目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团...目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团体心理干预。干预前、后分别对两组的患儿使用《儿少主观生活质量问卷量表》(ISLQ)、《中文版家庭功能评估量表》(FFAS-C)进行评估。比较两组的ISLQ评分、FFAS-C评分和生长发育情况,了解团体心理干预的影响。结果:与常规治疗相比,治疗组的ISLQ评分更高(P P P > 0.05)。结论:团体心理干预有助于改善CPP女童的家庭功能和生活质量。Objective: To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on improving the quality of life of CPP girls. Methods: Ninety-one CPP girls with poor quality of life were randomly divided into control group (44 cases) and treatment group (47 cases). Both groups were given GnRHa treatment and follow-up. The control group received routine education. In addition to the control group, the treatment group received group psychological intervention for 2 months. Before and after the intervention, the children in the two groups were evaluated by the Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (ISLQ) and the Chinese Version of Family Function Assessment Scale (FFAS-C). ISLQ score, FFAS-C score and growth and development of the two groups were compared to find out the effect of group psychological intervention. Results: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher ISLQ scores (P 0.05) and lower FFAS-C scores (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in growth indicators (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group psychological intervention can improve the family function and quality of life of CPP girls.展开更多
目的汉化护理时间管理量表(nursing time management scale,NTMS),并对其信度和效度进行检验,为评估我国护士时间管理提供一种工具。方法2023年6月30日取得作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模式,通过正向翻译、逆向翻译、跨文化调试和预试验...目的汉化护理时间管理量表(nursing time management scale,NTMS),并对其信度和效度进行检验,为评估我国护士时间管理提供一种工具。方法2023年6月30日取得作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模式,通过正向翻译、逆向翻译、跨文化调试和预试验等方法,形成中文版护理时间管理量表。2023年9月至2024年1月采用便利抽样法,在东莞市5家二级甲等以上医院中选取409名护士作为测试对象,对量表的信度和效度进行检验。结果409名护士完成研究。中文版护理时间管理量表包括3个维度,共15个条目,即护理工作计划与目标设定(6个条目)、护理工作组织(3个条目)和护理工作协调(6个条目)。平均量表内容效度指数为0.920,各条目水平的内容效度指数0.840~1.00。量表整体Cronbachα系数为0.894,折半信度为0.700,重测信度为0.942;各维度Cronbachα系数为0.781~0.901,折半信度为0.823~0.870,重测信度为0.692~0.965。在探索性因子分析中,探索性因子分析Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)值为0.904,Bartlett球形检验的统计量为3941.503(P<0.05),每个条目的因子载荷范围为0.629~0.838,累积方差贡献率达到67.672%。结论中文版护理时间管理量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为护士时间管理的有效评估工具。展开更多
文摘目的:探讨团体心理干预对改善CPP女童生活质量的作用。方法:选取91例生活质量不佳CPP女童,随机分为对照组44例和治疗组47例,两组均给予GnRHa治疗和随访。对照组接受常规宣教。治疗组在接受对照组治疗方案的基础上,同时接受为期2月的团体心理干预。干预前、后分别对两组的患儿使用《儿少主观生活质量问卷量表》(ISLQ)、《中文版家庭功能评估量表》(FFAS-C)进行评估。比较两组的ISLQ评分、FFAS-C评分和生长发育情况,了解团体心理干预的影响。结果:与常规治疗相比,治疗组的ISLQ评分更高(P P P > 0.05)。结论:团体心理干预有助于改善CPP女童的家庭功能和生活质量。Objective: To explore the effect of group psychological intervention on improving the quality of life of CPP girls. Methods: Ninety-one CPP girls with poor quality of life were randomly divided into control group (44 cases) and treatment group (47 cases). Both groups were given GnRHa treatment and follow-up. The control group received routine education. In addition to the control group, the treatment group received group psychological intervention for 2 months. Before and after the intervention, the children in the two groups were evaluated by the Subjective Quality of Life Questionnaire (ISLQ) and the Chinese Version of Family Function Assessment Scale (FFAS-C). ISLQ score, FFAS-C score and growth and development of the two groups were compared to find out the effect of group psychological intervention. Results: Compared with the control group, the treatment group had higher ISLQ scores (P 0.05) and lower FFAS-C scores (P 0.05). There was no significant difference between these two groups in growth indicators (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Group psychological intervention can improve the family function and quality of life of CPP girls.
文摘目的汉化护理时间管理量表(nursing time management scale,NTMS),并对其信度和效度进行检验,为评估我国护士时间管理提供一种工具。方法2023年6月30日取得作者授权后,采用Brislin翻译模式,通过正向翻译、逆向翻译、跨文化调试和预试验等方法,形成中文版护理时间管理量表。2023年9月至2024年1月采用便利抽样法,在东莞市5家二级甲等以上医院中选取409名护士作为测试对象,对量表的信度和效度进行检验。结果409名护士完成研究。中文版护理时间管理量表包括3个维度,共15个条目,即护理工作计划与目标设定(6个条目)、护理工作组织(3个条目)和护理工作协调(6个条目)。平均量表内容效度指数为0.920,各条目水平的内容效度指数0.840~1.00。量表整体Cronbachα系数为0.894,折半信度为0.700,重测信度为0.942;各维度Cronbachα系数为0.781~0.901,折半信度为0.823~0.870,重测信度为0.692~0.965。在探索性因子分析中,探索性因子分析Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin(KMO)值为0.904,Bartlett球形检验的统计量为3941.503(P<0.05),每个条目的因子载荷范围为0.629~0.838,累积方差贡献率达到67.672%。结论中文版护理时间管理量表具有良好的信度和效度,可作为护士时间管理的有效评估工具。
