期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
The Empirical Investigation and Improvement Path of Judicial Protection of Civil Litigation Rights in China
1
作者 李艳 胡月 JIANG Yu(Translated) 《The Journal of Human Rights》 2021年第5期831-850,共20页
The close coupling of civil litigation rights and human rights mean how well litigation rights are realized can directly or indirectly affect the judicial protection of human rights.Therefore,human rights protection i... The close coupling of civil litigation rights and human rights mean how well litigation rights are realized can directly or indirectly affect the judicial protection of human rights.Therefore,human rights protection in the field of civil litigation should take the right of civil litigation as the starting point and core.Based on a sample questionnaire survey of judges and lawyers,this paper conducts an empirical analysis and proposes that the exercise of this right should be taken as the main line to build a comprehensive protection mechanism for this right to realize its role in providing an institutional guarantee for human rights protection.It specifies three aspects:first,the process of filing a case should uphold the freedom and equality of the right to initiate litigation,remove substantial obstacles that affect the filing of the case,and ensure access to justice for disadvantaged groups;second,the trial procedure should have strengthened checks and balances on judicial power to ensure the right of litigation is compromised,and respects the procedural subject status of the two parties to realize equal protection of both parties;the third is to promote the implementation and improvement of relief for this right in the supervisory procedure,clarify the boundary of its relief by procuratorial supervision,and enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the relief. 展开更多
关键词 civil litigation rights freedom and equality of litigation rights checks and balances of litigation rights relief of litigation rights
原文传递
A REFERENCE-ORIENTED STUDY OF THE LEGAL SYSTEM OF FOOD SAFETY RISK COMMUNICATION 被引量:1
2
作者 陈思睿 刘智慧 +1 位作者 Zhang Lei Yang Wei 《China Legal Science》 2015年第3期94-117,共24页
风险交流起源于20世纪80年代的美国的环境领域,后被应用于食品安全领域。食品安全风险交流可以通过对风险评估、风险管理全过程的同步公开透明,最大限度的降低公众基于对政府不信任而产生的对风险实际危害的怀疑或对政府决策没有信心等... 风险交流起源于20世纪80年代的美国的环境领域,后被应用于食品安全领域。食品安全风险交流可以通过对风险评估、风险管理全过程的同步公开透明,最大限度的降低公众基于对政府不信任而产生的对风险实际危害的怀疑或对政府决策没有信心等负面情绪。我国目前还没有食品安全风险交流相关的法律制度,《政府信息公开条例》的法律位阶、公开原则、公开形式尚不足以支撑风险交流的运行,风险管理部门收集风险信息难度大以及国民的科学素养与交流意识较为欠缺,导致风险交流工作很难开展。本文先从立法层面为食品安全风险交流划定框架,分别分析了食品安全风险交流的制度建设、风险管理部门风险信息收集的法律出路、政府信息公开的完善、专家责任制的设想以及公众科学素养和交流意识的培养,希望通过完善以上问题帮助我国建立食品安全风险交流的法律制度。 展开更多
关键词 食品安全风险 公众科学素养 风险管理部门 LEGAL 食品安全领域 立法层面 风险信息 regulations 风险评估 PROVISION
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部