路易·阿尔都塞(Louis Althusser)作为20世纪西方马克思主义的重要代表人物之一,对马克思主义的独特阐释产生了深远影响。“理论上的反人道主义”是他最具争议的命题之一,通过“认识论断裂”理论揭示了马克思从早期人道主义哲学向...路易·阿尔都塞(Louis Althusser)作为20世纪西方马克思主义的重要代表人物之一,对马克思主义的独特阐释产生了深远影响。“理论上的反人道主义”是他最具争议的命题之一,通过“认识论断裂”理论揭示了马克思从早期人道主义哲学向历史唯物主义的转变,为西方马克思主义研究提供了新视角。他借助弗洛伊德与拉康的理论提出“症候阅读法”,揭示马克思主义理论中的潜在空白与缺失。阿尔都塞的“理论上的反人道主义”不仅提供了对马克思主义新的理解,还对人道主义思潮提出了深刻的批判,在当代思想史上具有不可忽视的积极意义。然而,这一理论也存在不足之处,例如对人的主体能动性关注不足以及用语过于偏激的问题。这些不足同样值得深入探讨。本文将基于阿尔都塞的主要著作及相关文献,探讨“理论上的反人道主义”与其他核心概念之间的内在联系,分析这一思想如何贯穿阿尔都塞的整体理论框架,从而为理解马克思主义哲学的结构性和逻辑性提供理论支持。Louis Althusser, as one of the most prominent representatives of 20th-century Western Marxism, has had a profound influence on the interpretation of Marxist theory. His concept of “Theoretical Anti-Humanitarianism,” one of his most controversial propositions, employs the theory of “Epistemological Break” to reveal Marx’s transition from early humanist philosophy to historical materialism, offering a new perspective for Western Marxist studies. Drawing on the theories of Freud and Lacan, Althusser introduced the “Symptomatic Reading” method, exposing the latent gaps and omissions in Marxist theory. Althusser’s “Theoretical Anti-Humanitarianism” not only provides a new understanding of Marxism but also delivers a profound critique of humanist thought, holding undeniable significance in contemporary intellectual history. However, this theory also has its limitations, such as insufficient attention to human agency and overly radical expressions, which merit further exploration. This paper will examine the intrinsic connections between “Theoretical Anti- Humanitarianism” and other key concepts in Althusser’s works, analyzing how this idea permeates his overall theoretical framework, thereby offering theoretical support for understanding the structural and logical dimensions of Marxist philosophy.展开更多
马克思主义实践观是马克思主义哲学体系的重要组成部分,是马克思主义区别于其他理论的本质特征。我国作为社会主义国家,始终坚持马克思主义在意识形态领域的指导地位。党的十八大以来,中国特色社会主义进入新时代,如今,我们正昂首阔步...马克思主义实践观是马克思主义哲学体系的重要组成部分,是马克思主义区别于其他理论的本质特征。我国作为社会主义国家,始终坚持马克思主义在意识形态领域的指导地位。党的十八大以来,中国特色社会主义进入新时代,如今,我们正昂首阔步迈向第二个百年奋斗目标,而我国各项事业的建设都必须开展相应的实践活动,坚持马克思主义实践观的指导的重要性日益凸显。同时,马克思主义实践观的内涵也在与时俱进,我们要充分了解马克思主义实践观的内容,逐步探索其科学内涵。本文在论述实践观的科学内涵的基础上,继续探寻马克思主义实践观的当代价值,同时明确实践观对当代中国特色社会主义各项事业的重要意义和价值。The Marxist view of practice is an important part of the Marxist philosophy system, and it is the essential feature that distinguishes Marxism from other theories. As a socialist country, China has always adhered to the guiding position of Marxism in the field of ideology. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era. Now, we are marching toward the second centenary goal, and the construction of various undertakings in China must carry out corresponding practical activities, and the importance of adhering to the guidance of Marxist practice has become increasingly prominent. At the same time, the connotation of Marxist view of practice is also advancing with the Times, we should fully understand the content of Marxist view of practice, and gradually explore its scientific connotation. On the basis of discussing the scientific connotation of the concept of practice, this paper continues to explore the contemporary value of the Marxist concept of practice, and clarifies the significance and value of the concept of practice to the various undertakings of contemporary socialism with Chinese characteristics.展开更多
