by using propensity score matching.A total of 25 EESCC patients with comorbid liver cirrhosis and 75 matched EESCC patients were ultimately included in the analysis.Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were used to compare the differences between the two groups.The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves,and differences in survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.RESULTS Among 25 patients with liver cirrhosis and 75 matched noncirrhotic patients,there were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding(P=0.234),30-d post-ESTD bleeding(P=0.099),disease-specific survival(P=0.075),or recurrence-free survival(P=0.8196).The mean hospitalization time and costs were significantly longer(P=0.007)and higher(P=0.023)in the cirrhosis group than in the noncirrhosis group.The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the cirrhosis group(P=0.001).CONCLUSION ESTD is technically feasible,safe,and effective for patients with EESCC and liver cirrhosis.EESCC patients with Child-Pugh A disease seem to be good candidates for ESTD.展开更多
Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent heterogeneous groups with different characteristics and different clinical course. A great deal of effort is made to discover proxies for more severe disease n...Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent heterogeneous groups with different characteristics and different clinical course. A great deal of effort is made to discover proxies for more severe disease needing more intense treatment and early intervention to gain the maximum therapeutic benefit. Endoscopy remains an invaluable method in assessment of patients with IBD. Pseudopolyps are often encountered during endoscopy and, although they are a well described entity, their presence is of unclear importance. In one of our recent studies and in conjunction with one study with a large cohort of patients with IBD and pseudopolyps, patients with pseudopolyps were found to face a higher inflammatory burden in terms of receiving more intense biological treatment. This letter comes as a comment and proposition regarding the concept of reevaluation of pseudopolyps as a promising marker in IBD scores.展开更多
Objective:The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS)and the Mayo endoscopic score(MES)are developed as objective methods of evaluating endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).The ai...Objective:The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS)and the Mayo endoscopic score(MES)are developed as objective methods of evaluating endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and MES in predicting the patient's response to mesalazine.Methods:Consecutive patients with UC who had undergone colonoscopy within 1 month before starting mesalazine between October 2011 and July 2016 were retrospectively collected at the Department of Gastroenterology,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.The median follow-up was 81 months,and all the data were analyzed in January 2021.The primary outcome was the need for step-up treatment,which included the use of corticosteroids,immunomodulatory,or surgery during admission and follow-up.Data were analyzed using the c2 or Fisher exact test,Spearman test,t-test,and ManneWhitney U test.Results:Totally,65 patients were enrolled,of whom 12(18.5%)needed step-up treatment due to nonresponse to mesalazine.The UCEIS score,MES,and the ulcerative colitis disease activity index(UCDAI)score were significantly higher in patients who had nonresponse to mesalazine(UCEIS score:6.92±0.69 vs.4.45±1.17,p<0.001;MES:2.67±0.49 vs.2.15±0.69,p=0.024;UCDAI score:9.33±1.87 vs.6.70±2.38,p=0.002).In the multivariate analysis,the UCEIS score(OR=25.65,95%CI:3.048 e45.985,p=0.003),UCDAI score(OR=1.605,95%CI:1.144e2.254,p=0.006),and C-reactive protein level(OR=1.056,95%CI:1.006e1.108,p=0.026)were independent risk factors of nonresponse.The area under the ROC curve of UCEIS was 0.95,with a sensitivity of 100%and specificity of 84.6%,a cut-off value of 6,which outperformed the MES with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70.When the UCEIS score≥6,60%of patients eventually needed step-up treatment.Conclusions:The UCEIS is a useful instrument for predicting the therapeutic effect in patients with UC treated with mesalazine.The high probability of mesalazine treatment failure and benefits of other therapies should be discussed in patients with baseline UCEIS score≥6.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the clinical value of the newly modified Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease(m SES-CD).METHODS:Seventy-six Crohn's disease(CD) patients who underwent transanal double balloon endoscopy(...AIM:To evaluate the clinical value of the newly modified Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease(m SES-CD).METHODS:Seventy-six Crohn's disease(CD) patients who underwent transanal double balloon endoscopy(DBE) in our hospital between 2003 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. DBE is defined as small intestinal endoscopy using two attached balloons. We included patients with stenosis which hampered passage of the scope and those who underwent DBE with observation for at least 80 cm from the ileocecal valve. Our new m SES-CD assesses the endoscopic activity of two consecutive small intestinal segments located 0-40 cm and 40-80 cm from the ileocecal valve by DBE,in addition to the activity of four colorectal segments. To compare the usefulness of m SES-CD with SES-CD,we similarly divided the patients into two groups according to total m SES-CD score(low disease activity group,< 4; high disease activity group,≥ 4). The clinical value of m SES-CD in predicting clinical outcome in patients with CD was evaluated using the occurrence of surgery after DBE as an endpoint.RESULTS:Median age of the 76 CD patients was 36 years(range,16-71). Thirty-nine patients had stenosis which hampered passage of the DBE to 80 cm on the proximal side from the ileocecal valve. Median evaluable length of small intestine by DBE was 80 cm(range,3-200). A total of 74 patients had one or more small intestinal lesions detected by DBE,of which 62(83.8%) were within 80 cm of the ileocecal valve on the proximal side. Only two patients(2.7%) with proximal-side lesions more than 80 cm from the ileocecal valve did not have lesions within 80 cm. Patients with high m SES-CD scores showed significantly shorter surgeryfree survival than those with low scores(P < 0.05). In contrast,surgery-free survival did not significantly differ between the low and high SES-CD groups(P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis by a Cox proportional hazards model identified m SES-CD as an independent factor for surgery-free survival.CONCLUSION:m SES-CD is useful in evaluating the risk of surgery-free survival in patients with CD.