文章采用熵值法以及耦合协调度模型测算了2012~2021年我国30个省份的数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调度。并采用Dugam基尼系数分解法分析了全国及各地区数字经济与乡村振兴协同发展水平的差异及不平等状况。接着,运用空间杜宾模型探讨经济...文章采用熵值法以及耦合协调度模型测算了2012~2021年我国30个省份的数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调度。并采用Dugam基尼系数分解法分析了全国及各地区数字经济与乡村振兴协同发展水平的差异及不平等状况。接着,运用空间杜宾模型探讨经济发展水平、人力资源水平、产业结构系数、政府引导对数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调度的影响。结果显示:1) 数字经济发展水平与乡村振兴发展水平均表现出波动增长的态势,二者的发展水平均具有明显的区域差异。2) 数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平呈现出上升态势。就空间差异而言,表现出“东强西弱”、“相似集聚”的空间分布特征。就时间演变特征而言,大部分省份耦合协调水平处于中等发展水平,而处于高端和低端水平的地区相对较少。数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平的差异主要来自区域间差异。3) 人力资源水平、经济发展水平、产业结构层次系数和政府支出四个方面对数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平均具有正向且显著的直接效应和间接效应。This study utilizes the entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model to assess the coupling coordination degree of the digital economy and rural revitalization across 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2021. It employs the Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method to examine the disparities and inequalities in the coordinated development level of the digital economy and rural revitalization in China and its various regions. Furthermore, the spatial Durbin model is applied to explore the impact of the level of economic development, human resources level, industrial structure coefficient, and government guidance on the coupling coordination degree of the digital economy and rural revitalization. The findings indicate that: 1) Both the development level of digital economy and rural revitalization exhibit a fluctuating growth trend, with significant regional differences in their development levels. 2) The coupling and coordinated development level of the digital economy and rural revitalization is on an upward trend. Spatially, it shows a pattern of “strong in the east, weak in the west” and “similar aggregation”. In terms of time evolution, most provinces are at the medium level of coupling and coordination, while relatively few areas are at the high-end and low-end levels. The differences in the coupling and coordinated development level between the digital economy and rural revitalization mainly stem from regional disparities. 3) The four dimensions of human resource level, economic development level, industrial structure hierarchy coefficient, and governmental spending exert all have positive and significant direct and indirect impacts on the development level of coupling coordination between digital economy and rural revitalization.展开更多
文摘文章采用熵值法以及耦合协调度模型测算了2012~2021年我国30个省份的数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调度。并采用Dugam基尼系数分解法分析了全国及各地区数字经济与乡村振兴协同发展水平的差异及不平等状况。接着,运用空间杜宾模型探讨经济发展水平、人力资源水平、产业结构系数、政府引导对数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调度的影响。结果显示:1) 数字经济发展水平与乡村振兴发展水平均表现出波动增长的态势,二者的发展水平均具有明显的区域差异。2) 数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平呈现出上升态势。就空间差异而言,表现出“东强西弱”、“相似集聚”的空间分布特征。就时间演变特征而言,大部分省份耦合协调水平处于中等发展水平,而处于高端和低端水平的地区相对较少。数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平的差异主要来自区域间差异。3) 人力资源水平、经济发展水平、产业结构层次系数和政府支出四个方面对数字经济与乡村振兴耦合协调发展水平均具有正向且显著的直接效应和间接效应。This study utilizes the entropy method and the coupling coordination degree model to assess the coupling coordination degree of the digital economy and rural revitalization across 30 provinces in China from 2012 to 2021. It employs the Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition method to examine the disparities and inequalities in the coordinated development level of the digital economy and rural revitalization in China and its various regions. Furthermore, the spatial Durbin model is applied to explore the impact of the level of economic development, human resources level, industrial structure coefficient, and government guidance on the coupling coordination degree of the digital economy and rural revitalization. The findings indicate that: 1) Both the development level of digital economy and rural revitalization exhibit a fluctuating growth trend, with significant regional differences in their development levels. 2) The coupling and coordinated development level of the digital economy and rural revitalization is on an upward trend. Spatially, it shows a pattern of “strong in the east, weak in the west” and “similar aggregation”. In terms of time evolution, most provinces are at the medium level of coupling and coordination, while relatively few areas are at the high-end and low-end levels. The differences in the coupling and coordinated development level between the digital economy and rural revitalization mainly stem from regional disparities. 3) The four dimensions of human resource level, economic development level, industrial structure hierarchy coefficient, and governmental spending exert all have positive and significant direct and indirect impacts on the development level of coupling coordination between digital economy and rural revitalization.