文摘路易·阿尔都塞(Louis Althusser)作为20世纪西方马克思主义的重要代表人物之一,对马克思主义的独特阐释产生了深远影响。“理论上的反人道主义”是他最具争议的命题之一,通过“认识论断裂”理论揭示了马克思从早期人道主义哲学向历史唯物主义的转变,为西方马克思主义研究提供了新视角。他借助弗洛伊德与拉康的理论提出“症候阅读法”,揭示马克思主义理论中的潜在空白与缺失。阿尔都塞的“理论上的反人道主义”不仅提供了对马克思主义新的理解,还对人道主义思潮提出了深刻的批判,在当代思想史上具有不可忽视的积极意义。然而,这一理论也存在不足之处,例如对人的主体能动性关注不足以及用语过于偏激的问题。这些不足同样值得深入探讨。本文将基于阿尔都塞的主要著作及相关文献,探讨“理论上的反人道主义”与其他核心概念之间的内在联系,分析这一思想如何贯穿阿尔都塞的整体理论框架,从而为理解马克思主义哲学的结构性和逻辑性提供理论支持。Louis Althusser, as one of the most prominent representatives of 20th-century Western Marxism, has had a profound influence on the interpretation of Marxist theory. His concept of “Theoretical Anti-Humanitarianism,” one of his most controversial propositions, employs the theory of “Epistemological Break” to reveal Marx’s transition from early humanist philosophy to historical materialism, offering a new perspective for Western Marxist studies. Drawing on the theories of Freud and Lacan, Althusser introduced the “Symptomatic Reading” method, exposing the latent gaps and omissions in Marxist theory. Althusser’s “Theoretical Anti-Humanitarianism” not only provides a new understanding of Marxism but also delivers a profound critique of humanist thought, holding undeniable significance in contemporary intellectual history. However, this theory also has its limitations, such as insufficient attention to human agency and overly radical expressions, which merit further exploration. This paper will examine the intrinsic connections between “Theoretical Anti- Humanitarianism” and other key concepts in Althusser’s works, analyzing how this idea permeates his overall theoretical framework, thereby offering theoretical support for understanding the structural and logical dimensions of Marxist philosophy.
文摘马克思主义实践观是马克思主义哲学体系的重要组成部分,是马克思主义区别于其他理论的本质特征。我国作为社会主义国家,始终坚持马克思主义在意识形态领域的指导地位。党的十八大以来,中国特色社会主义进入新时代,如今,我们正昂首阔步迈向第二个百年奋斗目标,而我国各项事业的建设都必须开展相应的实践活动,坚持马克思主义实践观的指导的重要性日益凸显。同时,马克思主义实践观的内涵也在与时俱进,我们要充分了解马克思主义实践观的内容,逐步探索其科学内涵。本文在论述实践观的科学内涵的基础上,继续探寻马克思主义实践观的当代价值,同时明确实践观对当代中国特色社会主义各项事业的重要意义和价值。The Marxist view of practice is an important part of the Marxist philosophy system, and it is the essential feature that distinguishes Marxism from other theories. As a socialist country, China has always adhered to the guiding position of Marxism in the field of ideology. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, socialism with Chinese characteristics has entered a new era. Now, we are marching toward the second centenary goal, and the construction of various undertakings in China must carry out corresponding practical activities, and the importance of adhering to the guidance of Marxist practice has become increasingly prominent. At the same time, the connotation of Marxist view of practice is also advancing with the Times, we should fully understand the content of Marxist view of practice, and gradually explore its scientific connotation. On the basis of discussing the scientific connotation of the concept of practice, this paper continues to explore the contemporary value of the Marxist concept of practice, and clarifies the significance and value of the concept of practice to the various undertakings of contemporary socialism with Chinese characteristics.
