The consumer psychology of consumers is constantly changing.Under the abundant material life,the emotional and personalized needs of consumers for products are highly valued.Winery tourism is a new ecotourism project....The consumer psychology of consumers is constantly changing.Under the abundant material life,the emotional and personalized needs of consumers for products are highly valued.Winery tourism is a new ecotourism project.Its high-end and fashionable characteristics do not only meet consumers’demand for personalized tourism,but also their pursuit for high-quality and fashionable leisure ways;thus,it has broad development prospects.At present,Qingdao winery tourism has begun to take shape,but in it faces problems in its development,especially in terms of resource integration and brand development.Therefore,taking the development of Qingdao winery tourism as an example,this paper puts forward several development countermeasures and policy objectives as well as provides a scientific analysis basis for the development of Qingdao winery tourism.展开更多
In the case of agrifood productions, Argentinean enterprisesmainly medium and smallzized, have a critical neck bottle that limits their possibility to build endogenous capabilities for knowledge production, circulatio...In the case of agrifood productions, Argentinean enterprisesmainly medium and smallzized, have a critical neck bottle that limits their possibility to build endogenous capabilities for knowledge production, circulation and appropriation. As a consequence, public institutions of science and technology have been called to play a central role in the innovation systems providing relevant inputs for the necessary learning process in order to obtain product and process innovation. Nevertheless, it looks like that these institutions, in Argentina, are prisoners of the offer （science） push--demand pull tension far away of a systemic behavior in an innovative environment. This work studies four cases of agrifood production in Argentina, considering a regional approach and the learning networks around each production. It is concluded that the behavior of each institution is different for each case. INTA has a systemic conduct in all cases while the other ones show a systemic behavior only in the case that their offer matches to specific demands.展开更多
文摘The consumer psychology of consumers is constantly changing.Under the abundant material life,the emotional and personalized needs of consumers for products are highly valued.Winery tourism is a new ecotourism project.Its high-end and fashionable characteristics do not only meet consumers’demand for personalized tourism,but also their pursuit for high-quality and fashionable leisure ways;thus,it has broad development prospects.At present,Qingdao winery tourism has begun to take shape,but in it faces problems in its development,especially in terms of resource integration and brand development.Therefore,taking the development of Qingdao winery tourism as an example,this paper puts forward several development countermeasures and policy objectives as well as provides a scientific analysis basis for the development of Qingdao winery tourism.
文摘In the case of agrifood productions, Argentinean enterprisesmainly medium and smallzized, have a critical neck bottle that limits their possibility to build endogenous capabilities for knowledge production, circulation and appropriation. As a consequence, public institutions of science and technology have been called to play a central role in the innovation systems providing relevant inputs for the necessary learning process in order to obtain product and process innovation. Nevertheless, it looks like that these institutions, in Argentina, are prisoners of the offer （science） push--demand pull tension far away of a systemic behavior in an innovative environment. This work studies four cases of agrifood production in Argentina, considering a regional approach and the learning networks around each production. It is concluded that the behavior of each institution is different for each case. INTA has a systemic conduct in all cases while the other ones show a systemic behavior only in the case that their offer matches to specific demands.
