Objective:This paper mainly study on the effects of irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin regimens in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Methods:50 cases of small cell lung cancer patients in our hospital ...Objective:This paper mainly study on the effects of irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin regimens in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Methods:50 cases of small cell lung cancer patients in our hospital were divided into control group and experimental group and administered with etoposide/cisplatin and irinotecan/cisplatin regimen,and the treatment effects of the two regimens were compared statistically.Results:After treatment,both groups achieved high treatment efficiency,and the incidence of toxic side effects was low,with no significant difference(P>0.05);serological ABCG2 and FGFBP1 level indicators were better than the control group,both showing significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusions:Irinotecan has achieved better improvement in serological indicators in the first-line treatment of small cell lung cancer,with no significant difference in short-term treatment efficiency.展开更多
文摘Objective:This paper mainly study on the effects of irinotecan/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin regimens in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.Methods:50 cases of small cell lung cancer patients in our hospital were divided into control group and experimental group and administered with etoposide/cisplatin and irinotecan/cisplatin regimen,and the treatment effects of the two regimens were compared statistically.Results:After treatment,both groups achieved high treatment efficiency,and the incidence of toxic side effects was low,with no significant difference(P>0.05);serological ABCG2 and FGFBP1 level indicators were better than the control group,both showing significant differences(P<0.05).Conclusions:Irinotecan has achieved better improvement in serological indicators in the first-line treatment of small cell lung cancer,with no significant difference in short-term treatment efficiency.