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is a common surgical strategy for the treatment of early gastrointestinal tumors and precancerous lesions.PDCA nursing can effectively prevent potential risks in the nu...BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is a common surgical strategy for the treatment of early gastrointestinal tumors and precancerous lesions.PDCA nursing can effectively prevent potential risks in the nursing process,protect patient privacy,and improve patient satisfaction,nursing integrity,and service quality.AIM To explore the effects of PDCA nursing model on the quality management of gastrointestinal ESD,the 36-item Shot-Form Health Survey(SF-36) score,and negative emotions.METHODS A total of 178 patients who underwent ESD between January 2020 and January 2021 were divided into two groups.The usual care mode was the control group,with 80 cases from January to July 2020;from July 2020 to January 2021,98 patients were enrolled in the PDCA care mode as the research group.The length of hospital stay and the costs of the two groups were statistically analyzed.The visual analog scale(VAS),SF-36 score,Zung self-rating scale for anxiety and depression,and postoperative complications were also assessed.RESULTS The length of hospitalization and cost in the research group were lower than in the control group(P < 0.05),and the VAS scores were lower than those before care(P < 0.05).Moreover,the VAS score of the research group was lower than that of the control group(P < 0.05).The SF-36 scores for physical function,role status,social function,pain,mental health,and physical strength were higher in the research group than in the control group(P < 0.05).Depression and anxiety scores of the research group were lower than those of the control group(P < 0.05).The postoperative complication rate in the research group(6.12%) was lower than in the control group(32.50%)(P < 0.05).CONCLUSION PDCA nursing can improve the quality of management of ESD surgery,shorten the length of hospital stay and cost,reduce the VAS and Zung scale scores to alleviate adverse emotions,improve the SF-36 score,and reduce postoperative complications.展开更多
AIM To compare the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for gastric neoplasms using Clutch Cutter(ESD-C) or other knives(ESD-O).METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study. Gastric neoplasms trea...AIM To compare the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for gastric neoplasms using Clutch Cutter(ESD-C) or other knives(ESD-O).METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study. Gastric neoplasms treated by ESD between April 2016 and October 2017 at Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center were reviewed. Multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were used to reduce biases. Covariates included factors that might affect outcomes of ESD, including age, sex, underlying disease, anti-thrombotic drugs use, tumor location, tumor position, tumor size, tumor depth, tumor morphology, tumor histology, ulcer(scar), and operator skill. The treatment outcomes were compared among two groups. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes were en bloc, complete, and curative resection rates, and adverse events rates including perforation and delayed bleeding.RESULTS A total of 155 patients were included in this study; 44 pairs were created by propensity score matching. Background characteristics were quite similar among two groups after matching. Procedure time was significantly shorter for ESD-C(median; 49 min) than for ESD-O(median; 88.5 min)(P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in treatment outcomes between ESD-C and ESD-O including en bloc resection rate(100% in both groups), complete resection rate(100% in both groups), curative resection rate(86.4% vs 88.6%, P = 0.730), delayed bleeding(2.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.62) and perforation(0% in both groups).CONCLUSION ESD-C achieved shorter procedure time without an increase in complication risk. Therefore, ESD-C could become an effective ESD option for gastric neoplasms.展开更多
BACKGROUND The selection of endoscopic treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)is controversial.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endosc...BACKGROUND The selection of endoscopic treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)is controversial.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)for SNADETs.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with SNADETs from a database of endoscopic treatment for SNADETs,which included eight hospitals in Fukuoka,Japan,between April 2001 and October 2017.A total of 142 patients with SNADETs treated with EMR or ESD were analyzed.Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the differences in the patient characteristics between the two groups.We analyzed the treatment outcomes,including the rates of en bloc/complete resection,procedure time,adverse event rate,hospital stay,and local or metastatic recurrence.RESULTS Twenty-eight pairs of patients were created.The characteristics of patients between the two groups were similar after matching.The EMR group had a significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than those of the ESD group[median procedure time(interquartile range):6(3-10.75)min vs 87.5(68.5-136.5)min,P<0.001,hospital stay:8(6-10.75)d vs 11(8.25-14.75)d,P=0.006].Other outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups(en bloc resection rate:82.1%vs 92.9%,P=0.42;complete resection rate:71.4%vs 89.3%,P=0.18;and adverse event rate:3.6%vs 17.9%,P=0.19,local recurrence rate:3.6%vs 0%,P=1;metastatic recurrence rate:0%in both).Only one patient in the ESD group underwent emergency surgery owing to intraoperative perforation.CONCLUSION EMR has significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than ESD,and provides acceptable curability and safety compared to ESD.Accordingly,EMR for SNADETs is associated with lower medical costs.展开更多
Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by dysphagia, regurgitation of undigested food, chest pain, weight loss and respiratory symptoms. The most common form of achalasia is the idiopathic one...Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by dysphagia, regurgitation of undigested food, chest pain, weight loss and respiratory symptoms. The most common form of achalasia is the idiopathic one. Diagnosis largely relies upon endoscopy, barium swallow study, and high resolution esophageal manometry(HRM). Barium swallow and manometry after treatment are also good predictors of success of treatment as it is the residue symptomatology. Short term improvement in the symptomatology of achalasia can be achieved with medical therapy with calcium channel blockers or endoscopic botulin toxin injection. Even though few patients can be cured with only one treatment and repeat procedure might be needed, long term relief from dysphagia can be obtained in about 90% of cases with either surgical interventions such as laparoscopic Heller myotomy or with endoscopic techniques such pneumatic dilatation or, more recently, with per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Age, sex, and manometric type by HRM are also predictors of responsiveness to treatment. Older patients, females and type Ⅱ achalasia are better after treatment compared to younger patients, males and type Ⅲ achalasia. Self-expandable metallic stents are an alternative in patients non responding to conventional therapies.展开更多
BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)is usually diagnosed through histopathology,enteroscopy,clinical symptoms,and physical findings;however,it is difficult to accurately evaluate disease severity.AIM To investigate the v...BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)is usually diagnosed through histopathology,enteroscopy,clinical symptoms,and physical findings;however,it is difficult to accurately evaluate disease severity.AIM To investigate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)in the evaluation of the severity and prognosis of UC.METHODS Patients with UC who were seen in our hospital from March 2019 to December 2020 were eligible,and disease severity was evaluated according to the modified Truelove and Witts and Mayo scores.We performed EUS,calculated the UC endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS)and EUS-UC scores,and administered appropriate treatment.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores of patients were assessed in relation to disease severity,and the correlations between UCEIS and EUS-UC scores and disease severity was also analyzed.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores before and after treatment were also compared.RESULTS A total of 79 patients were included in this study.According to the Mayo Index,23,32,and 24 patients had mild,moderate and severe UC,respectively.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores were higher in moderate cases(4.98±1.04 and 5.01±0.99,respectively)than in mild cases(1.56±0.82 and 1.64±0.91,respectively,P<0.05).Furthermore,the UCEIS and EUS-UC scores(7.31±1.10 and 7.59±1.02,respectively)were higher in severe cases than in moderate cases(P<0.05).According to the modified Truelove and Witts scores,21,36,and 22 patients were classified as having mild,moderate and severe disease,respectively.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores were significantly higher in moderate disease(4.79±1.11 and 4.96±1.23,respectively)than in mild disease(1.71±0.78 and 1.69±0.88,respectively,P<0.05).Additionally,the UCEIS and EUS-UC scores in severe disease(7.68±1.22 and 7.81±0.90,respectively)were significantly higher than in moderate disease(P<0.05).The UCEIS and EUSUC scores were significantly and positively correlated with disease severity according to the modified Truelove and Witts score and Mayo score(P<0.05).The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores after 2 mo of treatment(3.88±0.95 and 4.01±1.14,respectively)and after 6 mo of treatment(1.59±0.63 and 1.64±0.59,respectively)were lower than the respective scores before treatment(5.93±1.79 and 6.04±2.01)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION EUS can clarify the status of UC and accurately evaluate the treatment response,providing an objective basis for formulation and adjustment of the treatment plan.展开更多
AIM To evaluate rebleeding, primary failure(PF) and mortality of patients in whom over-the-scope clips(OTSCs) were used as first-line and second-line endoscopic treatment(FLET, SLET) of upper and lower gastrointestina...AIM To evaluate rebleeding, primary failure(PF) and mortality of patients in whom over-the-scope clips(OTSCs) were used as first-line and second-line endoscopic treatment(FLET, SLET) of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB, LGIB).METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database identified all patients with UGIB and LGIB in a tertiary endoscopic referral center of the University of Freiburg, Germany, from 04-2012 to 05-2016(n= 93) who underwent FLET and SLET with OTSCs. The complete Rockall risk scores were calculated from patients with UGIB. The scores were categorized as < or ≥ 7 and were compared with the original Rockall data. Differences between FLET and SLET were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced rebleeding after OTSC placement.RESULTS Primary hemostasis and clinical success of bleeding lesions(without rebleeding) was achieved in 88/100(88%) and 78/100(78%), respectively. PF was significantly lower when OTSCs were applied as FLET compared to SLET(4.9% vs 23%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement as SLET had a significantly higher rebleeding risk compared to those who had FLET(OR 5.3; P = 0.008). Patients with Rockall risk scores ≥ 7 had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with scores < 7(35% vs 10%, P = 0.034). No significant differences were observed in patients with scores < or ≥ 7 in rebleeding and rebleeding-associated mortality.CONCLUSION Our data show for the first time that FLET with OTSC might be the best predictor to successfully prevent rebleeding of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to SLET. The type of treatment determines the success of primary hemostasis or primary failure.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the correlation between fecal calprotectin(f C), C-reactive protein(CRP), and endoscopic disease score in Asian inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients.METHODS: Stool samples were collected and asses...AIM: To evaluate the correlation between fecal calprotectin(f C), C-reactive protein(CRP), and endoscopic disease score in Asian inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients.METHODS: Stool samples were collected and assessed for calprotectin levels by Quantum Blue Calprotectin High Range Rapid test. Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity(CDEIS) and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS) were used for endoscopic lesion scoring. RESULTS: A total of 88 IBD patients [36 patients with Crohn's disease(CD) and 52 with ulcerative colitis(UC)] were enrolled. For CD patients, f C correlated with CDEIS(r = 0.465, P = 0.005) and CRP(r = 0.528, P = 0.001). f C levels in UC patients correlated with UCEIS(r = 0.696, P < 0.0001) and CRP(r = 0.529, P = 0.0005). Calprotectin could predict endoscopic remission(CDEIS < 6) with 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity(AUC: 0.74) in CD patients when using 918 μg/g as the cutoff. When using 191 μg/g as the cut-off in UC patients, calprotectin could be used for predicting endoscopic remission(UCEIS < 3) with 88% sensitivity and 75% specificity(AUC: 0.87). CONCLUSION: f C correlated with both CDEIS and UCEIS. f C could be used as a predictor of endoscopic remission for Asian IBD patients.展开更多
AIM: To investigate in a prospective study whether a simplifi ed clinical score prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) patients was able to predict endoscopic findings at urgent endoscopy. METHOD...AIM: To investigate in a prospective study whether a simplifi ed clinical score prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) patients was able to predict endoscopic findings at urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All consecutive UGIB patients referred to a single endoscopic center during a 16 mo period were enrolled. Before endoscopy patients were strati- fied according to a simple clinical score (T-score), including T1 (high-risk), T2 (intermediate-risk) and T3 (low-risk). Endoscopy was performed in all cases within 2 h, and high-risk stigmata were considered for further analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 436 patients included into the study, 126 (29%) resulted to be T1, 135 (31%) T2, and 175 (40%) T3. Overall, stigmata of recent haem-orrhage (SRH) were detected in 118 cases (27%). SRH occurred more frequently in T1 patients than in T2/T3 cases (85% vs 3.2%; χ2 = 304.5309, P < 0.001). Older age (t=3.311; P < 0.01) and presence of comor-bidities (χ2 = 14.7458; P < 0.01) were more frequently detected in T1 than in T2/T3 patients. CONCLUSION: Our simplifi ed clinical score appeared to be associated with the detection of endoscopic findings which may deserve urgent endoscopy. A further,randomised study is needed to assess its accuracy in safely scheduling endoscopy in UGIB patients.展开更多
