<strong>Background and Aims:</strong><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style=&...<strong>Background and Aims:</strong><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Patients and the general public are under insur</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mountable psychological pressure which may lead to various psychological problems, such as anxiety, fear, depression, and insomnia, causing, consequently, the impaired quality of life. Psychological crisis intervention plays a pivotal role in the overall deployment of health-related quality of life and dis<span>ease control. A novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2</span> (SARS-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">CoV-2), a pathogen of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has affected several sector activities, including people’s health. To enhance infection con<span>trol methods, appropriate interventions, and public health policies, the</span> present study aims to assess the fear and peri-traumatic stress during the COVID-19 inBrazil. <b>Method:</b> A cross-sectional survey has been conducted from April 12<sup>th</sup> to 18<sup>th</sup></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">from 2020</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> using the Peri-Traumatic Distress Scale (CPDI) and the Fear Scale (FCV-19S) aiming to measure the peri-traumatic stress and <span>fear as psychological reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. For that</span> purpose, an online spreadsheet was used to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1844 participants as a collecting information tool. After the data analysis, the individuals were separated into 4 groups: Group 1 (1232) population without chronic health conditions;group 2 (298) patients with previous psychological suffering, group 3 (229) patients with cardiovascular diseases, group 4 (71) patients with diabetes. For analysis, G1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">were considered <span>control for comparison with groups 2, 3 and 4. <b>Results:</b> All the groups</span> showed the CPDI and FCV-19S increased in comparison with the G1 group. Concerning CPDI, the G 3 was increased when compared to G1, G2 and G4. The G3 had the FCV-19S higher in comparison with G1, G2 and G4. The <span>Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed a statistical difference between the </span>control group in comparison with 2 and 3 groups (Mann-Whitney p</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">< 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the Brazilian population, with patients with heart disease and hypertension present<span>ing the highest numbers of stress and fear, with numbers comparable and</span> even higher than those who reported previous psychological distress.</span></span></span>展开更多
<strong>Context and objectives</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""> <strong>:</strong></span><span style="font-family:;" "="&quo...<strong>Context and objectives</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""> <strong>:</strong></span><span style="font-family:;" "="">The unexpected pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affected several activities and exposed workers, students and the large mass of unemployed people to an economic and psychological pressure that could lead to various problems, such as anxiety, fear, depression and insomnia, consequently causing impairment of quality of life. <b>Method:</b> A cross-sectional study was c</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><b></b>onducted using the COVID-19 Peri-Traumatic Distress Index (CPDI) and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to measure peri-traumatic stress and fear, such as psychological reactions during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. An online spreadsheet was used as a data collection tool to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1,844 participants. Data were analyzed in groups of health professionals, students and teachers, and an analysis was performed between unemployed and employed people in order to evaluate the impact of employment on the population’s mental health. <b>Results:</b> All groups presented from moderate to high CPDI and FCV-19S scores, and students and unemployed people had higher levels of stress and fear. <b>Conclusion:</b> COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the Brazilian population, with students and the unemployed showing the highest rates of stress and fear.</span>展开更多
COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread exponentially worldwide, especially in America. At the end of August 2020, Brazil is one of the most affected countries with more than three and a half million cases and up to 114...COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread exponentially worldwide, especially in America. At the end of August 2020, Brazil is one of the most affected countries with more than three and a half million cases and up to 114,250 deaths. This study aims to assess the fear and peri-traumatic stress during the COVID-19 pandemics in Brazil, to enhance infection control methods, appropriate interventions, and public health policies. A cross-sectional survey has been conducted from April 12<sup>th</sup> to 18<sup>th</sup> using the Peri-Traumatic Distress Scale (CPDI) and the Fear Scale (FCV-19S) aiming to measure the peri-traumatic stress and fear as psychological reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. For that purpose, an online spreadsheet was used to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1844 participants as a collecting information tool. Significant positive relationship (r = 0.660, p < 0.001) and internal consistencies on CPDI and FCV-195 scales (Cronbach Alfa scores 0.90 and 0.88 respectively) were shown. Results highlight significant gender differences as in both scales women’s mean scores are higher showing that it is paramount that women’s voices were represented in policy spaces as socially constructed gender roles place them in a strategic position to enhance multi-level interventions (primary and secondary effects of COVID-19), equitable policies, and new approaches to control the pandemic.展开更多