AIM To simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC) on Narrow Band Imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy(NBI-ME).METHODS This study was based on the post-hoc analysis...AIM To simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC) on Narrow Band Imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy(NBI-ME).METHODS This study was based on the post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. We performed NBI-ME for 147 patients with present or a history of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck, or esophagus between January 2009 and June 2011. Two expert endoscopistsdetected 89 lesions that were suspicious for SESCC lesions, which had been prospectively evaluated for the following 6 NBI-ME findings in real time: "intervascular background coloration"; "proliferation of intrapapillary capillary loops(IPCL)"; and "dilation", "tortuosity", "change in caliber", and "various shapes(VS)" of IPCLs(i.e., Inoue's tetrad criteria). The histologic examination of specimens was defined as the gold standard for diagnosis. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify candidates for the simplified criteria from among the 6 NBI-ME findings for diagnosing SESCCs. We evaluated diagnostic performance of the simplified criteria compared with that of Inoue's criteria.RESULTS Fifty-four lesions(65%) were histologically diagnosed as SESCCs and the others as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or inflammation. In the univariate analysis, proliferation, tortuosity, change in caliber, and VS were significantly associated with SESCC(P < 0.01). The combination of VS and proliferation was statistically extracted from the 6 NBI-ME findings by using the stepwise logistic regression model. We defined the combination of VS and proliferation as simplified dyad criteria for SESCC. The areas under the curve of the simplified dyad criteria and Inoue's tetrad criteria were 0.70 and 0.73, respectively. No significant difference was shown between them. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosis for SESCC were 77.8%, 57.1%, 69.7% and 51.9%, 80.0%, 62.9% for the simplified dyad criteria and Inoue's tetrad criteria, respectively.CONCLUSION The combination of proliferation and VS may serve as simplified criteria for the diagnosis of SESCC using NBIME.展开更多
AIM To explore the risk factors of developing chronic pancreatitis(CP) in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP) and develop a prediction score for CP.METHODS Using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Tai...AIM To explore the risk factors of developing chronic pancreatitis(CP) in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP) and develop a prediction score for CP.METHODS Using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we obtained large, population-based data of 5971 eligible patients diagnosed with AP from 2000 to 2013. After excluding patients with obstructive pancreatitis and biliary pancreatitis and those with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, we conducted a multivariate analysis using the data of 3739 patients to identify the risk factors of CP and subsequently develop a scoring system that could predict the development of CP in patients with AP. In addition, we validated the scoring system using a validation cohort.RESULTS Among the study subjects, 142 patients(12.98%) devel-oped CP among patients with RAP. On the other hand, only 32 patients(1.21%) developed CP among patients with only one episode of AP. The multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of recurrent AP(RAP), alcoholism, smoking habit, and age of onset of < 55 years were the four important risk factors for CP. We developed a scoring system(risk score 1 and risk score 2) from the derivation cohort by classifying the patients into low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk categories based on similar magnitudes of hazard and validated the performance using another validation cohort. Using the prediction score model, the area under the curve(AUC) [95% confidence interval(CI)] in predicting the 5-year CP incidence in risk score 1(without the number of AP episodes) was 0.83(0.79, 0.87), whereas the AUC(95%CI) in risk score 2(including the number of AP episodes) was 0.84(0.80, 0.88). This result demonstrated that the risk score 2 has somewhat better prediction performance than risk score 1. However, both of them had similar performance between the derivation and validation cohorts.CONCLUSION In the study,we identified the risk factors of CP and developed a prediction score model for CP.展开更多
基金Clinical Medicine+X Research Project of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University in 2021,No.QDFY+X202101036Qingdao Medical and Health Research Program in 2021,No.2021-WJZD166and Youth Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province,No.ZR2020QH031.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic evaluation in diagnosing and managing ulcerative colitis(UC)is becoming increasingly important.Several endoscopic scoring systems have been established,including the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity(UCEIS)score and Mayo Endoscopic Subscore(MES).Furthermore,the Toronto Inflammatory Bowel Disease Global Endoscopic Reporting(TIGER)score for UC has recently been proposed;however,its clinical value remains unclear.AIM To investigate the clinical value of the TIGER score in UC by comparing it with the UCEIS score and MES.METHODS This retrospective study included 166 patients with UC who underwent total colonoscopy between January 2017 and March 2023 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University(Qingdao,China).We retrospectively analysed endoscopic scores,laboratory and clinical data,treatment,and readmissions within 1 year.Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient,receiver operating characteristic curve,and univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,version 26.0(IBM Corp.,Armonk,NY,United States)and GraphPad Prism version 9.0.0 for Windows(GraphPad Software,Boston,Massachusetts,United States).RESULTS The TIGER score significantly correlated with the UCEIS score and MES(r=0.721,0.626,both P<0.001),showed good differentiating values for clinical severity among mild,moderate,and severe UC[8(4-112.75)vs 210(109–219)vs 328(219–426),all P<0.001],and exhibited predictive value in diagnosing patients with severe UC[area under the curve(AUC)=0.897,P<0.001].Additionally,the TIGER(r=0.639,0,551,0.488,0.376,all P<0.001)and UCEIS scores(r=0.622,0,540,0.494,and 0.375,all P<0.001)showed stronger correlations with laboratory and clinical parameters,including C-reactive protein,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,length of hospitalisation,and hospitalisation costs,than MES(r=0.509,0,351,0.339,and 0.270,all P<0.001).The TIGER score showed the best predictability for patients'recent advanced treatment,including systemic corticosteroids,biologics,or immunomodulators(AUC=0.848,P<0.001)and 1-year readmission(AUC=0.700,P<0.001)compared with the UCEIS score(AUC=0.762,P<0.001;0.627,P<0.05)and MES(AUC=0.684,P<0.001;0.578,P=0.132).Furthermore,a TIGER score of≥317 was identified as an independent risk factor for advanced UC treatment(P=0.011).CONCLUSION The TIGER score may be superior to the UCIES score and MES in improving the accuracy of clinical disease severity assessment,guiding therapeutic decision-making,and predicting short-term prognosis.
基金Supported by National Council for Scientific and Technological Development(CNPq),No.301388/2018-0Funding for Education,Research and Extension Support(FAEPEX),University of Campinas.
文摘Inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD)comprise two major forms:Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis.The diagnosis of IBD is based on clinical symptoms combined with results found in endoscopic and radiological examinations.In addition,the discovery of biomarkers has significantly improved the diagnosis and management of IBD.Several potential genetic,serological,fecal,microbial,histological and immunological biomarkers have been proposed for IBD,and they have been evaluated for clinical routine and clinical trials.Ileocolonoscopy,especially with biopsy collection,has been considered the standard method to diagnose IBD and to assess clinical activity of the disease,but it is limited to the colon and terminal ileum and is considered invasive.For this reason,non-invasive biomarkers are necessary for this type of chronic inflammatory disease,which affects mostly young individuals,as they are expected to have a long follow-up.
基金Supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program,No.22GJHZ0177 and No.2019YJ0102.
文摘BACKGROUND Although early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(EESCC)with cirrhosis is a relatively rare clinical phenomenon,the management of EESCC in cirrhotic patients continues to be a challenge.AIM To evaluate the feasibility,safety,efficacy and long-term survival outcomes of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection(ESTD)for treating EESCC in patients with cirrhosis.METHODS This was a single-center retrospective cohort study.We examined 590 EESCC patients who underwent ESTD between July 14,2014,and May 26,2021,from a large-scale tertiary hospital.After excluding 25 patients with unclear lesion areas or pathological results,the remaining 565 patients were matched at a ratio of 1:3 by using propensity score matching.A total of 25 EESCC patients with comorbid liver cirrhosis and 75 matched EESCC patients were ultimately included in the analysis.Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods were used to compare the differences between the two groups.The Kaplan–Meier method was used to create survival curves,and differences in survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.RESULTS Among 25 patients with liver cirrhosis and 75 matched noncirrhotic patients,there were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding(P=0.234),30-d post-ESTD bleeding(P=0.099),disease-specific survival(P=0.075),or recurrence-free survival(P=0.8196).The mean hospitalization time and costs were significantly longer(P=0.007)and higher(P=0.023)in the cirrhosis group than in the noncirrhosis group.The overall survival rate was significantly lower in the cirrhosis group(P=0.001).CONCLUSION ESTD is technically feasible,safe,and effective for patients with EESCC and liver cirrhosis.EESCC patients with Child-Pugh A disease seem to be good candidates for ESTD.
文摘Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) represent heterogeneous groups with different characteristics and different clinical course. A great deal of effort is made to discover proxies for more severe disease needing more intense treatment and early intervention to gain the maximum therapeutic benefit. Endoscopy remains an invaluable method in assessment of patients with IBD. Pseudopolyps are often encountered during endoscopy and, although they are a well described entity, their presence is of unclear importance. In one of our recent studies and in conjunction with one study with a large cohort of patients with IBD and pseudopolyps, patients with pseudopolyps were found to face a higher inflammatory burden in terms of receiving more intense biological treatment. This letter comes as a comment and proposition regarding the concept of reevaluation of pseudopolyps as a promising marker in IBD scores.
基金the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province(LQ21H030010&Q19H030064)Medical Health Science and Technology Project of the Zhejiang Provincial Health Commission(2021417815).
文摘Objective:The ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS)and the Mayo endoscopic score(MES)are developed as objective methods of evaluating endoscopic severity in patients with ulcerative colitis(UC).The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the UCEIS and MES in predicting the patient's response to mesalazine.Methods:Consecutive patients with UC who had undergone colonoscopy within 1 month before starting mesalazine between October 2011 and July 2016 were retrospectively collected at the Department of Gastroenterology,Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.The median follow-up was 81 months,and all the data were analyzed in January 2021.The primary outcome was the need for step-up treatment,which included the use of corticosteroids,immunomodulatory,or surgery during admission and follow-up.Data were analyzed using the c2 or Fisher exact test,Spearman test,t-test,and ManneWhitney U test.Results:Totally,65 patients were enrolled,of whom 12(18.5%)needed step-up treatment due to nonresponse to mesalazine.The UCEIS score,MES,and the ulcerative colitis disease activity index(UCDAI)score were significantly higher in patients who had nonresponse to mesalazine(UCEIS score:6.92±0.69 vs.4.45±1.17,p<0.001;MES:2.67±0.49 vs.2.15±0.69,p=0.024;UCDAI score:9.33±1.87 vs.6.70±2.38,p=0.002).In the multivariate analysis,the UCEIS score(OR=25.65,95%CI:3.048 e45.985,p=0.003),UCDAI score(OR=1.605,95%CI:1.144e2.254,p=0.006),and C-reactive protein level(OR=1.056,95%CI:1.006e1.108,p=0.026)were independent risk factors of nonresponse.The area under the ROC curve of UCEIS was 0.95,with a sensitivity of 100%and specificity of 84.6%,a cut-off value of 6,which outperformed the MES with an area under the ROC curve of 0.70.When the UCEIS score≥6,60%of patients eventually needed step-up treatment.Conclusions:The UCEIS is a useful instrument for predicting the therapeutic effect in patients with UC treated with mesalazine.The high probability of mesalazine treatment failure and benefits of other therapies should be discussed in patients with baseline UCEIS score≥6.