文摘<strong>Background and Aims:</strong><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">Patients and the general public are under insur</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">mountable psychological pressure which may lead to various psychological problems, such as anxiety, fear, depression, and insomnia, causing, consequently, the impaired quality of life. Psychological crisis intervention plays a pivotal role in the overall deployment of health-related quality of life and dis<span>ease control. A novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2</span> (SARS-</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">CoV-2), a pathogen of the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19), has affected several sector activities, including people’s health. To enhance infection con<span>trol methods, appropriate interventions, and public health policies, the</span> present study aims to assess the fear and peri-traumatic stress during the COVID-19 inBrazil. <b>Method:</b> A cross-sectional survey has been conducted from April 12<sup>th</sup> to 18<sup>th</sup></span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">from 2020</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">,</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> using the Peri-Traumatic Distress Scale (CPDI) and the Fear Scale (FCV-19S) aiming to measure the peri-traumatic stress and <span>fear as psychological reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. For that</span> purpose, an online spreadsheet was used to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1844 participants as a collecting information tool. After the data analysis, the individuals were separated into 4 groups: Group 1 (1232) population without chronic health conditions;group 2 (298) patients with previous psychological suffering, group 3 (229) patients with cardiovascular diseases, group 4 (71) patients with diabetes. For analysis, G1</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">were considered <span>control for comparison with groups 2, 3 and 4. <b>Results:</b> All the groups</span> showed the CPDI and FCV-19S increased in comparison with the G1 group. Concerning CPDI, the G 3 was increased when compared to G1, G2 and G4. The G3 had the FCV-19S higher in comparison with G1, G2 and G4. The <span>Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test showed a statistical difference between the </span>control group in comparison with 2 and 3 groups (Mann-Whitney p</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:;" "="">< 0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the Brazilian population, with patients with heart disease and hypertension present<span>ing the highest numbers of stress and fear, with numbers comparable and</span> even higher than those who reported previous psychological distress.</span></span></span>
文摘<strong>Context and objectives</strong><span style="font-family:;" "=""> <strong>:</strong></span><span style="font-family:;" "="">The unexpected pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) affected several activities and exposed workers, students and the large mass of unemployed people to an economic and psychological pressure that could lead to various problems, such as anxiety, fear, depression and insomnia, consequently causing impairment of quality of life. <b>Method:</b> A cross-sectional study was c</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><b></b>onducted using the COVID-19 Peri-Traumatic Distress Index (CPDI) and the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) to measure peri-traumatic stress and fear, such as psychological reactions during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. An online spreadsheet was used as a data collection tool to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1,844 participants. Data were analyzed in groups of health professionals, students and teachers, and an analysis was performed between unemployed and employed people in order to evaluate the impact of employment on the population’s mental health. <b>Results:</b> All groups presented from moderate to high CPDI and FCV-19S scores, and students and unemployed people had higher levels of stress and fear. <b>Conclusion:</b> COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the Brazilian population, with students and the unemployed showing the highest rates of stress and fear.</span>
文摘COVID-19 pandemic continues to spread exponentially worldwide, especially in America. At the end of August 2020, Brazil is one of the most affected countries with more than three and a half million cases and up to 114,250 deaths. This study aims to assess the fear and peri-traumatic stress during the COVID-19 pandemics in Brazil, to enhance infection control methods, appropriate interventions, and public health policies. A cross-sectional survey has been conducted from April 12<sup>th</sup> to 18<sup>th</sup> using the Peri-Traumatic Distress Scale (CPDI) and the Fear Scale (FCV-19S) aiming to measure the peri-traumatic stress and fear as psychological reactions during the COVID-19 pandemic. For that purpose, an online spreadsheet was used to send the questionnaire and scales to a sample of 1844 participants as a collecting information tool. Significant positive relationship (r = 0.660, p < 0.001) and internal consistencies on CPDI and FCV-195 scales (Cronbach Alfa scores 0.90 and 0.88 respectively) were shown. Results highlight significant gender differences as in both scales women’s mean scores are higher showing that it is paramount that women’s voices were represented in policy spaces as socially constructed gender roles place them in a strategic position to enhance multi-level interventions (primary and secondary effects of COVID-19), equitable policies, and new approaches to control the pandemic.