文摘AIM:To evaluate the clinical value of the newly modified Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's disease(m SES-CD).METHODS:Seventy-six Crohn's disease(CD) patients who underwent transanal double balloon endoscopy(DBE) in our hospital between 2003 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. DBE is defined as small intestinal endoscopy using two attached balloons. We included patients with stenosis which hampered passage of the scope and those who underwent DBE with observation for at least 80 cm from the ileocecal valve. Our new m SES-CD assesses the endoscopic activity of two consecutive small intestinal segments located 0-40 cm and 40-80 cm from the ileocecal valve by DBE,in addition to the activity of four colorectal segments. To compare the usefulness of m SES-CD with SES-CD,we similarly divided the patients into two groups according to total m SES-CD score(low disease activity group,< 4; high disease activity group,≥ 4). The clinical value of m SES-CD in predicting clinical outcome in patients with CD was evaluated using the occurrence of surgery after DBE as an endpoint.RESULTS:Median age of the 76 CD patients was 36 years(range,16-71). Thirty-nine patients had stenosis which hampered passage of the DBE to 80 cm on the proximal side from the ileocecal valve. Median evaluable length of small intestine by DBE was 80 cm(range,3-200). A total of 74 patients had one or more small intestinal lesions detected by DBE,of which 62(83.8%) were within 80 cm of the ileocecal valve on the proximal side. Only two patients(2.7%) with proximal-side lesions more than 80 cm from the ileocecal valve did not have lesions within 80 cm. Patients with high m SES-CD scores showed significantly shorter surgeryfree survival than those with low scores(P < 0.05). In contrast,surgery-free survival did not significantly differ between the low and high SES-CD groups(P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis by a Cox proportional hazards model identified m SES-CD as an independent factor for surgery-free survival.CONCLUSION:m SES-CD is useful in evaluating the risk of surgery-free survival in patients with CD.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) is a common surgical strategy for the treatment of early gastrointestinal tumors and precancerous lesions.PDCA nursing can effectively prevent potential risks in the nursing process,protect patient privacy,and improve patient satisfaction,nursing integrity,and service quality.AIM To explore the effects of PDCA nursing model on the quality management of gastrointestinal ESD,the 36-item Shot-Form Health Survey(SF-36) score,and negative emotions.METHODS A total of 178 patients who underwent ESD between January 2020 and January 2021 were divided into two groups.The usual care mode was the control group,with 80 cases from January to July 2020;from July 2020 to January 2021,98 patients were enrolled in the PDCA care mode as the research group.The length of hospital stay and the costs of the two groups were statistically analyzed.The visual analog scale(VAS),SF-36 score,Zung self-rating scale for anxiety and depression,and postoperative complications were also assessed.RESULTS The length of hospitalization and cost in the research group were lower than in the control group(P < 0.05),and the VAS scores were lower than those before care(P < 0.05).Moreover,the VAS score of the research group was lower than that of the control group(P < 0.05).The SF-36 scores for physical function,role status,social function,pain,mental health,and physical strength were higher in the research group than in the control group(P < 0.05).Depression and anxiety scores of the research group were lower than those of the control group(P < 0.05).The postoperative complication rate in the research group(6.12%) was lower than in the control group(32.50%)(P < 0.05).CONCLUSION PDCA nursing can improve the quality of management of ESD surgery,shorten the length of hospital stay and cost,reduce the VAS and Zung scale scores to alleviate adverse emotions,improve the SF-36 score,and reduce postoperative complications.
文摘AIM To compare the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) for gastric neoplasms using Clutch Cutter(ESD-C) or other knives(ESD-O).METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study. Gastric neoplasms treated by ESD between April 2016 and October 2017 at Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center were reviewed. Multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were used to reduce biases. Covariates included factors that might affect outcomes of ESD, including age, sex, underlying disease, anti-thrombotic drugs use, tumor location, tumor position, tumor size, tumor depth, tumor morphology, tumor histology, ulcer(scar), and operator skill. The treatment outcomes were compared among two groups. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes were en bloc, complete, and curative resection rates, and adverse events rates including perforation and delayed bleeding.RESULTS A total of 155 patients were included in this study; 44 pairs were created by propensity score matching. Background characteristics were quite similar among two groups after matching. Procedure time was significantly shorter for ESD-C(median; 49 min) than for ESD-O(median; 88.5 min)(P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in treatment outcomes between ESD-C and ESD-O including en bloc resection rate(100% in both groups), complete resection rate(100% in both groups), curative resection rate(86.4% vs 88.6%, P = 0.730), delayed bleeding(2.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.62) and perforation(0% in both groups).CONCLUSION ESD-C achieved shorter procedure time without an increase in complication risk. Therefore, ESD-C could become an effective ESD option for gastric neoplasms.
基金We thank all members at the Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science,Graduate School of Medical Sciences,Kyushu University for cooperating with us in the data collection.
文摘BACKGROUND The selection of endoscopic treatments for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors(SNADETs)is controversial.AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD)for SNADETs.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with SNADETs from a database of endoscopic treatment for SNADETs,which included eight hospitals in Fukuoka,Japan,between April 2001 and October 2017.A total of 142 patients with SNADETs treated with EMR or ESD were analyzed.Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for the differences in the patient characteristics between the two groups.We analyzed the treatment outcomes,including the rates of en bloc/complete resection,procedure time,adverse event rate,hospital stay,and local or metastatic recurrence.RESULTS Twenty-eight pairs of patients were created.The characteristics of patients between the two groups were similar after matching.The EMR group had a significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than those of the ESD group[median procedure time(interquartile range):6(3-10.75)min vs 87.5(68.5-136.5)min,P<0.001,hospital stay:8(6-10.75)d vs 11(8.25-14.75)d,P=0.006].Other outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups(en bloc resection rate:82.1%vs 92.9%,P=0.42;complete resection rate:71.4%vs 89.3%,P=0.18;and adverse event rate:3.6%vs 17.9%,P=0.19,local recurrence rate:3.6%vs 0%,P=1;metastatic recurrence rate:0%in both).Only one patient in the ESD group underwent emergency surgery owing to intraoperative perforation.CONCLUSION EMR has significantly shorter procedure time and hospital stay than ESD,and provides acceptable curability and safety compared to ESD.Accordingly,EMR for SNADETs is associated with lower medical costs.
文摘Achalasia is a motility disorder of the esophagus characterized by dysphagia, regurgitation of undigested food, chest pain, weight loss and respiratory symptoms. The most common form of achalasia is the idiopathic one. Diagnosis largely relies upon endoscopy, barium swallow study, and high resolution esophageal manometry(HRM). Barium swallow and manometry after treatment are also good predictors of success of treatment as it is the residue symptomatology. Short term improvement in the symptomatology of achalasia can be achieved with medical therapy with calcium channel blockers or endoscopic botulin toxin injection. Even though few patients can be cured with only one treatment and repeat procedure might be needed, long term relief from dysphagia can be obtained in about 90% of cases with either surgical interventions such as laparoscopic Heller myotomy or with endoscopic techniques such pneumatic dilatation or, more recently, with per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Age, sex, and manometric type by HRM are also predictors of responsiveness to treatment. Older patients, females and type Ⅱ achalasia are better after treatment compared to younger patients, males and type Ⅲ achalasia. Self-expandable metallic stents are an alternative in patients non responding to conventional therapies.
基金Supported by Wenzhou Science and Technology Bureau,No.Y2020296.
文摘BACKGROUND Ulcerative colitis(UC)is usually diagnosed through histopathology,enteroscopy,clinical symptoms,and physical findings;however,it is difficult to accurately evaluate disease severity.AIM To investigate the value of endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS)in the evaluation of the severity and prognosis of UC.METHODS Patients with UC who were seen in our hospital from March 2019 to December 2020 were eligible,and disease severity was evaluated according to the modified Truelove and Witts and Mayo scores.We performed EUS,calculated the UC endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS)and EUS-UC scores,and administered appropriate treatment.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores of patients were assessed in relation to disease severity,and the correlations between UCEIS and EUS-UC scores and disease severity was also analyzed.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores before and after treatment were also compared.RESULTS A total of 79 patients were included in this study.According to the Mayo Index,23,32,and 24 patients had mild,moderate and severe UC,respectively.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores were higher in moderate cases(4.98±1.04 and 5.01±0.99,respectively)than in mild cases(1.56±0.82 and 1.64±0.91,respectively,P<0.05).Furthermore,the UCEIS and EUS-UC scores(7.31±1.10 and 7.59±1.02,respectively)were higher in severe cases than in moderate cases(P<0.05).According to the modified Truelove and Witts scores,21,36,and 22 patients were classified as having mild,moderate and severe disease,respectively.The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores were significantly higher in moderate disease(4.79±1.11 and 4.96±1.23,respectively)than in mild disease(1.71±0.78 and 1.69±0.88,respectively,P<0.05).Additionally,the UCEIS and EUS-UC scores in severe disease(7.68±1.22 and 7.81±0.90,respectively)were significantly higher than in moderate disease(P<0.05).The UCEIS and EUSUC scores were significantly and positively correlated with disease severity according to the modified Truelove and Witts score and Mayo score(P<0.05).The UCEIS and EUS-UC scores after 2 mo of treatment(3.88±0.95 and 4.01±1.14,respectively)and after 6 mo of treatment(1.59±0.63 and 1.64±0.59,respectively)were lower than the respective scores before treatment(5.93±1.79 and 6.04±2.01)(P<0.05).CONCLUSION EUS can clarify the status of UC and accurately evaluate the treatment response,providing an objective basis for formulation and adjustment of the treatment plan.
文摘AIM To evaluate rebleeding, primary failure(PF) and mortality of patients in whom over-the-scope clips(OTSCs) were used as first-line and second-line endoscopic treatment(FLET, SLET) of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding(UGIB, LGIB).METHODS A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database identified all patients with UGIB and LGIB in a tertiary endoscopic referral center of the University of Freiburg, Germany, from 04-2012 to 05-2016(n= 93) who underwent FLET and SLET with OTSCs. The complete Rockall risk scores were calculated from patients with UGIB. The scores were categorized as < or ≥ 7 and were compared with the original Rockall data. Differences between FLET and SLET were calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to evaluate the factors that influenced rebleeding after OTSC placement.RESULTS Primary hemostasis and clinical success of bleeding lesions(without rebleeding) was achieved in 88/100(88%) and 78/100(78%), respectively. PF was significantly lower when OTSCs were applied as FLET compared to SLET(4.9% vs 23%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, patients who had OTSC placement as SLET had a significantly higher rebleeding risk compared to those who had FLET(OR 5.3; P = 0.008). Patients with Rockall risk scores ≥ 7 had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared to those with scores < 7(35% vs 10%, P = 0.034). No significant differences were observed in patients with scores < or ≥ 7 in rebleeding and rebleeding-associated mortality.CONCLUSION Our data show for the first time that FLET with OTSC might be the best predictor to successfully prevent rebleeding of gastrointestinal bleeding compared to SLET. The type of treatment determines the success of primary hemostasis or primary failure.
基金Supported by Liver Disease Prevention and Treatment Research Foundation,Taiwanas well as the National Research Program for Biopharmaceuticals at the Ministry of Science and Technology of TaiwanMOST 103-2325-B-002-033
文摘AIM: To evaluate the correlation between fecal calprotectin(f C), C-reactive protein(CRP), and endoscopic disease score in Asian inflammatory bowel disease(IBD) patients.METHODS: Stool samples were collected and assessed for calprotectin levels by Quantum Blue Calprotectin High Range Rapid test. Crohn's disease endoscopic index of severity(CDEIS) and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity(UCEIS) were used for endoscopic lesion scoring. RESULTS: A total of 88 IBD patients [36 patients with Crohn's disease(CD) and 52 with ulcerative colitis(UC)] were enrolled. For CD patients, f C correlated with CDEIS(r = 0.465, P = 0.005) and CRP(r = 0.528, P = 0.001). f C levels in UC patients correlated with UCEIS(r = 0.696, P < 0.0001) and CRP(r = 0.529, P = 0.0005). Calprotectin could predict endoscopic remission(CDEIS < 6) with 50% sensitivity and 100% specificity(AUC: 0.74) in CD patients when using 918 μg/g as the cutoff. When using 191 μg/g as the cut-off in UC patients, calprotectin could be used for predicting endoscopic remission(UCEIS < 3) with 88% sensitivity and 75% specificity(AUC: 0.87). CONCLUSION: f C correlated with both CDEIS and UCEIS. f C could be used as a predictor of endoscopic remission for Asian IBD patients.
文摘AIM: To investigate in a prospective study whether a simplifi ed clinical score prior to endoscopy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) patients was able to predict endoscopic findings at urgent endoscopy. METHODS: All consecutive UGIB patients referred to a single endoscopic center during a 16 mo period were enrolled. Before endoscopy patients were strati- fied according to a simple clinical score (T-score), including T1 (high-risk), T2 (intermediate-risk) and T3 (low-risk). Endoscopy was performed in all cases within 2 h, and high-risk stigmata were considered for further analysis. RESULTS: Out of the 436 patients included into the study, 126 (29%) resulted to be T1, 135 (31%) T2, and 175 (40%) T3. Overall, stigmata of recent haem-orrhage (SRH) were detected in 118 cases (27%). SRH occurred more frequently in T1 patients than in T2/T3 cases (85% vs 3.2%; χ2 = 304.5309, P < 0.001). Older age (t=3.311; P < 0.01) and presence of comor-bidities (χ2 = 14.7458; P < 0.01) were more frequently detected in T1 than in T2/T3 patients. CONCLUSION: Our simplifi ed clinical score appeared to be associated with the detection of endoscopic findings which may deserve urgent endoscopy. A further,randomised study is needed to assess its accuracy in safely scheduling endoscopy in UGIB patients.
文摘AIM To simplify the diagnostic criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(SESCC) on Narrow Band Imaging combined with magnifying endoscopy(NBI-ME).METHODS This study was based on the post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. We performed NBI-ME for 147 patients with present or a history of squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck, or esophagus between January 2009 and June 2011. Two expert endoscopistsdetected 89 lesions that were suspicious for SESCC lesions, which had been prospectively evaluated for the following 6 NBI-ME findings in real time: "intervascular background coloration"; "proliferation of intrapapillary capillary loops(IPCL)"; and "dilation", "tortuosity", "change in caliber", and "various shapes(VS)" of IPCLs(i.e., Inoue's tetrad criteria). The histologic examination of specimens was defined as the gold standard for diagnosis. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify candidates for the simplified criteria from among the 6 NBI-ME findings for diagnosing SESCCs. We evaluated diagnostic performance of the simplified criteria compared with that of Inoue's criteria.RESULTS Fifty-four lesions(65%) were histologically diagnosed as SESCCs and the others as low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or inflammation. In the univariate analysis, proliferation, tortuosity, change in caliber, and VS were significantly associated with SESCC(P < 0.01). The combination of VS and proliferation was statistically extracted from the 6 NBI-ME findings by using the stepwise logistic regression model. We defined the combination of VS and proliferation as simplified dyad criteria for SESCC. The areas under the curve of the simplified dyad criteria and Inoue's tetrad criteria were 0.70 and 0.73, respectively. No significant difference was shown between them. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnosis for SESCC were 77.8%, 57.1%, 69.7% and 51.9%, 80.0%, 62.9% for the simplified dyad criteria and Inoue's tetrad criteria, respectively.CONCLUSION The combination of proliferation and VS may serve as simplified criteria for the diagnosis of SESCC using NBIME.
文摘AIM To explore the risk factors of developing chronic pancreatitis(CP) in patients with acute pancreatitis(AP) and develop a prediction score for CP.METHODS Using the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan, we obtained large, population-based data of 5971 eligible patients diagnosed with AP from 2000 to 2013. After excluding patients with obstructive pancreatitis and biliary pancreatitis and those with a follow-up period of less than 1 year, we conducted a multivariate analysis using the data of 3739 patients to identify the risk factors of CP and subsequently develop a scoring system that could predict the development of CP in patients with AP. In addition, we validated the scoring system using a validation cohort.RESULTS Among the study subjects, 142 patients(12.98%) devel-oped CP among patients with RAP. On the other hand, only 32 patients(1.21%) developed CP among patients with only one episode of AP. The multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of recurrent AP(RAP), alcoholism, smoking habit, and age of onset of < 55 years were the four important risk factors for CP. We developed a scoring system(risk score 1 and risk score 2) from the derivation cohort by classifying the patients into low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk categories based on similar magnitudes of hazard and validated the performance using another validation cohort. Using the prediction score model, the area under the curve(AUC) [95% confidence interval(CI)] in predicting the 5-year CP incidence in risk score 1(without the number of AP episodes) was 0.83(0.79, 0.87), whereas the AUC(95%CI) in risk score 2(including the number of AP episodes) was 0.84(0.80, 0.88). This result demonstrated that the risk score 2 has somewhat better prediction performance than risk score 1. However, both of them had similar performance between the derivation and validation cohorts.CONCLUSION In the study,we identified the risk factors of CP and developed a prediction score model for CP.
